Careercow Robert Chipman / Bob / Moviebob / "Movieblob" - Middle-Aged Consoomer, CWC with a Thesaurus, Ardent Male Feminist and Superior Futurist, the Twice-Fired, the Mario-Worshipper, publicly dismantled by Hot Dog Girl, now a diabetic

[Cantercoin]

bob chipman being a retard every second View attachment 2024635

Ftfy

 

[Ralph Barnhardt]

bob chipman being a retard for 33 secondsView attachment 2024635

I had forgotten all about that and how it gave us exceptional.png

View attachment 776184
View attachment 776185

template
View attachment 776186

View attachment 776190

We were given this great gift and I have been a bad steward of it by not showing off it's glory anymore smh

 

[Krokodil Overdose]

Probably because Jom and Terry is a well established property that did exactly what it always does, like the MCU. Feminist Eragon, on the other hand, is an echo, a contradiction. It's a Disney fairy tale that has been adapted from nothing, paying homage to no nationality.

That, and it's the Hollywood equivalent of a pity-fuck thrown to Kelly Marie Tran after they made her the least liked character in the most hated Star Wars movie, then summarily discarded her for the trilogy's finale. The movie itself seems to be an old-school Disney direct-to-video sequel, only it's not the sequel of anything. It's a trivial project even by the low, low standards of direct-to-streaming.

Popper's paradox (that is, ”an open society cannot tolerate intolerance”) does not refer to intolerant ideas but to organisations which start political violence against others.

Popper's paradox is misnamed; it's not a paradox, it's a proof by contradiction that the open society is inherently self-destructive (as we can can see while our institutions get turned into skinsuits by an insane crypto-religion.) OFC, Popper himself didn't like the implications, so he kept trying to bullshit his way around his own obvious conclusion. People like Bob love it, though, because the terms are so subjective that it's a perfect rationale for claiming to be peaceful and open-minded while demanding dekulakization.

 

[Lensherr]

The idea of a black elite disturbs the racist ass of Bobby and co. so much that they try the hardest to deny it.
View attachment 2023504

If you don't believe that all white people are inherently racist, you should hide yourself in deep sea.
View attachment 2023480

View attachment 2023515
Not all books are good. Ideological agitprop is not good. Brick by Brick is not good.
Even if the book were good, reading it to "piss off" someone else is not good. This is no doubt too fine a point for Bobby to understand.

Bob is basically a race reductionist who unironically believes that rich black people are more oppressed than poor black people. He also has the same attitude towards poor whites that the left accuses Republicans of having towards poor non-whites: that they are poor purely by choice. Just another reason why Bob is basically a woke Randroid.

 

[LORD IMPERATOR]

Spoiler: LOL REPUBLICS

You're still a Zionist, just now you've replaced "Zion" with "Monarchy."

Most Zionists are republicans, dude. They fucking hate monarchs because monarchs don't give as much concessions to Jews as the republics do. Monarchs routinely limited Jewish activity (like banning them from certain professions or owning Christian slaves) or even persecuted Jews, most democracies either didn't give a wet fart about Jews or openly supported Zionist causes as is the case with America, the European Union states, et. al.

. . .You just argued that with a straight face.

Ok let's see here... Britain during the English Civil war. That would be 1642. So population of it was... Estimates of 4-5 mil. Let's go with the 5 milion of 1650.

What was the US total population in 1860?

Population Of The United States (1860)

Oh right. 31 million.

What exactly was stopping either side of the English Civil War from mobilizing 600K troops? Even if just 1 out of 5 of all Brits fought, they'd at least have 500K guys each.

Yes, it's amazing how, when you have 6 times the total population, you can field 6 times the army.

Also, the English Civil War's sides relied mostly on bannermen flocking to either the king or the roundheads. Meanwhile, the US Army drafted everyone they can, and many in both armies didn't even want to fight. Meanwhile, both sides in the English Civil War sided with one or the other because they wanted to fight for the King or for the Puritans.

And of course, when the Puritans won, they proclaimed a republic and began oppressing everyone, to the point where the populace, which did nothing when Charles I got decapitated, began to openly rebel and call for the return of the Stuart monarchy.

