Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't worry hon, we're grateful you're a lesbian too.
Signed,
Men in general

Elvira, huh forgot all about her.
Wish I could. Youtube decided I really need to see an ad for Shudder - whatever that is - featuring her. She's been telling me she's coming soon for so damn long now I think she's into tease and denial.

Bonus points - the ad is showing up on my work account. I can't search Google for "Google Classroom assignment not showing up" because of "ass" getting filtered but I get to see geriatric titties if I so much as think of opening a tutorial vid. Brilliant. (Wasn't there some reality show where Peterson named a successor some time ago? No idea who won but even so I'm wondering if Elvira 2.0 wouldn't be the better option at this point.)

But to have capped the banned accounts? That takes some kind of weird dedication or access to a repository of autistic knowledge.
Maybe we should start wearing monk robes.

"Greetings, pilgrim. Have you come to our library seeking knowledge of... the Chipman?"

Someone was triggered by Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood:
stupid.png
Never saw the remake, what episode is that? (Looks.) Oh, Shou Tucker.

1) Watch a series described as "drama" or "dark fantasy", starring a protagonist who clearly lost limbs at some point in his past.
2) See something dramatic and dark.
3) Get mad at everyone for not warning you.
 
Someone was triggered by Fullmetal Alchemist Brotherhood:
View attachment 2944881
How does anyone, 11-19 years after airing (depending on if you count the original series or brotherhood), still not know about that girl and her dog being inseparable? Even non basement dwellers get the joke. And to what end? So moviebob of all people can give you asspats on twitter?
 
From the big Blob post

hitler.jpg


This is such backwards retarded logic trying to dunk on Hot Wheels. The Eagle's Nest is an impressive place for location and engineering, I hope you never posed in front of the White House or whatever gay places in Boston that were run by bad men in the past.
 
From the big Blob post

View attachment 2945318

This is such backwards retarded logic trying to dunk on Hot Wheels. The Eagle's Nest is an impressive place for location and engineering, I hope you never posed in front of the White House or whatever gay places in Boston that were run by bad men in the past.
I visited Abe Lincoln's tomb, museum and home while on a business trip a few years back (they're like a mile apart) and yet I haven't freed any slaves, I don't kill vampires, and I don't have nearly as cool of a hat as our former President. You can visit somewhere and it mean nothing. Why on Earth is Bob pretending that visiting a historical place means anything more than fuck all.

Cawthorn literally says in the pictures Bob posted, that it was a strange contrast that people were having a good time "where only 79 years ago a supreme evil shared laughs and good times with his compatriots". Clearly Cawthorn wasn't going there as some pilgrimage to a dictator, but even with as little faith as I have in Bob's intelligence, I don't actually believe that he truly thinks Cawthorn did it for that reason. But any reason to dunk on his enemies is a good enough reason for Bloberto to lie.
 
From the big Blob post

View attachment 2945318

This is such backwards retarded logic trying to dunk on Hot Wheels. The Eagle's Nest is an impressive place for location and engineering, I hope you never posed in front of the White House or whatever gay places in Boston that were run by bad men in the past.
you should always look somber and gloomy when visiting any WW2 historical site, no liberal would ever crack a smile anywhere in Europe
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Bob has never been to, or enjoyed, anything Bad ever. He has always only liked and interacted with Good things. Only Bad "people" choose to experience Bad things in any way.
Zack Synder's Justice League, if you don't know already, is going to be the undoing of WB.
View attachment 2943939
MovieBob: "It's a ***TOTAL*** sell-off. Literally dumping the entire company off on Discovery"
Except for it being neither of these things. Discovery is not a big enough company to purchase WarnerMedia from AT&T, which you could find out from simply looking up either on Wikipedia and being able to compare two different numbers. Or by reading the linked story but I know that's demanding too much.

MovieBob: "not even taking a chance on remaining connected."
70+% of the new company will be owned by AT&T, they have not yet decided if it will be spun off.

MovieBob: "Right there in black and white: They expect WB to keep losing money. Incredible."
WarnerMedia has never lost money in any quarter.

