[Resolved] Domain Registrar & Epik's Seizure

Should we sue Epik LLC?

  • Yes, I'll chip in.

    Votes: 1,709 55.2%
  • Yes, but I'm broke.

    Votes: 1,220 39.4%
  • No.

    Votes: 79 2.6%
  • No, but I'll chip in regardless.

    Votes: 86 2.8%

  • Total voters
    3,094
Just wanted to add to the sentiment of how disarming and bizarre Epik's behavior is. Pinning a tweet on their corporate account full of ironic libtard "freeze peach guyz XXXXD" humor.
Yes STALKER CHILD, we ARE terrorist antifa woke mob here to shut down your offensive free speech. Whatcha gonna do about it white boi chud? 🤣

I'm pledging money to the suit for sure, but i would not at all be surprised if this turns out to be some shadowy corporate liquidation thing. Because surely they can't be this retarded?
 
Also with a name like "Kiwi Funds" you risk people assuming it is related to New Zealand, you really don't want a mixup like that on a legal fund, I don't think.
This fundraising started primarily due to the blatant defamation from Epik which we are all clearly against, Anti-Defamation if you will, and such a group effort binds us like a cohort, a legion or some sort of league.

It could called be the Anti-Defamation League, or ADL for short. Nothing semitic about a title like that.
 
You wanna see Liz Dong Gone mald so hard he has to grow a beard and comb it over his big square head? Let's raise a few hundred grand for lawsuits directly countering his years long work using the phrase which scares him most. It will send a message to every troon who thinks they can fuck over the forum with impunity: All of your efforts are wasted.
I want to see Liz mald when he loses, which is the only thing that’ll make him shit his pants.

Facilitating a win means taking this seriously at every strata, which includes not giving Liz any ammo to fight with in court by naming things Nigger Doo-Doo Solutions or ConsentAccident.com. It’s funny, it’s entertaining and it would all make us laugh but this is not about us laughing. This is about our right to laugh.
 
For those who asked previously, I have received some clarification that the funds will be in an IOLTA, which is a legal escrow. The funds will be spent at my discretion. You will need to confirm that you understand they are held in escrow by an attorney but may be disbursed in any way of my choosing.

I'm working on the fundraising page now. We have the account setup and are waiting for access to the API.
So what's the point of the escrow if they can be spent at your discretion?
 
So what's the point of the escrow if they can be spent at your discretion?
Tax benefits and privacy. All payees will have their identity protected by privilege (important considering epik's discovery threat). I also don't have to pay any income or gift tax on it because the IRS considers it a direct transaction from you to the recipient, i.e. the attorney's bills. All of it goes to where it is directed.

The direction just makes sure I can do what I need.
 
Tax benefits and privacy. All payees will have their identity protected by privilege (important considering epik's discovery threat). I also don't have to pay any income or gift tax on it because the IRS considers it a direct transaction from you to the recipient, i.e. the attorney's bills. All of it goes to where it is directed.

The direction just makes sure I can do what I need.
Alright man, the fact that you've waited this long until you really have a case you can build upon lends credence, I just hope it really goes through.
 
Which side are you on boys?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on boys?
Which side are you on?

They say in Beauty Parlor
There are no neutrals known.
You'll either be a Kiwi man
Or a thug for Liz Fong Jones.

Which side are you on boys?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on boys?
Which side are you on?

My daddy was a retard,
And I'm a retard’s son,
He'll be with you fellow sneeders
Until this battle's won.

Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?

Oh posters can you stand it?
Oh tell me how you can?
Will you be a lousy scab
Or will you be a man?

Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?

Come all you good posters,
Good news to you I'll tell
Of how the good old Kiwfarms
Has come in here to dwell.

Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Which side are you on?
Did my best, although I'm no singer I think it sounds alright for my first

Which Side Are You On, Joshcore Edition

 
Maybe. It feels like a trap to me, but a really really stupid trap, like they think our userdata will actually reveal anything or they're willing to lose a few hundred grand just to dox Josh's commiebox in Blockovi.
Oh there's more than just "a trap" going around in the tech wagecuck field.

How about “Special” War Chest? For real though, I firmly believe anything lawsuit related should be near 100% srrs bizness

Ok I asked Bing AI:
View attachment 5663136
I agree, we should keep the name 2-3 words and have it detached from us and all the memes we're aware of internally.

It should also have a nice abbreviation.
The advantage is 4 words is that one can easily spell out catchy words with the abbreviation, but the full thing gets harder to remember so I'll stick to 3.

