Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

How will Bob react to seeing the Mario film?


  • Total voters
    1,451
Status
Not open for further replies.
Shhhh! If you point out -- like Judge Jeanine Pirro did -- that illegals are full of diseases and they are going to spread them in the US. You are a bad person and are likely full of money as well:
EvskViIXAAI1TRw.jpg
1) Mexico is badly affected by covid (source)
2) Ciudad Juarez is a literal shithole, so diseases are likely to spread quickly there
3) many illegal immigrants cross the border at or near Juarez.

These are all facts, and the obvious conclusion is that many covid cases come from Juarez.
The Dems are increasing blatant in their degradation of political opponents, which is exactly what Bobby wants.
5.png
If I ran a conservative media company, I'd be thanking my lucky stars that Blob existed.
 
LOL MovieBlob had to defend Olive Garden's honor ("There's actually nothing wrong with Olive Garden. Except they let white trash like you in". Zing!) because it's something he enjoys. Also the irony of the guy who makes Mt. Dew marinated chicken and Keystone Light beeramids calling someone else white trash is hilarious.
 
Robert knows nothing of technology.
Robert knows nothing of science.
Robert knows nothing of politics.
Robert knows nothing of religion.
Robert knows nothing of society.
Robert knows nothing of interpersonal communication.
Robert knows nothing of intrapersonal communication.
Robert knows next to nothing about movies and videogames.
Robert knows next to nothing about popculture.
Robert cannot for the life of him construct a sentence based on human grammar, logic and rationality.
Robert cannot for the life of him engage in culinarily activities that would result in a meal that is anything other than the equivalent to pig slop.

Of course he can't grasp the philosophical implications of his own beliefs. Yet despite all of this, he continues to flap his mouth about these topics as if he had any significant insight in them, and as we all know, he does so in the most asinine ways possible. Part of the reason for why he does this is simply because he is deluded and dumb. I'm not saying this to be needlessly mean — it's just the inevitable conclusion one must make after having spent some time following this thread and reading his ramblings on social media. If the theory he concocted in his younger years of Ubisoft's supposed (indirect?) involvement in 9/11 is anything to go by, then I believe that we can all agree with the notion that Robert is a quite dense and illogical individual, to put it mildly — if the abundance of all other evidence pointing to this verdict weren't convincing enough. The other part of the reason as to why he behaves the way he does, is because Robert firmly belives that if he were to not do this, then his enemies would win — and boy do Robert have enemies, imagined or otherwise. That the vast majority of his enemies are merely law-abiding people who does not know who he is, and would most likely recoil in contempt as soon as he opened the bottomless pit that is his mouth, is either a realization that Robert has never had, or is otherwise completely supressed in the moldy recesses of his dark mind, where all things unplesant to our dearest pseudo-cinephile are stowed away for scrutiny at his much fantasized about judgement day. Robert has been operating solely on dimwitted, hate-filled and vitriolic momentum for quite some time now. The moment he stops to get off the ride, it's likely that everything will collapse. Perhaps he is aware of this?

Others continually assert their belief that Robert reads this thread, but I very much doubt it. He might get some "reports" filling him in on the overall scoop of what is discussed here and elsewhere from his fans and the like from time to time, but Robert is a man who posses neither the integrity nor the bravery to log onto this website, much less to actively engage in arguments in this thread — especially not without the ability to block people and generally steer the course of the conversation.

Regardless, I believe that you're overthinking your analysis, Malgor-san, even though your conclusions are correct. The reason for the perpetual clusterfuck that is Robert Chipman is so easily explained, yet precisely because of the simplistic answer to his being, people can't help but continue to try and grasp for some more detailed and reasonable explanation for Roberts behavior. That he would be the way he is, that he would say the things he do, because of something other than a grander plan, simply perplexes the more orderly and reasonable members of polite society. The unfortunate truth is that Robert is the way he is simply because it's in his nature, like with the fable of the scorpion and the frog, combined with what might have been a subpar quality of upbringing (I'm not versed well enough in Bobology to claim that his parents are at fault though). Whichever forces that decided to bestow upon us with Robert Chipman are indeed cruel, for to be able to concoct such a horrifying individual is nothing short than an act which goes against the very concept of virtue and righteousness in this world. I've come to suspect that Robert suffers from more than mere raging autism and anger management problems. I'm more inclined to believe that he also suffers from some form of personality disorder, like the theory of the Chipman narcissism put forward by @Pokemonquistador2. I'm also of the mind that Robert is at least somewhat less intelligent than your average man. Again, I must stress that I'm not saying this in an attempt to dunk on him in an edgy manner, but I genuinely believe this to be the case. It seems to me that to be able to come up with the kind of conclusions that he broadcasts to the world on any given matter simply necessitates an active aversion to think things through. I just don't see how it's possible to become the Robert Chipman we all know and love without some more severe underlying deficiencies brewing beneath the surface.