MovieBob: "it's impossible to see WB's post-2012 collapse outside the context of ... [Snyder's] presence in the DCEU as a project being a main driver of this disaster."
PoSt-2012 CoLlApSe (giving Bob the most favorable territory, Warner Bros. box-office revenue rather than Warner corporate revenue)
1643825683742.png


Film industry expert!
 
So Bob is complaining about Nazis being everywhere and we have to stop them now, but Whoopi says that the Holocaust wasn't racist because it was white people killing white people and--oh gee, look at the time, gotta go, remember, Republicans are the real Nazis byeeeeeeeeee

Christ, Bob, would it kill you to have even an iota of standards?

Really, the simplest way to blow these dimwits' arguments about George and lore out of the water is to point out that Star Wars began at episode 4. He had a whole story leading up to what would become the Original Trilogy, but he didn't think special effects in the 70s were good enough to live up to his vision, so he started later in the story and planned to circle back later.

Furthermore, Star Wars is Lucas's baby. To imply that he only cared about doing the absolute bare minimum to get the movies done when he spent years coming up with the world and backstory while writing the original screenplay is retardation of the highest order. Maybe he didn't go as in-depth as Tolkien did, but let's face it, it'd be a rare sight to see anyone come close to the worldbuilding of Tolkien. That doesn't mean that Lucas didn't do a hell of a lot on his own, and he remained a guiding hand for the overall story as it branched out into the EU.

In short, once again, Bob is absolutely fucking terrible at his "job."
The man wrote a goddamn book working this out! Fucking hell Bob
 
  • Like
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Bob in that group of tweets sets up what he sees as a false fan viewed dichotomy between the Filoni Star Wars TV shows and the Kennedy/Abrams films. Except there's two problems with this. Filoni has history in Star Wars that dates back to the Lucas regime, where he worked with Lucas and with his approval and oversight, something which applies to none of the Disney regime filmmakers. Also, the nature of producing TV shows requires you to plot out the story before you actually produce the episodes, something that Filoni already has years of experience doing to an extensive level on The Clone Wars/Rebels/etc. And while fitting this into the original EU which no longer exists as a burden on the Disney regime. All of which makes him trustworthy to the fans.

As for the films, it's pretty blatantly obvious that literally nobody involved at the highest levels, aka Kennedy/Abrams/Johnson as Bob labels them, cared at all about even the film trilogy itself, let alone its place within the franchise going forward. Abrams rejected everything that happened in prior Star Wars to reset things to the original Episode IV status. Johnson spent most of his movie on how irrelevant and boring he found everything Abrams setup. Then Abrams returned to ignore everything Johnson did to mash up some weird Palpatine fanfic he probably found on the internet with a bunch of ironic Star Wars memes he took seriously. Meanwhile the rest of this regime has promoted things like Solo and Chuck Wendig's books as major pieces while telling Favreau and Filoni to "oh yeah, make us some streaming TV shit" (hands off like they have with video games, once a proud Lucasarts bastion) that they ignored as backwaters and irrelevant to their grander film designs until it wound up that it was the only Star Wars media being produced that the fans of all stripes seem to actually care about. All while the Disney executives Bob champions spin their wheels trying to figure out how to return one of the biggest film franchises in history back to film despite having the MCU happening elsewhere within the company.
 
World Wildlife Fund is evil: they were founded by imperialists and true-and-honest eugenicists, and now, scandalously, they even raise funds through NFT!
View attachment 2945045
It is so cute that Bobby blames environmentalism based on things that happened 30 years ago, when he refused to feel shame for what he said about the "Trump vaccine" 2 years back.
Anyone else think Bobby emphasized "capital-E Eugenicists" as a bad thing in an attempt to deflect from his own eugenicist tendencies? That screencap continues to haunt him despite how frequently he tries to hide behind "it was just a joke" and "it was out of context" and "you're not a person" cope.
Bob in that group of tweets sets up what he sees as a false fan viewed dichotomy between the Filoni Star Wars TV shows and the Kennedy/Abrams films. Except there's two problems with this. Filoni has history in Star Wars that dates back to the Lucas regime, where he worked with Lucas and with his approval and oversight, something which applies to none of the Disney regime filmmakers. Also, the nature of producing TV shows requires you to plot out the story before you actually produce the episodes, something that Filoni already has years of experience doing to an extensive level on The Clone Wars/Rebels/etc. And while fitting this into the original EU which no longer exists as a burden on the Disney regime. All of which makes him trustworthy to the fans.

