Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can someone explain what is so god damned amazing about blockbuster? I find chris's autistic obsession with a shit movie rental chain weirder than bobs autistic obsession with a game series with some fun games in it.
It's a generational thing. While a lot of people had mom and pop video rental stores or places like gas stations or grocery stores that rented movies on the side, you also had the big fucking chain video rental places like Blockbuster.

Now Blockbuster wasn't 100% perfect (refused to carry anything X/NC-17 rated and their stores were often 99% new releases, often having 10-15 copies of most movies so they could make money renting new releases and not having huge waiting ques for the big hits of the day and very little older films or cartoons among others). But in big cities especially, Blockbuster was the equivalent of a mega church if you were a movie fan that rented shit.

In particular, Blockbuster was one of the first major chains to try and ape the movie theater experience by way of shilling junk food (oftentimes selling the same boxed candies that you buy in theaters) to kids and multiple day rentals for older stock that wasn't in high demand. And since stores carried a dozen plus copies of all of the major blockbuster hits of the day, you had a far better chance to get the new release you were looking for than having to wander the store liking for an alternate choice if the film you were wanting was already rented out.

If we can go back to the Firefly/Serenity Bobposting for a moment, one point really struck me. Not his takes on Firefly, I don't know anything about Firefly (I'm not a nerd). It was his tweet that Firefly is a movie your "college friends" drag you to. I really wonder, what sitcom did Bob get that scenario out of? Bob didn't have friends in college, he didn't have friends in college "dragging" him to movies. Bob watched movies in college the same way he watches movies now: alone, in the dark, stuffing his face with junk food, to block out the outside world with loud movie sound and flashy distracting visuals.
He may be using hyperbole (as usually); the "friends" in this case are those guys who in college were huge Whedon fanboys and watching Serenity (the Firefly movie) was a huge deal as Wheon bet EVERYTHING on the film, both to get additional work and to get more Firefly made.

And given that Blob is desperately wanting to be part of the Sarkaasian crowd who worship the ground Whedon walks on and who were among the ardent "browncoat' brigade of annoying as fuck Firefly fans who promoted the show as the second fucking coming, I can see Blob haphazardly trying to say he didn't want to watch Serenity but had to in order to continue pathetically kissing ass of and brownnosing the SJW crowd who were 100% calling for people to watch Serenity for the sake of Whedon's career and more Firefly stuff being made.
 
Last edited:
Bob's take on "bionic soldiers" is just as dumb as any other "I LUV SIGHANCE!" faggot.

It overlooks the simplist, most basic bitch question that everyone has to ask once they begin researching Man Amplification Projects.

"What do you do with them when they aren't at war or leave the military?"

"When do they move from being a human being to actually being government property and losing their human rights?"

"Do they have the right to refuse to be part of human experimentation or have implants forced on them?"

Idiots like Bob just see "BIONIC SOLDIERS! WHEE! UNIVERSAL SOLDIER WAS COOL!" without even seeing the fucking context of that fucking movie.

Fuck Bob. He's a goddamn smooth brained moron.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how frustrating it was for Bob’s teachers grading his essays and papers.
Most teachers don't give a shit so long as you hit the right talking points required and you don't blatantly get caught cheated and it's legible. And while Calvin and Hobbes's Bill Waterson planted the idea into a generations heads that fucked up essays are traded and read by teachers school wide in private and laughed at, in reality most schools have strict policies that ban such things and snitches out that kind of shit in the rare case that it happens.

