Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
The comparison doesn't even work though. That was one bakery that didn't want to produce a specific product and they had to go looking for it.

This is several mega corps conspiring against their competition and political enemies.
They don't see the difference, and therein lies the key to their tactics. Just like they see labor as anything a human being does to make it exist in reality, private businesses are all ranked the same. A coordinated attack by huge entities is normal to them because - like the whole cake thing - they saw that incident as huge entities coordinating to attack them. To them everything is a conspiratorial chess move, which is also how the Soviets saw any of their former bloc nations that disagreed with them; it was imperialist subterfuge, and anyone who is against them even slightly is evidence of everyone secretly hating them and conspiring to destroy them.
This will seem familiar to anyone who has come across political trannies.
 
They don't see the difference, and therein lies the key to their tactics. Just like they see labor as anything a human being does to make it exist in reality, private businesses are all ranked the same. A coordinated attack by huge entities is normal to them because - like the whole cake thing - they saw that incident as huge entities coordinating to attack them. To them everything is a conspiratorial chess move, which is also how the Soviets saw any of their former bloc nations that disagreed with them; it was imperialist subterfuge, and anyone who is against them even slightly is evidence of everyone secretly hating them and conspiring to destroy them.
This will seem familiar to anyone who has come across political trannies.
Every single day that goes by, the average libtard thinks like a fucking Skaven.
I don't know, but this is probably one of the best times to apply to be an Amish just to escape the bugmen and their megacorp masters.

But this is probably Bob's wet dream.
 
To go off topic since Bob keeps sperging about it, wouldn’t Democrats now be less incline to work with Hollywood because Trump was part of the Hollywood elite?
Absolutely not. Trump was never a Hollywood guy, he is a tycoon from New York. The Democrats need Hollywood. It's been a bastion of Progressive sentiment and increasingly blatant propaganda for years. Look how many of its celebrities lined up against Bush back in the day. When Trump came along, they only grew incredibly vindictive and eager to make political ads and statements for Democrats especially with the recent Georgia elections. When nearly all of the Avengers announce support for your candidates, are you going to just turn them down? The Dems need to appeal to the youth and child-like consoomers such as Blobert. If anything, they need Hollywood now to create films to demonize the Trump era for current and future generations. It might just get Congress to bail out the movie theater industry like Bob has shaking his jowls about.

"That of all the arts, to us the most important is cinema" -Lenin
 
To go off topic since Bob keeps sperging about it, wouldn’t Democrats now be less incline to work with Hollywood because Trump was part of the Hollywood elite?
No. It’s never been an issue and never will be, in all honesty. Besides how highly valued the Cinema industry is, it’s also a cultural hotbed of spreadable memes and ideology waiting to happen. Celebrities talk, and they’re bad at keeping it under wraps. What better way to say “Go Dems!” then get the approval of the “gods” and “baby uwu”s that the younger generation worship, and have them unitedly promote it, right? It’s an interesting relationship that my grandfather after Vietnam came home to and talked about.

“Hollywood and the Government are Yin and Yang, kid. Both have actors, with power to change the world if they see fit. The only difference? One we listen to, one we obey. If we were to get politicians into Hollywood, we wouldn’t know, and we’ve always had actors since when I was a boy running the Government. You’re stupid if you think anyone would pass up that nexus of hyper charged influence. They’re soul bound, for better or worse, until the world stops turning.”

*Note: I’m not that old, he didn’t immediately come back and say it. He just had perspective after simmering on it for a few decades and decided to chat me on it.
 
Absolutely not. Trump was never a Hollywood guy, he is a tycoon from New York. The Democrats need Hollywood. It's been a bastion of Progressive sentiment and increasingly blatant propaganda for years. Look how many of its celebrities lined up against Bush back in the day. When Trump came along, they only grew incredibly vindictive and eager to make political ads and statements for Democrats especially with the recent Georgia elections. When nearly all of the Avengers announce support for your candidates, are you going to just turn them down? The Dems need to appeal to the youth and child-like consoomers such as Blobert. If anything, they need Hollywood now to create films to demonize the Trump era for current and future generations. It might just get Congress to bail out the movie theater industry like Bob has shaking his jowls about.

"That of all the arts, to us the most important is cinema" -Lenin
Exactly. The Dems have a death grip on culture, which is why Conservatives like Ben Shapiro have been saying that the right needs to create its own culture--a "counter culture" if you will. What Bob and effectively 99.9% of Hollywood fail to understand is that their entire world is based on fantasy and outright lies. None of the so-called Avengers are superheroes. That is all acting, green screen, and bad CGI. Frankly, it disturbs me how Bob views the celebrities who share his opinions as prophets or even gods, and fuck, you could argue that these actors live on Olympus and wholly separate from the people they lie to for a living. I'm not a strong christian, but I do believe that humans are hardwired for religion and nature abhors a vacuum. Bob basically replaced God with some twisted chimera of politics, science, and pop culture, and scripture with woke ideology.

