Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gamergate was spun by Zoe Quinn's defenders as some vast conspiracy to harass women out of gaming, after Zoe Quinn's boyfriend revealed that he found out she'd cheated on him with a video games "journalist" in exchange for a favorable review of her shitty game Depression Quest. Reportedly "Gamergate" was also a code for harassing Anita Sarkeesian (who has no clue how vidja games work and even admitted in a candid video that she isn't a gamer and not a fan of gaming) and others in the IngSoc Justice crowd who called themselves "women in gaming". In reality it was all about outrage that a games journalist was bribed with pussy to give a good review of a shitty game, and wanted to put a stop to that bullshit. But oh no, MUH HARASSMUNT OF WHAMMEN IN GAMING!

I don't think there's any solid proof of "rape and death threats" against either Quinn or Sarkeesian or any of the others, though I'm sure someone messaged any of them with "LOL KYS" or something stupid like that. I'm not saying it didn't happen, just that it really didn't have anything to do with not wanting corruption in vidja game journalism, while the IngSoc Justice crowd just want to push an agenda and obscure the real issue, and idiot sponges like MovieBlob and Dobson swallow it hook, line, and sinker.
isn't that shit as dead as the dinosaurs why is it being brought up
 
Whats with the weird obsession left wing wackos have with gamergate
"Are you tired of people criticizing and making fun of you on the internet? Are you a troon, scammer, soyboy or self-loathing game dev looking to dodge any responsibility for your actions? Then GAMERGATETM might be the thing for you! GAMERGATE is designed for those moments when the internet becomes too much to handle. Just one use of GAMERGATE can earn you more asspats and Patreon bucks than you've ever seen before. Side effects of GAMERGATE include Dishonesty, Weight gain, Erratic behavior, Laziness, Easily hurt fee-fees, Mental gymnastics, Transgenderism and a complete loss of respect across the internet. Please consult your nearest Twitter Checkmark before you begin taking GAMERGATE, and ask @Jaimas when you feel that you're ready to stop taking GAMERGATE."
 
isn't that shit as dead as the dinosaurs why is it being brought up
Because "Comicsgate" is now a thing, which has nothing to do with harassment anymore than Gamergate at its core actually didn't, where a few IngSoc Justice comics pros like Mark Waid et al actively worked like a fucking gangster using veiled threats and arguably violated several antitrust statutes to get a publisher to not publish a comic book by Diversity & Comics. But since people are stupid and gullible at least on the IngSoc side, they equate "Comicsgate" with "Gamergate" and claim that the true "Comicsgate" was D&C allegedly harassing Women, Transpeople and Persons of Color in the Comics Industry (and allegedly directing his fans to do so as well, which is demonstrably and researchably false).
 
Last edited:
Why Did the Democrats Lose the South? Bringing New Data to an Old Debate
Abstract
A long-standing debate in political economy is whether voters are driven primarily by economic self-interest or by less pecuniary motives like ethnocentrism. Using newly available data, we reexamine one of the largest partisan shifts in a modern democracy: Southern whites’ exodus from the Democratic Party. We show that defection among racially conservative whites explains the entire decline from 1958 to 1980. Racial attitudes also predict whites’ earlier partisan shifts. Relative to recent work, we find a much larger role for racial views and essentially no role for income growth or (non-race-related) policy preferences in explaining why Democrats “lost” the South.


The abstract doesn’t really explain how they’re getting their data or how they explain Bill Clinton sweeping the polls in the 90s. But I’m sure they did a rigorous study and didn’t leap to the conclusion that not agreeing with their candidate is racism.
 
But what about Mexican robots, like @Flexo ?
Fuck those fence sitters. We need illegal Mexican labor to fill the jobs that are never coming back because automation. How do you not see the logic here, Nazi?


But really though, I can't understand people who want both "eh, robots will replace jobs" and "eh, we'll just pay Mexicans to do it for pennies". It's one or the other as far as I'm aware.
 
Why Did the Democrats Lose the South? Bringing New Data to an Old Debate
Abstract
A long-standing debate in political economy is whether voters are driven primarily by economic self-interest or by less pecuniary motives like ethnocentrism. Using newly available data, we reexamine one of the largest partisan shifts in a modern democracy: Southern whites’ exodus from the Democratic Party. We show that defection among racially conservative whites explains the entire decline from 1958 to 1980. Racial attitudes also predict whites’ earlier partisan shifts. Relative to recent work, we find a much larger role for racial views and essentially no role for income growth or (non-race-related) policy preferences in explaining why Democrats “lost” the South.


The abstract doesn’t really explain how they’re getting their data or how they explain Bill Clinton sweeping the polls in the 90s. But I’m sure they did a rigorous study and didn’t leap to the conclusion that not agreeing with their candidate is racism.

The really interesting thing about this piece is that it hasn't actually been published yet, and is inaccessible to non-members of that journal.

Whether Bob is a paying member of an academic journal, or has spent the energy necessary to read this thing and analyze it critically, is a question that answers itself.
 
Why Did the Democrats Lose the South? Bringing New Data to an Old Debate
Abstract
A long-standing debate in political economy is whether voters are driven primarily by economic self-interest or by less pecuniary motives like ethnocentrism. Using newly available data, we reexamine one of the largest partisan shifts in a modern democracy: Southern whites’ exodus from the Democratic Party. We show that defection among racially conservative whites explains the entire decline from 1958 to 1980. Racial attitudes also predict whites’ earlier partisan shifts. Relative to recent work, we find a much larger role for racial views and essentially no role for income growth or (non-race-related) policy preferences in explaining why Democrats “lost” the South.


