US Road rage victim in Arizona resurrected through AI to deliver his own impact statement - The AI video also included real video clips from videos taken while he was alive, along with some of his personality and humor, while showing a real photo he once took with an "old age" filter.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

https://www.denver7.com/science-and...create-road-rage-victims-own-impact-statement
https://archive.ph/7a7Hv

Christopher Pelkey was killed in a road rage incident in Chandler, Arizona in 2021, but last month, artificial intelligence brought him back to life during his killer’s sentencing hearing.

It was the first time in Arizona judicial history — and possibly nationwide — that AI has been used to create a deceased victim’s own impact statement.

Pelkey’s sister and brother-in-law used the technology to recreate his image and voice likeness to “talk” to the courtroom about his life and the day he met Gabriel Paul Horcasitas, who shot him during a confrontation near Gilbert and Germann roads.

“In another life, we probably could have been friends,” the AI creation of the 37-year-old Army veteran said, addressing Horcasitas. “I believe in forgiveness…”

The AI video also included real video clips from videos taken while he was alive, along with some of his personality and humor, while showing a real photo he once took with an "old age" filter.

"This is the best I can ever give you of what I would have looked like if I got the chance to grow old," the AI version of Pelkey said. "Remember, getting old is a gift that not everybody has, so embrace it and stop worrying about those wrinkles."

Stacey Wales, Pelkey's sister, said everyone who knew Pelkey "agreed this capture was a true representation of the spirit and soul of how Chris would have thought about his own sentencing as a murder victim."

Family said the judge was so moved by the powerful video that he even referred to it in his closing statements at sentencing, handing down the maximum 10.5-year prison sentence for Horcasitas.

Pelkey’s family sought justice and found some peace in the process, especially seeing how one of Stacey’s children reacted to seeing their Uncle Chris one more time.

”'Mom and Dad, thank you so much for making that. I needed to hear from Uncle Chris one last time. And that meant so much, thank you.' That is not what this is intended to do. The result of it having it be a healing piece for anybody who saw it was just a beneficial result,” said Stacey.

Chief Justice Timmer offered the following response about the use of AI:

"AI has the potential to create great efficiencies in the justice system and may assist those unschooled in the law to better present their positions. For that reason, we are excited about AI’s potential. But AI can also hinder or even upend justice if inappropriately used. A measured approach is best. Along those lines, the court has formed an AI committee to examine AI use and make recommendations for how best to use it. At bottom, those who use AI—including courts—are responsible for its accuracy."

This story was originally published by Jordan Bontke and Ashley Loose with the Scripps News Group in Phoenix.
 
By this logic, I should be able to resurrect George Floyd through AI and make him screech monkey noises. Hell, let's go even further. Let's use Freddie Grey and all the other apes that have triggered riots when they died and make them screech monkey noises as a court admission. Clownworld cannot end fast enough.

This comes eerily close to Francis E Dec's warning about Frankenstein controls.
 
I doubt this guy is Asimov. They probably have a few pictures and videos and some scraps of writing and the AI fills in the rest. Oh and the recollections of some of his family colored through what they are trying to accomplish in the trial.
I agree with you. I was just more making a comment about how everyone is lazy and uses ai to write shit for them anyway. At least these people put some effort in.
 
This is literally no different from faking a witness statement, just with more steps. Why the fuck was this allowed? How fucking retarded is this judge to let this fucking precedent be set that this shit is acceptable?
Impact statements are at the tail end of the trial so the jury has already given their verdict and the judge has more than likely already have the sentence length already in mind. They are a tacked on thing as a way to have victims have a voice in the trial and as a result they basically have no rules. People can do it in person, send in letters, emails, videos, whatever. They can also lie too, because it is all subjective no one is going to call it out.
 
The BBC wrote a very tasteful article about this in Pidgin.
1746800164723.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Atlas Stone
Holy shit this is awful. I'd burst out laughing if I saw this in a court.

Everyday I'm ready for the world to get worse but I'm never prepared for how gay and retarded it becomes.
 
By this logic, I should be able to resurrect George Floyd through AI and make him screech monkey noises. Hell, let's go even further. Let's use Freddie Grey and all the other apes that have triggered riots when they died and make them screech monkey noises as a court admission. Clownworld cannot end fast enough.

This comes eerily close to Francis E Dec's warning about Frankenstein controls.
Are you not familiar with the George Droyd memes? The part where Bill Gates says 'we put the fent reactor to maximum power' always cracks me up.

Maybe they should use AI to have this guy give a PSA about not getting out of your vehicle UNARMED and going to confront a mutant-looking spic over some 'road disrespect' while they're at it.
 
The AI video also included real video clips from videos taken while he was alive, along with some of his personality and humor, while showing a real photo he once took with an "old age" filter.
How is this not satire wtf lmao
 
Back