Fuck. Can we just rename the the great Los Angeles area, "Jonestown" and pass the Flavor-Aid already?
 
Christ, nothing has changed. Bob is STILL a fat, barely-functional retard who has never gotten laid.
You fool.
Kamala will grant him the hottest Trump wrongthinking barbie the law can enforce as a sex slave, wave science wands around and find a pill that converts your fat into lean skeletal tissue, then Kamala will have a heart-to-heart with Lindsay Ellis and she'll go back to Bob wearing nothing but 2 dimes and a dorito chip and begging Bob for forgiveness and offering her eternal loyalty in return. Lastly, she'll declare online movie spazzing an essential artform and given a cultural milestone award.
And that's just as VP, when she comes out and becomes the first non-binary BIPOC trans-radical president, the next day Bob will be offered the 1st android body to transplant his fat head into and be granted immortality. As a bonus on top of everything, Bob's suit will come with lasers and rockets that he will be given full authority to use on Trumpers at his sole discretion.

That and much more are the boundless prizes that await those who voted for the Superior future.
Just you wait.
 
I hope Bob doesn’t see this and get his head explode.
01C5DFCD-BA40-44B8-BE06-756B11E146D3.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Also, how much time it will take for Merriam-Webster to revise the definition of terrorism? Because those guys in the capitol, as stupid as their actions were, didn't commited a single act of terrorist. Like the Nazi label, how long will it take for terrorism to be "doing anything that i do not like". After all, shit like this already happens in some other countries.
I don't know about Merriam-Webster but the current Wikipedia page for "Domestic Terrorism" includes the storming of the Capitol as an example:
TERRORISM.png


Funny thing about it was when someone edited the page to include a pic of said "terrorists":
TERRORIST GRANNY.png

As expected the Wikipedia editors got ass-pained and quickly removed it because showcasing a Terrorist Granny undermines their "ALL THESE MAGAs ARE TERRORISTS" narrative.

You know what ISN'T listed as an example of domestic terrorism? The 1983 U.S. Senate bombing by a radical left-wing group
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_United_States_Senate_bombing). This was an ACTUAL terrorist attack on the Capitol Building by people ACTUALLY attempting to overthrow the government. One of the people arrested for this was Susan Rosenberg (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rosenberg). She had her sentence commuted in 2001 by Bill Clinton and is now a free woman working for the Black Lives Matter Global Network. I mention all this to show how there is absolutely no political bias in Wikipedia.
 
I know this is a retard troon and that Chris is also as retarded as him, but do they realize what they would achieve with this? Because this is a good recipie for disaster, but it's not like they would retract their statement even if you told them the consequences. I could go on a tirade, but i have done enough expositions in this thread already and i think all of you have far more braincells than these two smoothbrains.

Also, how much time it will take for Merriam-Webster to revise the definition of terrorism? Because those guys in the capitol, as stupid as their actions were, didn't commited a single act of terrorist. Like the Nazi label, how long will it take for terrorism to be "doing anything that i do not like". After all, shit like this already happens in some other countries.
That depends what your definition of terrorist is.
I'm eagerly waiting for Chris' Groverhaus saga.

As for the Blob, fuck him. He's not human in my eyes. Positron was right, I got my blood boiling the more I read his Twatter tirade.
Bob is one of the few people who it's acceptable to get MATI about.
Between his tirade and the thread about relatives and friends reporting aquaintances to the FBI for the capitol shit, i'm really horrified and furious.
At this point, i really believe that city people are bugmen 100% without fail. Who the fuck would be capable of reporting their parents to their country authorities just for not being in the same political line? Holy shit, things are fucked. Living off the grid is the way, fellas. We better get ready to abandon society soon.
Yeah, some cities are fucked and as I live in London I'm at the centre of all of that. It's always an interesting experience listening to
:lol:
I know its getting washed away in the politico-autism storm but that's a pretty good Bobism.
"FUCK OLD/AT RISK PEOPLE, HEALTH CARE WORKERS, AND FIRST RESPONDERS, GET AS MUCH OF THAT VACCINE TO DISNEY STUDIOS ASAP! There isn't enough to consume! DO YOU WANT ME TO STARVE?"
But those old people probably voted Republican, so their lives don't matter.

