Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
"He's [also] not a Good Person, does that clear it up?"
NO, Bob. NO, IT FUCKING DOESN'T. Can't have your cake and eat it too, Bob, no matter how hard you try.
Elon Musk is exactly the kind of person Bob wanted. Some insanely wealthy tech magnate who will fund cool space travel and bring closer Bob's fantasy expectations of the future.

Damn thing is its a pesky white man who went on Joe Rogan and other things Bob doesn't like rather than a sexy ethnic woman super genius in her 20s like in the comics books foretold the saviour would be.
 
I want him to make it to see it and then the movie is a horrendous sodomization of the Mario name. We're talking Netflix live anime adaptation level. Then he spends weeks grappling with how all the "smart" "righteous" people in Hollywood could "betray" him like this. Then he can die.
Oh no, because he wants that. He wants it to be bad, because then it would prove that he was right and Hollywood should have gone with his live action version.

Something that spits on Mario would be funny, but I want it to be good. I want it to be successful. I want it to get fifty fucking sequels... Because that would make him cry harder because not only is he pissed off that it's an animated film, but Chris Pratt as Mario is also pissing him off because Pratt is a filthy Believer.
"He's [also] not a Good Person, does that clear it up?"
NO, Bob. NO, IT FUCKING DOESN'T. Can't have your cake and eat it too, Bob, no matter how hard you try.
"You just don't understand that you're wrong because you're too dumb to understand how amazingly I wrote that tweet!"

Also, Bob can't have his cake because he already ate it.
Man who can't properly work a greenscreen tells you about technology.
If that's what he considers a professional standard, how fucking lazy do you have to be for him to name you an amateur?
 
Oh no, because he wants that. He wants it to be bad, because then it would prove that he was right and Hollywood should have gone with his live action version.

Something that spits on Mario would be funny, but I want it to be good. I want it to be successful. I want it to get fifty fucking sequels... Because that would make him cry harder because not only is he pissed off that it's an animated film, but Chris Pratt as Mario is also pissing him off because Pratt is a filthy Believer.
Honestly, I don't think there's any way they could make the Mario movie that Bobbo wouldn't find problems with. Obviously if it were a typical Illumination production with cheap animation, he'd complain about that. And we already know how much he hates Chris Pratt voicing Mario; he wouldn't be my first choice either, but then again I think a Mario movie is a stupid idea no matter who's in the cast because you're adapting a video game with little story beyond "Peach got kidnapped, Mario beats Bowser." But supposing it actually had a decent budget and top animation quality, if it faithfully adapted the video game lore, sparse as it is, he'd have a problem with that since he still has this autistic fixation on Mario being from Brooklyn.

But even if it was made to his exacting specifications, the live-action epic he's been dreaming of since the 90s that includes his cringetastic "it's a Brooklyn thing" line, and even if every ticket to the Mario movie came with an average-size popcorn tub and a free blowjob from a Princess Peach cosplayer, he'd bitch about the popcorn not having enough imitation butter and the costume not being accurate.

Watch, though: a year from now, when it finally comes out, he might just give it a positive review solely because it's Mario and not because it's actually a decent movie, and he couldn't bear to give his beloved totem a negative score. If he does, know that behind those comically-oversized sunglasses, he's seething.
 
Not really MovieBob-related but Miyamoto apparently referring to Chris Pratt as "Chris-san" in light of the fake Miyamoto Chris-chan trolling is...amusing.
My theory is Clyde Cash dug out his old Miyamoto trollsona and helmed the Mario movie as a way to troll Moviebob. The Private Villa of Corrupted Citizens is his production company.
 
My theory is Clyde Cash dug out his old Miyamoto trollsona and helmed the Mario movie as a way to troll Moviebob. The Private Villa of Corrupted Citizens is his production company.
Miyamoto himself wanted Chris Pratt. Miyamoto does not need other folks to troll for him as he obviously knows how to do it himself. When will all these twitter weirdos that are obbessed with Nintendo IPs realise Nintendo hates them.

