CN Research reveals China has built prototype nuclear reactor to power aircraft carrier - Right now, only the United States and France have nuclear-powered carriers.

1.png

China has built a land-based prototype nuclear reactor for a large surface warship, in the clearest sign yet Beijing is advancing toward producing the country’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, according to a new analysis of satellite imagery and Chinese government documents provided to The Associated Press.

There have long been rumors that China is planning to build a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, but the research by the Middlebury Institute of International Studies in California is the first to confirm it is working on a nuclear-powered propulsion system for a carrier-sized surface warship.

Why is China’s pursuit of nuclear-powered carriers significant?​

China’s navy is already the world’s largest numerically, and it has been rapidly modernizing. Adding nuclear-powered carriers to its fleet would be a major step in realizing its ambitions for a true “blue-water” force capable of operating around the globe in a growing challenge to the United States.

Nuclear carriers take longer to build than conventional carriers, but once in operation they are able to stay at sea for much longer because they do not need to refuel, and there is more room on board for fuel and weapons for aircraft, thus extending their capabilities. They are also able to produce more power to run advanced systems.

Right now, only the United States and France have nuclear-powered carriers. The U.S. has 11 in total, which allows it to keep multiple strike groups deployed around the world at all times, including in the Indo-Pacific.

But the Pentagon is growingly increasingly concerned about China’s rapid modernization of its fleet, including the design and construction of new carriers.

2.png
FILE - In this photo released by Xinhua News Agency, China’s third conventionally powered aircraft carrier, the Fujian, conducts a maiden sea trial on May 7, 2024. (Ding Ziyu/Xinhua via AP, File)

China currently has three carriers, including the new Type 003 Fujian, which was the first both designed and built by China. It has said work is already underway on a fourth, but it has not announced whether that will be nuclear or conventionally powered.

The modernization aligns with China’s “growing emphasis on the maritime domain and increasing demands” for its navy “to operate at greater distances from mainland China,” the Defense Department said in its most recent report to Congress on China’s military.

How did researchers conclude China has built a prototype reactor for a carrier?​

3.png
This satellite image from Planet Labs PBC shows the Nuclear Power Institute of China’s Site No. 1, also known as Base 909, in Mucheng Township, Sichuan Province, China, July 5, 2023. (Planet Labs PBC via AP)

Middlebury researchers were initially investigating a mountain site outside the city of Leshan in the southwest Chinese province of Sichuan over suspicions that China was building a reactor to produce plutonium or tritium for weapons. Instead they said they determined that China was building a prototype reactor for a large warship.

The conclusion was based upon a wide variety of sources, including satellite images, project tenders, personnel files, and environmental impact studies.

The reactor is housed in a new facility built at the site known as Base 909, which is under the control of the Nuclear Power Institute of China.

Documents indicating that China’s 701 Institute, which is responsible for aircraft carrier development, procured reactor equipment “intended for installation on a large surface warship.” as well as the project’s “national defense designation” helped lead to the conclusion the sizeable reactor is a prototype for a next-generation aircraft carrier.

What does China say?​

Chinese President Xi Jinping has tasked defense officials with building a “first-class” navy and becoming a maritime power as part of his blueprint for the country’s great rejuvenation.

The country’s most recent white paper on national defense, dated 2019, said the Chinese navy was adjusting to strategic requirements by “speeding up the transition of its tasks from defense on the near seas to protection missions on the far seas.”

4.png
FILE - In this photo released by Xinhua News Agency, Chinese honor guard raise the Chinese flag during the commissioning ceremony of China’s conventionally powered Shandong aircraft carrier at a naval port in Sanya, south China’s Hainan Province, on Dec. 17, 2019. (Li Gang/Xinhua via AP, File)

Sea trials hadn’t even started for the new Fujian aircraft carrier in March when Yuan Huazhi, political commissar for China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy, confirmed the construction of a fourth carrier. Asked if it would be nuclear-powered, he said at the time that would “soon be announced,” but so far it has not been.

Neither China’s Defense Ministry nor Foreign Affairs Ministry responded to requests for comment.

Even if the carrier that has been started will likely be another conventionally-powered Type 003 ship, experts say Chinese shipyards have the capability to work on more than one carrier at a time, and that they could produce a new nuclear-powered vessel concurrently.

Article Link

Archive
 
Last edited:
Normal nuclear plants are boring because you know where the mess will be if there's a colossal fuckup. The Chinese are just keeping it interesting by making the future Elephant's Foot mobile until it reaches its final destination.
Ironically, it would be safer. A nuke melting down at the bottom of the ocean is, for all intents and purposes, a non-entity in terms of its effect over any significant area. Radiation wouldn't spread particularly far and it wouldn't make any measurable change to the amount of radioactive material dissolved in the ocean. The only danger would be from wildcat fishing boats dredging up parts of the reactor, which given the wildcats are all Chinese, would just end up being karma.

