Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Weimar Republic was a mess, no other way you can phrase that. The poltical system was a nightmare, the economy for the a long time was also a mess and it didn't had much support from the population.
49929525ae8cc7a612d9f96d1d4d333183964f27d21e2ca4eb7e6d1b585336e3.png
 
Last edited:
Queer-anarcho-socialist-pagan communes! How progressive! Surely they were the peak of human civilisation until the Nazis showed up with their science and industry and Hugo Boss uniforms and ruined LITERALLY EVERYTHING.

Kind of remind me of Antifa. I'm sure they get into plenty of circle-jerks after committing crimes.
 
Do we even know how good of a student he was? He clearly doesn't have the intellect/charisma necessary of a Galt/Roark type, but he might have been decent enough in school. All in all I'm reminded of a quote from Free Fire: "He was misdiagnosed as a child genius and never got over it."

According to his book, which I have had he unfortunate experience of reading in it's entirety, his grades were similar to Bart Simpson, who notoriously had bad grades on the show. However, knowing Bob, this could just be him trying to make himself sound more like a character he admires.
But if he is to be believed, he was a moron in school.
 

Does he know that Weimar Germany was pre WW2 or did he mistype. Either way he's wrong.

After WW1, Britain gave women the right to vote, owing to the massive help women were in keeping the factories running.

After WW2, the US funded welfare states in Europe in order to stave off communism. Furthermore, in 1946 not only did Attlee's Labour Party defeat Churchill. they also set up the National Health Service in the UK, arguably one of the most 'progressive' sorts of health service in the entire world at the time.
 
I also love how he insists fascism started as a way to control or dampen progress.

Fascist governments achieved some of the greatest scientific and social achievements of the 20th century. Largely through unethical means, mind you, but that should say something about Bob's "Progress At Any Cost" ethos.

No, they didn't. Nations FIGHTING fascism made enormous technological and social progress before, during, and after World War 2, but the number of major achievements by Axis nations is rather small. American Robert Goddard launched the first liquid-fuelled rocket in 1926, the UK had jet fighters operational at the same time as Nazi Germany, Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin in the UK, and the United States detonated an atom bomb while the German programme was stymied by a mistrust of "Jewish physics" which led to many top scientists fleeing across the Atlantic.

The Germans came up with some good ideas, like assault rifles, motorways, and jerry cans, but compared to the Allies their technological achievements are negligible. None of Germany's significant inventions were designed unethically, either. We didn't need the Nazis to tell us that decompressing and freezing people tends to kill them.
 
The republic failed due to complex socio political issues which bob doesnt understand, neither does he grasp the complex motivations of Facism. Most likely his understanding of both of is high school level plus his own conjecture. You may as well ask a child for an opinion on physics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Elim Garak
I'm pro choice but Abortion isnt a pure logic issue it's way more complex than that. God's debatable existence does not change that you are discussing the termination of life. Not in the least because theists and atheists can be found on both sides.

You silly fat bastard bob
 
I'm pro choice but Abortion isnt a pure logic issue it's way more complex than that. God's debatable existence does not change that you are discussing the termination of life. Not in the least because theists and atheists can be found on both sides.

You silly fat bastard bob

It's ridiculous to assert that only religious belief (as Bob so endearingly calls it, "superstition") can lead to a pro-life position. If you believe that the organism inside a pregnant woman is a human life, it follows that life has rights that need to be protected -- and that belief can be supported by the science Bob claims to hold so dear. It's a cliche to say it, but abortion becomes a much more nuanced issue when you have microsurgery being performed on a 4 month old fetus on one floor of a hospital and 5 month old fetus being aborted on another. It's why some pro-choice advocates are doing everything they can to kill sonograms and why pro-life advocates are trying to make them mandatory before a woman can elect to have an abortion: the science shows that the "cluster of cells" comes to look like a human being much, much earlier than we once thought.

