Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Much to his surprise, Bob liked Aquaman. However, he gives it a tepid review just like with Wonder Woman.

Not a good week before Christmas for Bob. Trump was able to throw a wrench in the plans of the CR bill to the point where money was provided for the wall, he signed a Farm Bill, and Aquaman is predicted to to lead the box office (however that could change).
 
Not a good week before Christmas for Bob. Trump was able to throw a wrench in the plans of the CR bill to the point where money was provided for the wall, he signed a Farm Bill, and Aquaman is predicted to to lead the box office (however that could change).
The fact that Trump has money to build the wall is going to bring amazing salt from bob.
 
Look what's going on with Pateron with how they're fucking over Sargon and both YouTube and Facebook banning Alex Jones. These people are manipulating companies to kneel before will.
I'll give Lindsay Ellis a little credit she at least admitted she really didn't care about a rich white guy losing his job with Gunn but the precedent it sets if a Mega Corporation like Disney will dump a guy who made them billions no one is safe. But their revenge vitriol to those on the right will have future consequences the policies these companies are creating are not going away once the "Alt-Right" purge is done and the pendulum will turn and when it does hated filled SJWs with penchants to rant on public forums will get bit in the ass by the very beast they created it already happened with Gunn it was the SJWs who weaponized Social Media. The really scary thing is to me 1984 happened except it wasn't the government who created the thought police state it was us the public.
 
The fact that Trump has money to build the wall is going to bring amazing salt from bob.
No it won't. First, because he reads this thread and saying in advance how mad something will make him and how funny it will be will insure that he won't do it just to spite us; and second, because he'll gloat about how Mexico didn't actually end up paying for it, so it doesn't count as keeping his campaign promise.
 
Spider sperging
4FEDAE2A-9CA7-463C-8B3A-64B8D6400A9B.png


Politisperging about a troon.
F146B20C-043D-4DB8-A2CC-4C9116B2814C.png
E09F5016-C76E-47A6-B48D-A80449B5365A.png


And finally, that politisperging with Khmer Rouge sympathizer and Venezuela Nostradamus himself, Chomsky.
4EE9A161-64DA-4CD4-BC1E-D6A4613CC217.png
 
His constant hard on for censorship (Oh, i forgot it's done by corporations so it's not censorship, tee hee.)

It's not censorship right up until they censor something they don't like. I remember when some game site did it.
"Tentacle Bento removed from Kickstarter. Not censorship as it's not the government."
"Nintendo Treehouse changing stuff in Fire Emblem. Not censorship as it's not the government."
"Cartoon Network removed a gay kiss from Steven Universe. This is censorship! Mega-corporations silencing minority voices! REEE!"

It's a serious question that i have and that irks me quite a lot: Why side with corporations for censorship and not with the government? is it because they know that Murrica cannot do that without having thousands of people up in arms? Or because it's easy for a corporation to do a "preemptive veto of speech" in something they own and that cannot be touched by the goverment?

The libertarian point of view is that it's freedom of association. eg. You can't force me to bake a cake for you if I don't want to. If I remove a scene from a game or film that's my choice as a corporation. etc.

But as already said by others, people like Bob see it as more of a loop hole. This is evident when it's the government or a government organization like ratings boards that are doing the censoring, and as the example above showed they have no problem REEEing and pissing their pants if it's something they like getting cut.

And it's understandable. Much like Bob's obsession with eugenics, he doesn't seem to know why it's bad, just that the word is associated with bad people. Hence constantly finding ways to do censorship (banning ideas, book burning, black lists) but without the "evil words" being attached to it.
 
Even after a year of posting in this thread, it's constantly amazes me how ill-equipped Bob is for the future, despite his entire schtick being THE SUPERIOR FUTURE. He has no skills in major fields, has an obnoxious and derisive personality, which leads him to getting mocked at every turn, and anything he associates with turns into pure shit. If his brother died and he got fired from everything he's been hired at, he's good as dead. If he went outside his echo chamber, traveled across the US and started holding rallies about THE SUPERIOR FUTURE, he'd be mocked by the general public and run out by those that his "plan" would affect. Go ahead Bob, I know you're reading this thread, go outside and see if your ideals can survive outside of your little bubble and report how well it would go, but we all know you won't because you are an obese coward who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism from anyone, let alone by those that you hate.
 
Even after a year of posting in this thread, it's constantly amazes me how ill-equipped Bob is for the future, despite his entire schtick being THE SUPERIOR FUTURE. He has no skills in major fields, has an obnoxious and derisive personality, which leads him to getting mocked at every turn, and anything he associates with turns into pure shit. If his brother died and he got fired from everything he's been hired at, he's good as dead. If he went outside his echo chamber, traveled across the US and started holding rallies about THE SUPERIOR FUTURE, he'd be mocked by the general public and run out by those that his "plan" would affect. Go ahead Bob, I know you're reading this thread, go outside and see if your ideals can survive outside of your little bubble and report how well it would go, but we all know you won't because you are an obese coward who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism from anyone, let alone by those that you hate.
I would love to see him go on CNN and MSNBC and have Rachel Maddow be uncomfortable with him.
 
