Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well for one, the "evolved ones" would keep up with exercise and have 3-4 children apiece to keep up their superior genes.
Inferior Past people like Bobby don't know even the most basic science.

It is called "survival of the fittest" (where "fittest" being the ability to pump out the most offspring that can in turn pump out offsprings) not "survival of the most 'wired'." The notion that the most intelligent will somehow inherit the Earth is a quasi-religious belief akin to "man should be the steward of the Earth".

So Bob is anti-creationism AND pro-choice.
I don't see the problem with that. It would, however, be untenable if a person is both pro-creationism and pro-choice (because creationism implies each life is a creation of God and thus sacred), or if he is both pro-eugenics (as Bobby doubtless is) and pro-life.

I don't get it.
That particular screen cap has Bob denouncing what he calls "emotionalism" as he refers to the exploitation of natural resources by Inferior Past in order to preserve their "jerbs", yet just a moment earlier he extols natural resources for their "beauty and historical significance" -- a pure, naked appeal to emotion. To double-down on his stupidity, he then envisions "urban, cosmopolitianism" as the model of Superior Future: a future that cannot come into being without sacrificing much of the "beauty and historical significance" of Nature, and the creation of countless Inferior "jerbs".

And isn't "historical significance" a by-word of Inferior Past anyway?!
 
Last edited:
Bob's being an ableist again, but wants to speak for the disabled too.
Ablism.JPG

NoPotential.JPG


Oh really...
NoPotential0.JPG


Here's a simple solution: Shut up!
Will.JPG
 
  • Informative
Reactions: The Valeyard
More fascist a-logging:
View attachment 327343
Yes Bob, you are the bad guy because you want to decry everyone who is of the same political party as Moore as "non-human", should be treated lower than dirt, and not be given any rights. Not the people who support and/or enable Roy Moore for his deplorable actions, even the people who agree that Moore should get the boot and not take part in politics and drop out of the race.
 
Last edited:
spergsense-jpg.327248

Doing things for "the People" is bad apparently. Worst leftist ever.

If it was someone else I'd give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they meant those who frame things as "for the people" are usually bad (hence socialism/communism) but given Bob's track record it presumably comes from just the sheer contempt that he holds for the general-population.

IT's often said of people whom support authoritarian ideologies online that they do it because they think they'll be elevated into positions of power, and I don't think that's necessarily true, but with Bob it definately. He definately thinks he should have sole-executive authority over a country like the US.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: link1234
Someone needs to quote the constitution at Bob and see what happens. "We, the people, of the United States..."

Or how about the Gettysburg Address? "...government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."

Wonder if he'd recognize either of them.
 
Yes Bob, you are the bad guy because you want to decry everyone who is of the same political party as Moore as "non-human", should be treated lower than dirt, and not be given any rights. Not the people who support and/or enable Roy Moore for his deplorable actions, even the people who agree that Moore should get the boot and not take part in politics and drop out of the race.

I REALLY want to see how Bob would process that all the allegations against Moore? Happened during a period of time when he was a democrat.

It is called "survival of the fittest" (where "fittest" being the ability to pump out the most offspring that can in turn pump out offsprings) not "survival of the most 'wired'." The notion that the most intelligent will somehow inherit the Earth is a quasi-religious belief akin to "man should be the steward of the Earth".

I don't see the problem with that. It would, however, be untenable if a person is both pro-creationism and pro-choice (because creationism implies each life is a creation of God and thus sacred), or if he is both pro-eugenics (as Bobby doubtless is) and pro-life.

I'm putting those two together since you answered what the problem was with the reply above. Killing your offspring means that you have less offspring.

Bob's being an ableist again, but wants to speak for the disabled too.
ablism-jpg.327415

nopotential-jpg.327417

I got an idea, let's compare Bob's charity work with those of the stupid people!

He has the intellectual fortitude to reject emotion based arguments, despite the fact that the argument for all the policies he wants is "PEOPLE WILL DIE!"

 
I'm putting those two together since you answered what the problem was with the reply above. Killing your offspring means that you have less offspring.
It does not follow that pro-choice means you're obliged to eliminate your own offspring. You're merely offering other people a choice to eliminate theirs. It also does not follow that anyone who believes in evolution has to follow its imperative: if that were the case the Western world would have the highest birth rates ever.
 
Last edited:
It does not follow that pro-choice means you're obliged to eliminate your own offspring. You're merely offering other people a choice to eliminate theirs. It also does not follow that anyone who believe in evolution has to follow its imperative: if that were the case the Western world would have the highest birth rates ever.
I didn't say anything about obliged, but one should at least be able to follow the logic that it's a bad idea.

Now I guess you don't HAVE to follow its imperative, any more than believing in anthropomorphic climate change means you have to drive a prius, you could still drive a pick-up truck. Still the person should at least be able to follow that if you want the future to look more like you, THEN HAVE KIDS. If Bob could think for one damn minute, he would piece together that EVEN IF TRUE that he and his were legitimately "more evolved" and "superior" their not having kids (or aborting the ones they would have) ensure whatever superiority they think they possess will be gone in a generation, two at the latest.

Though there is irony with belief in evolution being an evolutionary disadvantage. And given that the Western world is starting to experience societal problems because of cratering birth rates...

Interesting times ahead.
 
I love how if nothing else, unpopularity has defined his entire life.
Countdown.JPG


Here he is playing doctor:
DrBob.JPG
DrBob0.JPG


For a liberal, he'll sure cling to stereotypes to prove a point.
Gambler.JPG


"I don't wanna give TV credit until it's too late!"
TwinPeaks.JPG


Well, no one cares, Bob.
NP.JPG


And lastly, sperging about zombies:
Zombo.JPG
Zombo0.JPG
Zombo1.JPG
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Pokemonquistador
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back