Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
It speaks volumes that he is so much of a sperg that most people don't even know about Game Overthinker. That shit is nearly as cringe inducing as his tweets.
To be fair he ended that series during when GamerGate, and the height of Bob's cringe came way after that (i.e. his 2016 meltdown, the cooking disasters, his dumb McDonald's tweet, getting fired from Escapist again, the Cuties obsession, getting thrown in the trash by Lindsay, and so on)

Honestly the three main components that make Bob a lolcow are really his OverEater Series, his shitty book, and his twitter
 
He is dying slowly. And even if you pitch him against someone of comparable physical state, Bobby's slow deterioration will be more painful to him than the other guy's degeneration to that guy himself, simply because Bobby holds on to some sci-fi myth of immortality, and bears the grudge that it is everyone else's fault that he must die.

Le Cordon Bleu avec Chris. Remember the Mooby gimmick that had him squeaking and bouncing?
View attachment 2077990

View attachment 2077985

View attachment 2077987

View attachment 2077986
This is Sarah

View attachment 2078387

View attachment 2078389
You mean these things are $30 ?!?!

View attachment 2078384

View attachment 2077988
Chris "My family desperately needs your financial support" Chipman
 
I can feel that poor belt's pain just by looking at the image. Note also the contrast between how the t-shirt is tightly stretched by his gunt and the pants hanging baggily around his atrophied legs.
Only temporarily. We all know he has to undo his belt to sit down.

When all of your shirts look like Crayola vomit, it distracts the eye from noticing his belted gut looks like a rubber band around an egg.
 
Fucking Christ why would anyone be excited for a shitty overpriced event branded on a fictional fast food chain from a forgettable hipster comedy from the early 2000's?
I really don't understand the devotion people have for Kevin Smith. What the fuck does that talentless do to make all the consoomers want to slob his knob so much?
Smith was one of the chief pioneers of the whole "geek chic" movement; he also benefited from Harvey "Sex Pervert" Weinstein's patronage, as far as owing his career to Weinstein deciding that he was going to make Smith a household name.

For what it's worth, his early films (IE Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, and Dogma) are decent if not flawed films that helped him make his name, with Harvey's help. However, Smith was a super cagey marketer in creating the "ah shucks" stoner fanboy image for himself (even though he's since had his defenders claim "he didn't become a pothead until he met Seth Rogen in the mid-00s") and he was quick to find outlets outside the mainstream media (Marvel, Wizard Magazine, the various internet movie websites of the late 90s) to shill his works and some things he was able to parley into being a Hollywood outsider even as he was attached to Weinstein's hips (IE the issue with Dogma's release being delayed).
 
For what it's worth, his early films (IE Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, and Dogma) are decent if not flawed films that helped him make his name, with Harvey's help. However, Smith was a super cagey marketer in creating the "ah shucks" stoner fanboy image for himself (even though he's since had his defenders claim "he didn't become a pothead until he met Seth Rogen in the mid-00s") and he was quick to find outlets outside the mainstream media (Marvel, Wizard Magazine, the various internet movie websites of the late 90s) to shill his works and some things he was able to parley into being a Hollywood outsider even as he was attached to Weinstein's hips (IE the issue with Dogma's release being delayed).
He also used his fame to make a guest appearance on Degrassi: The Next Generation because he was obsessed with the original series. He apparently has a thing for teenage Canadian girls.
 
West Wing had a couple of episodes like this during the Sorkin days. The good guy Democrats were always being attacked, shot at and demonized by evil republicans that always had the upper hand. But Martin Sheen would give a rousing speech and put them in their place.
West Wing has it's own hellish issues, which is worse than Studio 90, given the fact that it poisoned an entire generation of Washington insider/party hacks (like the assholes at Pod Save America).

In general:

