Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
In regards to the purported DCEU reboot, Grace Randolph claimed that Supergirl and Batgirl are part of a new DC trinity. That would be a death kneel for the franchise as the audience doesn't want a more expensive version of the CW's Arrowverse.
Especially not one where Supergirl and Batgirl don't even resemble their comic book selves. Seriously, they had ONE fucking job. And that's to put the World's Finest waifus on screen.
1d18f69eece1876c9e568150207246ca.jpg
 
Last edited:
1641149798293.png

Rich Evans?
Do not ever compare Rich Evans to the genetic defects that are the Chipman brothers. Rich Evans is actually charming, funny, interesting to listen to, and above all is a functioning adult.
2022 welcomed Bobby with a round of dunking:
1641149945982.png


1641149953116.png
See Bobby, that's the thing about the internet - when you post something on there, it's on there forever. Which is why you either need to not post stupid stuff, or at a minimum if you are going to post stupid stuff you post it from an account that can't be linked back to your IRL identity. Twitter of course for the most part discourages the latter, which is why it has been an absolute gift to "dedicated trolls and doxxing forums." (BTW I love how he mentions us without actually mentioning us)

Anyway, here's to 2022 and 4500 pages of Bob Chipman's exceptionalism.
 
Last edited:
4500 baby!

I know Bob has mentioned, at least vaguely that he's aware of us, but is he aware of how prolific he is here?

Evil may not be able to comprehend good, but I don't think that Bob comprehends much at all.

The only time that I can think of a non-Supes, Batman, and WW trinity in the DC was the New 52 Earth-2 comic which started with the premise that those three died/went missing, and Green Lantern, the Flash, and Hawkgirl are their replacement. It was an interesting premise, but they basically remade the normal trinity anyway because as it turns out, the extremely popular characters remain extremely popular.
 
MOSsy, yours is the faction that attempted to make "Milkshake Duck" a meme, the most forced meme I have ever seen in my life (it got on Jeopardy! for crying out loud). A meme that was built on the concept that if you get randomly internet famous the rats on Twitter will dumpster-dive your entire tweet history for ONE negative comment to burn you with in order to elevate their own standing, and - most gallingly - in this farce of purity spirals and purges the person being purged is the one at fault.

Don't call it a grave, it's the future you chose.

And Bob: The Farms are persona non grata on search engines. We couldn't game them if we tried. If those terms are top results it's because of everyone else.


(Edit: 4500 yaaaaaaaay.)
 
The only time that I can think of a non-Supes, Batman, and WW trinity in the DC was the New 52 Earth-2 comic which started with the premise that those three died/went missing, and Green Lantern, the Flash, and Hawkgirl are their replacement. It was an interesting premise, but they basically remade the normal trinity anyway because as it turns out, the extremely popular characters remain extremely popular.
That was Tom Taylor who brought in a new Superman and Batman alongside other more normal DC stuff. The original creator, James Robinson, intended the series to be more of a JSA (which he also wrote on) reformat than anything.

The premise was that the original Trinity (plus Catwoman) sacrificed themselves to stop Darkseid.

I still liked the whole thing (plus Futures End) though, one of the more fun New 52 runs altogether. It was dumb that DC just ended it semi-randomly instead of giving it an ending since they were going to wipe it out with Doomsday Clock anyway.
 
This better reply to that tweet helpfully includes within its theory Robert's desperate desire to make sure others know he thinks this BAD PERSON IS BAD AND SAYING BAD THINGS:
View attachment 2808231

Ian Bogost is a garbage game journo who became an even worse game developer scamming the government for funding for political games
One of the games he made was called Killer Flu, a game about how a global flu pandemic would actually not be a big deal and almost no-one would die of it
Read this and laugh at him, he's a complete government tool and will completely change his beliefs as he's told to
This is the kind of genius game journo mind Bob thinks needs protection from the "anti-intellectual"
 
Last edited:
Dude, no offense, but I thought the New Batman Adventures were lame. Not because they were darker but because they weren’t fun.

The original episodes were a perfect blend of fun and drama. The new adventures tried so hard to be intense, it just fell flat.

Plus, I prefer the original Batgirl.

View attachment 2851583
I'm more pointing to the designs than the quality of the episodes. I'm just implying I'm stay they didn't cast the roles well for the screen IMO.
 
I mean...Bob has a serious writing crutch? Maybe? Like...all of Tweets start like this? I think? It's like...a passive aggressive way hinting at disagreement without inviting debate? I guess?
Like... are you implying that Robert may not be as confident in his opinions as he pretends? I guess? Maybe? It's possible?
 
In his haste to dump on Musk, Bobby here shows he doesn't understand what an automotive recall is or is deliberately pretending he doesn't in order to bash the 'right' kind of target.

A recall doesn't mean you send your car back to the factory, it doesn't mean the manufacturer or dealer retroactively loses a sale. It doesn't mean the car goes to the junkyard....

It means you receive a letter in the mail saying "According to our records, you are the owner of a 2020 Tesla Model Whatever, the manufacturer has noted that "part A' on this vehicle is defective and poses a safety risk. At your earliest convenience, please have this part replaced, save the receipts, and we will cover the costs."

That's it.

It doesn't mean you now get a free car or have to send yours to anyone else against your will, or get compensated the cost of buying the whole thing new......

And as the other poster there points out, a recall is hardly unprecedented. It's a standard thing in the auto industry and has been for years.

In fact, some hard-core car collectors consider the Holy Grail to be a car that has, among it's papers, original recall notices which provide provenance that it is from the year/model/trim level it claims to be as not EVERY car is affected by a recall. Only ones with certain parts.

Tesla doesn't lose any of the sales from those recalled cars, they don't have to pay a fine or take them back. Having one-too-many recalls can get them labeled as a maker of lemons, or a particularly bad recall (Like the Ford Explorer's tires) can get a specific model labeled a deathtrap and cost you sales going FORWARD... but a recall doesn't mean that the NHTSA gets to go into his company books and vacate sales like the NCAA vacating wins from a team caught cheating.....
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back