As for the films, it's pretty blatantly obvious that literally nobody involved at the highest levels, aka Kennedy/Abrams/Johnson as Bob labels them, cared at all about even the film trilogy itself, let alone its place within the franchise going forward. Abrams rejected everything that happened in prior Star Wars to reset things to the original Episode IV status. Johnson spent most of his movie on how irrelevant and boring he found everything Abrams setup. Then Abrams returned to ignore everything Johnson did to mash up some weird Palpatine fanfic he probably found on the internet with a bunch of ironic Star Wars memes he took seriously. Meanwhile the rest of this regime has promoted things like Solo and Chuck Wendig's books as major pieces while telling Favreau and Filoni to "oh yeah, make us some streaming TV shit" (hands off like they have with video games, once a proud Lucasarts bastion) that they ignored as backwaters and irrelevant to their grander film designs until it wound up that it was the only Star Wars media being produced that the fans of all stripes seem to actually care about. All while the Disney executives Bob champions spin their wheels trying to figure out how to return one of the biggest film franchises in history back to film despite having the MCU happening elsewhere within the company.
Well, Furloni is a hack of a different stripe. Whereas Abrams is an "I can just throw in a bunch of flashy effects and mystery boxes and that will make up for my lack of a story" hack, and Johnson is a "fuck everything, I'm gonna sUbVerT eXpEctAtiOnS" hack, Furloni is a "fuck consistency, I'm gonna throw in whatever I think is cool, especially my OC donut steels who are actually the bestest characters ever" hack. He's a bad fanfiction writer that never got his bad writing habits beaten out of him, and the only reason he has the position he does is because Lucas couldn't find anyone else to take the reins from him.

And yet, the fact that this wolfaboo is still the least-bad option of the three (though not by much, honestly) says a lot about the state of Disney Wars.
 
Cawthorn literally says in the pictures Bob posted, that it was a strange contrast that people were having a good time "where only 79 years ago a supreme evil shared laughs and good times with his compatriots". Clearly Cawthorn wasn't going there as some pilgrimage to a dictator, but even with as little faith as I have in Bob's intelligence, I don't actually believe that he truly thinks Cawthorn did it for that reason. But any reason to dunk on his enemies is a good enough reason for Bloberto to lie.
I visited Eagle's Nest once many years ago and it's a popular tourist destination. It was a government retreat for the Nazis, sure, but Hitler only visited there a dozen times or so. It was hardly his 'house'.

Of all the places for someone to visit in order to dog whistle their neonazism or whatever the fuck Bob's implying, Eagle's Nest is probably the worst, simply because so many American GIs knocked off pieces of marble out of the fireplace as souvenirs and left graffiti behind. And remember: Eagle's Nest was a GOVERNMENT retreat spot. It was never meant to be a place for average people to visit, especially Americans, and DEFINITELY not American politicians. I'd like to think that visiting there as an American politician is one more twist of the knife in Adolf's old corpse and a minor celebration of our victory in addition to being an opportunity to reflect on history. I would think the guy who got apoplectic over boomers milling around the capitol building on January 6th could appreciate the message shown by an American senator enjoying a resort location that the Nazis had meant to stay exclusive, but I guess understanding the irony of that is too much to ask from the Blob.
 
Moviebob is actually right here, even if it's only because he searched for anything about NFT's and sperged at any big organisation that released some.

The Sierra Club (yes, that one) was founded by a literal eugenicist and until the 90's, when climate change became a bigger worry, lots of environmentalist arguments were based off "overpopulation" and the fear that the West would be outbred by China and Africa. There's a reason lots of US foreign aid in Africa had (and still has - go read Target Africa by Obianuju Ekeocha) something to do with promoting contraception and abortion, and why lots of the anti-American movements in the Third World, such as liberation theology in South America or Islamism in the Middle East, have something to do with religions that oppose contraception.
 
