Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[cypocryphy]

Tulsi attacked the pedo film. So naturally, that means that Robert was right about her being a MAGA chud all along!!!:
View attachment 1590797View attachment 1590800
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304672490929696769 (Archive)

This is really the hill he wants to die on.

Jesus fucking Christ I hate when neckbeards use backstage wrestling terminology for non-wrestling stuff....they're the only people who still actually watch wrestling anymore.

Bob,it's ok to not like Cuties. Just take the L and go back to talking about Marvel or Super Mario.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Celluloid Chubster: "Akshually, that West African French director needed several takes from multiple cameras to fully realize that shot of a loli's titty."

Bob is extremely smart.

I think the only reason Bob is defending this pedobait is due to it being directed by a colored woman woman of color. In his mind, the only reason people dislike this "film" (a word I use in its loosest sense) is because a black woman was involved in an executive position. Were it somebody his SJW overlords hated (or even some nobody), he'd be denouncing the film.

 

[Mola Ram]

I think the only reason Bob is defending this pedobait is due to it being directed by a colored woman woman of color. In his mind, the only reason people dislike this "film" (a word I use in its loosest sense) is because a black woman was involved in an executive position. Were it somebody his SJW overlords hated (or even some nobody), he'd be denouncing the film.

That's part of it, definitely. Another part is that this has, like so many things that never should have, broken into partisan lines, probably because it was Trump supporters who reacted to it most strongly. You can see some rightwing Never Trumpers not exactly defending it but taking a "wait and see" approach, all while pouring scorn on anyone who's lambasting it. (Sonny Bunch is a good example of this.) Bob is also very susceptible to any argument that flatters his intellect, and the swells have decided that this is a "nuanced," "challenging" film that requires great insight and perspicacity to really grasp. I guess it requires advanced degrees and voluminous film knowledge to appreciate the finer points of an 11 year old sexually grinding on a stage.

 

[Illiterate Wanderer]

Were it somebody his SJW overlords hated (or even some nobody), he'd be denouncing the film.

Yeah if this was produced by Steve Bannon or Mike Cernovich he'd be reeing hard.

 

[Neko GF]

Bob is now outright defending the concept of putting a child into a sexual exploitive situation.
View attachment 1590961

You can hit me with all the a-log ratings you want, but if I was to ever meet Bob in real life I would without hesitation punch him right in his face. And I'm not joking about that. He crosses my path and he's going to get knocked out.

Robert's ability to constantly sink to new lows is something else. This sub-70 IQ tard is seriously trying to defend a movie that sexualized pre-pubescent kids by pointing to obviously faked, over-the-top fight scenes where no one actually got hurt or died. Robert and other "professional critics" can cry "it was just an act" all they want but it doesn't change the fact that the people behind Cuties actually filmed and directed 11-year-olds twerking and other gross shit.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Robert ability to constantly sink to new lows is something else. This sub-70 IQ tard is seriously trying to defend a movie that sexualized pre-pubescent kids by pointing to obviously faked, over-the-top fight scenes where no one actually got hurt or died. Robert and other "professional critics" can cry "it was just an act" all they want but it doesn't change the fact that the people behind Cuties actually filmed and directed 11-year-olds twerking and other gross shit.

Not to mention the 600+ auditions where they had the girls twerk until they found the ones they wanted. Congratulations are in order for Bob's senpais, I suppose: they're proving that the Slippery Slope argument isn't a fallacy.

 

[Flexo]

You can see some rightwing Never Trumpers not exactly defending it but taking a "wait and see" approach, all while pouring scorn on anyone who's lambasting it. (Sonny Bunch is a good example of this.)

I saw that reported on Ace and I nearly blew a processor.

Sonny and JVL have been big disappointments and increasingly an example of what "Conservative In Name Only" means.