I mentioned some pages ago that I read a book about happiness, which was centered around a pshychatrist's interviews with Dalai Lama. Based on the book, I'd say that one of the core parts of the philosophy of the bodhisattva can be summarized by the phrase "extreme empathy". This goal is explained as the strive to achieve basically universal empathy. It's a tall order, though Dalai Lama explains how he has learnt to feel empathy and kindness towards even the communist chinese, whom the Tibetan Buddhists obviously don't have an especially cordial relationship with. In all honesty though, I'm struggling to understand how one would go about to employ this kind of empathy with someone like Robert. I might be overly dramatic here, but really — what kinds of circumstances could possibly have affected Robert in order to possess him to continuously spew his trademark antipathy of whomever he ambiguously decides is a part of his personal Vietnam? Dalai Lama explains how he envisions the negative influences on the chinese who perpetuated the crimes of humanity that they enforced on the Tibetan people, and how he can empathize with the struggle of these chinese people, even after what they did to his fellow countrymen and others. He explains how one can learn to see how strong negative influences would affect such people like, say, a poor chinese farmer in the 50's, who was suddenly conscripted into the service of the communist party and eventually forced to commit heinous acts. The same holds true for many other perpetrators of atrocities against human beings in history. Take that and put it in contrast to Roberto del Cine. The kind of deluded, nonsensical bitterness and hate he upholds is very much not in proportion to any sort of hardship he has had to endure. In this light, Robert seems to be quiet evil indeed.

At any rate, it is marvelous to behold just how uncanny and wearisome his convoluted and retarded ramblings in cyberspace are, but juxtaposed with his simplistic core of being, one comes to understand one of the great joys of the Internet that is Robert Chipman.

When last I saw these pictures posted here, someone mentioned that Robert displays feelings of feeling powerful in them. It's not just a casual cosplay for the fun of it, but him indulging in a power fantasy. The fact that he feels mighty and dangerous when dressing up as Super Mario just makes me smile.
Those poor rice farmers were forced into a set of circumstances they had no control over and probably spent the rest of their lives haunted by the memories of the dead. That's assuming they didn't swallow the CCP line wholesale.

Bobert hasn't endured anything that would cause him to think with such brutality, like you said, but what he's advocating extermination for is absurd and the biggest reason why you can't even begin to empathize with him. Wanting a great annihilation of millions of people because you think it's the best chance to remake the world into a Hanna Barbera Saturday morning cartoon show's vision of the future is a line of thinking that could only come from an irredeemable fuck like him.

---------------------------------------------
Good God, the Mario power-tripping pictures. They are easily worse than Chris-Chan's super mode Sonichu getup. Chris's mind is beyond broken and has been for some time, so there's at least a reason why you can excuse his delusional fantasy. Bob doesn't have that out. He sincerely believes he looks so awesome and surely has rolled a fantasy about wandering around in that outfit with that hammer to slay his foes.
 
The Dems are increasing blatant in their degradation of political opponents, which is exactly what Bobby wants.
View attachment 1971081
This is such a bob tweet. Needlessly hostile, insanely rude, but walks back a tiny bit because he must defend a food franchise. Imagine a fat diabetic MARVEL movie reviewing virgin calling you dumb.
 
It's not that these ideas can't be genuinely creative, they're just smashed into the standard MCU structure that almost always follows the same beats. Someone else could do a superhero heist movie and make it interesting, but Bob probably wouldn't like it because it would verge on being gritty and he doesn't like any grit in the superhero genre.
You are definitely right about that.

But the problem is with people like Bob and Hollywood is that they’re too stupid and dull to come up with anything creative.
It's kinda funny actually when the original came out Lola was a blank slate "sexy tomboy-don't call me "babe" " stereotype, and now with this movie, they're bending the other way where she's still bland eye candy but now spout feminist crapola. It says something when the Looney Tunes show version had more personality and character.
Yeah, I saw the new Looney Tunes and they are not as funny as the original. They’re nicely animated and had good voice actors but they’re just not as good.


It's yet another franchise that's decided "pissing off heterosexual males" is a viable long-term strategy in a franchise that appeals primarily to heterosexual males. Of course, the entire purpose of doing this isn't to make money, but to push an ideology. The natural feedback mechanisms and need for profit that used to keep ideologues from seizing the means of cultural production have gone awry, and soon we'll have an entire entertainment industry that makes entertainment that no one wants to watch or pay money for. Movie and game studios will still stay in business and keep making this shit, somehow, and MovieBob will still pretend that he can understand it.
I agree with everything except the entertainment. I think some indie creators might break us out of this cycle.

But I do understand what you’re saying. One of the reasons why I think the entertainment industry is failing is because it’s being run by a bunch of betas with their own personal agendas.

Like, you know Noelle Stevenson? She based the She-Ra/Cat-Ra in the reboot relationship off of one of her actual relationships in the real world. Which honestly says a lot about her and these other YA hacks.
With all these spergs complaining that classic movies need to have warning labels lately, I really hope Disney trolls Bobby and the others by adding warning labels to Black Panther.