Anyone else think Bobby emphasized "capital-E Eugenicists" as a bad thing in an attempt to deflect from his own eugenicist tendencies? That screencap continues to haunt him despite how frequently he tries to hide behind "it was just a joke" and "it was out of context" and "you're not a person" cope.
Bob thinks he's not a capital-E Eugenicist because he only associates it with the Nazis and thus racial eugenics something he knows enough to not proclaim except against white people he perceives as lower class then himself. The fact that he openly describes his views regularly as documented in this thread and that they are a warped and even less scientific version of the original eugenics that were not concerned about race specifically (even if many of them were abjectly racist even for the time) never enters his mind because he's very determined to not learn anything ever.

The Sierra Club (yes, that one) was founded by a literal eugenicist and until the 90's, when climate change became a bigger worry, lots of environmentalist arguments were based off "overpopulation" and the fear that the West would be outbred by China and Africa.
Overpopulation was a wonderful episode even though Malthusian concerns have never happened and even Malthus himself wasn't sure that they would, the environmentalists went wholeheartedly into it as PROVEN SCIENCE in the late 1960s. The Population Bomb being the most famous (though it was one of only a few of these) for declaring that the 1970s would see hundreds of millions die from starvation among other things like war due to the effects. None of them predicted the Green Revolution. Most of the writers, including Elrich adamantly to this day, contend they were actually right because people continued to die even if not directly from starvation and also that they will in the future from the climate crisis so it was all pointless to feed them in the end. Elrich notably thought India would cease to exist from starvation in the 1980s as creating enough food to feed it was considered impossible. The degrowthers basically never change their predictions except for the date it will happen and what will cause the massacres and collapse, they just know that the only way to stop it is to roll back civilization and industrialization. (At least the for the darkies anyway.)
 
Last edited:
Really, the simplest way to blow these dimwits' arguments about George and lore out of the water is to point out that Star Wars began at episode 4. He had a whole story leading up to what would become the Original Trilogy, but he didn't think special effects in the 70s were good enough to live up to his vision, so he started later in the story and planned to circle back later.

FWIW, there's ample evidence that Lucas retconned his own history here, with the idea for a prequel trilogy not really forming until later during the creation of Star Wars, and him not really having any idea what the plot of it would be beyond "where Darth Vader came from" (with "Vader is Luke's father" not really coming up until they were brainstorming for Empire) for years and years.
 
How does anyone, 11-19 years after airing (depending on if you count the original series or brotherhood), still not know about that girl and her dog being inseparable? Even non basement dwellers get the joke. And to what end? So moviebob of all people can give you asspats on twitter?
I get it, not everyone can know a piece of media, even with all the memes out there. But I highly doubt Bob even knew what happened in that episode and decided to just pretend to try and get some good boy points.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Bob in that group of tweets sets up what he sees as a false fan viewed dichotomy between the Filoni Star Wars TV shows and the Kennedy/Abrams films. Except there's two problems with this. Filoni has history in Star Wars that dates back to the Lucas regime, where he worked with Lucas and with his approval and oversight, something which applies to none of the Disney regime filmmakers. Also, the nature of producing TV shows requires you to plot out the story before you actually produce the episodes, something that Filoni already has years of experience doing to an extensive level on The Clone Wars/Rebels/etc. And while fitting this into the original EU which no longer exists as a burden on the Disney regime. All of which makes him trustworthy to the fans.
Haha no he doesn't. It's just Star Wars fans will eat literal shit and cry to themselves it's good.

Dave doesn't care about any of that; Lucas openly told him to kill Ahsoka and a variety of other things he refused to fucking do because he can't even meet JK Rowling's low bar of nutting up and killing characters when their arc has ended or if their death would give more meaning to the other characters than their survival. He also ignored and forced his own favorite faction of Mandos, the Death Watch over George's hippy version of them, despite George being pretty clear on that. Dave never gave a shit and just wanted to write his own fanfics. People like to conveniently forget early streams where he got called out on things like this. His response was to pull a MovieBob and waddle away from the stream.