The collapse of his consoomer manchild lifestyle has really been hitting Chris hard. He's reaching middle age where his body is beginning to fail, being the parent of at least one special needs young child is tough for someone not used to being an adult, he's financially pinched between the demands of parenthood on one hand and $14 craft beer on the other, and now there's been this fucking disease and resultant social insanity. It's not surprising that he'd mentally retreat to better days, but it's still pretty pathetic that the best days of his life were being a video rental store clerk, and rather autistic that he'd think that anyone would want to join him on his laughable nostalgia trip.
I think I missed the $14 craft beer can saga with Chris. A recap?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Positron
How do you write so poorly that “two many” and “one that belong” are not the biggest problems in a 50 word post?
Step 1: Be MovieBob.
Step 2: Be incompetent See step 1.
Step 3: Be igorant See step 1.
Step 4: Be fired for being a fat pedophile See step 1.
Step 5: Be a Nazi See step 1.
Step 6: Be told to BTFO by a drunk breadtuber See step 1.
Step 7: ??????
Step 8: Fail at everything.

Simple.
 
He's best known for sexually harassing Lindsay Ellis at this point.

He's still socially retarded and doesn't realize why his own side thinks he's a pathetic embarrassment.
The problem with Bob, as I've said numerous times, is that he says the quiet part out loud.
well the thing is, Twitter is exceptional a lot of the time on its own. Bob had no idea whether Lindsay had done something to unsubscribe him, or whether some sperg wrote an algorithm wrong making Twitter unsub him. After all, this is known to happen with Youtube. It's the ambiguous case. So, I wouldn't fault him for being confused at the initial outset because then he can just think, "Oh, twitter's being exceptional again" especially if he or others he knows have experience with twitter malfunctioning and unfollowing people from other people randomly.

After Lindsay called him out, though, I give him no sympathy whatsoever. Lindsay would have to spell out exactly what Bob said that she referred to as "toxic views" for Bob to even have a hope of "getting it" and understanding where he went wrong, but if she did that, there's a far more likely scenario that he'll dismiss her as another wasteland mayo ghoul rather than face the truth.
If it happens six times, you have to admit that there was some form of denial involved.
For two guys who think of themselves as future-looking champions on the side of the little guy, Robert and Chris sure do have a hell of a family boner for mega-corporations. Even Bob Chapek is like “Damn, dudes, give it a rest — you’re chewing the shine off my boots.”
And ironically enough, they call themselves socialists while they lick Disney's boots.
lol you're still a despicable asshole, asshole
View attachment 1793513
tweeted pics
View attachment 1793515
View attachment 1793516
The article
The wedding photographer had already spent an hour or two inside with the unmasked wedding party when one of the bridesmaids approached her. The woman thanked her for still showing up, considering “everything that’s going on with the groom.”


When the photographer asked what she meant by that, the bridesmaid said the groom had tested positive for the coronavirus the day before. “She was looking for me to be like, ‘Oh, that’s crazy,’ like I was going to agree with her that it was fine,” the photographer recalls. “So I was like, ‘What are you talking about?’ And she was like, ‘Oh no no no, don’t freak out. He doesn’t have symptoms. He’s fine.’”


The photographer, who has asthma and three kids, left with her assistant before the night was over. Her exit was tense. The wedding planner said it was the most unprofessional thing she’d ever seen. Bridesmaids accused her of heartlessly ruining an innocent woman’s wedding day. She recalls one bridesmaid telling her, “I’m a teacher, I have fourteen students. If I’m willing to risk it, why aren’t you?” Another said everyone was going to get COVID eventually, so what was the big deal? The friend of the bride who’d spilled the beans cried about being the “worst bridesmaid ever.”


After the photographer left, she canceled her Thanksgiving plans with family, sent her kids to relatives’ houses so they wouldn’t get sick, and informed the brides of her upcoming weddings that she’d be subcontracting to other shooters. A few days later she started to feel sick, and sure enough, tested positive for the coronavirus. She informed the couple. “But they didn’t care,” she says. They didn’t offer to compensate her for the test, nor did they apologize for getting her sick.


Weddings are complicated events, and reorganizing them, as many have in the face of COVID-19, is no simple task. Couples must take into account the schedules of the venue, the caterers, the bartenders, the DJ, the florist, the photographer, and often many more cogs in the wedding machine, all of whom are coordinating schedules with a dozen other couples trying to plan what should be the best day of their lives in what is likely the worst year of their lives. And rescheduling a wedding is not just a logistical nightmare: deposits are at stake.




