- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
I guess the only one that bucks the "based southron" trend is South Yemen? Maybe there's a couple more I can't think of right now. I know South Ossetia is a thing, but I don't know if they are "based southrons" or not.
Right wing memes - The good, the bad, and the ugly
- Thread starter Slap47
- Start date
-
🔧 Issue with uploading attachments resolved.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
cummytummies
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2021
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2021
cummytummies
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2021
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2021
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
In light of recent news:
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2021
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2021
Then again, this IS the Imperium we're talking about here....
Cuz coming out of the right vagina and not training/moral character/discipline automatically makes someone qualified for a skill. I thought right wingers were all about achievement, pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and overcoming your shortfallings and circumstances? Besides, the people who post this shit unironically wouldn't captaining the ship or even sucking him off in the cabin on lonely nights, they'd be down with the bilge rats.
Attachments
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 10, 2020
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2019
>Cuz coming out of the right vagina and not training/moral character/discipline automatically makes someone qualified for a skill.
Do you really think most politicians aren't born with connections and wealth?
>pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and overcoming your shortfallings and circumstances?
Have you ever once seen a voting majority actually doing this?
>they'd be down with the bilge rats
like what 99% of the population does now?
Edit:
Let's also not forget that the Habsburg inbreeding was scandalous at the time and pissed off other nobles for a plethora of reasons. This kind of shit is just the norm.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2021
Hell no. Doesn't mean we should go back to "you came out of ______'s womb, you're automatically qualified to run shit." Also, wealth and connections can be acquired. You can't work your way up on the Heritage stat.
I repeat: does this mean we go back to the notion that who you were born to automatically makes you right for the job?
No, 99% of the population are more likely to just be deck swabs and rope monkeys.
I'm sorry, but I'm not ready to go back to kissing the ass of someone who had the raw luck to have the right bloodline just on account of the state of things. I'm into achievements and competency instead.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2018
There are many strands of conservatism.
American conservatism is steeped in a liberal tradition that emphasizes individual freedom and achievement. Most countries root their conservatism in the traditional order with a tinge of neoliberalism.
The dominant strains of conservatism in most anglophone countries is a paternalistic conservatism. They support a heavily interventionist government, a state that guards morality like a parent, and respect for a political class who act to a noble ideal. They often embrace neoliberalism, but that is not their focus.
Canada and the UK broke from this in favor of a more populist conservatism (Reform Party in Canada, Brexit in UK), but that old style of conservatism is still dominant.
Karakhalkin-Gol
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2021
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2019
Could include Rhodesia too, since it was originally the colony of SOUTHERN Rhodesia. Northern Rhodesia became Zambia.
This is because of the nature of the political left and right. At their cores, Leftism is "Society needs to constantly be pushing for as much equity as possible" while Rightism is "Too much equity is bad, actually."
This is why conservatism, the broadest and most generic form of rightism, has so much more conflict than progressivism, the broadest and most generic form of leftism. Leftists have a common goal they're working towards while Rightists are only really defined by what they DON'T want.
We can say that the right is for "hierarchy" (which Breadtubers like to do and then equate hierarchy with fascism for nonsensical propaganda reasons) but what does "hierarchy" mean? It's just a system where some people or groups are more powerful than others. But who should be more powerful and why? Americanism (as its been labeled, I think accurately, by some European reactionaries) says that a free market system should sort everything out (because they feel that's the most meritocratic and therefore earned). Ethnonationalist want a more race-based collectivist structure (because people are naturally tribalistic and race is the most easily ID'd tribal identity), and monarchists favor heredity and divine right of kings (because the leaders get trained to lead their whole lives, don't have to pander to anyone, and their fate is tied to the nation so it's harder for them to bail if they screw everything up).
These different systems are at odds with each other on an ideologically as well as a functional level (they value and want different things), whereas different leftist systems are only really at odds with each other on a functional level (they value and want the same thing, they just disagree about how to do it).
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2018
I hope that the destruction of celebrity trust has stayed thanks to that sing-along back in 2020.
Celebrities are nothing but puppets.
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2021