Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm an elitist too, and in any actual "fascist" state, or even Plato's Republic - an overweight, uneducated 30-year old man who talks about console wars on the internet would be declared untermensch and cordoned off from civilized society, as would 90% of the "gamer" subculture.
 
He is really just a horrifically ignorant pseudo-intellectual hypocrite.

"This is a new paradigm!" Sure, because there's never been non-factual propaganda delivered to naive audiences, ever, in human history.

"They(meaning we) are not Helen Lovejoy!" Yes, you are, Bob, you really are -- you simply have a different justification for your Puritanical urges.

"The inheritor to Jack Thompson is Jeff Sessions!" I dunno, Bob, the last high profile politician I remember taking a virulent anti-vidya stance was the Dowager Banshee of Chappaqua, for whom you enthusiastically voted.

Who decides who these "smart" people who can step in and shut down a democratically elected senate? And what kind of "smart" people, Stephen hawking and Neil degrasse tyson smart, or law smart, the point is, what bob wants is some thing that could easily backfire and something that is beyond the will of the people ie closer to facsim then democracy

The sort of governance Bob craves requires a dictator, whether you call it an Enlightened Council of Elders or a Fuhrer. What he doesn't seem to grasp (or maybe want to admit) is that sooner or later it requires a butcher.
 
Ah yes, it wouldn't be Bob floundering in an argument without him invoking Godwin's Law. Truly, he's smarter than the rest of us. Also, better people than Bob have tried the benevolent dictatorship route, but had things such as "popular support" and "concrete, well-thought out ideas". In other words, Ataturk, he is not.

Falafel Fataturk.
 
I'm sure this has been said before but even for someone looking to kick up controversy he fails at that. That should be a media personality's last option and he can't even round up anyone except us to care.
I think the thing is with Bob is that he can't handle being irrelevant. He gets defensive when you question his lack of success, he frequently trash-talks bigger YouTubers and acts like he's better than them and for all his talk about "The Superior Future", he's remarkably hesitant to embrace New Media, refusing to believe that younger, much more charismatic people stole a tastemaker position he never really had.
 
One of the funniest things about deciding who the "smart" people are that get to vote is that something as simple as a literacy test would cut out huge parts of the "diversity" that Bob and co champion.

The main reason Bob goes so hard against JonTron or Pewdiepie or any other YouTuber outside of his general ideology is because he is still buddy buddy with video game journalists. Video game journalists go hard against any small "wrong" a video game YouTuber because they are making the journalists obsolete. I remember once when Bob was going on some rant about Total Biscuit he even said something to the effect of, "He is putting my great and talented friends out of a job."
 
One of the funniest things about deciding who the "smart" people are that get to vote is that something as simple as a literacy test would cut out huge parts of the "diversity" that Bob and co champion.

The main reason Bob goes so hard against JonTron or Pewdiepie or any other YouTuber outside of his general ideology is because he is still buddy buddy with video game journalists.

I seem to remember this is why people think video game "journalists" are fucking corrupt garbage and SHOULD be put out of a job.
 
66GkWyE.png
Didn't someone JUST SAY Bob thinks Deliverance was a real thing? And he decides to actually prove them right via this?

Go see a doctor. The diabetes is melting your brain. Get help.
 
The sort of governance Bob craves requires a dictator, whether you call it an Enlightened Council of Elders or a Fuhrer. What he doesn't seem to grasp (or maybe want to admit) is that sooner or later it requires a butcher.

Well, this is the same guy who suggested that the European union should use military force to prevent brexit, not to mention his infamous "no bad tactics, only bad targets" tweet. I doubt he'd lose much sleep over a "superior " government brazenly using violence and underhanded tactics so long as it's done against the right people.

It seems like he would prefer a dictatorship, but doesn't want to outright say it because of the negative connotations. He's getting pretty damn close with these rants about replacing democracy though.
 
Who decides who these "smart" people who can step in and shut down a democratically elected senate?

Bob without likely ever reading Plato wants some kind of weird Philosopher King class which rules with absolute authority because they're smarter. But Bob's idea of intelligence is someone who he thinks will fire all American farmers and replace them with Chinese robots.

His frame of reference for intelligence and progressivism has absolutely no basis in reality. His ideal government, like his superior future, is a pipe dream which begins and ends with his own diabetes-addled brain.
 
He is really just a horrifically ignorant pseudo-intellectual hypocrite.

"This is a new paradigm!" Sure, because there's never been non-factual propaganda delivered to naive audiences, ever, in human history.

"They(meaning we) are not Helen Lovejoy!" Yes, you are, Bob, you really are -- you simply have a different justification for your Puritanical urges.

