blablabla
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic
- Thread starter Enriku
- Start date
- Status
Tronathon242
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2020
Exactly. If it was actually "the end," it would have stopped the entire story. There are entire segments of that film devoted to promoting Phase 4, not to mention recycled footage from previous MCU films. This isn't Return of the King where there is no going forward anymore. You could easily snip thirty minutes to an hour off of Endgame and it wouldn't lose any narrative cohesion.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Now that Luke Lockhart has gone silent, I don't expect so.
Host, to "fashion blogger": "Let's talk about nuclear weapons...some says we cannot trust Iran; what are your thoughts?"
Fashion blogger: "I don't think we can trust this country either...the legacy of imperialism, colonization... America not only created this violence but created the capacity for it...blah blah blah..."
Host: "You are an American; you don't sound like an American."
Fashion blogger: "(laughs) That's because I read! This country is built on the backs of black slaves and the genocide of indigenous people..."
Read something other than Twitter and Reddit, both of you.
Eco-imperialists vs China, guess whose side Bobby's on?
The video Bobby posted is a commercial for G.I. Joe's "Eco Warriors" toy set.
Seems Bobby's Chinky Fever has come down a bit; it must have something to do with Pelosi the Ice-Cream Lich.
Bobby seems really obsessed with this Samirah woman, as you will see presently.
Anyone against the FBI is a neo-confederate, i.e. Nazi.
(The clip Bobby posts.)
Still, Bobby's one true love remains Peter Coffin.
It is easy to be right when you argue against Peter Coffin.
Tranny tells a joke. See if you can laugh with him.
New York Post's cultural-elite journalists make themselves useful (archive)
The nightclub sex did happen in Crimea but it is not a fucking "report about bombings"; the journoroach just tagged on the bombing as an aside.
I know Bobby is illiterate but this is ridiculous.
Bobby's cronies reveals more differences between Endgame and The Batman.
The worst person you know is right again.
MCU hacks vs Snyder:
Archive of Gamespot article in case you want to look at the list.
Bobby can't forget that headless thing that is all butts.
Neither Free Guy nor Everything is Shitting Up Everywhere is science fiction.
Bobby's Predator headcannon:
Google told me that "this man" made the Smash Bros and Kirby games. I strongly doubt he "asked so little" for them.
Last edited:
NaviSpider
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 10, 2022
What a pair of retarded fucking takes. In every film we've seen, the Predators completely outclass their prey. They only lose because they handicap themselves to make it more of a challenge, or they go up against somebody smart enough to work around their hunting styles. Neither of thise point to being a "lul such a bad fighter". Arnold couldn't even hurt it in a 1v1 fist fight and had to trick it with a double bluff to get it in the perfect spot for a trap.
Calling them bad fighters is like calling the Witch King of Angmar a sissy bitch because he got beat by a girl. You completely undermine the achievement of the human character by overcoming them.
What is with Bob's need to project everything he hates onto villains? I've said it before here, but Predators are not the sort of sad losers who go out and shoot elephants from a mile away. They target things that could be a threat (they're even pro life).
Take the original predator. He only shoots 4 people with shoulder cannon. Blaine (the one carrying the biggest gun possible), Mac (the one who found the Predator after he'd walked into a trap and escaped, he was careless and punished), Dillon (had his arm shot off, was still standing and holding another gun, the predator was man enough to close in and finish him off) and Poncho (ok he was wounded and unceremoniously shot in the head, maybe not totally honourable, perhaps the pred was looking to separate Dutch from the dead weight)
Point is, these were people who could quite easily have returned fire, or fired first, if they'd been able to spot the predator or if he somehow gave himself away. He's not necessarily fighting fair, but he's not gunning down defenceless kittens.
Fuck you Bob. Watch movies.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
I love whenever people dissect and show just how retarded Bob is with his takes, since it further shows that he has no talents, even in things he pretends to know. He can't even remember how the Yautja fucking work; either intentionally to be dishonest or genuinely due to stipidity, while arguing this shit.
Maybe that special needs energy is why MattPatt from the Theorists has been reduced to staring at shows for literal babies like Paw Patrol.
