Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[Red Hood]

Bob, woman respecter, child exploitation appreciator

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304443822429134848

https://archive.vn/Ljnhn

View attachment 1588726

Spoiler: in case you were wondering what Monica wrote

https://archive.vn/UOxC6

Article text:


There’s a saying in criticism that “depiction does not equal endorsement.” Art should be able to address taboos without necessarily advocating for them, but some surface-level readings miss what the work digs into because it’s not obvious at first glance. In the wake of conservative outrage over an early poster of debut writer/director Maïmouna Doucouré’s “Cuties,” this is a sentiment that bears repeating. The film actively critiques the very thing pearl-clutchers were mad about—the sexualization of children—but Doucouré received death threats. Netflix, the movie’s distributor, issued an apology.



Controversy aside, “Cuties” is a difficult and challenging film, pushing the idea of “depiction does not equal endorsement” to its limit. It will not surprise me to read responses still accusing the movie of what it condemns. However, Doucouré uses these uncomfortable images to provoke a serious conversation about the sexualization of girls—especially regarding girls of color, the policing of a girl’s sexuality, double standards, the effect of social media on kids, and how children learn these behaviors. To do this, the director shows what it looks like for young girls to emulate what they see in music videos and grown-up dance routines. A few times in the film, we see the confused or even disgusted faces of adults watching the younger generation gyrate and twerk, biting their lips or their nail in a suggestive way. It’s likely that these girls don’t fully understand what those gestures mean, but they see it in pop culture and they imitate it, like several other generations of girls before them. Doucouré also explores some of the emotional tangles that come with wanting to fit in and to be taken seriously, as well as the repercussions that come with acting youthfully impulsive. Many of these experiences were rooted in the director’s own childhood or in the stories of girls she interviewed when working on the “Cuties” script.

“Cuties” is a coming-of-age story of a girl caught between cultures and age. 11-year-old Amy (Fathia Youssouf Abdillahi), the eldest daughter of a Senegalese family living in Paris, must help her mother, Miriam (Maïmouna Gueye), around the apartment with mundane tasks like watching her younger siblings, going out for supplies, and cleaning messes. Then, Miriam learns that her husband has taken a new wife, and Amy is reluctantly swept up in the preparation for their impending nuptials. Although her family is devoutly Muslim, Amy begins to admire a dance group at school who call themselves Cuties—Angelica (Medina El Aidi), Coumba (Esther Gohourou), Jess (Ilanah Cami-Goursolas) and Yasmine (Myriam Hamma)—and tries to join their ranks. She starts dressing more like them and doing what they dare her to do. Finally, she figures out a way to get the cool girls to accept her by learning provocative moves that will help them win a dance competition against a rival group of older girls. Amy gets caught up in the whirlwind of her emotions and runs afoul of her mother’s expectations.

Under Doucouré's direction, the film walks a fine line between its controversial imagery and taking a step back to reveal the emotional impulses that drive Amy and her friends to seek attention and affirmation. There are echos of films like “Eve’s Bayou,” “Girlhood” and “The Fits,” but given Amy’s age and the directness with which “Cuties” addresses the issue of sexualizing young girls, the film feels uniquely its own. With the help of cinematographer Yann Maritaud, Doucouré adds little surrealistic elements and uses color to make her images pop off the screen. For instance, there’s a recurring motif of Amy transfixed by the dress she’s supposed to wear for her father’s wedding, and different things happen to it that correspond to what she’s going through. It’s likely not a mistake that the turquoise color of the dress echoes some of the colors around the apartment, tying together the threads of culture and home into one. For every dance scene that may make you want to avert your eyes, there are other uncomplicated moments of childhood playtime like Amy and Angelica talking with their mouths full of gummy bears or four of the girls running with shopping bags throwing confetti, like they’re leading a parade for themselves. As if following the beat of Niko Noki’s music for the film, “Cuties” moves at a quick, riveting pace. The two parts of Amy’s world are seamlessly connected together by editors Stéphane Mazalaigue and Mathilde Van de Moortel.



The movie is so much more nuanced and bold than the first wave of outrage charged. With “Cuties,” Doucouré announces herself as a director with a keen visual style who’s unafraid to explore these cultural and social tensions. After all, these are issues facing many young girls growing up today in various corners of the world. You’d just never know it because their coming-of-age horror stories aren't always told in film.

Perhaps the most important message of “Cuties” is that no matter what Amy says or does, she’s still just an 11-year-old girl. People are quick to judge her for trying to act like an adult, but really, all she wants is to feel cool and fit in. She wants to be liked, and what person who survived middle school couldn’t identify with that? She thought the way to do that was to emulate others. Instead, she becomes a cautionary tale in the process.

Now available on Netflix.