The question of whether to reschedule is also an emotional one for many couples. “Postponing a party is one thing,” another photographer told me. “Postponing getting married is another.” Maybe that’s why so many couples are moving forward with their plans, telling themselves that it will be fine; if other people are doing it, why not them?


Many couples have rescheduled and/or significantly downsized their guest lists. They made adjustments when Greg Abbott said wedding venues could hold events only at 50 percent capacity (now 75 percent). But in many cases, that just meant that what was once a 500-person wedding became a 250-person wedding. And even at much smaller weddings, precautions quickly fell to the wayside.


One quick spin around the frenzied dance floor that is the Instagram hashtag #texaswedding reveals hundreds of posts from recent nuptials from across the state. In these photographs, there are usually neither masks nor Purell pumps, nor any other visual indication that the celebrations are taking place amid a global pandemic. Some events do seem safer than others—they take place outside, and they’re small—but it doesn’t take long to find a carousel of images of a wedding with a two-dozen-person bridal party and a bustling (and maskless) indoor reception.


Wedding photographers find themselves in a tight spot. They need to shoot weddings in order to make a living, but that means consistently spending time in large groups. Six photographers I spoke with said they carry hand sanitizer and wear masks when they’re working, and some even double up with face shields. But because they’re serving a couple on their special day, once they’re at the wedding photographers can’t do much, if anything, to enforce any pandemic guidelines.


“I think most people’s intentions are good,” said one photographer who, like most who shared their stories, asked to be anonymous, because she didn’t want to risk losing more work than she already has this year. “It’s just when you get a group of people together with alcohol and socializing, at a certain point, everyone just kind of lets loose and it gets a little dicey.” She recalls one event when the groom approached her at the end of the night, shouting his gratitude over the sounds of the DJ. “He was excited and happy and saying thank you,” she told me, “and I just felt spit land on my face.”


Photographers’ experiences shooting weddings during the pandemic have run the gamut. Several photographers described couples who were cautious, respectful, and understanding. But many were not. “I would say about fifty percent of the weddings I’ve shot, there’s been no masks at all. It’s like we’re living in the pre-COVID parallel universe,” one photographer told me. “I’ve been in hotel ballrooms inside and it’s been packed like sardines and everyone’s having a great time. No one’s wearing masks. I’m there as the photographer documenting the reception and there’s sweat flying, and it’s hot, and the music’s blaring and the fan’s on, and I’m just like, ‘Well, the odds are that one of every ten people here have COVID and don’t realize it.’”


One now disillusioned photographer shot a wedding in South Texas with roughly a hundred guests, including one who told one of her co-shooters, “Oh, you don’t have to wear a mask. You don’t have to worry. None of us have the ’rona.” During the reception, hundreds of guests lined up for a non-COVID-compliant group dance. The guests, old and young, arranged themselves for a traditional grand march, and the photographer was horrified to see “tunnels of people running through with each other, high-fiving, and yelling at each other and touching.” The photographers and catering staff, she says, were the only attendees who seemed to be taking precautions. “Not even the bartenders were masked,” she told me.


Another photographer, also sounding a bit incredulous, described a wedding where at least six out of the fourteen or so people in the bridal party ended up testing positive. “I’m pretty certain there were people in the wedding party who just didn’t get tested because they didn’t feel any symptoms,” he said.




He added that not all of the weddings he’s attended have been reckless, such as one over the summer where at least half the guests had masks on for both the ceremony and reception. (I suppose it’s too much to ask that all the guests mask up?) He was one of the more upbeat and forgiving photographers I spoke to. But even he was shocked by what he’d seen. At plenty of weddings, he said, guests in their eighties and nineties walk around maskless. “I saw a guy with an oxygen machine. He was carrying around an oxygen machine to breathe, but he didn’t have a mask on.”