Robert's ability to constantly sink to new lows is something else. This sub-70 IQ tard is seriously trying to defend a movie that sexualized pre-pubescent kids by pointing to obviously faked, over-the-top fight scenes where no one actually got hurt or died. Robert and other "professional critics" can cry "it was just an act" all they want but it doesn't change the fact that the people behind Cuties actually filmed and directed 11-year-olds twerking and other gross shit.

Not to mention actually put them in those costumes.

(Though I was talking to a parent friend of mine and according to her - you can get worse clothes at wal-mart right now! So you know, if we're all in a burn-it-down mood...)

 

[LordofCringe7206]

I think the only reason Bob is defending this pedobait is due to it being directed by a colored woman woman of color. In his mind, the only reason people dislike this "film" (a word I use in its loosest sense) is because a black woman was involved in an executive position. Were it somebody his SJW overlords hated (or even some nobody), he'd be denouncing the film.

I don't deny this being a possibility. But even if this is the real reason for his pedodefending, it is so revealing about what a truly utter sociopath he is to his core. He would outright allow child sex abuse to happen just because of his hatred towards people he considers beneath him. There is no moral line with Bob, just who he hates and who he likes.

To understand the seriousness of what Bob is doing, let me frame it to everyone in the context of this very website. Bob hates us with a passion. He is so butt hurt and enraged over this website that he goes out of his way to avoid mentioning us by name. He thinks we are the absolute worst human beings on the planet.

There is strong possibility that if he knew who they were that Bob would have defended the likes of the zoosadists or Nick Bate because of this website opposing them. People who outright bragged about their crimes and later put behind bars for them would see Bob defending them just because Kiwi Farms is evil in his mind.

 

[Flexo]

I don't deny this being a possibility. But even if this is the real reason for his pedodefending, it is so revealing about what a truly utter sociopath he is to his core. He would outright allow child sex abuse to happen just because of his hatred towards people he considers beneath him. There is no moral line with Bob, just who he hates and who he likes.

To understand the seriousness of what Bob is doing, let me frame it to everyone in the context of this very website. Bob hates us with a passion. He is so butt hurt and enraged over this website that he goes out of his way to avoid mentioning us by name. He thinks we are the absolute worst human beings on the planet.

There is strong possibility that if he knew who they were that Bob would have defended the likes of the zoosadists or Nick Bate because of this website opposing them. People who outright bragged about their crimes and later put behind bars for them would see Bob defending them just because Kiwi Farms is evil in his mind.

Yeah, I don't know if I've ever seen Bob grasp or voice the idea of two evil sides fighting each other. I think in his mind, whichever side is evil, then those fighting them must be good.

He's exactly the kind of sociopath who would burn down an entire village because there were 2 gamergators hanging out in it.

 

[XtrmGamr719]

Bob... you do know Jackie Chan and his crew have gotten real life injuries from their stunt work, right?

Not to mention that stunt work has lead to deaths.

Though honestly comparing stunt work to basically child pornography is like apples to child pornography.

 

[Mola Ram]

I saw that reported on Ace and I nearly blew a processor.

Sonny and JVL have been big disappointments and increasingly an example of what "Conservative In Name Only" means.

OT, but Frum's might be the worst. It's certainly the funniest, with all that truly unfortunate imagery.

 

[Flexo]

Not to mention that stunt work has lead to deaths.

Though honestly comparing stunt work to basically child pornography is like apples to child pornography.

lol Well it's trying to argue Bob's autism on its own grounds (which is a sign of how dumb he is). He's so much on the "nothing that happens on screen is real" idea that he literally thinks nothing that's on the screen is real.

He needs to try and grasp: those are actual kids, on the screen, actually dancing. It isn't rendered fiction when you point a camera at it.

OT, but Frum's might be the worst. It's certainly the funniest, with all that truly unfortunate imagery.

View attachment 1591097

. . .

I'm sending you a bill. I'll decide later if it's for therapy-therapy or alcohol-therapy.

(Also I think I may actually punch David Frum over this tweet.)

 

[Illiterate Wanderer]

OT, but Frum's might be the worst. It's certainly the funniest, with all that truly unfortunate imagery.

