Remember when "Climate Change" was a subversive Republican name change? - IT'S GLOBAL WARMING

[seri0us]

That's like saying you "earned" the right to ride on the shortbus.

Still not as awful as you "earning" your prescription for PrEP.

 

[Muttley]

But the seething they had over the term "Climate Change" well it was much akin to how they call anyone who is skeptical of the Science to be "deniers."

The term is climate change.
The correct way to describe global warming, and the way THE HECKIN SOYIENCE always has described it, "climate change through human activity".

Global warming is the actually the term that was the buzzword.

 

[GunCar Gary]

unless climate doomers have an all-in focus on nuclear energy i assume they're stupid, lying, or both

usually it's both

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

That was a different issue entirely and was for the most part solved due to sensible government regulations that resulted in the phasing out of many chemicals/substances..

Was, being the operative word, thanks to the Ohio train crash, and no they did not solve it, because we still have aerosols with chlorine in them.

Global warming is a more accurate name. Too bad 70iq retards took that to mean "there's no global warming because I gots a snowball dddddddd" since they can't understand the most basic of concepts.

It is not more accurate. Winter doesn't start until late December, and lasts until May here, which has been consistent for 10 years, but at no other point in recorded history. The winters are more extreme in either direction, depending on the year, where we will flip-flop between hundreds of miles of glacial cave formations, record lows, record snowfall, to having almost no snowfall whatsoever. The occasional warmer, milder, winters are the normal thing. The consistent setting of record low temperatures and a month and a half delay, but full duration winter, are the unusal part.

 

[WhiskeyJack]

I still fondly remember the big posters on the wall in front of my desk back in the early 90's insisting that the Amazon Rain Forest would be gone by the year 2000 due to "slash and burn agriculture".

I remember it vividly, because after I pointed out that slash and burn agriculture is actually how you replenish the soil in the Amazon and without it the forest would've died out thousands of years ago, the teacher replaced the poster with a new propaganda poster informing me that Chewing Tobacco has weapons grade Uranium in it, and "Contains Urea, a major component of Urine" because whoever runs the "TRUTH" anti-tobacco advertising group doesn't know what nitrates are.

Later she put up a poster insisting that Mercator maps are racist, and we should totally use something stupid-looking like Gall-Peters projections.

That was a different issue entirely and was for the most part solved due to sensible government regulations that resulted in the phasing out of many chemicals/substances.

Shocking to think things might have changed since the 70s right? Agricultural practices have gotten better and far more efficient on every single level. If we were still farming and distributing food like it was 1970 many people very well might have starved, but technology saves the day.

The main drop-off in the Ozone hole predates any of the bans on CFCs, and overall the nature of Ozone levels looks like a pretty standard natural phenomenon we haven't been studying long enough to recognize as such. One year it's the worst ever (2017), then a bit later its suddenly the best levels we've seen in decades (2019).

As to agricultural practices, farming methods have scarcely changed since the widespread adoption of diesel tractors after WWII. If anything we're more harmful today, since we use a hell of a lot more chemical fertilizers and insecticides/herbicides/pesticides than before that. We actually farm less land now specifically to artificially inflate food prices by reducing food supplies. Food distribution is literally unchanged since the invention of the refrigerated truck/train car. We've been producing more food than we can eat since at least the 1850's.

The real reason the 1970-era Malthusian proclamations that overpopulation would kill us all utterly failed is because Malthus was a retard.

 

[Gender: Xenomorph]

Found this chart

Gasp you guys le heckilg look!

Red is going UUUP!

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

I'm getting real sick of the climate grift. They portray every single little change in the weather as "DEADLIEST EVER" and "MILLIONS AFFECTED" in the headlines now. Getting an inch of snow rn and you'd think we're heading into the ice age from what the headlines are proclaiming.

 

[Return of the Freaker]

Later she put up a poster insisting that Mercator maps are racist, and we should totally use something stupid-looking like Gall-Peters projections.

I had never heard of Gall-Peters, but managed to correctly guess it makes Africa look massive MUH DIK

 

[AeroGavin Rossdale]

Caught this head line and had to share with the class.

Fitting data to a conclusion aside, who wrote this headline? The first hunter-gatherer to wander out of the hills into Mesopotamia? 'Our lands cold, but south lands hot. Shaman explain' lmao