Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Where I disagree with Diabeeto is audience reactions. He believes that Disney is trying to get people acclimated to the idea of having their favorite characters replaced with (potentially inferior) other actors for this reason, but he seems to think that people won't generally be opposed to it. In a post-Endgame world, the MCU has lost two of its most bankable stars in Robert Downey Jr. and Chris Evans, and Black Widow is the swan song for ScarJo. Thor has been turned into a walking punchline and is already set to be replaced by Natalie Portman, so Chris Hemsworth fans are fucked for the foreseeable future as well.
The funny part part about Natalie Portman replacing Hemsworth is that she is older than him and ScarJo. My theory about why Disney is so eager to replace its core heroes is two-fold. First is that they want to avoid potential audience backlash or fracturing from replacing the actors. In the case of Iron Man, the character had never been portrayed in live action before so RDJ had the blank slate to inject his trademark snark and flippancy to the point where it became engrained into character. Placing someone in the iron boots would likely spark some sort of revolt from the fans. Similarly, Chris Evans' portrayal of Captain America was enough to make even the most knowledgeable fans forget that Reb Brown and Matt Salinger took up the shield before him, though their films where burning sacks of garbage.

The second is pure corporate greed. Merchandising makes up much of value of Marvel IPs and replacing core heroes means they can push new product--essentially, "Buy product. Get excited for next product." By phasing out Iron Man/Cap/Thor and replacing them with Ironheart/Captain Falcon/She-Thor, they assume that it opens up new revenue streams and draws in new "diverse" fans. Except it didn't work for Star Trek and Star Wars. Kelvin Trek merchandise sold poorly compared to Prime Trek until fans stopped buying merchandise altogether thanks to Alex Kurtzman's mismanagement of the franchise. Similarly, sequel trilogy merchandise sold poorly to the point where Hasbro only produces original and even prequel trilogy toys because they know it sells.

Of course, Bob is too smooth-brained to acknowledge that.
 
Well, remember, Bob did delusionally write in Brick by Brick that Mario was popular; as he should be, and how he was always totally ahead of the currrrve when it came to him. Bob genuinely thinks that he must become popular because he likes shit that is popular.

He's really that pathetic.
Every nerd, introvert or just plain geek I ever met with popular, mainstream tastes was always either just doing it to appease a girl or just the group he wanted to get into. Or they were either autistic or plain stupid
 
My theory is that the "bullying" he received was nothing more than pushback and social isolation from the other kids over his behavior towards them.
Covert narcissists love fishing for sympathy with tragic backstories.
Therefore all the people who wont embrace trans rites are blocking us from having cyborg bodies.
Bob is sitting so far up the Dunning-Kruger slope that he fails to grasp that some things are just physically impossible.
Anyone who says they are leftist but enjoys wrestling has never, and I mean never, been to a real-life event.
I agree with other posters who have pointed out that this isn't really true in Current Year. Vince MacMahon is buddies with Trump and his goofy family members have lost elections as Republicans, but plenty of fans are liberal. I went to a RAW show with some co-workers who were all pretty left-ish. I guess actual commies would have a problem with the rampant consumerism aspect of wrasslin.
Trying to find out how someone votes based on the types of entertainment they enjoy is a pretty Bob'd take.
 
I'm not so sure. I haven't watched WWE in 15 years, but I hear that Kevin Nash is a giant Fag Hag. It wouldn't surprise me to learn that guys like Cena, Brian, Punk etc were as well.

To be fair, he is a victim.

View attachment 2308418

CM Punk and Daniel Bryan are openly liberal. Though CM Punk I know has used homophobic slurs in the past. I don't really know what Cena genuinely believes in since so much of the things he does comes off as fake and pandering.
I didn't say all wrestlers are right leaning I said most. Here are some that I know of The undertaker, Big Show, Triple H, The Maz, Brock Lesner, AJ. Styles, Kane (who is now a Republican politician), Chris Jericho, Sgt Slaughter to name atop of my head that are on the right.
Let's go through this bit by bit, because unlike the Dread Diabeeto, he of the Frictionless mind, I'm a loser who genuinely loves these films and have actually watched them.

1. Bob misrepresents via not actually watching the films. WeyYu did not send the crew of the Nostramo, Sulaco, AND a retrieval team to Fury 161 to get killed by the monster. They did it to capture the fucking things. Out of those films, only the Nostromo crew had no clue on the beast, as the Colonial Marines did have Ripley's reports, and they also had them for Alien3. Also the Prisoners on the planet had Ripley herself as an advisor. I'm not including Resurrection since that was a government project, but Bob probably is too stupid to catch that the Company was eaten by Walmart in that one.
2. The first movie effectively a slasher movie merged with a monster movie. The class elements in 1 are the only time it really gets brought up. Wanna know why? Because Ridley Scott's English. Brits are still autistic about class structure. Cameron didn't have that, but had corporate greed. Fincher had faith as an element, which also was reflected in the comics at the time, as religion is hilariously a big thing in the franchise. I guess Bobby never read those scawy comics tho.
3. Alien wasn't fucking based on Nostramo; that's just the book that they took the name from. It was a Dave O'Bannon schlock film that was created from a WW2 script he made about gremlins possessing and fucking with an airplane and then changed to sci-fi. It was then elevated via team effort, much to O'Bannon's initial dislike for it. Fuck off you smoothbrained blue curtain analyzing crayon eaters.
4. Bob of course desperately ignores the big message: humans are in a way worse than actual monsters, and fuck corporations. This is because Bob wants to believe he's a perfect being, and corporations are his pantheon.
5. Ripley being right proves this dumb bastard only knows the series because he watched blind reactions and looked at fan proceedures and he just parroted them. This was more a thing in Aliens, which by the way was much more anti-corporation, about the concept of overcoming trauma, motherhood, and slight Vietnam nods by how the group of Marines were structured.