David "Trump is our first Marxist president" Frum

 

[Bolo]

Here is the rest of Robert's argumentation that LordofCringe posted earlier:

Been a while since I saw Robert being this much of a disingenuous asshole. For a guy who bemoans bad faith argumentation, he sure as fuck engages in one as a pro.

like it was pointed out before, the Jackie chan comparison is ridiculous, and so is the Exorcist/Linda Blair one.

The point, Robert, isn't that the child actor risking injury and use of body doubles, but how the said child is DEPICTED you idiot. Even if the movies used body doubles for the butt cheeks close in, there is still PLENTY of wides showing the 11 year olds in skimpy outfits, even a fucking poster!

So the point is mute, close in or not, these girls were already exposed and sexualized in the movie. And even if the girls have every single support from their guardians, friends etc, they still have to deal being seen in the public eye like that, it's a tough call. Brooke Shields is 50 and she still getting questions because of "Pretty Baby".

And if the production used body doubles, they would be screaming that shit from every hill right now either way because of the backlash.

Look, there is an argument that can be made that for a movie talking about a uncomfortable subject, it needs to show said uncomfortable subject, I get that.

But regardless the point being about the girls, the movie or the message, the thing is, Robert can play low just as much as the people he "fights" over the internet when it suits him.

Incredible condescending and dismissive, Robert cares about who is making the point, not the argument itself. If Lindsay Ellis came against the movie, Robelt would be calling for the producer's head right now.

For all that virtuous posing, talk about empathy and intelligence, all that is gone when it's time to do twitter battle.

Fucking asshole.

 

[The Nothingness]

I think the only reason Bob is defending this pedobait is due to it being directed by a colored woman woman of color. In his mind, the only reason people dislike this "film" (a word I use in its loosest sense) is because a black woman was involved in an executive position. Were it somebody his SJW overlords hated (or even some nobody), he'd be denouncing the film.

See his recent defending of Megan Fox from dudebro director, Michael Bay, despite his past comments about the former.

 

[A Big Bumbling Black Man]

David "Trump is our first Marxist president" Frum

Funny how it's always the people who crow about "empathy" the most who can't seem to understand that in order for one to "excuse" Trumps' "scandals" they'd have to actually believe Trump is guilty of his opponents' allegations, which his supporters don't.
Bob displayed this the most when he pretended people defending Kavanaugh were somehow defending rapists.
It's just another way Bob uses his flawed logic to validate his seething bigotry.

 

[Bolo]

See his recent defending of Megan Fox from dudebro director, Michael Bay, despite his past comments about the former.

The Megan Fox thing is just Robert paying atonement on the church he kneels for. And it goes without saying that its just performative.

I don't believe for a second that Robert really enjoys some rinky-dinky, Asilum tier, b-movie, even in the deatched "it has some good action" way people call these type of movies.

The point is, Robert is very conscious on the way he ragged on Megan Fox, and even if he tries to excuse it as in "everybody else was doing it", the way Robert did went over the edge because his incel rage got the best of him, as usual, and now every chance he gets, he kisses Megan Fox's ass in penitence.

 

[Neko GF]

Robert's really energetic today! In addition to pedo-shielding, Robert's also up to usual shit, advocating for voter suppression:

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304790531315322880 (Archive)

"Muh bullies 'n sheeeiiiiiit":

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304789470458384384 (Archive)

"you necrotic sundowning human gourd":

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304779738972655624 (Archive)

How will Drumpf ever recover from this SICK BURN from professional NEET Robert Chipman?!

 

[Flexo]

I don't believe for a second that Robert really enjoys some rinky-dinky, Asilum tier, b-movie, even in the deatched "it has some good action" way people call these type of movies.

Eh.... Bob has such basic bitch tastes I could see him enjoying it unironically.

 

[A Big Bumbling Black Man]

I've never stanned for Tulsi before, but I enjoy how much her occasional common sense gets under Blob's skin.