But yeah, I'm sure all those romans, chinese, and japanese emperors honored habeas corpus - which originated as a concept in the 12th century in England...

Yes, Habeas Corpus was a concept that was made by Medieval monarchs, not the Athenian, Roman, or Italian republics. No democracy in the modern day would have habeas corpus if it wasn't for a bunch of medieval kings and nobles coming up with the concept.

No, YOU asserted that. These were your words:

Sure, monarchies have invaded other countries for taxation, slavery, and exploitation, and in the case of some, they've even eradicated entire tribes now and then, (like Spain with the Aztecs/Incas) but that can hardly get close the crimes done at the hands of so-called democracies, such as slavery, (which existed in America up to 1860) eradication of entire tribes, (which kept on going up until the 20th century) and forced sterilization (which continued up until the end of WW2).​

You even mentioned the Aztecs right there. WHO HAD SLAVERY! So pick your damn lane, which is it?
A) monarchies . . . can hardly get close the crimes done at the hands of so-called democracies
OR
B) Monarchs could easily have been more tyrannical than the modern republics of today if they wanted to, and many ancient monarchies before the rise of Roman/Western Civilization WERE that tyrannical.

The Aztecs were the oddity, as I noted. Meanwhile, modern-day America and most of modern-day Europe practices human sacrifice in the form of abortions, not to please some ancient god or keep the sun rising, but because they just don't want to raise kids. Even though we have a welfare system that gives food and money out like candy to people too poor to afford kids, we're still doing the same shit that the Aztecs and the Carthaginian Republic were doing. With them, it was to please some kind of god. With modern democracies, it's because people just don't want to take up responsibility. Most monarchies would look at the Aztecs and put a stop to the shit they did. Modern democracies would do the same shit they did, for even stupider reasons.

So yes, we are just as bad, if not worse than the Aztecs. They sacrificed human beings because they were genuinely scared that their gods will get angry if they don't. We throw babies in the dumpster because little Susie or Sally didn't want to be tied down when she wants to be a STRONG EMPOWERED WOMAN who works as a corporate wage slave in the office.

And don't be pulling this Bob-level "talk out of both sides of your mouth shit on me.

The problem is with so many debates is that any objection to fool-hardy interference is dismissed as "worship." To make a metaphor it would be like if a dude said, "I want to introduce this new species of grass in this environment." "I'm not sure that's a good idea. There could be a lot of unforeseen consequences." "What, you worship nature or something? Get with the science!"

(years later, we're dealing with Johnson grass...)



"unregulated"
View attachment 2024719
View attachment 2024720
View attachment 2024721
View attachment 2024724

This isn't even an argument of "oh true free market capitalism has never been tried." This is a straight up argument of you've had what you wanted for half a century now! Kind of like the communists who keep getting all their policies implemented on the west coast only to have inequality increase, eventually maybe it's time to take a moment and go "wait a minute, maybe our idea isn't working."

But we DID have unregulated free market capitalism in the 1800s. And it was TERRIBLE. Worse than what we have now. As bad as the unions that we piss on now are, as bad as the welfare state is now, back then, you had robber barons eating up whole sectors of the economy, kids getting worked while being paid barely enough to eat, and workers being treated so badly, they formed anarchist sects or outright joined socialist parties with the expressed idea of overthrowing the capitalist regime. Because when backed to the wall, a cornered animal will do just about anything to break free. Even if it means joining up with certified lunatics who want to create a utopian la-la land based on pure insanity.

You want an explanation as to why so many people wanted to try out Communism in the 1900s? The unregulated capitalism of the 1800s are your answer. That's where people like Bob come from. Anytime someone argues on behalf of free-market capitalism without regulations, and Pinkos like Bob just have to point to the era when capitalism was unregulated, robber barons sprang up like vultures, workers were treated worse than slaves in the Dixie South, and many workers responded to it by joining parties calling for an overhaul of the entire political system or just joining plain old bomb-throwing anarchist outfits.

