REMOVE FISH'N'CHIPS

1776 Shall Commence Again

  • Fuck'em

    Votes: 115 40.1%
  • Don't ban the Brits; Use at own peril

    Votes: 172 59.9%

  • Total voters
    287
I don't think the government will be able to enforce any of this 'cause they're too busy trying not to collapse- if it's not somewhere really out in the open like Facebook and you're not using your actual name they'll be too busy not punishing migrants or gypsies to care. The whole thing's a dick-waving contest that no-one who actually votes cares about.

With the way these things normally go, May would normally have been knifed by now, politically speaking at least- if she'd had any balls she'd have thrown Rudd into a furnace anyway because literally no-one likes Rudd. The only reason they're still around is that Jezza is a literal friend to fucking Hamas.
The only reason they are still around is because May is the only decent candidate they have for the chair of PM. Rees-Mogg and Johnson are meme candidates who would lead the Tories to getting crushed by Labour at at the very least Labour making a coalition government with the SNP and/or Lib-Dems.

Wasnt that just the point of colonisation in the first place?

I've just remembered what this reminded me of.

Anyone remember CEOP? no? didnt think so.

The Child Exploitation and On-line Command was exactly this, but set up to deal with kiddy fiddlers when that was all the Daily Mail was getting it thigh rubbing kicks over.

Within a month or so, the Plod that was put in charge started chimping on MSM about how he didnt have enough money to get anywhere near tackling the mahoooosive amounts of abuse he was finding.
So he was sacked and the whole thing was brushed under the table. CEOP still has a website and the copper will occasionally turn up on a current affairs programme to complain that he wasn't given a chance, but I'd be surprised if anyone remembers it.

And that was fucking children, not just fucking with SJWs.

The government defunding a government agency in order to sweep cheese pizza under the rug. Shocker.
 
The only reason they are still around is because May is the only decent candidate they have for the chair of PM. Rees-Mogg and Johnson are meme candidates who would lead the Tories to getting crushed by Labour at at the very least Labour making a coalition government with the SNP and/or Lib-Dems.

There's some fairly good Conservatives, but they're not influential yet- Davidson's competent (and would make the Tumblr crowd eat itself) but she's not got country-wide appeal yet.

Labour's arguably in a worse position for who comes next mind, but I'm veering off topic...
 
Come on Daddy Freedom, ignore the vote results. Ban every snaggletoothed piss-drinking islandmonkey to step foot here.

No, let them stay here, so they can be rounded up, and raped and murdered in prison by Muslim terrorists. Oh wait I forgot, they don't put those in prison over there.
 
No, let them stay here, so they can be rounded up, and raped and murdered in prison by Muslim terrorists. Oh wait I forgot, they don't put those in prison over there.
British prisons: where you're safe from rape and murder. Sign up today!

Best part is, the foods really not any worse.
 
That is of little help to the victim of their malicious prosecution. Arguments like yours are pushing me in Dynastia's direction; I may well change my vote.
Do you not consider the fact that cases like this can help set precedent? If the case that this guy has ostensibly trained his dog to throw Nazi salutes gets thrown out of court or overturned (if shit goes south for the defendant, and he's prosecuted), then that's going to inform any future decisions made by the bench with regards to cases like this.

I'm not that convinced that the judiciary in the UK is so far gone with regards to silly shit like this that this guy's gonna do any serious time. The thing that a lot of people like to forget is that offense is taken, not given - the onus of proof for any kind of damage wrought by these things has to be demonstrated by the assumed victim. A dog raising its front right leg is not the same as setting up a personal army and publicly doxxing someone to the point where they're a permanent shut-in, nor is it the same as issuing rape/death threats to someone, nor does it have any kind of concurrence with imparting a sense of personal danger to whosoever views the video.
 
Politicians ruin everything.
Politicians rely on lolcows or a majority of the population being exceptional individuals for power. Get rid of the lolcow you smash the state.

Only a retarded fucking country needs to set a precedent for convicting people for teaching their dogs to do dog tricks, because literally every other country in the world would say "What? No, that's dumb and we're not going to arrest people for that."

Isn't it illegal to have dogs in Muslim countries?
 
Only a retarded fucking country needs to set a precedent for convicting people for teaching their dogs to do dog tricks, because literally every other country in the world would say "What? No, that's dumb and we're not going to arrest people for that."
Given how petty and vindictive people in general are, I'd rather have precedents set to say "No, you can't sue for that shit, knock it off" than the assumption that common sense will win out.

Anyway - you're in a country that's made it illegal to wear a disguise without a 'proper' justification. We've all got stupid case law examples in our history, I'm just of the opinion that this is most likely to turn out in the defendant's favour.
 
Do you not consider the fact that cases like this can help set precedent?

That's like saying a murder is cool because people might decide murder isn't a great idea.

Some dude is getting his life ruined over utter nanny state bullshit and being smeared as a Nazi for fucking nothing. For a fucking joke.

It's not worth the sacrifice of tossing some poor dude who made a joke into a meat grinder in the hopes that the sausage he's ground into might establish a precedent that "hey doing this is a shitty idea" when it should have been obvious to everyone involved that it was an absolutely shitty idea and no real country would do it.
 
Given how petty and vindictive people in general are, I'd rather have precedents set to say "No, you can't sue for that shit, knock it off" than the assumption that common sense will win out.

Common sense is already winning out in every country that isn't doing something as bugfuck retarded as arresting a guy for dog tricks, and only a complete fucking mongaloid is going to stand there and say "No this is a good thing because we'll learn that arresting people for dog tricks is dumb". Only the fucking British are retarded enough to need that spelled out for them with a real-life example.
 
I've voted "use at own peril." As other people have pointed out, it's basically unworkable and is a last-ditch attempt at appearing effective from a failing government that is laughably out of touch with reality. What will happen if anyone complains to the police about something someone says here is they'll get a letter advising them on counselling services and that'll be about it.
 
This sounds like some sort of "feel good" policy that the UK police are doing because some politician's kid did something stupid and got called out for it. It's like the gun control laws that get passed in the US every time some wackjob goes on a killing spree.

This is not a solution. This might help a few high schoolers (or whatever the equivalent is in the UK) but in reality it's just going to enable idiots.
 
Just when I thought the rising hostility and disgust towards the classic act of baiting people into replying to absurd shit for laughs couldn't get more ridiculous, it becomes a designated as a fucking hate crime in a first world country. Considering people with significant influence have twisted the use of the word to literally mean "anyone I don't agree with and/or think is dumber than me", the fallout of this is likely going to be fucking massive.

I'm really hoping this shit never happens here in the USA. I'm extremely fucking thankful it hasn't yet.
Shitty jokes are all I got left to keep me from going nuts.
If you think it's only the left that wants to regulate your speech you might want to look up free speech zone from GWBs era.

Both the left and right wanna fuck ya over concerning your rights. If you defend free speech the right will say you're a terrorist. If you defend free speech the left will label you as a Nazi. Both will use the law to silence you.

If you wanna keep trolling in the free world I highly suggest finding or creating a political world view that transcends the left vs right claptrap.
 
Last edited:
Canada also want's to do something similar, but ISP's don't share your information there. We have to face it, the world is fucked because people gave Liberals too much power. I'd almost say we need another war to slap them back down into their place.


Also, why the fuck are people putting down their actual place of residence here? I though only @Null and the mods had IP information.
Do you have a source for that? I haven't heard about it yet?
 
Last edited:
Back