It's a difficult issue. I've believed for a long time it's almost impossible to be 100% pro-choice or pro-life, and it's an issue that merits much more intelligent debate than we tend to see.

Naturally Bob makes it as stupidly simplistic as possible. Big words to cover his small, petty ideas.
 
H89pQBL.png

1380697092809.jpg

If SJWs (or Hillary) tomorrow turned around and fully supported pro-choice, this lardass would be right there saying how dumb pro-choice people were. It's not even worth getting mad over, he simply has no thoughts or beliefs of his own. He just parrots what his SocJus overlords command him to do; then mocks religious folk for how dumb they are for following a man in the sky.

:trump: Sad! :trump:
 
Yes Blob, tell us all about how you speak for women because :neckbeard:

Aren't about half of women in America pro-life? I always hate abortion being called a women's issue like it's a unanimous consensus among women and only the dang, dirty patriarchy is what keeps them from having abortions.

The most recent PEW survey says about 52% of American women describe themselves as pro life which means being pro choice isn't even a majority opinion anymore. Which I personally blame on the extremism of the pro choice movement and the Democratic party. There's a big difference between believing that women should get to decide and gleefully cheering about dead babies.
 
Last edited:
I'm pro-choice myself, but note the word there. Choice. As in letting someone decide for themselves if they want to have an abortion. I can respect the opinions of pro-lifers because there is a legit argument to be had about whether life truly begins at conception and if they don't want to have it that's their choice.

Bob once again cannot process gray morality issues so he simplifies them into another stupid Us vs Them argument like he does with anything he dislikes.
 
It's a difficult issue. I've believed for a long time it's almost impossible to be 100% pro-choice or pro-life, and it's an issue that merits much more intelligent debate than we tend to see.
It's an incredibly difficult issue. I'm pro-choice, but it's an issue I constantly find myself grappling with. It's dumb to write off every opponent of abortion as some kind of bible thumping religious fundamentalist especially since there are tons of atheists and agnostics who are pro-life.

It's pretty rich of Bob to say pro-lifers are anti-science when he and his ilk deny that life begins at conception. Hey dummies! Life does begin at conception. That's basic science. The question is not whether life begins at conception, it's whether life at that stage should be put on an equal footing with the mother's. Personally, I say it shouldn't, but I can fully understand someone disagreeing with me.

Morons like Bob, who treat the issue as an open shut case, and loathsome fucks like Lena Dunham who want to have an abortion just hurt the cause. If you want to guarantee total abortion shutdown, just get this Boston-accented windbag to sound off in a public place. Even the mothers in question won't want to abort if it puts them in a camp with MovieBob.
 
It's an incredibly difficult issue. I'm pro-choice, but it's an issue I constantly find myself grappling with. It's dumb to write off every opponent of abortion as some kind of bible thumping religious fundamentalist especially since there are tons of atheists and agnostics who are pro-life.

It's pretty rich of Bob to say pro-lifers are anti-science when he and his ilk deny that life begins at conception. Hey dummies! Life does begin at conception. That's basic science. The question is not whether life begins at conception, it's whether life at that stage should be put on an equal footing with the mother's. Personally, I say it shouldn't, but I can fully understand someone disagreeing with me.

Morons like Bob, who treat the issue as an open shut case, and loathsome fucks like Lena Dunham who want to have an abortion just hurt the cause. If you want to guarantee total abortion shutdown, just get this Boston-accented windbag to sound off in a public place. Even the mothers in question won't want to abort if it puts them in a camp with MovieBob.

Alternatively, the possibility their child might grow up to be MovieBob could goose support for abortion by a good 20-30 points.
 
I'm mostly ambivalent when it comes to abortion (though I do lean slightly pro-life), but I hate it when windbags like Bob claim that any opposition to abortion is just "religious hokum" and that it should be a universal right to be able to kill a fetus at any time (IMO it should be a state-level decision). For all his talk about "science over superstition", Bob's just as much of a science-denier as he proclaims Trump-supporters to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back