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304444081003794432

https://archive.vn/kDnRk

View attachment 1588729
Can we take a moment to stare in awe how Bob interjected himself into this last one, to someone he doesn't follow nor the other way around and only claim to fame seems to be that Matt writes for the same Ebert publication the thot does, by SUBTWEETING HIMSELF.

Eat shit Terry Gilliam! Who cares that you're a Python alum, has made at least one more movie that was a success than The Moviebob's zero, and has actually fathered one more child than The Moviebob's zero? Brazil is "VERY tough for" Robert now... sad face emoticon. Bob has put you on blast from his main AND retweeted son!

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304442390799945728

https://archive.vn/nsDO3

View attachment 1588652
View attachment 1588679

Spoiler: mfw

View attachment 1588711

Twitter is not real life, I know, but it's things like this that keeps pushing this thought into my head that we have destroyed almost an entire generation in our pursuit of such hedonistic opulence.

"Aspiring filmmaker, screenwriter, actor". Pick one or fuck off, you're not Orson Welles.

 

[haunted vagina]

"Aspiring filmmaker, screenwriter, actor". Pick one or fuck off, you're not Orson Welles.

"Aspiring rapper" = black person who has never had a job and is the perpetrator or victim of a crime in a news story
"Aspiring filmmaker" = white person who has never had a job and is the perpetrator or victim of a social justice crusade on Twitter

 

[BubbleButt]

Bob's vested interest in his niece now makes me even more uncomfortable, if that were POSSIBLE

 

[Giga_Nigga_28]

In addition to DBZ, here is another anime that Bobby totally didn't watch:

Pretty sure it's made explicitly clear that Team Rocket is bankrolling their own schemes and not Giovanni, hence why they're always broke. Furthermore, whats with this growing number of idiots that think crossdressing jokes are anything but? Its funny cause a man is dressing up like a woman, its not that deep.

Yes Bob. The backlash is completely due to trolls looking to harass innocent people.

Spoiler: Cuties

I actually watched Cuties yesterday and it's honestly a garbage film with nothing to say. The mc is sociopathic little weirdo who abandons her familial responsibilities and general social decency to hang around another group of sociopathic little weirdos. Y'know how the trailer makes it seem like she's rebelling against a hyper conservative home environment? Yeah, that's bullshit; her family - or at-least what we see of it - are normal, i guess they pray or something? but we're barely shown enough of their home circumstances to understand why she acts the way she does. The movie even has two perfect opportunities to give her something to rebel against; when the grandmother talks about how she got married after she got her period and when her mother calls an...imam? - idk some type of religious person - to exorcise the mc's demons (this is after she stole from the mother, locked her brother in the bathroom, tried to seduce, and after that didn't work assault, her cousin) except, the grandmother follows that up by saying that was something that happened during her time and the girl doesn't have to worry about getting married then the imam guy says that she isn't possessed by anything so the 'oppressive religion' angle kinda falls thu. That part in the trailer where her mother/grandmother says the mc is a woman now? the only pay off is that the grandmother teaches her how to cook, nothing about forcing her to wear a hijab or anything, just learning how to cook some rice. The only thing i can think of that causes her behavior is her father getting a second wife but its not portrayed as a positive thing in the film either (the imam tell the mother to divorce the father if she thinks she can't handle it) plus the father is still in Senegal and if you recall the mc is...11. I doubt she really gets whats even going on.

There's no impetus for her fixation with twerking. She's not forced to dress conservatively at any point in the film and its not some peer pressure 'trying to fit in with the cool kids' type story either since the kids she's hanging around seem like nobodies as well and we don't see enough of her social interactions to justify any of her actions. Near the end of the movie she, for no reason at all, uploads a vagne pic and when some kid calls her a slut, she stabs him then later she pushes some fatty into the canal so she can take her place at the twerking competition.

Furthermore, the twerking scenes are unnecessary and downright exploitative. The director could've got the point across without dressing a bunch of kids up like whores and having them shake their asses. At one point they even do a routine that's straight up shot like a music video with close ups on their butts and everything. What asshat protests child exploitation by exploiting children? Its absolute nonsense.
Tbf I skipped a lot of it because there's an uncomfortable amount of dance scenes, maybe the critics who faithfully watched those scenes recognized some hidden genius that no one else caught. Sincerely doubt it though

Bob is the kind of retard who defends atrocities just to own the 'obsoletes and trumpers' people who, mind you, have no idea he even exists.

 

[Jeff_the_Thriller]

Hell, it’s not just Blue is the Warmest Color that’s making creepy lolcows gush with saliva. Any arthouse/indie Oscar bait with lesbians barebacking each other is a sensation to these people.

Just take a look of the new movie with Kate Winsleg and Saoirse Ronan. I guarantee you Robert is praising this as the greatest thing since slice cheese because it’s a indie film about a woman bending over another woman.