Maybe that special needs energy is why MattPatt from the Theorists has been reduced to staring at shows for literal babies like Paw Patrol.
blablabla
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2019
I really like when people point out how much of a retarded loser Bob Is on twitter
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2014
I legit skip through the tweet dumps unless he gets bullied on Twitter. It's the only time he's entertaining to read nowadays.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
Yeah, fans will sometimes joke that the predators we encounter might be "weekend hunters" type of thing more as a thought experiment exercise or gag (like imagine the Yautja book-nerds; or a slam-poetry night). Given that not even the big game hunters are like the movie cliché that Bob thinks they are (and boy does he think in terms of movie clichés), it's not like we ever see one of them go, "That elephant is now unarmed! I'm going to go fight it hand to hand!"
Hell even when fighting Arnold 1 v 1, we've seen the Yautja has massive fucking claws on its hand
but it still balls up a fist to smack the Terminator around instead of just gutting the guy in 2 seconds.
Predator 6 should be a Yautja vs Kyle Rittenhouse. I just want to watch Bob's mind fry trying to process that.
NaviSpider
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 10, 2022
Not gonna lie, a Predator going on a hunting spree during some mostly peaceful protests would be a pretty legit film. All the shit on fire, people running around flashing guns, prime real estate. Predator starts picking off the biggest and loudest on both sides, escalating the protest into a full scale riot as both sides blame the other for their dead. Police and military get involved, things get way out of hand. There's threat of an actual civil war breaking out, one character things something smells fishy and investigates (suspecting government bullshittery) only to find an 8ft tall alien is behind it all. Eventually both sides unify to fight this foe, their common humanity trumping whatever Twitter fueled political bullshit had them all riled up in the first place.
Admittedly a bit similiar to Predator 2, but modernised. Plus the idea of BLM/antifa tards teaming up with MAGA heads would make Bob's sperging legendary.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2018
Except even when Bob's right he's still wrong. The urban environment isn't the premise of Sesame Street. It's the setting. The premise of Sesame Street was teaching kids basic things like how to share, letters, numbers , colors, and which one of these things is not like the other.Still, Bobby's one true love remains Peter Coffin.
It is easy to be right when you argue against Peter Coffin.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
Completely agree.
Actually closer to what avpcentral (which I've been having fun all day on) ranked as #9 best comic.
So at the top of "the most incompetent predators" list comes this bit of fun editorializing.
And this is how i know if an SJW is a true fan or not. If they complain about what the Predator series should be and don't even reference this book or claim it was a good idea, then i know they are a pathetic poser.
And this is how i know if an SJW is a true fan or not. If they complain about what the Predator series should be and don't even reference this book or claim it was a good idea, then i know they are a pathetic poser.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2021
A word too rarely used; thank you.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
Bob's stunning, staggering ignorance of "children play outside", is absolutely mind-fucked. What the fuck it even has to do with 1910s and Pa Kettle, however, fucked if I know (unless it's a reference to Pa Kettle being lazy and dumb AF). Were the movies set in the 1910s? Cuz I know they were made in the 1940s and 50s. If it wasn't set in the 1910s, it would be the sort of smoothbrained take that would mistake the Little House On The Prairie as being set in the same era as The Waltons, despite there being a nearly 100-year gap between the two, as the Little House on the Prairie is set in the 1860s, and The Waltons is set in the depression era 1930s.
Sure, in Sesame Street, kids were outside, on the street, listening to Big Birb or the human characters, occasionally playing. Also remember SS started in the fucking 1960s, when it was still relatively safe to play outside in the inner city (despite SS itself being a clear indoor studio set, rather than an actual street).
Maybe kids play outside in Suburbia (lord knows they do here but I haven't seen them do it a lot unless they are riding bikes), but in the middle of a city it's a different fucking story. Even in Victoria it's risky to "play outside" if you don't have a yard (re: if you live in a condo or apartment). There's homeless druggie bums, discarded needles, human waste, and all manner of other things that today's helicopter parent generation wouldn't let their kids anywhere near. As for a major US city's "inner city", it's even worse. If kids play outside there, they're liable to be shot, or recruited into a gang. Lately being glued to a screen (be it TV, Video game, or computer/phone/tablet) is more of a thing than you know, going outside. Because it's "safer".
At least Lesser Brother has a home with a decent yard. Then Uncle Bob can play with daniece and danephew properly, like Sesame Street.
