Kyria the Great
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
Blue Mary Poppins(y'all) totally beats out Diana.
Though now that I think about it? did Wonder Woman have any memorable dialogue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Blue Mary Poppins(y'all) totally beats out Diana.
Though now that I think about it? did Wonder Woman have any memorable dialogue?
People like Bob see it as a victory for their ideology regardless of whether or not the film actually espouses it. The films success (because unlike FemBusters, the people making it didn't belittle fans of the property) in their eyes justifies said victory.What's so gazemazing about Wonder Woman anyway? It felt like DC trying to do Captain America and not getting it as right.
You're making me disappointed that people didn't go "All men who liked Wonder Woman before are massive faggots. Comes see Wonder Woman in theaters now!". Maybe even Bob would see the flaws in that.People like Bob see it as a victory for their ideology regardless of whether or not the film actually espouses it. The films success (because unlike FemBusters, the people making it didn't belittle fans of the property) in their eyes justifies said victory.
Going back to the first part these people put waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayy too much stock into how art influences culture, and believe that injecting their ideology into art as much as possible will reshape the culture in its image. Because it's not like people are naturally inclined towards certain products irrespective of ideology, and selling based on ideology alone is a surefire way to guarantee your product tanks (again, see Fembusters).
It never ceases to amaze how much of a hate boner Bob has for fps games. He'd rather have a shameless sonic rip off like bubsy over those new dang dirty shooters just because it reminds him of the 90's. Truly the bastion of the superior future.
Here's some rambling about Wonder Woman:
Makes you wonder why he bothers if he hates everything.Bob has a hateboner for anything that came after 1995 in the gaming world. The only exception to this rule is Nintendo, but even that only extends to Mario AFAIK. The only other times he's commented on the other Nintendo franchises is to attack non-Nintendo properties or to white-knight either a Nintendo product or Nintendo itself.
People like Bob see it as a victory for their ideology regardless of whether or not the film actually espouses it. The films success (because unlike FemBusters, the people making it didn't belittle fans of the property) in their eyes justifies said victory.
Going back to the first part these people put waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayy too much stock into how art influences culture, and believe that injecting their ideology into art as much as possible will reshape the culture in its image. Because it's not like people are naturally inclined towards certain products irrespective of ideology, and selling based on ideology alone is a surefire way to guarantee your product tanks (again, see Fembusters).
Bob has a hateboner for anything that came after 1995 in the gaming world. The only exception to this rule is Nintendo, but even that only extends to Mario AFAIK. The only other times he's commented on the other Nintendo franchises is to attack non-Nintendo properties or to white-knight either a Nintendo product or Nintendo itself.
Pretty much the only time he hated Nintendo is that rabbit thing cause of Guns and Prime because of it being first person. As long as gun/first person is not apart of the game he will defend ever single thing they do as he famous did with the fan hated game Other M; which is some what ironic being the fact that the only game I would actually say is any bit sexist but he dose not care about that as it not first person.
People like Bob see it as a victory for their ideology regardless of whether or not the film actually espouses it. The films success (because unlike FemBusters, the people making it didn't belittle fans of the property) in their eyes justifies said victory.
Going back to the first part these people put waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayy too much stock into how art influences culture, and believe that injecting their ideology into art as much as possible will reshape the culture in its image. Because it's not like people are naturally inclined towards certain products irrespective of ideology, and selling based on ideology alone is a surefire way to guarantee your product tanks (again, see Fembusters).
Don't you have a loop there since the people behind both of those things also believe in that school of thought?It's been my experience that the hardcore believers that commercial art determines culture, rather than the other way around, are exactly the tier of stupid that actually gets their moral precepts from commercial art. Why do you think this same camp keeps making tormented Harry Potter and Avengers analogies to explain modern politics?
It's been my experience that the hardcore believers that commercial art determines culture, rather than the other way around, are exactly the tier of stupid that actually gets their moral precepts from commercial art. Why do you think this same camp keeps making tormented Harry Potter and Avengers analogies to explain modern politics?
Don't you have a loop there since the people behind both of those things also believe in that school of thought?
Why do you think this same camp keeps making tormented Harry Potter and Avengers analogies to explain modern politics?