MovieBlob is such a smug fuck nugget he would praise something like this to appear deep and woke to the struggles of m'ladies. This looks like the most boring pile of petrified dino turds ever shat onto film. If I wanted to watch a couple of 5s grinding boxes, then I would go abby winters free clips. At least that would save 2 hours and 55 minutes of my extremely valuable time.

I don't understand how someone who consoomes Marvel so hard would like this boring shit. He would probably denounce Predator or First Blood for their toxic masculinity and in the very next tweet he praises "Marvel Hero 4: Reheroing" for being deep and nuanced.

 

[Sir Wesley Tailpipe]

"Aspiring filmmaker, screenwriter, actor". Pick one or fuck off, you're not Orson Welles.

He’s as fat as Welles got by the end, but that’s where the commonalities end.

 

[Judge Dredd]

Bob's defence of Cuties makes even less sense when you remember that he's condemned games for far less.

The needy Chris and his artisan ales:

I don't get mad at the internet, especially when it comes to lolcows, but Chris's e-begging immediately followed by buying expensive shit annoys me more than most of Bob's behaviour, even if I could easily argue Bob's behaviour is worse.

 

[Red Hood]

There is at least one thing Bobby is the best at: he is the best Useful Idiot. And the amusing thing is, you can give him any order in the name of woke and he will actually believe it. Thinkers, Believers.

Bobby types in ALL CAPS because someone besmirches MARVEL!!!!
View attachment 1587181
Your broken record is still broken, Bobby.

Dobsonesque fantasy about MCU. Juvenile sexual fantasies are now "representation"!
View attachment 1587197
Vino di Sappho is more like it.

DC goes against CG:
View attachment 1587178

Thirsting at Megan Fox:
View attachment 1587216

Star Trek. No idea.
View attachment 1587158

+ + + +
Bobby is obsessed with his delusion that Trump's wealth is somehow "fake":
View attachment 1587165

Be Bob. Be hateful.
View attachment 1587190

+ + + +
My heart sank when I saw Bobby defending Pedobear's Delight, because I dread the miles of convos that I have to sort out. Luckily Bobby hasn't started bickering back yet.

Of course only the obsolete hate Pedos.
View attachment 1587228
Look how undirected, how generic Bobby's rant is. He is totally aware of the left's agenda of normalizing pedophilia, and having the left exposed as the hellbound human detritus they are causes Bobby to erupt in rage. For my money, if going against pedophilia marks me for "irrelevance and obsolescence", then so be it.
(I've archived this convo. Just search "MovieBob defends pedophilia" or "Bob Chipman defends pedophilia" to get back to this post and the archived link)

And don't you know, we obsolete, irrlevant ghouls just have a grudge with Netflix because of She-Ra and shit.
View attachment 1587278
(Archived)

View attachment 1587174

The replies to Bob aren't particularly original either:
View attachment 1587293

This is from one of those threads about Trumpsters. But people have to bring up the pedo flick because they hate Bobby so much:
View attachment 1587166

View attachment 1587266
How obsolete.

Here is a more insightful observation:
View attachment 1587284

That's all about Pedo for the moment. At the moment Bobby is more interested in flirting with trannies:
View attachment 1587222

The needy Chris and his artisan ales:
View attachment 1587145
View attachment 1587146

Are we talking about the same Kitty Pryde that had a thing with Peter Parker and has been with Peter Rasputin for years? This is Iceman-tier retconning.

Also congratulations to Chris on his successful transition to a D&D Dwarf.

 

[Mola Ram]

Are we talking about the same Kitty Pryde that had a thing with Peter Parker and has been with Peter Rasputin for years? This is Iceman-tier retconning.

Also congratulations to Chris on his successful transition to a D&D Dwarf.

"Vino de Presentable."

Sigh.

I don't know if Bob was bullied or not when he was a kid, but Christ almighty he is in desperate need of an ass-kicking now.

 

[Red Hood]

"Vino de Presentable."

Sigh.

I don't know if Bob was bullied or not when he was a kid, but Christ almighty he is in desperate need of an ass-kicking now.

Bob's on the list of people who weren't bullied enough and whose parents needed to whoop his ass. He represents a failure of parenting. Ultimately, most monsters do.

 

[Oh Long Johnson]

How, exactly, does Robert know how it feels to hate an office job?

And why would Terry Gilliam relate to that upon reading 1984? Or anyone, for that matter, as 1984 was about authoritarianism and not corporate world pathos?

 

[Kyria the Great]

I know it is stupid, lets not forget that for all of his genocidal tangents, the man will ultimately be remembered for the fact he compared the unveiling of Mario 3. Also this man believes that Activision first-person shooters helped cause 9/11.