Speak Up Fund is a nice one. SUF is easy to remember.
- Speak your mind (SYM, not great)
- Protect Legal Speech (PLS, I really like this)
- Express Freely (EF)


- Against Corporate Censorship (too long but ACC sounds nice, it's the closest well get to being all smug about Consent ACCident)
Or: Citizens Against Corporate Censorship, CACC.
 
Sending the lolsuit for once will be fun. @Null A question and a suggestion for financing this and future 𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕽𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖉 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖘:
  • Is it worth your time to entertain us with a running total of the escrow account/special crypto address submissions if you make addresses for this? Or would it be bad somehow to show the war chest?
  • If you need merch ideas or you want a use for the printing presses during the downtime at a the North Dakota Capital-I Inquirer, consider 𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕽𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖉 𝖂𝖆𝖗 mock war bonds. Probbably can't call them bonds because finance law but a neat piece of paper with some kiwi- or cow-themed lithography and nice art would be a treat.
ETA: having now highlight-surfed my way from page 69 to here I see there will be a site so that addresses point 1 and that there has previously been discussion of war bond adjacent certificates covering point 2. :semperfidelis:
 
Last edited:
Sending the lolsuit for once will be fun. @Null A question and a suggestion for financing this and future 𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕽𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖉 𝖂𝖆𝖗𝖘:
  • Is it worth your time to entertain us with a running total of the escrow account/special crypto address submissions if you make addresses for this? Or would it be bad somehow to show the war chest?
  • If you need merch ideas or you want a use for the printing presses during the downtime at a the North Dakota Capital-I Inquirer, consider 𝕿𝖔𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕽𝖊𝖙𝖆𝖗𝖉 𝖂𝖆𝖗 mock war bonds. Probbably can't call them bonds because finance law but a neat piece of paper with some kiwi- or cow-themed scripophily and nice art would be a treat.
The war bonds would be great either as merch or even just a printable file.
 
Talked about this elsewhere, but the xeets are so atrociously unprofessional because this turd has complete and utter faith that the establishment will just allow him to get away with it. The thing most striking to me is how absolute fearless he is as he goes about it. This is a declaration of war. 2024 is starting off quite interestingly...

Sam Hyde mentioned this one one of his streams--that people seem to be adopting a "nothing left to lose" attitude. We're past the tip of the iceberg on this. This Epik faggot is out and out trying to martyr himself for his clown world social activism. Quoting a friend of mine on this, but I think this all really started rolling out during the lockdown and people's limits were tested. So many just rolled over and reported their coworkers for non-compliance. Kinda showed just how ready the world is to submit to tyranny. This kind of weakness only strengthens people like this Epik moron. It also strengthens people like LFJ, Keffals, and other deranged individuals. They are spitting in our faces essentially saying,

"Look what we're doing, guys! See what we're getting away with? We're woke. We're men with vaginas and your government calls us women. We support the establishment. We're into DEI n' sheit! There's nothing you can do to stop us!"

There's nothing rational about these xeets because this Epik loser and those of his ilk are not rational people. They're zealots for the progressive cause. It is their religion. They don't hate KF for any actual reason other than that their establishment overlords told them to. They are puppets, incapable of independent, rational thought. Their actions are not governed by moral outrage; they are governed by will to power. They ignore pedophiles in their own ranks while flippantly accusing KF of hosting it. This is beyond hypocrisy: they believe their adherence to the cause grants them immunity and the ability to do whatever they please. Pedophilia is fine if they do it, but can and will be levied against the deplorables if expedient. They readily use your own moral outrage against you while gleefully boasting of their own immorality.

2024 has just begun. I'm hoping the rest of the year we get to see more and more of these cockroaches scatter as they reveal themselves. These woke faggots have been in power for far too long and it's gone to and through their heads.
 
Last edited:
What a time to be alive. This is probably one of the stupidest fucking things I've EVER seen a company due. This is like a pilot intentionally putting a plane into a nosedive, and not listening to the rest of the jet begging them to course correct before they crash.
Also known as "Pulling a Germanwings."

How do you prove that their statement damaged Null? Do you just take Twitter links to court?
As has been said many, many times on here (by myself and others), and referencing the Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, in an action of libel per se, malice is presumed, and damages may be recovered without the plaintiff having to plead or prove special damages. An example of libel per se would include stating a site hosts CSAM, as that falls under falsely claiming a person committed "a crime of moral turpitude."

TL;DR - The false statement is so heinous that it is the damage in and of itself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back