BTW Bob's Aimee Therese-like obsession with Samirah Khan seems to stem from the fact this lady likes to retweet InfraHaz, Dr. Prism, Ian Miles Cheong, and Andrew Yang.
If Bob didn't already have a reason to hate Andy Yang:
I ALMOST laughed at the tranny "so good at tucking the ball" joke. ALMOST. The rest was garbage.
Last edited:
Arthur Morgan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2019
It's validating to know that we're not just being trolls and have an actual point. It's also funny when people Bob says he admires call out his bullshit.
It also makes it clear he's too stubborn and stupid to change. People he says are important and everyone needs to listen to them tell him he's wrong, and he immediately dismisses them as idiots.
JayHarrison
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2021
Moviebob: "The 'Christians' [...] are BELIEVERS, and do not have minds [...] of their own--they will be 'for' whatever their leaders tell them the invisible man in the sky says to be 'for'."
Moviebob will always support whatever elected Democrats, Climate Change™ activists, vaccine mandate proponents, and the lamestream media tells Bob to support, so long as it complies with Moviebob's straw-thin worldview. Moviebob is a Thinker™, after all.
Except... has anyone actually disclosed the context behind this nuclear information yet? Nuclear weapons? Nuclear power plants? Nuclear disposal?
Counterpoint: Has Moviebob actually performed any self-sacrifice for the betterment of others?
Shut up, Sexistbob.
Compared to Moviebob's acting abilities, Bongino is a Shakespearean master. Then again, so is earwax.
Why would it?
Good.
Bingo.
Given how Moviebob favors technofascism, I'm rather surprised Bob thinks technology and cature can co-exist.
It is impossible to feel bad toward those who want to make others feel bad. Ergo, it is impossible to feel bad for Moviebob.
Even the worst of Hell isn't a harsh enough punishment for Moviebob.
Corrected version of Moviebob's statement: "Don't toy with me, Science™."
Griftuber (n.): [lengthy description]. See also Chipman, Robert (film critic).
Pretending to care is literally the only way Moviebob knows how to care.
Speaking of which...
Hasn't Moviebob's entire spiel for the past... however many years always been "it doesn't matter if it doesn't improve anyone else's well-being, how does it make Moviebob safer?"?
So... is Moviebob's role in this idiom the pot or the kettle?
Better be careful Bob. Putin's successor could be significantly worse.
The FBI lost credibility on at around noon, PDT, on July 5, 2016, when James Comey spiked a no-doubter case against Führer Hillary.
Peter Coffin: "Kids don't play outside because they don't have yards."
Might that be the same reason Moviebob rarely spends time outdoors?
There's a gag in the old Looney Tunes short Show Biz Bugs in which Daffy performs a solo dance number to the song "Jeepers Creepers" (where'd you get those peepers?), after which the crowd sits silent as frogs croak and crickets chirp.
OrangeCats' joke is so bad, even the frogs and crickets have fallen completely silent.
Bolo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2019
More LOTR bullshit from Robert.
For context, here is the new clip from the Amazon LOTR that had people bitching:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1559210197431754753
Basically it is warrior princess Galadriel announcing herself with all her pompuous titles and shit, and then the editing dry cuts (even the musics stops) to a new human only saying his name, as his bluntness juxtaposes Galadriel regal pomp.
I don't even think I have to explain that, but yes Robert is right, it is a beat, a humorous one, the type of a humurous beat that relies on a build up of a statement of seriousness and importance, only to be undercut by the trivial or the ridiculous, AKA A JOKE!!!!!!
It is the bathos shit that the MCU relies like a crutch, overused to be the point it became assinine, but not as obnoxious as Robert pretending that it isn't the case, and it is clear as day that this Amazon LOTR will be very much "current year" in its presentation, failing to capture the timelessness of the original work due not having the same talent behind it's words, but instead using modern storytelling conventions to claim audiences.
Also Robert doesn't know how "canon" work. Canon when used in the context of what the fanbase considers "true to the orignal story" isn't just about adaptation, but also to sequels or prequels to a original work. Usually "canon" relates to anything made by the original author, while anex work made by others are either seen "alternative takes" and not to be taken part of the main story, but there are exceptions, and those are usually made when said work strongly resembles the sytle of the original author.