"The inheritor to Jack Thompson is Jeff Sessions!" I dunno, Bob, the last high profile politician I remember taking a virulent anti-vidya stance was the Dowager Banshee of Chappaqua, for whom you enthusiastically voted.



The sort of governance Bob craves requires a dictator, whether you call it an Enlightened Council of Elders or a Fuhrer. What he doesn't seem to grasp (or maybe want to admit) is that sooner or later it requires a butcher.

Bob is the very definition of Pseudo-intellectual. And would be considered as such with any of his 'ideal' government types come into power. Believe me, Bob would be surpressed and silenced by any of his 'smart people only' governments. Because he doesn't have the education, job or experience to result in the advancement of society.

The problem is that his idea of rulership is one of a technocratic dictatorship or an oligarchy and he is too fucking stupid to recognize this. He's also too incompetent to realize that people aren't just going to accept stripping them of power and go 'gee, while I guess these people know best! I better just let them do it'. He thinks that by disenfranchising some people they're just going to take it and not react at all. They'll react: by killing his stupid fat ass. Its going to cause a vast amount of violence and death, especially if he thinks that taking power away from rural Americans will work. Many of those 'rural Americans' are pretty willing to fight, not to mention have way more arms and ammunition that pseudo-intellectual retards like Bob and ANTIFA. Guess who will fight harder, some half-assed pseduo intellectuals who think they will make a utopia or people fighting for their basic rights as people, who will inevitably be suppressed and persecuted by this new form of government? Hmm. Not to mention just because scientists are smart doesn't meant hey would govern well. Scientists have stayed far away from government for a reason. Good governance is an understanding of human nature, people's needs, empathy and a whole host of other skills which scientists and technocrats just do not have. Look at Soylent, its what happens when technocrats try to create the ultimate food thinking they know better. It kills off all your guy bacteria, is rife with heavy metal toxins, and tastes like shit.

Not to mention a lot of those rural Americans are in police forces, military and local governments. And a lot of them also occupy places in solid blue states, some up to 30-40%. His ideal government would be dead before its founding. It would require purges and violent suppression and more likely than not would involve a very bloody and violent civil war in which the technocrats would inevitably lose. Bob also doesn't realize technocratic governments are inherently fascist by their very nature. The government would be working with the means of production, ensuring certain benefits to certain industries, and would generally be capitalistic. Communism wouldn't result, because you naturally need smarter people over others, so there would be a clear hierarchy who would have different rights and privileges than others, especially over the working class who Bob despises. Nor would it result in a socialist utopia either, because people would need to be suppressed on the basis of their ideas and deprived of natural rights, typically the lowest rungs of society which Socialisim strives to protect.

Bob is a dumb fucking cunt who is too retarded to realize what he's actually advocating for is a fascist form of government. He's also too stupid to realize that a lot of rural Americans voted Trump because they had no other choice. Clinton wasn't going to fight for them, she didn't give a shit about them. So the Democrats forced their hand, even if they didn't like Trump. They were a people striving to be heard, by any means necessary. They are desperate and ignored, committing suicide and turning to drug addiction in droves. And YOU think silencing, suppressing them and giving them a cause to unite against is going to work out well for you? Yeah, good fucking luck with that buddy.
 
Bob and his ilk are all pathetic, doughy snobs with pasty skin and no force behind their aggressive shoving.

The idea that any of these people could legitimately advocate for violent means to take over without realizing that they'd have to be the one's fighting just goes to show the dissonance between the people and their ideas. Their riots barely consist of breaking windows, cars, and setting fires for the span of a couple of hours before it peters out, and they think this is enough show of force to the government with access to the country's military?

And even then, in an alternate reality where they get their society, who among them will hold the power? They all follow each other with no definitive leaders, who is gonna be the one capable of standing up when these people can find ways to tear anybody down for the most bullshit reasons?

"Anita Sarkeesian will lead us!"
"No she has privilege of being a speaker with press coverage! Let No-Legs Gerome lead!"
"No! He's a male! Males shouldn't be leaders in this new society, they all have more privilege than women! Let Laci Green lead!"
"No! Trans people have never had a position of power! Let Brianna Wu lead!"

Etcetera and etcetera.

And surely, they must realize, even if they were to get this far, that the violent system they used to usurp would also be used to single out as many of their own ranks as possible. Whoever had the power would surely, predictably use it to further weed out the undesirables in society, ally or not.

These people don't realize that all their ideals would lead them all to literally eat each other.


Then again, Bob might be ok the idea of more eating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back