Lets be honest Nintendo hates anyone that lives outside of Japan and for good fucking reasons and I am OK with that just as long as they keep making Kirby games.
 
Chris thought you were a toad.



Jason X.


Chris talks about Moonknight.


1.png
 
Chris thought you were a toad.

View attachment 3218795

Jason X.
View attachment 3218798

Chris talks about Moonknight.
View attachment 3218801

View attachment 3218804
He looks like a homeless druggie. Lesser brother is degrading faster than Bob is at this point.
Bob's trying to explain technology again:
View attachment 3218465
Here's how Twitter's algorithm works, but for dummies.
  1. You log into Twitter.
  2. You search for something/tweet something/like a Tweet/retweet something/follow someone
  3. This information is sent to The Algorithm (TM)
  4. The Algorithm (TM) immediately searches Twitter for results related to what you positively interacted with, typically by searching tweet keywords, profile bios, trending topics, etc.
  5. Those results are then placed in your Twitter feed and your happenings as recommendations for you.
It's much more complicated than that, but for laymen, that's how it works. This is how the mentally ill are able to build colossal virtual hugboxes on Twitter in a relatively short amount of time.
Bob, you're not winning the way you think you are. When dealing with people with a persecution complex, the last thing you want to do is confirm that someone is persecuting them. When a MAGA ghoul says "The Algorithm is persecuting me," you should not say "No, it's not The Algorithm, it's the people behind it." If you're wrong, the right will call for The Algorithm to be changed. And if you are right, then the right will call for Musk to purge Twitter of the dangerhairs. But either way, you have confirmed their persecution complex.
 
Bob's trying to explain technology again:
View attachment 3218465

Bob is kinda right here in that AI is a puppetshow, a bag of tricks rather than a program that can "think" it's way through complex tasks. Lex Fridman, one of the top AI researchers in the world, has said as much.

But an algorithm can do what the person described, shuffle through posts and look for keywords/context in order to suppress certain messages and elevate other.

So in the final analysis Bob is once again ultimately wrong.

He looks like a homeless druggie. Lesser brother is degrading faster than Bob is at this point.

Here's how Twitter's algorithm works, but for dummies.
  1. You log into Twitter.
  2. You search for something/tweet something/like a Tweet/retweet something/follow someone
  3. This information is sent to The Algorithm (TM)
  4. The Algorithm (TM) immediately searches Twitter for results related to what you positively interacted with, typically by searching tweet keywords, profile bios, trending topics, etc.
  5. Those results are then placed in your Twitter feed and your happenings as recommendations for you.
It's much more complicated than that, but for laymen, that's how it works. This is how the mentally ill are able to build colossal virtual hugboxes on Twitter in a relatively short amount of time.
Bob, you're not winning the way you think you are. When dealing with people with a persecution complex, the last thing you want to do is confirm that someone is persecuting them. When a MAGA ghoul says "The Algorithm is persecuting me," you should not say "No, it's not The Algorithm, it's the people behind it." If you're wrong, the right will call for The Algorithm to be changed. And if you are right, then the right will call for Musk to purge Twitter of the dangerhairs. But either way, you have confirmed their persecution complex.

If persecution is confirmed, it hardly counts as a complex.
 
Bob's trying to explain technology again:
View attachment 3218465
Whoever claimed that Big Data (or neural networks, or whatever) works automatically with no human input? Indeed SJWs have been raging about how systems such as face recognition are biased thanks to the "implicit racism" of their coders.
alg.png


Twitter's algorithm supposedly favors right-leaning accounts.
alg2.png
Like presumably 99.9% of people, I don't understand the paper or how Twitter's algorithm works, but then I bet 99.9% of people can't explain how Tylenol stops fever either -- yet people DON'T infer from that fact to the conclusion that drug labelling is superfluous or pointless.