The photographer who got sick after shooting the COVID-positive groom said her experiences throughout the pandemic have left her a little depressed. She recalled one conversation from that wedding, before she left the reception. “I have children,” she told a bridesmaid, “What if my children die?” The bridesmaid responded, “I understand, but this is her wedding day.”
The fuck does "all lives matter" have to do with this?

EDIT:
To not double post
View attachment 1793548
Fuck you and all of your repulsive ilk Robert. There's been people screaming about this SINCE FUCKING MARCH! We have ruined our economy while faggots like you have smugly sneered and said "just stay home how hard is that?". If people are not working then they're not spending. If they're not spending then money's not moving. If people are not working or spending then no tax money is coming in and the one last hope that they had dries up. All the while your worthless ass offering nothing but derision while on neetbucks. "Should made more PS5's" this shit right here is why NO ONE OUTSIDE OF DISEASED MINDS LIKES YOU OR WANTS TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH YOU.
1) I don't think holding a wedding party while one person there has a disease that, at its worst, has a 99% survival rate is worthy of the death penalty. Especially when Bob's waifus are opposed to putting people (and I use that term very loosely) like Alfred Bourgeois to death.
2) what? Bob, you argued for the closure of the economy because ”muh covid”. Your party refused to pass legislation that would have provided covid relief while you forced people to stay at home. You do not get to sit at home and laugh at poor business owners who you fucked over.
Many women, including feminists, have found being objectified a turn-on. And because they themselves don't mind being objectified (as feminists, no less) that means no woman should mind being objectified as well.

Critical theory is solipsistic.


Yes he has, the first one in 4 months Chris says. It's an hour and a half long.

Also if your office is still having Christmas party this year and you need a very degrading gag gift:
View attachment 1793479
View attachment 1793483

+ + + +
Bobby doesn't know why David Perdue, a Senator from Georgia, is allowed to speak:
View attachment 1793508

Bobby wants Tucker Carlson to be framed for rape:
View attachment 1793510

And Carlson's latest sin: recounting the history of George Soros:
View attachment 1793595

Bobby continues to shit on men smarter and more successful than him:
View attachment 1793578

View attachment 1793570
Where is your MBA, Bob?

When a rich white man (as opposed to a rich black man) says the right things, he can only ever be "technically correct":
View attachment 1793520
I think this is the "technically correct" thing that offends Bobby so much: Tom Cruise Tears Into ‘Mission: Impossible 7’ Crew for Not Following COVID-19 Safety Protocols.

China Numba Won!
View attachment 1793556

+ + + +
Today's Totally Not Eugenics Story.
View attachment 1793522
In brief: a wedding photographer attended a wedding party where the groom is covid-positive and nobody wore masks. She felt ill days after. I can understand Bob getting indignant, but read on:

View attachment 1793542
It is okay to withdraw rights to the wrong people, or otherwise devise ways to make sure "they are not around". As long as we don't literally murder them this is not eugenics.

An auto-da-fé is okay too! And at the hands of the right (which means left) people it totally will not turn into genocide!
View attachment 1793587

Another misguided soul mistook Bob as an eugenicist:
View attachment 1793568

+ + + +
Bobby dusts off his defunct Wordpress site, MovieBob Central, for our enjoyment.
View attachment 1793561

Minor setback: WB sends a copyright strike against Bobby's Adam Sandler feature. The video is still on Youtube unfortunately.
Legal experts: does that mean Bobby gets no revenue from this video?
View attachment 1793546