If the French could do it, why not the Chinks?
They can't make steel to consistent tolerances and their ships occasionally sink for no obvious reason.
 
If the French could do it, why not the Chinks?
The French are idiot-savants in that nuclear is the only thing they actually excel at. The Chinese are idiot-savants in that scams are the only thing they actually excel at... and even then that's iffy.
 
Such has never happened to a US sub. Even before the navy got serious with sub maintenance after losing 2 in the 60's to critical failures of non-reactor systems.
There's occasional issues with the reactor control systems, but you constantly train to deal with them. There's a yearly test across the nuclear fleet called ORSE and, if you fuck up enough, Naval Reactors will just lock your scram breakers and take the key with them.
 
I've seen a lot of defense wonks claim that the age of the super carrier is over due to hypersonics, yet the Chinese are still pursuing them.
 
Why are nuclear carriers a big deal? We've had nuclear subs since the cold war and those are way smaller, it doesent seem like a nuclear carrier would be harder to make than a nuclear sub.
 
I think at this point, the Chinese want a nuclear carrier mostly for dick-waving rights. "Look, we can do all the shit the Americans can do, but cheaper! Follow our lead, world!" They understand perfectly well that their own nuclear carrier is just as vulnerable to missile attack should a real shooting war break out against a reasonably well-equipped opponent. This is about looking and acting (and spending) like a credible replacement option to American dominance.
 
The French are idiot-savants in that nuclear is the only thing they actually excel at. The Chinese are idiot-savants in that scams are the only thing they actually excel at... and even then that's iffy.
The French also benefit with a trade deal for knowledge capture with the UK, and by proxy the USA. Unlike the UK, they seem keen to keep their cool shit actually funded, so sharing facilities and scientists to the point where you can wander around Aldermaston, and Los Alamos, and every other random facility that you feel like, is pretty useful for them.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hitman One
I think at this point, the Chinese want a nuclear carrier mostly for dick-waving rights. "Look, we can do all the shit the Americans can do, but cheaper! Follow our lead, world!" They understand perfectly well that their own nuclear carrier is just as vulnerable to missile attack should a real shooting war break out against a reasonably well-equipped opponent. This is about looking and acting (and spending) like a credible replacement option to American dominance.
Agree on the dick-waving. The big point of carriers is launching and recovering aircraft, which allows you to project force at a distance more effectively. Not whether it’s nuclear powered or not.

The US (along with everybody who had carriers in WWII) started off with conventional carriers, and propeller aircraft. The US has kept up with advances, going to jets, magnetic launchers, etc., but still the main thing practiced on a carrier is launch and recovery. Otherwise you’re limited to certain aircraft. Like the Harrier. There were plenty of times when we would do circles off the coast of California, while baby pilots practiced landing and taking off the carrier.

I sure as shit wouldn’t want to be on the first plane the first Chinese pilot attempts to land on their first carrier.
 
And the US Navy is at that unfortunate point in the replacement cycle where they've scrapped all the old ships without waiting for the replacements to be built.
That will be the Clinton Administration's Peace Dividend when those ships were retired enmasse, scrapped, and very few new replacements being ordered to be built. Dubya's and Obama's administrations didn't help by wearing down the remaining fleet and ordering any new ships to be built.


I've seen a lot of defense wonks claim that the age of the super carrier is over due to hypersonics, yet the Chinese are still pursuing them.
They been claiming that ever since the Soviets had built their first cruise missile.
 
That will be the Clinton Administration's Peace Dividend when those ships were retired enmasse, scrapped, and very few new replacements being ordered to be built. Dubya's and Obama's administrations didn't help by wearing down the remaining fleet and ordering any new ships to be built.
Because they listened to retards who said "conventional wars are a thing of the past".
 
Because they listened to retards who said "conventional wars are a thing of the past".
Wrong generation and wrong administration as those American retards were post WWII right up to the start of the Korean War.

Clinton was all in shuffling money from U.S. military and educated white Americans in the defense tech and manufacturing. To gibs & shit for uneducated and unemployed niggers and spics to buy their votes. Congress did tard wrangled that to some extent.
 
Wrong generation and wrong administration as those American retards were post WWII right up to the start of the Korean War.

Clinton was all in shuffling money from U.S. military and educated white Americans in the defense tech and manufacturing. To gibs & shit for uneducated and unemployed niggers and spics to buy their votes. Congress did tard wrangled that to some extent.
I always thought the "no more need to fight peer or near-peer rivals like Russia or China, all wars from here on out will be low-intensity sandbox wars and peace keeping operations in shitholes" came after the "end" of the Cold War.

TIL retards said it before then...
 
I always thought the "no more need to fight peer or near-peer rivals like Russia or China, all wars from here on out will be low-intensity sandbox wars and peace keeping operations in shitholes" came after the "end" of the Cold War.

TIL retards said it before then...
Hate to mention that line about "history and rhymes" but it is most apt for the topic at hand.
 
Back