Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[Doctor Placebo]

Bob is now outright defending the concept of putting a child into a sexual exploitive situation.
View attachment 1590961

You can hit me with all the a-log ratings you want, but if I was to ever meet Bob in real life I would without hesitation punch him right in his face. And I'm not joking about that. He crosses my path and he's going to get knocked out.

Celluloid Chubster: "Akshually, that West African French director needed several takes from multiple cameras to fully realize that shot of a loli's titty."

Bob is extremely smart.

I didn't see the film, but I saw the PaymoneyWubby review where he showed clips, and there's a scene full of little girls groping each other's asses. I'd love to hear what behind the scenes stuff on "how it was filmed" could possibly exonerate that.

These comments also make me pretty positive Diabeeto didn't actually see the film either.

I think the only reason Bob is defending this pedobait is due to it being directed by a colored woman woman of color. In his mind, the only reason people dislike this "film" (a word I use in its loosest sense) is because a black woman was involved in an executive position. Were it somebody his SJW overlords hated (or even some nobody), he'd be denouncing the film.

Absolutely. Tactics and targets wasn't just a throwaway comment for him, it's literally the credo he lives his whole life around. If the right people are doing something it's automatically good and if the wrong people are doing something it's automatically the most evil thing ever. He's just proving now that he does in fact apply that to absolutely everything, including pedo shit. Indie film makers are the "right" people, unless they're associated with the political right in some way or said something unwoke, therefore everything they do is right. WOC's are the "right" people therefore everything they do is right, unless they're dirty Uncle Toms who support Trump in which case they're not people.

I don't think he's personally a pedo. He's a severely stunted and warped individual who worships and bootlicks an industry that has a major pedo problem. I'm not sure if that really makes him any better.

 

[Judge Dredd]

And from watching it come up as it was trending, I actually don’t doubt it was started by a bot campaign. The overuse of hashtags, the same exact images and phrasing and the accounts did not seem organic.

I don't use social media so I don't see a lot of that stuff, but I know the feeling. Ru Paul's Drag Race is one of those shows that is everywhere. On billboards, bus stops, pushed heavily on Netflix, but nobody I know watches it. She-Ra and Black Panther were similar, but the hype was limited to the internet.

Makes me wonder how many woke shows and films have artificially inflated hype.

 

[Zaryiu]

@Ralph Barnhardt has captured quite an important tweet in the annals of Bobology. Nota Bene:

View attachment 1519590

This is simply a new, camouflaged through verbal spinach version of "No bad tactics, only bad targets."

Bob is a hateful little fuck with violent fantasies he cultivates to assuage his own impotence.

You forgot an horrifying fact: Bob still isn't the bottom of the barrel in terms of being pathetic, that would be his fans/those that see him as a mentor/follow him on Twitter and side with him more or less (yes all 3 categories of people exist out there)

 

[The Littlest Shitlord]

And from watching it come up as it was trending, I actually don’t doubt it was started by a bot campaign. The overuse of hashtags, the same exact images and phrasing and the accounts did not seem organic. For what reasons, I can only speculate. That doesn’t change that real people noticed and were disgusted by the movie.

Sounds like corporate rivalry to me. I smell a Rat.

 

[dzonatan]

This is what frustrates me most about Bob; How could a man who spends so much time arguing online be so bad at it?

Because it doesn't matter if you're good at it or not anymore.
Internet discourse has been reduced to junior high corridor debate.
Frustrating your opponent into leaving in disgust is viewed as a sign of victory.

 

[TheAmbiguousLurker]

There’s a saying in criticism that “depiction does not equal endorsement.” Art should be able to address taboos without necessarily advocating for them

That's the point, Dipshit. Depiction does not equal endorsement, but this movie isn't a depiction. A depiction is artificial, it's a recreation, a trick on the senses using allusions, special effects and actors to portray a version of the topic that's free of real world consequence. Cuties is an active participation in the immoral act. It's not a dummy with fake blood spilled over it to simulate a corpse, it's not two consenting adults pretending to scream in pain and horror to simulate rape, it's not a dog trained to react like it's in great pain in response to a soft pretend kick to simulate animal abuse; it's real under-aged girls being forced to act provocatively and be objectified on camera by a swarm of adults in an industry that's known for the abuse of it's child actors. Where's the wall between reality? Where's the artificial aspect that makes this a simulation? What part of the creation process stopped it from actually being soft-core child porn?

 

[Mola Ram]

We interrupt your "Cuties" shitstorm to remind you that Bob is eager to defend a whole smorgasbord of sexual weirdness in pop culture.