"Attn: Nymphomachy"
View attachment 1793551

View attachment 1793572
Assured Cretin At Birth.
1) isn't that the same logic as ”my friend's black and he doesn't think [racist thing] is racist, therefore I can do [racist thing”?
2) the only reason I'd wear that is if I lost a bet.
3) if Georgia goes blue, will he treat Raphael Warnock with the same derision he treats the current Georgian senators? Thought so.
4) once again, Bob, you simp for Ilhan Omar and AOC. You are in no position to accuse us of anti-Semitism, because if I had a pound for every time either of those two women said something anti-Semitic, I would be rich enough to buy Amazon.
(as an aside, is it just me or is it mainly Gentiles who accuse criticism of Soros of being anti-Semitic? I've never seen a practicing Jew say that it was anti-Semitic to point out the shady shite he's done.)
5) Eugenics Bob meets Feudalism Elon! Between them and the various socialists, this thread is like a potpourri of history's failed ideas.
6) Eugenics Bob supports genetic modification and calls for the death of undesirables. More at 11.
7) muchas gracias por tus ideas, Roberto de Torquemada. Quisieras hacer una Inquisición contra estes derechistas?
8) anti-Irish racism stopped being funny a few hundred years ago.
Robert’s revival of his blog is as well-written, coherent and free from basic errors as you’d expect from this “professional writer”:

View attachment 1793805

Top comment so far:

View attachment 1793806
That looks like it was written by a Japanese restaurant owner and translated into English via five different languages.

On another note, which one of you wrote the comment from ”HHimmler”?
Bob's take on "bionic soldiers" is just as dumb as any other "I LUV SIGHANCE!" faggot.

It overlooks the simplist, most basic bitch question that everyone has to ask once they begin researching Man Amplification Projects.

"What do you do with them when they aren't at war or leave the military?"

"When do they move from being a human being to actually being government property and losing their human rights?"

"Do they have the right to refuse to be part of human experimentation or have implants forced on them?"

Idiots like Bob just see "BIONIC SOLDIERS! WHEE! UNIVERSAL SOLDIER WAS COOL!" without even seeing the fucking context of that fucking movie.

Fuck Bob. He's a goddamn smooth brained moron.
My response to that would be simple. Don't.

We were made imago Dei - in the image of God. Mutilating and bastardising that image because you want to make 8' tall super soldiers is blasphemous. Not to mention that the second the floodgates of genetically modifying humans are opened, you allow billionaires to make designer babies in a lab, effectively seperating humanity into two subspecies - the rich and the poor.

Is that really the future we want?
 
I had a momentary blip of feeling happy for Chris when I saw that his latest FB post (about — what else? — the Last fucking Blockbuster) actually got a few likes. I clicked to see if any of his family members had liked any of his recent sperging (no) then checked out who shared. Lol:

69B27901-1206-4C76-8054-9E59BCC374FC.jpeg
 
Bob's take on "bionic soldiers" is just as dumb as any other "I LUV SIGHANCE!" faggot.

It overlooks the simplist, most basic bitch question that everyone has to ask once they begin researching Man Amplification Projects.

"What do you do with them when they aren't at war or leave the military?"

"When do they move from being a human being to actually being government property and losing their human rights?"

"Do they have the right to refuse to be part of human experimentation or have implants forced on them?"

Idiots like Bob just see "BIONIC SOLDIERS! WHEE! UNIVERSAL SOLDIER WAS COOL!" without even seeing the fucking context of that fucking movie.

Fuck Bob. He's a goddamn smooth brained moron.
I think he's actually just literally enough of a sociopathic literal Nazi that he's completely okay with involuntary medical experiments that would give Dr. Mengele nightmares, just because he personally finds the results cool. He's okay with eugenics after all.
Is that really the future we want?
Bob's "Superior Future" looks a lot like Nazi Germany even without his genocidal murder rampages.
 
Bob's take on "bionic soldiers" is just as dumb as any other "I LUV SIGHANCE!" faggot.

It overlooks the simplist, most basic bitch question that everyone has to ask once they begin researching Man Amplification Projects.

"What do you do with them when they aren't at war or leave the military?"

"When do they move from being a human being to actually being government property and losing their human rights?"

"Do they have the right to refuse to be part of human experimentation or have implants forced on them?"

Idiots like Bob just see "BIONIC SOLDIERS! WHEE! UNIVERSAL SOLDIER WAS COOL!" without even seeing the fucking context of that fucking movie.