 

[cypocryphy]

It would be hilarious if twitter shut down for 6 months and Bob didn't know what opinion he should have on anything. It would be horrifying for him, when it came back he might unknowingly agree with the dudebros.

 

[Positron]

“depiction does not equal endorsement.”

But the director still exploited children, at least 650 of them.

Y'know how the trailer makes it seem like she's rebelling against a hyper conservative home environment? Yeah, that's bullshit; her family - or at-least what we see of it - are normal

To be fair to the film maker (even though I don't want to), the father is taking a second wife and their relatives strong-arm the first wife, the mom of the protagonist, into preparing for and hosting the wedding, and there is suggestion that the first wife is unwanted because she does not satisfy the husband sexually (I got that from the synop). This would indeed be a traumatic experience to a little girl, and might even explain why she strives to be ultra-sexual: she think this to be the way to escape her mother's fate, to really hold onto a man and life's security.

Indeed the pro side always claims the girls know nothing about sex and are merely aping adult behaviors. From the discussion on this forum it seems the opposite is the case. The girls know enough about sex to manipulate security guards, and the protagonist attempts to strip in order to keep a stolen phone.

More on Pedo:




Bobby have already told us his general thoughts: obsolete obsolete backwards irrelevant yada yada


Kate Winslet has spoken against pedo directors and consider her doing their films "a disgrace", so the logical thing for Bobby to do is -- to berate Cate Blanchett for not having done so!



Mulan failed on Disney+, therefore Bobby think they'll put Black Widow there!

 

[breadandcircuses]

Are we talking about the same Kitty Pryde that had a thing with Peter Parker and has been with Peter Rasputin for years?

Claremont has been wanting to hook Kitty up with Illayana as early as 82 and as late as 2006.

The only complaint I have is that it's wasted on some literally who no body.

But I support Kitty fucking both of the Rasputin siblings, so I'm slightly biased.

 

[Neko GF]

But the director still exploited children, at least 650 of them.


To be fair to the film maker (even though I don't want to), the father is taking a second wife and their relatives strong-arm the first wife, the mom of the protagonist, into preparing for and hosting the wedding, and there is suggestion that the first wife is unwanted because she does not satisfy the husband sexually (I got that from the synop). This would indeed be a traumatic experience to a little girl, and might even explain why she strives to be ultra-sexual: she think this to be the way to escape her mother's fate, to really hold onto a man and life's security.

Indeed the pro side always claims the girls know nothing about sex and are merely aping adult behaviors. From the discussion on this forum it seems the opposite is the case. The girls know enough about sex to manipulate security guards, and the protagonist attempts to strip in order to keep a stolen phone.

More on Pedo:
View attachment 1589750

View attachment 1589780
View attachment 1589781
Bobby have already told us his general thoughts: obsolete obsolete backwards irrelevant yada yada


Kate Winslet has spoken against pedo directors and consider her doing their films "a disgrace", so the logical thing for Bobby to do is -- to berate Cate Blanchett for not having done so!
View attachment 1589770

This thread should get the "pedo defence force" tag due to Robert's Cuties rants.

 

[LordofCringe7206]

This thread should get the "pedo defence force" tag due to Robert's Cuties rants.

Considering he already helped cover up the crimes of a sex pest, I am surprised this thread hasn't already gotten it already.

 

[CharlesBarkley]

Honestly, I doubt Bob watched the movie.

I assumed he just heard some Hollywood fag he idolized say positive things about it and parroting the whole speal.

Now that he has gotten backlash, he can't go back because he believes its not humanity in general being disgusted by kids twerking but instead a mix of alt-right gamergaters poking a black lady.

So, I dunno. Doubt he is a pedo or has pedo tendency, nigga is prob just a fat lazy retard, like usual.

 

[Red Hood]

Considering he already helped cover up the crimes of a sex pest, I am surprised this thread hasn't already gotten it already.

I can't remember if he propped up Ali Rapp during her shitshow, but that would qualify him. I, or perhaps some other intrepid Kiwi, ought to dig into that line of evidence.

Claremont has been wanting to hook Kitty up with Illayana as early as 82 and as late as 2006.

The only complaint I have is that it's wasted on some literally who no body.

But I support Kitty fucking both of the Rasputin siblings, so I'm slightly biased.

Why am I imagining Claremont rambling on about that idea to John Byrne way more than anyone would be comfortabke with, and then one day Byrne just isn't in Marvel's office because he quit to write and draw Man of Steel without a co-writer?

 

[Adamska]

All I do know is that this is just another time that Billy-Bob defended a sexual predator, and I think it's the second time he defended a pedophile with the first being that one French movie he never saw and just masturbated to because it had lesbians in it.

Since I haven't seen this horrid film, is there a lesbian subplot or something? That might explain this moron's defense.