I felt ill typing that. I don't know how Bob can legitimately believe that.
We should just call this the "White Scare." Much like the Communists of old, Bob and his ilk seem to, unintentionally or not, embraced de-kulakization as their preferred method of removing their foes.
In that case, we need a White Guard, one of the many advantages of which is that we get to use some pretty metal marching songs. I mean, who else has a march called ”The Song of the Conquering Freedom Fighter” with lyrics such as ”thousands of Russkies may come. The Karelian Army shall deal with them” and ”down with the red Russkies. Show no mercy to the enemy!”
The young are the easiest to radicalize. It's no coincidence that Orwell devoted some sections of 1984 just to talk about kids reporting their parents.
Yeah. I wonder when they'll get brown shirts and a special salute.
Only problem with that statement is that the kulaks were actually huge bastards who banked of the actual working class aka farmers and driving those into debt, thus making sure they stayed in the kulaks services. So really, Id say Bobby and his ilk are more fitting as the kulaks since they dont wanna work, but gladly wish to benefit of work of others.
That depends hugely on what you mean by kulak. Most kulaks were poor peasants who only became rich because they bought land during Stolypin's reforms and weren't rich landowners.
Trump got band by Deutsche bank and some other bank called Signature said they will not do buisness with "any members of Congress who voted to disregard the electoral college". Bob responds.
View attachment 1842667
Bob stan RukiTanuki feels the need to politely correct a black man to remind him of the protected class that is the gays.
View attachment 1842668

I'd say the same tired thing about this coming back on them but it won't matter because they don't care. I am fully convinced that Bob will do/say whatever he will to ingratiate himself with those who will hurt his preconceived "enemies" no matter what it costs him. It's not like he's got anything to lose anyways.
So it's okay for a social network to refuse service to conservatives because it goes against their moral beliefs? Fair enough, although I'm not sure a market can be truly free if everyone in that market agreed to gang up on everyone outside it. But either way, the left have just set the precedent, and very publically set it, that it's okay for a business to refuse service to people if that service would contradict their moral beliefs. Now let's say, hypothetically, that a similar case to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission happens, and a gay guy walks into a bakery owned by a Christian and demands a cake for a gay marriage. By this precedent, the owners of that bakery could very legally tell him ”fuck off, battyman, and read Leviticus 18:22” and the left would be in no position to complain.
Real question, if Twitter crumbled, where do you think Bob would go? Facebook?
Twitter is such a big part of his life it's hard to say what he'd do.
I'm not a strong christian, but I do believe that humans are hardwired for religion and nature abhors a vacuum. Bob basically replaced God with some twisted chimera of politics, science, and pop culture, and scripture with woke ideology.
Yeah. It's worth noting that the cult of personality around some politicians only really developed after society began to secularise.
 
That depends hugely on what you mean by kulak. Most kulaks were poor peasants who only became rich because they bought land during Stolypin's reforms and weren't rich landowners.
Most were a small number, a large majority of kulaks were from a rich family's or got a large inheritance. Suffice to say to them it was all about money and not the land itself, jacking up credit prices, and so forth to screw over other peasants/farmers. But this is kinda off topic.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Koby_Fish
Also, how much time it will take for Merriam-Webster to revise the definition of terrorism? Because those guys in the capitol, as stupid as their actions were, didn't commited a single act of terrorist. Like the Nazi label, how long will it take for terrorism to be "doing anything that i do not like". After all, shit like this already happens in some other countries.
that's what it was like throughout the 2000s; after 9/11, the legal definition of terrorism became so loose it could be used to mean nearly anything
also, the folk in the Capitol made one critical error - they forgot to black up first
if they'd been blacked up, I'm sure we'd never have heard anything negative about it
 
Most were a small number, a large majority of kulaks were from a rich family's or got a large inheritance. Suffice to say to them it was all about money and not the land itself, jacking up credit prices, and so forth to screw over other peasants/farmers. But this is kinda off topic.
This is definitely off topic but according to Wikipedia, which has a left wing bias and so would be expected to be against the kulaks, most kulaks were peasants who bought their land under Stolypin. There was a wealth of difference between the kulaks and the landed aristocracy.
if they'd been blacked up, I'm sure we'd never have heard anything negative about it
”mostly peaceful racial justice protestors march into democracy's birthplace in attempt to convince Pmurt that Black [sic] lives matter”
 
Yeah, some cities are fucked and as I live in London I'm at the centre of all of that. It's always an interesting experience listening to
fucking hell, gutted - one of the biggest advantages of living in small-town South Yorkshire, besides the low cost of living, is that this sort of bullshit is still many, many years away, assuming it ever gets here at all (it's virulent, but it dies quickly outside cities and the south)
 
Real question, if Twitter crumbled, where do you think Bob would go? Facebook?
That's a good question. Bob likes Twitter so much because it's easy to post there and get his dopamine hits, but also because it's a place where he has a big number of followers so he can pretend he's still relevant. The only other place where he has a huge follower count is YouTube, but that platform isn't good for the sperging Bob usually does. As we saw with his his little "private account" experiment, Bob got almost no followers there and dropped it like a hot potato the second he was allowed to sperg about the subhumans on his usual account again so the number of Followers/Subscribers matters for Bob even if he gets little engagement.

If Twitter goes away I think Bob would either start using his YouTube channel for his hot takes due to his subscriber count there (even if the majority of those accounts are dead), or start using Facebook and forever feel an impotent rage that his Facebook follows would be a tenth of what he had on Twitter. But making videos is too much effort for Bob so the Facebook option seems more likely.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back