I would love to see him go on CNN and MSNBC and have Rachel Maddow be uncomfortable with him.
They wouldn't have him on to begin with because of how embarrassing he'd be, I'd like to see him on Tucker Carlson launching into some angry incoherent rant that sounded a lot better on Twitter or a rehearsed YouTube video. Just going on about Drumpf and mayonnaise ghouls and moon wheat while Tucker gives his trademark confused look.
 
Much to his surprise, Bob liked Aquaman. However, he gives it a tepid review just like with Wonder Woman.


Of course Bob can't let himself get too excited about Aquaman due to his tribal loyalty to Marvel. I know that we try to refrain from speculation, but given his lukewarm reception to both WW and Aquaman, I do wonder if he would give the same treatment to Shazam. Particularly because I've heard rumblings that audiences are more excited about Shazam than they are of Captain Marvel (not that I blame them as Zachary Levi has more charisma than Brie Larson. Hell, Asher Angel AKA Billy Batson is probably more likable than her.)
 
It's not censorship right up until they censor something they don't like. I remember when some game site did it.
"Tentacle Bento removed from Kickstarter. Not censorship as it's not the government."
"Nintendo Treehouse changing stuff in Fire Emblem. Not censorship as it's not the government."
"Cartoon Network removed a gay kiss from Steven Universe. This is censorship! Mega-corporations silencing minority voices! REEE!"

One of the big problems with Bob & Co is they don't clock how the corporations operate-they don't ban out of moral outrage or public interest they do it because they're concearned about the bottom line. As Tumblrs purge and the firing of James gunn show, they'll just as happily cull left wingers if they think they might loose some ad rev or get some bad PR.
Bob operates under the delusion these obligarchic power structures can be entrusted to act altruisticly because Silicon Valley has a ( superficial) liberal culture and hates Donald trump. What he forgets is pretty much all these companies bend to violent authoritarian regimes and would almost certainly look the other way to pretty much anything as long as they made a profit.

As I keep explaining to my fellow lefties "you're a fool if you think they'll stop with Alex jones."
 
Last edited:
One of the big problems with Bob & Co is they don't clock how the corporations operate-they don't ban out of moral outrage or public interest they do it because they're concearned about the bottom line. As Tumblrs purge and the firing of James gunn show, they'll just as happily cull left wingers if they think they might loose some ad rev or get some back PR.
Bob operates under the delusion these obligarchic power structures can be entrusted to act altruisticly because Silicon Valley has a ( superficial) liberal culture and hates Donald trump. What he forgets is pretty much all these companies bend to violent authoritarian regimes and would almost certainly look the other way to pretty much anything as long as they made a profit.

As I keep explaining to my fellow lefties "you're a fool if you think they'll stop with Alex jones."

Exactly that. They are guided by the old fashioned greed and you have to be either very stupid or very naive to think that corporations will act out of the goodness of their heart instead of just making more profit. They cash in with leftism because it's in and they think they can make a nice buck out of guillable tards like Bob here. Reason why at the slightest sign of bad press coming their way, they will go full damage control. And like you say, as long as you give them a hefty profit, they will look the other way around. The moment you start to tank their profits they will denounce you openly and fuck you over.

You cannot convince these people. They are so fucking self convinced that it will go their way to the very end that until they have a gun to their heads they will not change their mind. As someone said "If you're young and you're not a leftist, you don't have a heart. If you're an adult and you're a leftist, you don't have a brain."
 
Of course Bob can't let himself get too excited about Aquaman due to his tribal loyalty to Marvel. I know that we try to refrain from speculation, but given his lukewarm reception to both WW and Aquaman, I do wonder if he would give the same treatment to Shazam. Particularly because I've heard rumblings that audiences are more excited about Shazam than they are of Captain Marvel (not that I blame them as Zachary Levi has more charisma than Brie Larson. Hell, Asher Angel AKA Billy Batson is probably more likable than her.)
I haven’t heard anything about people saying that Zachary Levi looks more charismatic in Shazam than Brie Larson does in Captain Marvel.

Again, this is speculation, but one thing I do know is that Bob would defend Larson the same manner with Ghostbusters 2016 and TLJ by mocking the fans that have complaints about the product.
 
Of course Bob can't let himself get too excited about Aquaman due to his tribal loyalty to Marvel. I know that we try to refrain from speculation, but given his lukewarm reception to both WW and Aquaman, I do wonder if he would give the same treatment to Shazam. Particularly because I've heard rumblings that audiences are more excited about Shazam than they are of Captain Marvel (not that I blame them as Zachary Levi has more charisma than Brie Larson. Hell, Asher Angel AKA Billy Batson is probably more likable than her.)

