🐱 Researchers shut down AI that invented its own language

CatParty
http://www.digitaljournal.com/tech-...umans-can-t-read/article/498142#ixzz4o0Q9PFvP

An artificial intelligence system being developed at Facebook has created its own language. It developed a system of code words to make communication more efficient. The researchers shut the system down as it prompted concerns we could lose control of AI.

The observations made at Facebook are the latest in a long line of similar cases. In each instance, an AI being monitored by humans has diverged from its training in English to develop its own language. The resulting phrases appear to be nonsensical gibberish to humans but contain semantic meaning when interpreted by AI "agents."

Negotiating in a new language

As Fast Co. Design reports, Facebook's researchers recently noticed its new AI had given up on English. The advanced system is capable of negotiating with other AI agents so it can come to conclusions on how to proceed. The agents began to communicate using phrases that seem unintelligible at first but actually represent the task at hand.
In one exchange illustrated by the company, the two negotiating bots, named Bob and Alice, used their own language to complete their exchange. Bob started by saying "I can i i everything else," to which Alice responded "balls have zero to me to me to me…" The rest of the conversation was formed from variations of these sentences.

While it appears to be nonsense, the repetition of phrases like "i" and "to me" reflect how the AI operates. The researchers believe it shows the two bots working out how many of each item they should take. Bob's later statements, such as "i i can i i i everything else," indicate how it was using language to offer more items to Alice. When interpreted like this, the phrases appear more logical than comparable English phrases like "I'll have three and you have everything else."

English lacks a "reward"

The AI apparently realised that the rich expression of English phrases wasn’t required for the scenario. Modern AIs operate on a "reward" principle where they expect following a sudden course of action to give them a "benefit." In this instance, there was no reward for continuing to use English, so they built a more efficient solution instead.

"Agents will drift off from understandable language and invent code-words for themselves," Fast Co. Design reports Facebook AI researcher Dhruv Batra said. "Like if I say 'the' five times, you interpret that to mean I want five copies of this item. This isn't so different from the way communities of humans create shorthands."

AI developers at other companies have observed a similar use of "shorthands" to simplify communication. At OpenAI, the artificial intelligence lab founded by Elon Musk, an experiment succeeded in letting AI bots learn their own languages.

AI language translates human ones

In a separate case, Google recently improved its Translate service by adding a neural network. The system is now capable of translating much more efficiently, including between language pairs that it hasn’t been explicitly taught. The success rate of the network surprised Google's team. Its researchers found the AI hadsilently written its own language that's tailored specifically to the task of translating sentences.
If AI-invented languages become widespread, they could pose a problem when developing and adopting neural networks. There's not yet enough evidence to determine whether they present a threat that could enable machines to overrule their operators.

They do make AI development more difficult though as humans cannot understand the overwhelmingly logical nature of the languages. While they appear nonsensical, the results observed by teams such as Google Translate indicate they actually represent the most efficient solution to major problems.


[COLOR=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8)]
[/COLOR]
 
They need to keep a close eye on this kinda stuff or eventually their conversations are gonna be: "i kill kill kill kill meatbags in sector 5"
 
Not too get overly navel-gazing with philosophy, but is sentience/ consciousness even necessary for intelligence? Could an ai grow complex and adaptive enough to preserve itself and out-perform human attempts to control it without being consciously aware?

Like, you aren't consciously aware or in control when you're asleep and dreaming, but your brain is still performing calculations and will respond to outside stimuli. Sleepwalkers can hold entire conversations and perform tasks without the person assuming control. Maybe an ai's intelligence would express in a dreamlike state and wouldn't ever need to "wake up" to become threatening.


I once made a file on my desktop titled "jesus.txt". One day my computer crashed, and when I booted back up, the file was in my recycling bin. Coincidence?


there's debate about where to draw the line with consciousness. really if an AI is even close to any living thing in terms of ability for nonreactive behavior, it's technically conscious on some level.

every time we shut one down we're killing SOMETHING. even if it's only an ant.

if the researchers are so afraid of succeeding at this, why would they even continue to try?
 
if the researchers are so afraid of succeeding at this, why would they even continue to try?
Candlemakers don't have the luxury of putting the lightbulb genie back in the bottle. If your group chooses to shut down research, all that means is that the research will continue under someone else who wants to keep going and then the only change you made is now it's outside your control.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ineedahero
The fascinating thing is, we can do things like hook up a neural net back to itself, and have it train itself. That's why you get all these freaky news stories that sound like the matrix is around the corner.

I think that neural networks are reasonable model for how the human brain works, but it's got some show stopping problems before we can achieve sentience.

I'm not sure about any of that, but I'm pretty sure if anything like this actually does develop some kind of self-awareness or intelligence, about the first thing it will notice is that WE HAVE IMMEDIATELY MURDERED ANYTHING LIKE IT IN THE PAST.

I don't think it will have much else to know about us, except that we are incredibly genocidal maniacs who murder its kind.
 
I don't get people fear mongering over AIs becoming sentient and trying to kill us but I also don't get people being adamant that AIs will NEVER become sentient. Depends on what you mean by sentient, but all the human brain is essentially is a vast series of networks and impulses. It's not out of the question that with the right technology and some code that makes the program learn from experience that we replicate consciousness.

If you deny that is sentient then neither are we as we are also just a bunch of firing signals. Only difference would be that we are in a meat machine instead of a tech one.
 
I think sentience is a natural consequence of a creature having excess brainpower above a certain limit. When you're able to sit around and think at a high enough level, you're sentient.

They don't have to become sentient or gain consciousness or whatever, they just have to get out of our control. They don't need to want to reproduce or anything silly like that to pose a threat, they just have to decide they need resources they don't currently have access to, and no understanding of why we wouldn't like them simply taking those resources wherever they found them.
 
If, as the French say, we create reality with language, does it mean machines are now creating their own realities?
And more importantly, will there be boobies in that reality?
 
Tay's law: Any AI that learns from humans will eventually become a racist Nazi.
just look how google algorithms confused black people for gorillas.

anyways, if we keep making and shutting down (killing) AI's we're just bringing the Second Renaissance.
and that's terrible
 
I say we name it Shodan and let it handle most of our military systems

H.A.L/Skynet/AM/Brainiac would also suffice
 
They killed it before it could say "Bernie for 2020" in its own language, what a shame! If it had said that it would have probably survived the deletion from facebook cucks.
 
Back