  1. The chief problem with politics isn't the parties or the partisan nature of American politics or corrupt special interest groups; it's the stupid motherfucking common person. Normal Americans should shut the fuck up, take the anal rape, and get shitted on by the politicians because politicians are the Ubermensch and that the best way to run the country is to let them do whatever they want with zero consequence or oversight
  2. The elites are superior because they have superior tastes even if they are a century out of date with what people actually like (IE an episode Sorkin wrote where he had one of the White House staff humiliate an underling for liking Star Trek while claiming his interest (IE Gilbert and Sullivan) is superior because it's classy rich white people music that has fan clubs at Ivy League schools
  3. "What's good for the country" is a campaign slogan that is never to be actually put into practice. In one episode, when shit happens and the White House finds itself with TWO openings on the Supreme Court at the same time due to one Justice dropping dead at the same time another resigned, they decide to nominate a lunatic leftie and a lunatic right winger for the two open slots; not because of horse trading but because the President catches the two judges having a massive public fight over their respective politics and decides, that amusement the Washington elite will have with the two being forced to coexist (and the ensuing fights to come on the court via their rulings) will be prime entertainment for the elites, even though doing so will make the Supreme Court utterly dysfunctional.
  4. Lots of shitting on minorities, but especially gays, for going off the reservation. There is an entire episode based around one of the staff having a meeting with a gay Republican and basically shitting all over him for being a traitor to all gay people everywhere for being a Republican.
  5. You can pretend to be a righteous god-loving liberal in public; but in private you can engage in wholesale blasphemy and cursing out God and deface a church's marble floor with a cigarette you throw to the ground and stomp out, because you are pissy that you might have to decline to run for office due to a medical emergency that you know you'll get impeached over when you get caught lying about it.
And that's not counting that the characters are all Ivy League trust fund scum and represents Sorkin's elitist view that the rich are our superior and that God-damn it, the world would be great if the poor people could be permanently be made mute via rings in their lips sealing them shut/forcing them to wear bondage muzzles in public and hung from walls if they get uppity ala Handmaiden Tales.

He also used his fame to make a guest appearance on Degrassi: The Next Generation because he was obsessed with the original series. He apparently has a thing for teenage Canadian girls.
To be fair, Degrassi V1.0 was fairly popular up north, where it was a stable of PBS stations where Smith lived. And if anything, Smith making a huge plot point of it in Dogma helped raise awareness of the original show back when it had vanished off the airwaves and not only helped get the revival greenlit, but it aired on an actual TV network and not a super limited US release on select PBS networks
 
  1. You can pretend to be a righteous god-loving liberal in public; but in private you can engage in wholesale blasphemy and cursing out God and deface a church's marble floor with a cigarette you throw to the ground and stomp out, because you are pissy that you might have to decline to run for office due to a medical emergency that you know you'll get impeached over when you get caught lying about it.
And that's not counting that the characters are all Ivy League trust fund scum and represents Sorkin's elitist view that the rich are our superior and that God-damn it, the world would be great if the poor people could be permanently be made mute via rings in their lips sealing them shut/forcing them to wear bondage muzzles in public and hung from walls if they get uppity ala Handmaiden Tales.
For some reason I get Aaron Sorkin confused with Larry David, probably because both men are Jesus-hating Jews. Am I wrong, or do I remember Larry David actually pissing on a picture of Jesus during an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm? I was so angry at that, it made me wish that modern day Christians had balls. David wouldn't have dared to piss on a picture of Mohammed, because he knew that he and his staff would have been Charlie Hebdo'd. And yet he and other Hollywood Jews pour most of their bile out on the Evangelical Christian community, who would be more than happy to suck their cocks and send US money and military aid to Israel. I'm not one of those people who thinks Jews are responsible for the world's ills, and I have Jewish inlaws myself whom I'd never want to come to harm, but if Nazis rose out of the Earth and burned down Hollywood, I'd probably shrug and say "Whaddayagunna do?"
 
The first bit of this post is me talking in depth about history and religion. If you just want to see me laugh at the retard then scroll on to the end.

Let me tell you a story, Bobby. In the 1920's, an atheist government with views much like yours took power in Mexico and closed down churches. The president said that the Catholic Church had kept the Mexican peasantry in ”darkness” and that ”in a year without the Sacrament the peasants would forget the Faith”. Sound familliar?

In response, those same peasants took up their rifles and fought the Cristero War in defence of their religious liberty. Want to know who won that war? I'll give you a hint; it's not the side which hanged Catholic priests in public and burnt churches.

So, Bobby, if you do want to criminalise Christianity, I have one thing to say to you; ¡viva Cristo Rey y Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe!

Let me point out that the (atheist) Nazi Germany, the (atheist) People's Republic of China and the (atheist) Soviet Union killed far more people than the (Catholic) Spanish Empire, the (Orthodox) Russian Empire or the (Anglican) British Empire ever did.

In fact, and to go back to what I said earlier, if you want to look at what ”Thinkers” can do to ”Believers”, just look at what the Camisas Rojas did during the Cristero War or the CNT-FAI did to Catholics in Catalonia.
This whole "Believers vs. Thinkers" shtick of his is one of the most asinine ways to view the world. No one bases their entire set of thoughts and view points based upon cold logic, there is always an element of faith in ideas that has to be present. As you've pointed out, there have been plenty of non-Abrahmic or even non-religious governments that devolved into committing some of the worst atrocities ever recorded. They believed what they were doing was entirely justified. I urge anyone here to read the statements and writings of these people as well as testimonies about from survivors. Bob may thrash his manchild fists about proclaiming that the "Believers" are the source of all the ills of the world, but he's completely fallen in with the same horrific logic that fueled mass murder.
 
