Disaster REVEALED: Inmate charged with stabbing Derek Chauvin was FBI informant - he was stabbed a week after his lawyer send in appeal in light of new evidence aka the documentary

John Turscak, 52, became an FBI informant in 1997.

The inmate accused of stabbing Derek Chauvin 22 times at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tucson, Arizona has been revealed to be a former FBI informant.

John Turscak, 52, who has been charged with attempted murder for allegedly stabbing Chauvin, became an FBI informant in 1997, according to the LA Times.

Turscak was sought out by the FBI while he was a member of the Mexican Mafia prison gang. He helped federal authorities with an investigation that resulted in the indictment of more than 40 Mexican Mafia members and associates, the outlet reports.

However, Turscak was dropped as an informant after prosecutors said he admitted to extorting money, dealing drugs, and authorizing assaults while receiving monetary compensation as an informant.

In 2001, Turscak was sentenced to 30 years in prison after pleading guilty to racketeering and conspiring to kill a rival in the prison-based gang.

At the time of his sentencing, he slammed the FBI and told US District Court Judge A. Howard Matz: "I didn't commit those crimes for kicks. I did them because I had to if I wanted to stay alive. I told that to the [FBI] agents and they just said, 'Do what you have to do.'"

Turscak has now allegedly admitted to stabbing the former Minneapolis police officer accused of killing George Floyd during an arrest in May 2020 and spoke with FBI agents following the attack on Chauvin.

Prosecutors said that Tursak used an improvised knife and allegedly told authorities he would have killed Chauvin had they not intervened, according to the Associated Press.

Prosecutors claim that Turscak later disclosed to FBI agents that he had been contemplating assaulting Chauvin for approximately one month due to the fact that he is a high-profile inmate, but denied intending to murder him.

Turscak informed the agents that he planned to attack Chauvin, 47, on Black Friday, the day following Thanksgiving, as a symbolic nod to the Black Lives Matter movement and the "Black Hand" emblem affiliated with the Mexican Mafia gang, prosecutors said, according to the outlet.

Chauvin was sentenced to 252 months in prison, with credit for time served. He pleaded guilty in federal court in December 2021 to "willfully depriving Mr. Floyd of his constitutional right to be free from the use of unreasonable force by a police officer, resulting in Mr. Floyd's bodily injury and death."

An autopsy revealed that Floyd, who had been accused of trying to pass a counterfeit bill by a cashier who called police to the scene, had an excessive amount of drugs in his system. In testimony that came out of another case, a staffer stated that there had been pressure to ensure Chauvin was convicted due to the fact that the case had gained national attention. That attention resulted in "defund the police" movements nationwide.


 
I was half joking in the other thread when I said the glowies were trying to kill him, I didn't actually believe it was the case. Chauvin better get ready for a fight if the cameras shut off at his cell and the guards mysteriously leave their posts.
An autopsy revealed that Floyd, who had been accused of trying to pass a counterfeit bill by a cashier who called police to the scene, had an excessive amount of drugs in his system.
First time I've seen this mentioned in a while.
 
To be fair, people in prison inform on each other all the time. They are all backstabbing scumbags. That's why they led a criminal life, they are dog shit people. Probably half the people in prison are informants of some kind. Anyone in prison would do anything to reduce a sentence or make their own lives easier.
 
Chauvin should not have plead guilty. It was inevitable they were going to throw everything they had at him and more, might as well have kept the little integrity he was allowed and the door open for appeals in the event of a political sea change.
 
thought crime.png

Wow, they really really really didn't like that he tried to get an appeal.

Chauvin should not have plead guilty.
Implying he even had a choice.
 
get this the guy was 3 year away from release something like that . Either way big thonk its all a coincindence
He wouldn't have been if he refused to do the job...

Or maybe the FBI would have "let slip" who else he might have informed on. Or the guards "accidentally" left some of those groups he informed on around him unsupervised. Myriad of ways to coerce someone when you've incarcerated them.
 
Implying he even had a choice.
I'm not saying they weren't applying every sort of pressure they could, I'm saying that they were going to crucify him anyway so what could the court and lawyers threaten him with that was worse? Expecting some sort of leniency from a court that would find him guilty when he clearly had evidence showing his innocence anyway, is naive.
 
What could possibly be gained from getting a prison inmate to stab Chauvin to death? He doesn't "know too much," he's a beat cop who worked in the ghetto that almost nobody likes. His blunder was the entire impetus for the "defund the police" movement, which I presume the lefty Fed wanted. Is it really just because he maybe/maybe not killed a black man? You could at least say that Ruby Ridge and Waco had an overall point to be made, this is just petty and vindictive on a level I didn't think the FBI were willing to stoop to for the sake of at least appearing professional.
 
I imagine being a sacrifice to make race riots to make Orange Man look bad has to be some kind of super villain origin story. You would think some of his family would start putting on capes and burning down hospitals or something at this point.
What's worse is that faggots sell their souls, not even for Gold anymore, but for unbacked fiat notes the State openly debases by printing trillions of, essentially food chits.
 
What could possibly be gained from getting a prison inmate to stab Chauvin to death?
This particular inmate was an informant that got maybe a dozen cartel members imprisoned. He is a dead man on the outside because the Feds are full of cartel moles.
I didn't think the FBI were willing to stoop to for the sake of at least appearing professional.
I seem to recall seeing the allegation lately that the FBI was responsible for having the autopsy results changed to have positional asphyxiation as the reason for death rather than being the result of an overdose. But there is so much bullshit about this case that I can't keep it straight any longer, it may be just fake news that the FBI put their finger on the scale and it was just a cowardly medical examiner.
 
I'm not saying they weren't applying every sort of pressure they could, I'm saying that they were going to crucify him anyway so what could the court and lawyers threaten him with that was worse? Expecting some sort of leniency from a court that would find him guilty when he clearly had evidence showing his innocence anyway, is naive.
Chauvin has family and the media would absolutely put them at risk if he didn't take a knee.
 
What could possibly be gained from getting a prison inmate to stab Chauvin to death? He doesn't "know too much," he's a beat cop who worked in the ghetto that almost nobody likes. His blunder was the entire impetus for the "defund the police" movement, which I presume the lefty Fed wanted. Is it really just because he maybe/maybe not killed a black man? You could at least say that Ruby Ridge and Waco had an overall point to be made, this is just petty and vindictive on a level I didn't think the FBI were willing to stoop to for the sake of at least appearing professional.
It's called cleaning up loose ends. If Chauvin is killed the narrative is closed and the fickle eye of the public moves on. There will be no appeals, no lingering calls for justice, no show in five of six years time which interviews him and puts his side of the story.
 
It's called cleaning up loose ends. If Chauvin is killed the narrative is closed and the fickle eye of the public moves on. There will be no appeals, no lingering calls for justice, no show in five of six years time which interviews him and puts his side of the story.
and no posibility for pardon or investigation into how dunnit once the new president or strong enough congress and senate gets into position. Can you imagine congress comitee snooping whomever is responsible might actually see prison for perjury and intimidaiton.
 
Back