 

[Bolo]

We interrupt your "Cuties" shitstorm to remind you that Bob is eager to defend a whole smorgasbord of sexual weirdness in pop culture.

View attachment 1591770

If Dr. Strange would only do pee pee surgery on "passable" people, then he would not have a dime on his pocket.

Robert loves to indulge this crazy person, wonder if he got the very obvious tone of regret and resentment Ellie here holds about cutting off his own dick.

Yeah, estrogen isn't magic, neither is surgery, and there is no such a thing as "passable" for 99% of trans people, everybody can see, it is just polite to not point it out.

oh, and for the 1% androgynous elf people, the disfigured genitalia is still there, and regardless of gender or sexual orientation, it still is a hurdle to be attracted to it when things come down to it.

If you wanna go trans, fucking go for it, just know that reality won't bend to anyones caprices and it is far, far more easy to be accepting of trans in a public and general way, than in a particular and personal fashion.

Case in point, a query for you Ellie, you think your good friend, movie Robert, would have sex with you?

 

[Strange Wilderness]

Here is the rest of Robert's argumentation that LordofCringe posted earlier:

View attachment 1591057

Bobs arguments about Jackie Chan and Kane Hodder would hold weight if those two had actually killed people filming their movies, but those two weren't making snuff films they were making real movies. When Chan kills a henchman its a choreographed stunt that multiple people worked on to ensure it wouldn't end with a guy in a body-bag. When Hodder was killing dumb teens in the woods as Jason he was stabbing mannequins or slamming sleeping bags full of bricks into trees. The production of their films was based on using special effects to simulate their characters killing people. Cuties, like CGoris, Awesome Man, and countless other people have said before, actually uses young children who actually act out sexual activity and are shot in a way that emphasizes their genitalia. It doesn't matter how many stunt butts you use at the end of the day the film has shots of little girls acting out sexual scenes on camera, uninterrupted and uncut. They used real children in the film to actually act out some of these scenes instead of just using movie magic to simulate the scene on screen.

If Cuties really is a coming of age drama about a young girl defying her restrictive home life and trying to find liberation through sexuality only to realize how far people take it, there are ways to tell the same story without including underage children. Do what Game of Thrones did and age up its child characters to acceptable ages. Instead of a 12 year old boy trying to sexually assault an 11 year old girl like in the books they changed it to a 17 year old boy trying to sexually assault a 14 year old girl played by actors in their teens in the show. Both are meant to be disturbing scenes that show Jofferys cruelty and how vulnerable Sansa is, but one is written on paper and doesn't involve real people while the other has real actors who are at a believable age when people have sex and might be exposed to sexual assault and both actors are at an age when they understand that and know just what they are acting out.

Cuties should have had its characters aged up to 13 or 14 and played by 17-20 year old actresses. That way they can have it be about girls discovering their sexuality and acting out in a way that balances the line between "what I'm watching is messed up and its disturbing that society glorifies this behavior" and "holy shit why are you focusing on two 11 year olds grinding on each other?" You could have told the same story but with characters who would realisticly be exposed to this behavior in their lives and played by actresses who are at the age of consent and actually understand just what they are doing. One scenario is not the best thing in the world but its a little more tolerable than what audiences had to deal with. Bob of course doesn't see Cuties as anything more than something he can use to attack people he doesn't like and kiss-up to the clique he wants to be apart of no different than High School.

 

[Flexo]

Case in point, a query for you Ellie, you think your good friend, movie Robert, would have sex with you?

You think he can afford to be that picky?

Or that Ellie would survive the experience?

 

[The Nothingness]

Bobs arguments about Jackie Chan and Kane Hodder would hold weight if those two had actually killed people filming their movies, but those two weren't making snuff films they were making real movies. When Chan kills a henchman its a choreographed stunt that multiple people worked on to ensure it wouldn't end with a guy in a body-bag. When Hodder was killing dumb teens in the woods as Jason he was stabbing mannequins or slamming sleeping bags full of bricks into trees. The production of their films was based on using special effects to simulate their characters killing people.

So what you're saying about Bob is that...

 

[Neko GF]

Why is he so contempt with defending pedobait?

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304944752610213937 (Archive)

"The alt-right and Q-Anon are bad because they don't like a "film" about pre-pubescent children". Most people agree with that notion, Robert. That's a good advertisement for the "alt-right" and "Q-Anon" and a bad one for Robert and other Neolib tards. He's actually that dumb.

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

Why is he so contempt with defending pedobait?
View attachment 1592003
https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304944752610213937 (Archive)

"The alt-right and Q-Anon are bad because they don't like a "film" about pre-pubescent children". Most people agree with that notion, Robert. That's a good advertisement for the "alt-right" and "Q-Anon" and a bad one for Robert and other Neolib tards. He's actually that dumb.