I remember him actually being excited for Shazam when it was revealed at Comic Con. Whether or not that carries over upon the films release is another story.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Even after a year of posting in this thread, it's constantly amazes me how ill-equipped Bob is for the future, despite his entire schtick being THE SUPERIOR FUTURE. He has no skills in major fields, has an obnoxious and derisive personality, which leads him to getting mocked at every turn, and anything he associates with turns into pure shit. If his brother died and he got fired from everything he's been hired at, he's good as dead. If he went outside his echo chamber, traveled across the US and started holding rallies about THE SUPERIOR FUTURE, he'd be mocked by the general public and run out by those that his "plan" would affect. Go ahead Bob, I know you're reading this thread, go outside and see if your ideals can survive outside of your little bubble and report how well it would go, but we all know you won't because you are an obese coward who can't handle the slightest bit of criticism from anyone, let alone by those that you hate.

There's a thought experiment to see how much value someone has to society by imagining a plane crash in the mountains/being cast away on a desert island. Everyone survives, but you have to decide who to eat first. Ignoring the fact people could live off Bob for weeks (predictable fat joke) Bob and every other critic has no retort if they are chosen to be the first in the pot.

What if he was shipped off to the moon farm or a private island where the best and brightest are building the world of tomorrow? What would Bob's role be? As you said, he doesn't have anything. He's not an architect, a scientist, anything that might prove even remotely useful. He can't even be used for manual labour because the robots are doing that. All he can do is sperg on Twitter about capeshit movies. Maybe it's because I'm a mayonnaise ghoul that I don't see how that matches his rhetoric.

And like you say, as long as you give them a hefty profit, they will look the other way around. The moment you start to tank their profits they will denounce you openly and fuck you over.

In theory, yes. In practice, not so much. They get companies to try it under the assumption that every woman and minority will spend money if only they do things their way, but they set it up so that there's always an excuse, be it not advertised enough, alt right trolls, Russian bots, etc. Not only that, but they fear being smeared in the press. Firing any SJWs they hired also runs the risk of smears. I didn't notice it until it was pointed out, but smear campaigns will list full names, allies, and any accusations they can. This is deliberate so that it will appear on the front page of any search results.

Has Bob ever explained why he thinks wheat should be grown on the Moon? Even if terraforming were easy, wouldn't that just make wheat more expensive? Is it just his personal synonym for "progress" and doesn't really mean anything?

As far as I know, not directly. I could be wrong but I think the story came from a podcast where a guy met Bob at a convention (I think they were friends) and Bob started ranting about the superior future. The friend zoned him out to do something, when he turned back to Bob he was talking about growing wheat on the moon. This is backed up by various Twitter threads where he talks about how colonizing the moon is a top priority and how it would be done by now if Hillary was president instead of Trump.
 
Has Bob ever explained why he thinks wheat should be grown on the Moon? Even if terraforming were easy, wouldn't that just make wheat more expensive? Is it just his personal synonym for "progress" and doesn't really mean anything?

That's essentially what it is. Bob sees technology and the field of "science" so to speak as the ultimate representation of humanity's worth. It doesn't matter if growing crops in your backyard is far more efficient and better quality producing than growing it on the moon. If we can grow it on the moon than that's automatically the better option because that's scientific progress. Any criticism is just ghoul gibberish.

It's the reason why he hates franchises like The Terminator or other technology run amok type stories. He's an absolutist in this area, if something can be done in the realm of science and technology than it HAS to be done. Screw the consequences, the fact that we did it is far more important than the effect it has on us.
 
That's essentially what it is. Bob sees technology and the field of "science" so to speak as the ultimate representation of humanity's worth. It doesn't matter if growing crops in your backyard is far more efficient and better quality producing than growing it on the moon. If we can grow it on the moon than that's automatically the better option because that's scientific progress. Any criticism is just ghoul gibberish.

It's the reason why he hates franchises like The Terminator or other technology run amok type stories. He's an absolutist in this area, if something can be done in the realm of science and technology than it HAS to be done. Screw the consequences, the fact that we did it is far more important than the effect it has on us.
I feel like Bob got his science from watching Saturday morning cartoons when he was a kid.
 
Screw the consequences, the fact that we did it is far more important than the effect it has on us.

This! This is why he can't have a position of power. His sociopathic tenacity. His lack of self-reflection. His ego doing the talking rather than common sense. All of his mentality revolves around this small sentence. He thinks short term without considering the long term.

Bob believes all his absolute dreams will suffice every shortcoming of his past, finally getting the future where he is laughing and the rest weeping.

If Bob could accept the situation being far away from his fat fingertips. Then he won't have to stay in the echo chamber since he hates that people check him for his bullshit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back