Evidence that the CIA have failed their job: at least one MAGA scum is breathing.
cia.png

The 80s were the most "agenda saturated" era of cartoon.
agenda.png
You are 41 Bobby. Most people your age have long stopped caring about cartoons and hip-hop, even if they pretend to be cultural critics.
 
This is his response. Totally deranged.
Miyamoto.png
You know, if I didn't know who Shigeru Miyamoto was and saw Bob's tweet without context, I think I'd assume the Miyamoto was a revolutionary with a cult of personality who'd taken over some small island nation near the Philippines.
I'm no expert folklorist but as far as I can tell there's no part of that large tweet that Bob got right:

If you spell it "Yōkai" instead of "Youkai" you should probably at least attempt the macron over the O. (To hell with typing macrons, I'll use the alternate spelling.) Then again, maybe I'm just being a diacritic purist on this one.

Youkai aren't poltergeists. For one thing, a lot of them have physical bodies. Two random examples:
1) A kitsune is literally just a fox. Foxes in Japanese folklore have paranormal abilities and extremely long lives, the foxes you see are generally young ones who haven't come into most of their power yet.
2) Western vampires are sort of youkai: the Japanese term for them (not counting the transliterated English word) translates as "Blood-sucking oni" and oni are youkai. Not surprisingly I've seen the word used to mean "supernatural being", a two-syllable word that makes an elegant shorthand without the baggage of English words like "spooks" or "monsters".
Conversely, poltergeists are one specific kind of paranormal manifestation. Bob's pointing to anything with wheels on a highway and calling it a pickup truck.

Also, poltergeists don't need to be the ghosts of people. Hell's sake, some paranormal types figure they're not ghosts at all, they're uncontrolled telekinetic potential from one of the living members of the house. (If I recall correctly this angle was taken due to the number of poltergeist hauntings that had a pubescent teenager in residence, the implication being that the kids are inadvertently pulling a Carrie.)

I'm not sure there's even any Japanese equivalent to the poltergeist, not that equivalencies are easy at the best of times. For example, you could sort of make the argument that the Scottish brownie and the Japanese tsukumogami occupy the same "ecological niche" of a household spirit that can help or play pranks - or, if abused, turn downright malicious - and are therefore similar but the two creatures are so wildly different otherwise that there's no ground for comparison otherwise.

"Poltergeists" isn't a proper name. Neither is "animistic". They get lowercase letters.

Oh, and while Shinto is animistic and that does carry over to other elements of the culture, I wouldn't suggest telling a Buddhist that their "spiritual system" is animistic, capital A or not.
 
Bob's trying to explain technology again:
View attachment 3218465
These couple of posts are so incredibly dense in stupidity. For one the types of AI that moderate Twitter and produce a story are completely different, all ai are not the same. Two, the implication that ai is just smoke and mirrors because a human has to be involved is just dumb. That'd be like saying the entire industrial revolution is just smoke and mirrors because you humans were still involved. It's outright nonsensical.

And he's so smug over his ignorance, fuck this cunt.

Whoever claimed that Big Data (or neural networks, or whatever) works automatically with no human input? Indeed SJWs have been raging about how systems such as face recognition are biased thanks to the "implicit racism" of their coders.
View attachment 3218834

Twitter's algorithm supposedly favors right-leaning accounts.
View attachment 3218845
Like presumably 99.9% of people, I don't understand the paper or how Twitter's algorithm works, but then I bet 99.9% of people can't explain how Tylenol stops fever either -- yet people DON'T infer from that fact to the conclusion that drug labelling is superfluous or pointless.

Evidence that the CIA have failed their job: at least one MAGA scum is breathing.
View attachment 3218828

The 80s were the most "agenda saturated" era of cartoon.
View attachment 3218859
You are 41 Bobby. Most people your age have long stopped caring about cartoons and hip-hop, even if they pretend to be cultural critics.
And then he fucking doubles down. What the fuck does he mean the algorithms don't make final desicions? Does he think the yt copyright content ID system just shits out recommendations to a farm of a billion pajeets that sit around 24/7 automatically hitting the ban button?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back