Bob's one supporter(?) in that thread

https://twitter.com/Ospero79/status/1304952744864821248

https://archive.vn/vzhu3

https://twitter.com/Ospero79

https://archive.vn/4I2Oh

trannies, ABDLs, and now bronies...Bob has collected the triforce of degeneracy.

EDIT TO NOT DOUBLE POST:

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304955974529306630

https://archive.vn/IXDnl

Lindsay Ellis and every one of your supposed "mutuals" continues to want nothing to do with you.

https://twitter.com/the_moviebob/status/1304956670515318784

https://archive.vn/NSdms

Still no idea how Greenwald and Assange play into a movie where they exploited children. I need to eat more limited edition MCU Superi-o's

 

[Neko GF]

Bob's one supporter(?) in that thread

https://twitter.com/Ospero79/status/1304952744864821248

https://archive.vn/vzhu3

View attachment 1592046
View attachment 1592060
View attachment 1592047

https://twitter.com/Ospero79

https://archive.vn/4I2Oh

View attachment 1592064
trannies, ABDLs, and now bronies...Bob has collected the triforce of degeneracy.

"You don't have that many followers and retweet people I don't like!!! Shut up!!!". What a compelling argument against the fact that the pedobait is pedobait. Also, if having a low amount of followers after so many years is a warning sign, does that mean that we don't have to take this person seriously? 58 followers over 8 years is really unimpressive.

 

[Zaryiu]

So when does "pedo sympathizer" gets added to the thread title?

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

So when does "pedo sympathizer" gets added to the thread title?

Let's give it a week before go that far. I'm fairly convinced that this has nothing to do with Bob's concern about exploitation and everything to do with the "right" people saying "This movie is le gud!" and the "wrong" people saying "This was advertised as pedo shit and we do not like pedo shit!". I am legit curious to see how badly everyone gets burned by this, assuming it doesn't get memory holed and the gradual acceptance of this pedo shit gets quietly inserted into our sub conscious.

 

[Judge Dredd]

It's come up several times in the thread, so I've got to ask. Who or what is Q-Anon? I don't follow American politics closely enough to know, but I do recognise them being name dropped like GamerGate was. Flip flopping between laughable far-right conspiracy theory about nothing in particular that no sane person would believe, and a shadowy super-villain controlling right wing populism all across the world.

 

[Zaryiu]

Let's give it a week before go that far. I'm fairly convinced that this has nothing to do with Bob's concern about exploitation and everything to do with the "right" people saying "This movie is le gud!" and the "wrong" people saying "This was advertised as pedo shit and we do not like pedo shit!". I am legit curious to see how badly everyone gets burned by this, assuming it doesn't get memory holed and the gradual acceptance of this pedo shit gets quietly inserted into our sub conscious.

On the one hand I agree but on the other I want Bob to never forget how low he sunk

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

It's come up several times in the thread, so I've got to ask. Who or what is Q-Anon? I don't follow American politics closely enough to know, but I do recognise them being name dropped like GamerGate was. Flip flopping between laughable far-right conspiracy theory about nothing in particular that no sane person would believe, and a shadowy super-villain controlling right wing populism all across the world.

QAnon is a person, or a group of people, who claim to be US government insiders who drop inconvenient truths about the Deep State. In truth, their "inconvenient truths" are so in line with current trends that it'd be tough for them to be wrong. For many on the right, however, Q feeds their confirmation bias, and so is held as sacrosanct and infallible. In my opinion, it's likely a group of speds from /b/ having a laugh. If you'd like to judge for yourself, Q's stuff can be found here (dead link as of this post, but it was active 4 days ago so it may come back) and here.
Bob and his ilk bring it up like GamerGate because it gives them a tangible enemy to direct their hatred against. Think Goldstein from 1984- an enemy who can be spat upon, discredited, and trampled into the dirt, yet somehow always survives. To keep the thread on topic, for Bob in particular this means that it's not his fault he's been reduced to a 40 year old manbaby defending softcore child porn- it's Q's fault, just like it was GamerGate's fault five or six years ago.

 

[Zaryiu]

It's come up several times in the thread, so I've got to ask. Who or what is Q-Anon? I don't follow American politics closely enough to know, but I do recognise them being name dropped like GamerGate was. Flip flopping between laughable far-right conspiracy theory about nothing in particular that no sane person would believe, and a shadowy super-villain controlling right wing populism all across the world.

There is/was a theory Q-Anon wasis a controlled opposition version of Alex Jones (I heard that in multiple places)