- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
Can you imagine if a conservative woman got on Bob's case? I guarantee you he'd go full Loveshy and stay that way for the rest of the year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think that he'd go full violent incel on her, implying or outright stating that she deserves to be raped for her opinions.Can you imagine if a conservative woman got on Bob's case? I guarantee you he'd go full Loveshy and stay that way for the rest of the year.
Can you imagine if a conservative woman got on Bob's case? I guarantee you he'd go full Loveshy and stay that way for the rest of the year.
He'll never move on from Jack Thompson and hating fundies.Also lol @ Bob for hating on "Jesus-Crazed Republicans" like it's still the 2000's. That's not what helped Trump win, MovieBlimp.
He'll take two steps and run out of breath.
It's his whole philosophy."No bad tactics, only bad targets"So its okay to generalise whole groups of people if you don't like them? Really?
Whats really amazing and quite disturbing is that he has people who legit read that sociopathic crap and agree with with it. And that self loathing? As we have established his tastes in food and entertainment are distinctly lower/middle class. Add his skin color and it becomes clear that whenever he talks about Trump voters deep down he's talking about himself.I hate to be a broken record, but I'm eternally amazed that he persists in tweeting stuff that is so horrible that if you substituted literally nearly any ethnic or religious group for "Trump voters" he'd provoke a shitstorm of epic proportions. Geek.com wouldn't be able to dump his carbuncled ass fast enough.
But you know, the more I see, the more I realize he's an intensely bitter person overflowing with self-loathing and Squeezy Cheez.
That's been done, I think with either Jews or blacks. He just waves it off with some typical non-engaged remark like "I have no words." Honestly nothing short of a face to face confrontation would get to him, and who wants to bother?Somebody should tweet at him repurposing his words with an anti-Muslim bent instead.
One of the things I'm disappointed we'll never get is an honest-to-God debate featuring Bob. Bob's too much of a coward to actually engage in meaningful conversation. I'm pretty sure the reason he prefers Twitter is because he has the freedom to back out of any argument when it's clear it's not going his way, something he can't do in a debate.That's been done, I think with either Jews or blacks. He just waves it off with some typical non-engaged remark like "I have no words." Honestly nothing short of a face to face confrontation would get to him, and who wants to bother?
"Democrats are bad at literally everything political (great once they won) except mythmaking."
Oh for fucks sake. He doesn't mean anything because he's a stupid or lying bag of porkfat! Has he really forgotten Obama's campaigns? Say what you will about him (and believe me, I've said plenty bad about Obama), his presidential campaign were nothing short of staggeringly brilliant."Democrats are bad at literally everything political (great once they won) except mythmaking."
What does this mean exactly? Because he contradicts himself in the same sentence. He says Democrats are bad at everything political but are great once they win. If they're bad at everything political, wouldn't that mean that they're bad at the one thing they're designed to do? I really don't get what he's going for when he says that.