The abstract doesn’t really explain how they’re getting their data or how they explain Bill Clinton sweeping the polls in the 90s. But I’m sure they did a rigorous study and didn’t leap to the conclusion that not agreeing with their candidate is racism.
I only have a vague idea of what that article is about and I can already smell the pretentiousness coming off it.
 
Gamergate was spun by Zoe Quinn's defenders as some vast conspiracy to harass women out of gaming, after Zoe Quinn's boyfriend revealed that he found out she'd cheated on him with a video games "journalist" in exchange for a favorable review of her shitty game Depression Quest. Reportedly "Gamergate" was also a code for harassing Anita Sarkeesian (who has no clue how vidja games work and even admitted in a candid video that she isn't a gamer and not a fan of gaming) and others in the IngSoc Justice crowd who called themselves "women in gaming". In reality it was all about outrage that a games journalist was bribed with pussy to give a good review of a shitty game, and wanted to put a stop to that bullshit. But oh no, MUH HARASSMUNT OF WHAMMEN IN GAMING!

I don't think there's any solid proof of "rape and death threats" against either Quinn or Sarkeesian or any of the others, though I'm sure someone messaged any of them with "LOL KYS" or something stupid like that. I'm not saying it didn't happen, just that it really didn't have anything to do with not wanting corruption in vidja game journalism, while the IngSoc Justice crowd just want to push an agenda and obscure the real issue, and idiot sponges like MovieBlob and Dobson swallow it hook, line, and sinker.

I've said this multiple times across multiple threads but it bares repeating: I am just baffled at how GG was the thing that caused everyone to lose their shit. This was the thing that everyone had to sperg out at and reveal what autists they truly were.

It's been nearly three years since it died out and I still haven't been able to wrap my head around it.
 
I've said this multiple times across multiple threads but it bares repeating: I am just baffled at how GG was the thing that caused everyone to lose their shit. This was the thing that everyone had to sperg out at and reveal what autists they truly were.

It's been nearly three years since it died out and I still haven't been able to wrap my head around it.
we have to respect WAHMEN
 
I've said this multiple times across multiple threads but it bares repeating: I am just baffled at how GG was the thing that caused everyone to lose their shit. This was the thing that everyone had to sperg out at and reveal what autists they truly were.

It's been nearly three years since it died out and I still haven't been able to wrap my head around it.

It's actually simple. If you don't have time for its wiki article, I'll give you the quick-and-dirty:

A bunch of entitled fucking idiots invaded a hobby they had no stake in and tried to bring a culture war with them. During this, one of their darlings got their sexual indiscretions exposed, and when the indie journo circuit tried to close ranks to protect one of their own, they got exposed as not only being in collusion but financially supporting the indie darling in question. The brainlets in the indie journo circuit doubled down once more, attacking their own audience and declaring that gaming hobbyists were over and should no longer be appealed to by developers, instead embracing identity politics. The gamer nerds in turn responded by calling out their shit, getting the FTC involved, conducting many boycotts, supporting numerous charity drives, and exposing many other examples of journalistic fraud and malfeasance. Enraged with their enemies getting the better of them, the indie journo circuit decided to push the narrative that allowing any discussion of GG at all was tantamount to enabling the harassment of women, evidence be damned.

Despite the full support of the indie and mainstream press, the indie journo circuit ultimately failed to stop GG in any meaningful capacity, and while they arguably won the PR war, the Autists won every other front. The hashtag wrapped up in October of 2015 after Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian's disastrous UN appearance obliterated any credibility they may have had.

TL;DR: Great example of Gaben's Law and the Streisand Effect.
 
It's actually simple. If you don't have time for its wiki article, I'll give you the quick-and-dirty:

A bunch of entitled fucking idiots invaded a hobby they had no stake in and tried to bring a culture war with them. During this, one of their darlings got their sexual indiscretions exposed, and when the indie journo circuit tried to close ranks to protect one of their own, they got exposed as not only being in collusion but financially supporting the indie darling in question. The brainlets in the indie journo circuit doubled down once more, attacking their own audience and declaring that gaming hobbyists were over and should no longer be appealed to by developers, instead embracing identity politics. The gamer nerds in turn responded by calling out their shit, getting the FTC involved, conducting many boycotts, supporting numerous charity drives, and exposing many other examples of journalistic fraud and malfeasance. Enraged with their enemies getting the better of them, the indie journo circuit decided to push the narrative that allowing any discussion of GG at all was tantamount to enabling the harassment of women, evidence be damned.

Despite the full support of the indie and mainstream press, the indie journo circuit ultimately failed to stop GG in any meaningful capacity, and while they arguably won the PR war, the Autists won every other front. The hashtag wrapped up in October of 2015 after Zoe Quinn and Anita Sarkeesian's disastrous UN appearance obliterated any credibility they may have had.

TL;DR: Great example of Gaben's Law and the Streisand Effect.

Not to kiss ass, but I swear one of these days Jaimas if you write the book about Gamergate and all involved, I will certainly buy it.
 
I gotta love how common sense is considered "victim-blaming" to these pinheads.
Victim.JPG


I'm starting to think that people like Bob are ruining Star Wars more than we are.
CoolDad.JPG


Wow, could this be any more mastubatory if he tried?
Beard.JPG
Beard0.JPG


At least you confirmed that The Escapist canned your fat ass.
Fired.JPG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back