I wish they would stop crying about racial insensitivity. If they accurate cultural and historical knowledge, go watch a documentary.

This is such a bob tweet. Needlessly hostile, insanely rude, but walks back a tiny bit because he must defend a food franchise. Imagine a fat diabetic MARVEL movie reviewing virgin calling you dumb.
What is with these nerds calling us dumb? All their ‘knowledge’ comes from make believe bullshit.


Uh ... nor do rabbits play basketball.
Rabbits do not speak, either. Or walk on their hind legs.
"Rabbits don't have tits". Someone tells Bobby that humans can't fly.
65.png
Even Bob in all his stupidity realize how bullshit Space Jam 2 is. It’s just a sexy cartoon rabbit.

Let it go.
 
Yeah but i don't blame you.

Blame the media which proves every day it should be burned down long before the government.
>Acting like the media and the government are distinct entities instead of two heads of the same hydra
Ah, no Bob. No one is fantasizing about splitting some catglasses wearing housefrau's head open here.

Except you.

Get help, you fat misanthrope.
This gets exceptionally worse when you read up on the Q Shaman guy and realize that he is, by all indications, legitimately schizophrenic. So we have a mother standing up for (impaired) son committing, at worst, a victimless crime, and Blob's reaction is to fantasize about her being brutally murdered. Stay classy, Boston.

(Also, I feel obliged to append what the Duck said here: "Remember, if [he was] a racial minority who'd raped and murdered someone, the left would be screaming about the rights of the accused and excessive bail requirements.")
 
Um, excuse me, rabbits can have up to 10 teats, so... they absolutely do, you boorish American clyde.
Film Robert MIGHT have a point if it was Lola Lizard rather than Lola Bunny. Reptiles don't have tits.

However, I'm going out on an autistic limb and posit that when Film Bobbert says autistically, "Rabbits don't have tits", he means "Rabbits don't have two large-at-all-times swinging chesticles placed at what would be chest-high if they were to stand on their hind legs". This being because most mammals, including primates other than female humans, only possess visible mammaries when pregnant/nursing.

The nipples are always visible, though.

But it's like Film Blob doesn't (or is pretending not to) understand Anthropomorphism, at least for Woke Twitter upvotes.
 
Film Robert MIGHT have a point if it was Lola Lizard rather than Lola Bunny. Reptiles don't have tits.

However, I'm going out on an autistic limb and posit that when Film Bobbert says autistically, "Rabbits don't have tits", he means "Rabbits don't have two large-at-all-times swinging chesticles placed at what would be chest-high if they were to stand on their hind legs". This being because most mammals, including primates other than female humans, only possess visible mammaries when pregnant/nursing.

The nipples are always visible, though.

But it's like Film Blob doesn't (or is pretending not to) understand Anthropomorphism, at least for Woke Twitter upvotes.
I don’t think Bob understands anything except whatever crap he reads on the internet. He like most sjws is stupid and ignorant.

But seriously, they need to stop getting upset over a sexy anthropomorphic animal. There have been plenty of anthropomorphic animals in fictional history.

Ever read aseop’s fable about the tortoise and the hare? Or the Animal Farm, by George Orwell, the characters are all animals. For example, old Major, a pig, has a dream where all animals are free from the tyranny of the farmer.
 
Last edited:
It's yet another franchise that's decided "pissing off heterosexual males" is a viable long-term strategy in a franchise that appeals primarily to heterosexual males. Of course, the entire purpose of doing this isn't to make money, but to push an ideology. The natural feedback mechanisms and need for profit that used to keep ideologues from seizing the means of cultural production have gone awry, and soon we'll have an entire entertainment industry that makes entertainment that no one wants to watch or pay money for. Movie and game studios will still stay in business and keep making this shit, somehow, and MovieBob will still pretend that he can understand it.
IMO, most of the people working in the entertainment industry (especially the higher ups) are really out of touch and living in their own little bubbles. They think that Twitter trends are an accurate way to gauge consumer desires, when in reality only a small fraction of the site's users make the majority of tweets and thus, they aren't a good way to do so. The entertainment industry have always been trend-chasers, and because of their myopic view of reality informed by social media and by being part of the 1%, they see social justice as the hot new trend to chase, which also gives them an opportunity to virtue signal like you said. It's entirely possible that they want to push an ideology, but it's also informed by their own myopia. However, as long as money exists and private companies need it to support their continued existence, if nobody is paying to watch their shit, they can't sustain themselves forever, and they'll eventually collapse and be replaced by companies that are more in touch with consumers and thus able to find success. To bring it all back to MovieBob, it begs the question, how would he react to this? Would he defend these SocJus-pushing companies to their bitter end and viciously attack the competition, or would he eventually come around to and becoming an ardent consumer of this new media?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back