Fuck Bob. He's a goddamn smooth brained moron.
Not to mention wouldn't this shit be stupidly expensive and massively impractical? Just off the top of my head you would need to fund development, and manufacturing, and installing the tech with expensive surgery, along with maintenance, various drugs (to keep the body from rejecting it), and recovery/therapy/training to use any "bionic enhancements". That not even talking about any long term effects that would have to be studied on having a bunch of electronic in a human body or assuming any of this crap would work in the first place. There is a reason there wasn't whole platoons of 6 million dollar men running around (not counting the fact they did it again to save Steve Austin's girlfriend).

Having some dumb thing thing where robo-Rambo runs around ripping the roofs of cars is all well and good, but its science FICTION for a reason.

God damn he really doesn't think past "There is cool thing in movie why isn't government dumping all money into making thing like in movie but in real life?"
 
Having some dumb thing thing where robo-Rambo runs around ripping the roofs of cars is all well and good, but its science FICTION for a reason.

God damn he really doesn't think past "There is cool thing in movie why isn't government dumping all money into making thing like in movie but in real life?"
Do you expect Bob to have an obvious grasp on the limitations and constraints of limited technology and its applications given its current state? This is a man who thinks that Hydroponics is a massively viable option that will make farmers extinct when in reality, it's incredibly inneficient and pointless given our current situation. Bob is a grown ass man who thinks that dedicating an inmense amount of resources and technology will somehow solve a problem that we currently do not have, because Hydroponics would only be used in case you are in a hostile enviroment where crops cannot adapt in any way. If you can freely farm why not do it normally? Because right now GMOs are much more viable and efficient than hydroponics when it comes to farm in harsh conditions (by making crops hardier, etc). Plus, it's not like hydros are going to make farmers extinct. Machines will not be able to tend to plants very well right off the bat.

But since it's cool and high tech, it definetly has to be much better and amazing than what we have now. Because fuck low technology even if it's more functional and far more efficient than some other mumbo jumbo. It's just like thinking that mechas are much better than current armored cars just because they are cooler and amazing rather than thinking about the obvious weaknesess and constraints of having them.
 
Do you expect Bob to have an obvious grasp on the limitations and constraints of limited technology and its applications given its current state? This is a man who thinks that Hydroponics is a massively viable option that will make farmers extinct when in reality, it's incredibly inneficient and pointless given our current situation. Bob is a grown ass man who thinks that dedicating an inmense amount of resources and technology will somehow solve a problem that we currently do not have, because Hydroponics would only be used in case you are in a hostile enviroment where crops cannot adapt in any way. If you can freely farm why not do it normally? Because right now GMOs are much more viable and efficient than hydroponics when it comes to farm in harsh conditions (by making crops hardier, etc). Plus, it's not like hydros are going to make farmers extinct. Machines will not be able to tend to plants very well right off the bat.

But since it's cool and high tech, it definetly has to be much better and amazing than what we have now. Because fuck low technology even if it's more functional and far more efficient than some other mumbo jumbo. It's just like thinking that mechas are much better than current armored cars just because they are cooler and amazing rather than thinking about the obvious weaknesess and constraints of having them.
Bob's thinking reminds me of all those shitty Kickstarter science campaigns like "solar roadways" and "water from air!" and other shit that usually either doesn't work or works but isn't even almost as good as what we already use. It isn't science, its smoke and mirrors, pageantry. Pseudo-Science.

Bob is the kind of rube who thinks Sophia is a scientific marvel and not a glorified muppet, or the kind of sucker who empties out his wallet donating to solar roadways. A science fetishist.
 
Bob's thinking reminds me of all those shitty Kickstarter science campaigns like "solar roadways" and "water from air!" and other shit that usually either doesn't work or works but isn't even almost as good as what we already use. It isn't science, its smoke and mirrors, pageantry. Pseudo-Science.
I bet that when Bob hears that we can filter gold out of seawater he would think it's the most brilliant idea in the world and everyone is stupid for not doing it when you would have to filter nearly 1 million liters of water to get 0.13 grams of gold.