I only wanted to do this because you really need to get an idea of how fake this fat stupid alcoholic is with everything he touches.
Bob easily ignores all of that to fit his worldview. I don't know how one can the watch the alien movies and think that the movie isn't criticizing corporations? Also yes the first alien movie was a slasher with an alien.
Movie: Has one political or philosophical theme that provides social commentary but isn't the main focus.
Remake of Movie: Ignores everything about the movie to just focus on this one theme that was barely a thing.
Diabeeto: WOW THIS MOVIE HAS BEEN ALWAYS ABOUT [THEME]! YOU STUPID NERDS WON'T UNDERSTAND THE ADVANCED META NARRATIVE THIS MOVIE WILL SPEAK OF!

I miss when we could have movies that touched on political themes that actually served the story and wasn't blatantly shoved down our throats.
I always found the claim "[insert franchise here] has always been political" to be stupid. Yes stories like Star Wars have had political themes in them but they were never the main focus of the story. Unlike today where writers make politics the front and center of stories and ruin them.
 
Covert narcissists love fishing for sympathy with tragic backstories.

Bob is sitting so far up the Dunning-Kruger slope that he fails to grasp that some things are just physically impossible.

I agree with other posters who have pointed out that this isn't really true in Current Year. Vince MacMahon is buddies with Trump and his goofy family members have lost elections as Republicans, but plenty of fans are liberal. I went to a RAW show with some co-workers who were all pretty left-ish. I guess actual commies would have a problem with the rampant consumerism aspect of wrasslin.
Trying to find out how someone votes based on the types of entertainment they enjoy is a pretty Bob'd take.

I think I actually read online somewhere that most WWE fans were Democrats some years back.
 
LokiSimpson.png
As if Bobby knew anything about Renaissance art and their patronage.
"...but I also, like... KNOW human history myself" -man who doesn't know anything about human History.

I don't know what Bob is even trying to say there but I'm going to give a quick explanation as how Renaissance art was created; a lot of it was commissioned by the Catholic Church like the art in the Sistine Chapel, a lot other of it was made in independent Italian City States.
I don't know what Bob means by saying "murderous princelings showing off literal blood money" so I'd appreciate it if someone could enlighten me.
I'm not going to comment on Bob comparing the Pharaos, Xerxes, Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar to fucking Disney.
 
Last edited:
Bob basically said "it's okay for Disney to have a monopoly because they're woke liberals." My god, this man is the perfect corporate simp. The exact type of drone Disney has been trying to cultivate for the past several decades.
Bob would change his tune about this if it was a company he didn't like that was in Disney's place. Bob gets really deranged when it comes to those like blaming Activision for 9/11 and a lot of companies that produce First Person Shooters for brainwashing people to be trained to murder blacks.
 
Bob would change his tune about this if it was a company he didn't like that was in Disney's place. Bob gets really deranged when it comes to those like blaming Activision for 9/11 and a lot of companies that produce First Person Shooters for brainwashing people to be trained to murder blacks.
Yeah, Bob would be pissed off if Warner Bros. owned most of Hollywood and the Snyderverse was a big hit while the MCU was struggling to find its footing.
 
Yeah, Bob would be pissed off if Warner Bros. owned most of Hollywood and the Snyderverse was a big hit while the MCU was struggling to find its footing.
It would probably make his political sperging look like kid's shit if his toys were deemed inferior by the society controlled by "mayo ghouls"
 
Yeah, Bob would be pissed off if Warner Bros. owned most of Hollywood and the Snyderverse was a big hit while the MCU was struggling to find its footing.
Bob would change his tune about this if it was a company he didn't like that was in Disney's place. Bob gets really deranged when it comes to those like blaming Activision for 9/11 and a lot of companies that produce First Person Shooters for brainwashing people to be trained to murder blacks.
I always find it amusing that people like Bob are bitching about Amazon buying MGM for like $8.5 billion and must be regulated while they turned a blind eye and let Disney buy 20th Century Fox and its library (a major studio) for $71 billion.
 
don't know what Bob is even trying to say there

Bob basically said "it's okay for Disney to have a monopoly because they're woke liberals." My god, this man is the perfect corporate simp. The exact type of drone Disney has been trying to cultivate for the past several decades.
I usually avoid trying to transcribe bobanese, because we usually land there in a few pages, but his history jab has coaxed my autism.

He is trying to say he doesn't necessarily think its a "good" thing that Disney wants to consume every IP into an unholy abomination of self referential formulaic bull shit. (Because he ostensibly is an individualist or something.) But if any company is gonna do it, it might as well be the one that makes the stuff he likes a lot. Then following that up with a shallow understanding of history, where in he imagines that the mouse would be a benevolent tyrant that any ancient culture would choose to live under rather than...alexander the great I guess? So as long as disney pumps out crap he can easily consoom he is fine with them going against what he morally thinks is right.

Then ends with the zinger that, if we were gonna stop disney from taking over the entertainment industry we would have had to a long time ago, and now all we are left with is neo nazis that only want to stop disney to own some fat retard who records youtube videos in his basement.
 
Yeah, Bob would be pissed off if Warner Bros. owned most of Hollywood and the Snyderverse was a big hit while the MCU was struggling to find its footing.
I dunno about that; I give a 25% chance odds that he probably would 360 to pretend he always liked it or he doubles down.

He only has a few definite psychological pins, and Disney's one of them. But he also loves to pretend to know, understand, and agree with people he tries to toady up to or creep on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back