Just gonna skip the politisperging and coofsperging and focus on what is theoretically Blobbo's career:
Oh, and lest we forget his moniker is "MovieBob":
View attachment 1822739
More Azn-made sci-fi kung-fu B-flick for your elite tastes:
View attachment 1822747
For the first one, I have not seen Crazy Samurai Musashi, but from
Adam/YMS's quick review, the movie is...pretty awful (he deemed it the worst movie he saw from the festival). Once you get past the gimmick of "oh wow it's all done in one take," the actual film is apparently pretty amateurish. Cinematography is bad, sound is loud and obnoxious, the blood spatters are all CGI, and the fighting--basically what they're hinging their entire movie on--is laughably awful ("some LARPer pretending to swordfight the worst video game NPCs of all time").
Bob will also be disappointed to find out how the "1 vs. 400" (not 500 you fat retard, it's even on the poster) plays out. Again, this is secondhand, but it's basically just groups of 20-40 people attacking, with most of them just kinda standing back as they run into the MC one at a time. And whenever someone gets killed, they just stumble out of frame, partly so they're out of the way and partly so that they can reuse them quickly. So instead of having a bunch of corpses lying around, they just...disappear. The only ones that stick around are the last few of a group.
So yeah, seems like yet another movie that's trying to score some cheap points by going the "oh wow it's all done in one take" thing (and if Adam's right, there was even an obvious cut in the middle of the movie so they might have just lied about it entirely). I guess as long as it keeps working on simpletons like Bobby, hack filmmakers will keep doing it.
(Let me take a moment to say that I have some respect for any filmmakers that do long scenes--or even a whole movie--in one take. Even if they're not done especially well, I'll at least give a point for effort. But there seem to be an increasing number of examples of movies that throw in a scene where it's all shot in one take, either because the filmmaker wants to show off or they want to trick reviewers into thinking their films are actually better than they are. I mean, fuck, The Bye Bye Man had a one-take opening scene, and that movie is a dumpster fire. Basically, I'm not gonna gush over a film solely because they did a one-take thing. If the movie's bad, no gimmick will make it good.)
For the second one, Skyline is one of the worst movies I've ever had the displeasure of paying full price to see in theaters. It was ridiculously stupid and utterly boring, and certainly nothing I'd ever want to see more of; I audibly guffawed at the sequel hook in the end. Honestly, it wouldn't take much for a sequel to be better because of how low the bar was set, so I wouldn't be surprised if either sequel was. But "fucking awesome" (who are you censoring for, Bob?)? Please, Bob, get some fucking standards. It's a cheapo alien invasion movie. I swear, all you'd have to do is film some jingling keys and Bob would declare it the best movie of the year.