There are things that are definetly doable. But just because they are doable doesn't mean they should be done, because they would be a massive waste of resources. It's like he cannot grasp the concept of cost effectiveness or return investment or he sees those as something evil and therefore, always disregards them.
 
There are things that are definetly doable. But just because they are doable doesn't mean they should be done, because they would be a massive waste of resources. It's like he cannot grasp the concept of cost effectiveness or return investment or he sees those as something evil and therefore, always disregards them.
From his hatred of providing basic decency to rural folks, to his hardon for technology that left cutting edge 100 miles back, I think this is the root of it all. Bob does not see the value in ensuring as many people as possible have something reasonably good, he believes that a handful of people should have the perfect thing, and everyone else should suffer to make sure it happens. Because in Bobs mind, its the act of the advancement that is the only relevant factor, not the scale or viability of it.

He treats technology like a video game, believing that you just need to set a research goal and allocate enough of the budget and It'll just happen. He's completely ignorant to the sheer volume of low skill and unskilled labor that goes into the supply chains that make any level of technological development and distribution possible, and wants to see the people involved in that chain suffer for the gall of wanting to be compensated for participating in the very process he demands be accelerated. Bob doesn't want to solve global infrastructure problems, he just wants scientists to research "Robotics Tier 3" so that a robot maid just arrives to ensure the +15 amenities score from that tech level.
 
One of the few actuall GOOD ideas Movie Bob has gotten.

View attachment 1794092
This can't be his original idea.
The problem with Bob, as I've said numerous times, is that he says the quiet part out loud.

If it happens six times, you have to admit that there was some form of denial involved.

And ironically enough, they call themselves socialists while they lick Disney's boots.

1) I don't think holding a wedding party while one person there has a disease that, at its worst, has a 99% survival rate is worthy of the death penalty. Especially when Bob's waifus are opposed to putting people (and I use that term very loosely) like Alfred Bourgeois to death.
2) what? Bob, you argued for the closure of the economy because ”muh covid”. Your party refused to pass legislation that would have provided covid relief while you forced people to stay at home. You do not get to sit at home and laugh at poor business owners who you fucked over.

1) isn't that the same logic as ”my friend's black and he doesn't think [racist thing] is racist, therefore I can do [racist thing”?
2) the only reason I'd wear that is if I lost a bet.
3) if Georgia goes blue, will he treat Raphael Warnock with the same derision he treats the current Georgian senators? Thought so.
4) once again, Bob, you simp for Ilhan Omar and AOC. You are in no position to accuse us of anti-Semitism, because if I had a pound for every time either of those two women said something anti-Semitic, I would be rich enough to buy Amazon.
(as an aside, is it just me or is it mainly Gentiles who accuse criticism of Soros of being anti-Semitic? I've never seen a practicing Jew say that it was anti-Semitic to point out the shady shite he's done.)
5) Eugenics Bob meets Feudalism Elon! Between them and the various socialists, this thread is like a potpourri of history's failed ideas.
6) Eugenics Bob supports genetic modification and calls for the death of undesirables. More at 11.
7) muchas gracias por tus ideas, Roberto de Torquemada. Quisieras hacer una Inquisición contra estes derechistas?
8) anti-Irish racism stopped being funny a few hundred years ago.

That looks like it was written by a Japanese restaurant owner and translated into English via five different languages.

On another note, which one of you wrote the comment from ”HHimmler”?

My response to that would be simple. Don't.

We were made imago Dei - in the image of God. Mutilating and bastardising that image because you want to make 8' tall super soldiers is blasphemous. Not to mention that the second the floodgates of genetically modifying humans are opened, you allow billionaires to make designer babies in a lab, effectively seperating humanity into two subspecies - the rich and the poor.

Is that really the future we want?
*Sigh* look, friend. Sorry to break it to you... we were't "made in the image of GOD" but have built ourselves into the image of SCIENCE. It's time for the thinkers to take the rains and plant microchips in our brains if there's any chance of me seeing the future I EARNED in my lifetime. If you're too much of a *believer* to see this... then you are unnecessary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back