There are cases when the author dies mid-work, and said work is completed by another, such recent case is the manga "Berserker", the author recently passed away but his team and best friend are carrying on with the work, and the fanbase seems to be taking the new chapters as canon because it seems the story has been already been delineated by the original author.
In terms of adaptation, what is considered canon is a work that retains the events and characteristics of the story as close as possible to be recognizable from the original work for authenticity, and it may vary depending of the proprety.
Sam Reimi's Spider-man doen't read like any previous Spider-man comic, but it does have just enough similiarities with the original work, mainly the names of the characters, powers, similiar origin story, that with just take people will take the movie as a genuine "Spider-man", and that maybe be dues the fact that Spider-man already has numerous adaptations in other forms and medias that as long as it retains the basics, that will be enough.
Not so with Lord of the Rings, this work has one very specific source. And yet, the Peter Jackson flicks are considered "canon", even if the story doesn't go over the spam of decades to finish, even if there is no Tom Bombadil and no Scouring of the Shire, and yet the movies are taken as a accepted adaptaion because it remains faithful to the original work in key points to be seen as "genuine".
What ticks me off is that Robert knows that, at least to a point. The notion that "canon" is a 100% adaptation is ludicrous, if that were the case, then there would be no way for stories to transverse medias, this is some bad faith bullshit Robert does and he keeps doing it because he thinks everybody is an idiot.
It would be better if Robert was honest in his stupidity, instead of this malicious bullshit he tries to squirm his way around to dunk on them chuds.
For context, here is the new clip from the Amazon LOTR that had people bitching:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1559210197431754753
Basically it is warrior princess Galadriel announcing herself with all her pompuous titles and shit, and then the editing dry cuts (even the musics stops) to a new human only saying his name, as his bluntness juxtaposes Galadriel regal pomp.
I don't even think I have to explain that, but yes Robert is right, it is a beat, a humorous one, the type of a humurous beat that relies on a build up of a statement of seriousness and importance, only to be undercut by the trivial or the ridiculous, AKA A JOKE!!!!!!
It is the bathos shit that the MCU relies like a crutch, overused to be the point it became assinine, but not as obnoxious as Robert pretending that it isn't the case, and it is clear as day that this Amazon LOTR will be very much "current year" in its presentation, failing to capture the timelessness of the original work due not having the same talent behind it's words, but instead using modern storytelling conventions to claim audiences.
Also Robert doesn't know how "canon" work. Canon when used in the context of what the fanbase considers "true to the orignal story" isn't just about adaptation, but also to sequels or prequels to a original work. Usually "canon" relates to anything made by the original author, while anex work made by others are either seen "alternative takes" and not to be taken part of the main story, but there are exceptions, and those are usually made when said work strongly resembles the sytle of the original author.
There are cases when the author dies mid-work, and said work is completed by another, such recent case is the manga "Berserker", the author recently passed away but his team and best friend are carrying on with the work, and the fanbase seems to be taking the new chapters as canon because it seems the story has been already been delineated by the original author.
In terms of adaptation, what is considered canon is a work that retains the events and characteristics of the story as close as possible to be recognizable from the original work for authenticity, and it may vary depending of the proprety.
Sam Reimi's Spider-man doen't read like any previous Spider-man comic, but it does have just enough similiarities with the original work, mainly the names of the characters, powers, similiar origin story, that with just take people will take the movie as a genuine "Spider-man", and that maybe be dues the fact that Spider-man already has numerous adaptations in other forms and medias that as long as it retains the basics, that will be enough.
Not so with Lord of the Rings, this work has one very specific source. And yet, the Peter Jackson flicks are considered "canon", even if the story doesn't go over the spam of decades to finish, even if there is no Tom Bombadil and no Scouring of the Shire, and yet the movies are taken as a accepted adaptaion because it remains faithful to the original work in key points to be seen as "genuine".
What ticks me off is that Robert knows that, at least to a point. The notion that "canon" is a 100% adaptation is ludicrous, if that were the case, then there would be no way for stories to transverse medias, this is some bad faith bullshit Robert does and he keeps doing it because he thinks everybody is an idiot.
It would be better if Robert was honest in his stupidity, instead of this malicious bullshit he tries to squirm his way around to dunk on them chuds.