This whole "Believers vs. Thinkers" shtick of his is one of the most asinine ways to view the world. No one bases their entire set of thoughts and view points based upon cold logic, there is always an element of faith in ideas that has to be present.
Thinking is also nothing to brag about; everyone who is not a vegetable thinks. Someone is thinking when he analogizes a real life situation to an MCU film, and reasons that because the situation in the film is only resolved by destroying the villain, we should destroy that villain's counterpart in real life. This is thinking, but is this good thinking? The notion of good (vs. bad) thinking reminds me the difference between intelligence and rationality. Intelligence is a problem-solving skill and is neither reflective nor evaluative (as long as the problem is solved, all solution is as good as another); rationality requires more. At the very least rationality requires you to 1) articulate the basis of your strategies, beliefs and attitudes and 2) evaluate the basis; ask questions such as "is it good or is it bad?"

Say when someone claims "We must destroy all MAGA ghouls". If that someone is rational, he will follow it with "Why do I have such an idea?". Let's imagine how such a Socratic soliloquy might occur in Bobby's mind:

"...because they voted Trump and not Hillary Clinton."
"Is it a good reason to destroy people for not voting her?"
"Yes."
"Why is it a good reason? What is the basis of that?"
"Because without Hillary we don't have culture, we don't have science, we don't have a global economy, space technology and cybernetics. They deprive me of a robotic body and a sojourn in Mars!"
"Are you sure? What is the basis of that in turn?"
"..."

The problem with Bobby isn't just that he is an irrational thinker; he surrounds himself with other irrational thinkers, notably Luke Lockhart, who claims "The willingness to cheat for something means one wants that thing more, and thus deserves it more". But I guess irrational thinkers find comfort in each other, because reflections and interrogations are painful.
 
Last edited:
For some reason I get Aaron Sorkin confused with Larry David, probably because both men are Jesus-hating Jews. Am I wrong, or do I remember Larry David actually pissing on a picture of Jesus during an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm? I was so angry at that, it made me wish that modern day Christians had balls. David wouldn't have dared to piss on a picture of Mohammed, because he knew that he and his staff would have been Charlie Hebdo'd. And yet he and other Hollywood Jews pour most of their bile out on the Evangelical Christian community, who would be more than happy to suck their cocks and send US money and military aid to Israel. I'm not one of those people who thinks Jews are responsible for the world's ills, and I have Jewish inlaws myself whom I'd never want to come to harm, but if Nazis rose out of the Earth and burned down Hollywood, I'd probably shrug and say "Whaddayagunna do?"
I didn't remember this as you described but I found the clip on YouTube from a helpful Catholic, IIRC later on the family discovers the "tear" and assumes it's a miracle putting Larry in a tight spot:

It's from the season where they do a new Seinfeld episode.
 
Bob’s right: There are two kinds of people in the world — but not the categories he imagines.

We are divided between those who think the world owes them something and those who know better. Bob and his ilk are firmly entrenched in the born creditor/victim identity.

Bob, no one cares about the size label on your shirt, they care about how you look and you look super fat.

Bob squeezes his fat gut into a too-small shirt and brags about his supposed weight loss. No bitch, it’s called you’re still fucking fat no matter what size you manage to burst the seams at. Accept it and wear the size that fits your body slightly more loosely than a sausage casing.
 
Bob’s right: There are two kinds of people in the world — but not the categories he imagines.

We are divided between those who think the world owes them something and those who know better. Bob and his ilk are firmly entrenched in the born creditor/victim identity.

Bob, no one cares about the size label on your shirt, they care about how you look and you look super fat.

Bob squeezes his fat gut into a too-small shirt and brags about his supposed weight loss. No bitch, it’s called you’re still fucking fat no matter what size you manage to burst the seams at. Accept it and wear the size that fits your body slightly more loosely than a sausage casing.

Hell, nobody even really cares that he's fat.

People just make fun of him for it because they don't respect him enough to not go for the low blows, and because he constantly makes fun of the appearances of objectively more attractive people than him, in a dazzling display of miniscule social awareness.
 
Last edited:
Hell, nobody even really cares that he's fat.
I didn’t mean cares as in gives a shit. Just that people don’t ask to see your clothing tag for your size before they decide how you look. They have to go on the visual data their brain processes immediately as “REALLY RATHER FAT AS FUCK.”
 
Hell, nobody even really cares that he's fat.

People just make fun of him for it because they don't respect him enough to not go for the low blows, and because he constantly makes fun of the apparences of objectively more attractive people than him, in a dazzling display of miniscule social awareness.
He also gets fun of for being fat because he harps on about being superior and wanting to disappear the undesirables despite being objectively a fat lardass with an only marginally useful skillset.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back