If you sit down and actually pay attention to his shows he runs himself; you can see he mostly writes things that he wants to happen and uses the same basic plot. If characters need to win, they will win no questions asked and ignoring their opponents strengths over them. If they need to lose, they will lose no matter what even if it makes no sense they should. This is how Ahsoka can yeet Maul, but lose to random pirates in the same period of time. Dave doesn't plan shit; that's why Resistance sucked balls and Bad Batch is mediocre. He just sells his ass up because he usually has other people like Favreau bailing him out to a degree.

He can only write fetch quests and cameos. Seriously; look at his newest string of cartoons. All of them involve children who need to get a thing and take it to a thing so they can get a thing and deal with his other OCs in the fracas. There's a reason even George admitted that Dave's fanfic of Star Wars was its own canon before he sold it, and there's a reason he keeps pushing to have his OCs make it live, which is what he did recently to prove George and the haters who use C-Canon against him.

Dave is a bad fanfic writer who only cares about his OCs. He condoned and approved of all of Kennedy's decisions, since it gave him the capital to write his character out of death and on her way to becoming the female force itself. He supported and cheered all of the decisions Kennedy made, because it fucked over rivals he may have had or because it had nothing to do with his small cast of OCs he only cares about.

He's not called out mainly due to a mixture of astroturfing by corporate, and the fact Star Wars fans are stupid consoomers like Bob who will hatewatch stuff, cry it sucks, but then watch more. Or sit there and grimace for 80% of the run time, but cheer because a single good thing happened and they need to make an excuse for it.

Sorry for the essay, but I lost any respect for Dave when he invented Time Travel as a deus ex machina to save his favorite jailbait character.
As for the films, it's pretty blatantly obvious that literally nobody involved at the highest levels, aka Kennedy/Abrams/Johnson as Bob labels them, cared at all about even the film trilogy itself, let alone its place within the franchise going forward. Abrams rejected everything that happened in prior Star Wars to reset things to the original Episode IV status. Johnson spent most of his movie on how irrelevant and boring he found everything Abrams setup. Then Abrams returned to ignore everything Johnson did to mash up some weird Palpatine fanfic he probably found on the internet with a bunch of ironic Star Wars memes he took seriously. Meanwhile the rest of this regime has promoted things like Solo and Chuck Wendig's books as major pieces while telling Favreau and Filoni to "oh yeah, make us some streaming TV shit" (hands off like they have with video games, once a proud Lucasarts bastion) that they ignored as backwaters and irrelevant to their grander film designs until it wound up that it was the only Star Wars media being produced that the fans of all stripes seem to actually care about. All while the Disney executives Bob champions spin their wheels trying to figure out how to return one of the biggest film franchises in history back to film despite having the MCU happening elsewhere within the company.
This segment's pretty accurate, but you actually need to add in that Kathy had a bad habit of poorly managing films. She'd pick directors who'd try to make their own thing, get a decent way in, and then she'd fire them or force them to rewrite shit since she can't manage worth a shit.
 
Last edited:
FWIW, there's ample evidence that Lucas retconned his own history here, with the idea for a prequel trilogy not really forming until later during the creation of Star Wars, and him not really having any idea what the plot of it would be beyond "where Darth Vader came from" (with "Vader is Luke's father" not really coming up until they were brainstorming for Empire) for years and years.

It's also worth mentioning that the 1977 release of Star Wars did not have "Episode IV" or "A New Hope" in the title crawl.

Bob is still fat and stupid.
 
Oh and I should also mention the only reason Dave got remotely where he was pre-buyout was George was desperate to find an heir of sorts; none of his adopted children had a lot of interest in taking the company from him or working on his titles with him. That's where some of the weirder episodes from Season 3 came from, since that was George asking his kids and others to try and write their own episode. Dave was literally the last choice.

Much to his rage I bet.
 
The essay was fine! I have no strong feelings about Filoni's work or the recent TV shows which I have not watched anyway. I was more interested to pointing to why Filoni gets more of a pass than the filmmakers have. I know some of it is simply because he has more of Lucas' blessing (even if solely by implication) than Abrams ever got. Lucas sorta went out of his way to express his displeasure in the latter case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back