TopTierHealer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2020
I don't care who the IRS sends, I'm still not paying taxes.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Ray Blanchard points out the obvious fact that you can easily tell which subtype of perv a tranny is.
Some of Bobby's followers already pointed out the possibility that she was already dead before the gator found her.
What hath Science done?
Bobby masturbates to the thought of Kevin Feige getting more diversity hires.
Disney fanboyism:
On the contrary, "that fandom" can be safely ignored.
Another reminder that Scott Mendelson is a writer for Forbes.
The mysterious "fantasy" that Bobby alluded to two days ago was She-Hulk, his latest fap fuel.
Fake might She-Hulk's VFx look, it doesn't stop Gen-X creepers drooling:
I can't see Marvel-style quips in the promo either, just a swashbuckling Galadriel.
A satire to a film genre cannot make the genre over (in the same way that satires to trannies will literally murder them), but it will affect people's perception to the genre and threaten the idolatrous hold it has over certain people.
Ezra Miller again:
More Cavill dissing:
Cavill might not be Chris Pratt, but he is way more famous than that actress who played Batgirl (I forgot her name already).
And if Bobby thinks the ability to dance is such an important skill for an actor, let's see how The Rock excels:
Bobby analyses the source of charisma in Chris Pr*tt
This is what The Worldwide Celluloid Massacre says about Everything is Shitting Up Everywhere.
Case clinched; it is indeed Twitter-Reddit: The Movie.
Wizard Of Oz remake:
"Woke" is simultaneous "not a real thing" and "things" that someone can sense. I admit I'm not properly evolved.
Does Bobby mean this shit?
Some of Bobby's followers already pointed out the possibility that she was already dead before the gator found her.
What hath Science done?
Bobby masturbates to the thought of Kevin Feige getting more diversity hires.
Disney fanboyism:
On the contrary, "that fandom" can be safely ignored.
Another reminder that Scott Mendelson is a writer for Forbes.
The mysterious "fantasy" that Bobby alluded to two days ago was She-Hulk, his latest fap fuel.
Fake might She-Hulk's VFx look, it doesn't stop Gen-X creepers drooling:
I can't see Marvel-style quips in the promo either, just a swashbuckling Galadriel.
A satire to a film genre cannot make the genre over (in the same way that satires to trannies will literally murder them), but it will affect people's perception to the genre and threaten the idolatrous hold it has over certain people.
Ezra Miller again:
More Cavill dissing:
Cavill might not be Chris Pratt, but he is way more famous than that actress who played Batgirl (I forgot her name already).
And if Bobby thinks the ability to dance is such an important skill for an actor, let's see how The Rock excels:
Bobby analyses the source of charisma in Chris Pr*tt
This is what The Worldwide Celluloid Massacre says about Everything is Shitting Up Everywhere.
Case clinched; it is indeed Twitter-Reddit: The Movie.
Wizard Of Oz remake:
"Woke" is simultaneous "not a real thing" and "things" that someone can sense. I admit I'm not properly evolved.
Does Bobby mean this shit?
Bush King
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2022
YASSS KWEEEN SLAY THAT HUWHITE SAURON MAN
I wonder what the difference between views on this versus PJ's series will be when it launches.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2014
It's bad enough that he doesn't actually comprehend jokes or humor, as evidenced by that bullshit exchange about 'beats vs quips', it's clear FilmBob doesn't understand Canon properly if he thinks that since the exact story of the books is "unfilmable", thus something something canon doesn't matter. Either that, or he's just being a disingenous asshole for the sake of 'winning' an argument on fucking twitter. You know, the website that Bob admits doesn't matter.
Just what is Bob thinking? That because the books are too long and plodding in places (Y Halo Thar, Tom Bombadil), that by excluding any of it, means 'canon' doesn't matter? Uh, no, Bob, that's not how canon works. That's not how non-canon works. You can leave stuff out, and still have it be canon, or faithful to canon. For something to be non-canon, would mean it's specifically going against established canon. And yeah, it's absofrickingloutely outrageously galaxy-smoothbrained of Bob to try to palm off "canon" as meaning 100% inclusive-of-everygoddamnthing-mentioned-in-the-book, and anything less means that canon doesn't matter. Only the paste-eaters in his timeline will accept that ridiculous premise.
- Status