- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
I wonder how his opinions on IS are. Because they're going to be way more brutal than any chemical attack.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder how his opinions on IS are. Because they're going to be way more brutal than any chemical attack.
Of course it is, "Let's see step two," rather than, "I think step two should be."
Because he has no balls or feet.
So Bob's willing to justify the Syria attacks if Hillary was in charge...just because. His Hillary obsession really is somewhere between psychotic and pathetic. Also, he says "Yer Boy":
View attachment 202269 View attachment 202270
So...more bombings then? FFS, with Bob's mental gymnastics:
View attachment 202272
A few points:
- It pisses me off to no end how leftists see the Constitution as just a piece of paper to be interpreted and not the law of the land. It exists to protect your rights, and the Supreme Court exists to uphold it, not make new laws.
- It really says a lot about him that he correlates white with ignorance and POC with virtue.
He is not wrong in that an electoral college does prevent the ideal democratic concept of One Man, One Vote. However, in the event of a more direct method of electing someone, this would mean that most politicians would not even bother to go to Middle America and the Flyover States. This means that a large minority would be ignored by Presidential Candidates and they would simply canvass votes in big cities. That's what the Electoral college prevents above all else.
Bob is an idiot.
Either he's got some creepy Hillary fetish that he's failing to hide.So Bob's willing to justify the Syria attacks if Hillary was in charge...just because. His Hillary obsession really is somewhere between psychotic and pathetic. Also, he says "Yer Boy":
View attachment 202269 View attachment 202270
So...more bombings then? FFS, with Bob's mental gymnastics:
View attachment 202272
Or he really wishes he could be Bill right now. Either way it's creepy. He also doesn't realize that most people would likely be ragging on her if she did it.
Chances are people don't remember Obama doing it because it was not reported 24/7 by the media conglomerates and if it was, it was spun into the most positive way.I seem to recall people being more okay with it when Obama did the same shit. But I guess Bobby was too busy rolling around in a star pattern blanket imitating Charles Martinet during that time.
I wonder how his opinions on IS are. Because they're going to be way more brutal than any chemical attack.
The Islamic State has repeatedly used gas attacks against Iraqi and Syrian forces. They don't gather much attention because the attacks are too small to cause significant casualties.
http://plenglish.com/index.php?o=rn&id=11243&SEO=ie-loses-four-leaders-and-causes-35-victims-in-iraq
This attack only killed 6 people, as opposed to 50+ in the recent government attack.
Both the Syrian government and rebel groups have deployed gas, but the government gets criticised more for it because they have a big enough stockpile to cause massive damage and have more access to deadlier nerve agents as opposed to just chlorine and mustard gas.
At most we'll probably get a generic, "Not all Muslims" line. I don't see Bob having the mental capacity to address something that completely destroys his narrative.I wonder if Bob will tweet about Sweden.
There's also the small matter of us having supposedly stripped Syria's government of such weapons, as we were assured by John Kerry and the Obama administration. Which means either Kerry lied or Syria played them for complete fools.
I don't know if the airstrike was the right move or not, but pretending it isn't at least defensible is nuts (which, amusingly, seems to be the stance taken by a lot of hardcore Trump supporters, which must be causing Bob all kinds of cognitive dissonance).
No bad tactics, only bad agents.Just before Trump bombed Assad, Hillary was bleating that we had to bomb Assad right away. I snickered to myself because as I read that, it had already happened.
IMHO - A state-sponsored gas attack will ALWAYS justify an immediate military response. If for no other reason than ignoring the uncorking of WMDs on foreign soil may just embolden the same users to try it on yours.
i.e. - You got 50 missiles rammed down your throat for using them on your 'own' people, just imagine how bad it would be if you used them on us directly.... in the hands of irregulars and rebels is one thing, but once an established and recognized power decides to use them? Well you just signed your own bitchslapping warrant.
Anyone trying to say "yeah but..." in that situation is living in a fantasyland where nerve agents only destroy the neurons of people who didn't virtue-signal enough on Twitter.