And the funny thing is, monarchs were nowhere near this bad. Capitalist republics treated people like utter shit and allowed robber barons to game the system, whereas monarchs at most, had peasants working out in the fields who get some bad luck on a bad harvest, while at the same time, most peasants had at least half the year off due to holy days, while today, you'd get accused of laziness by your boss if you wanted more than three months off.

In fact, during the revolutions of the 1800s where most monarchies lost their crowns, most of the peasants were loyal to the king, and it was usually those city-folk who were easily swayed by the upper-class bourgeois who supported the revolutionaries, only for them to get treated like shit when factories sprang up and they got worked to the bone worse than slaves in Cuba. Then of course, the same people who put the bourgeoisie in power start plotting to put socialists in power or outright joining the bomb-throwing anarchist groups, and the capitalist upper class had to break bread and make peace with former monarchists and traditionalists in Europe, (the very same people whose heads the bourgeois wanted removed during the French Revolution) or use groups like the Pinkertons and the Ku Klux Klan in America to put down these industrial worker revolts.

Where there's smoke, there's fire. People like Movieslob didn't come out of nowhere; them and the communist movements they represented were a result of unregulated capitalism in the 1800s and early 1900s being so bad that people had to rely on Churches, mafia bosses, and corrupt gangsters like Boss Tweed for welfare. And of course, when the state got in on that business, the "true capitalist republicans" got pissy that the state was doing its job providing for the poor. If it wasn't for the Churches (many of which would rather have monarchies) mafia bosses (many of whom acted like corrupted versions of nobility and had Dons and Made Men being paid protection money by businesses not wanting to get roughed up by ruffians) or the corrupt party machines like those of Boss Tweed (which outright subverted traditional democratic principles by gaming the system) then the lower classes of the west would have either starved to death, or started the Cultural Revolution a century earlier than Red China did.

And of course, in these so-called republics, the rich always dominate. It's been that way since Ancient Rome, where the Patricians dominated the Republic and saw the plebians as beneath them. Today, we have American democracy where the political elites see the people as pawns for a game, and they turn violent against anyone who subverts their script.

Bob is basically a race reductionist who unironically believes that rich black people are more oppressed than poor black people. He also has the same attitude towards poor whites that the left accuses Republicans of having towards poor non-whites: that they are poor purely by choice. Just another reason why Bob is basically a woke Randroid.

For an "anti-racist", Bob's reductive views on race are ironically, very racist.

 

[Caustic Gelatin]

Too easy to not do.


View attachment 2024735

"I just want to make animal noises or something."

Also what the fuck? Bob just painted a wall green? Holy fuck this is your career you would think you would set up a proper green screen and learn lighting. Then again it is Bob so I guess that can be done half-assed will be done half-assed.

 

[Flexo]

There! Now caught up.

Stormies can hit targets just fine. We see this in the original SW movie where they had no problems hitting targets. They only miss when it's Luke's friends and Vader wants them alive, and they instead try to drive them back to the Falcon so that Vader can follow the ship instead.

I always liked how the Dark Forces game explained & executed it: the rifles made and carried by stormtroopers were horribly inaccurate with bolts flying in every direction (like some kind of retarded lazer shotgun). So you always wanted to close in where most of the shots would nail the hitbox.

If anyone can break the Enigma Code below, please teach me (archive of Vance's article if it is of any help)

He's basically saying, "Daymun son, I thought you were smart! why you gotta be writtin' all dumb?"

The irony of this coming from Bob is immense.

Bobby has problem with people joking about someone else's misfortune: BAD TARGET bro!

The "tragedy" is that the high-maintenance woman Bridgett Adams can't find her Mr. Right (LOL) and by the time she reached 45, she unfroze her eggs and looked for sperm donors. All her eggs failed.

Acknowledging the consequences of your choices now is only "slightly" better than burning heretics according to Bob.

Child abuse, Ayn Rand, and The Synder Cut. Did someone miss his meds?

https://www.nationalreview.com/2005/01/big-sister-watching-you-whittaker-chambers/

As usual, Bob is so wrong it's actually quite impressive. But then, the mainstream right's repeated rejection of Ayn Rand is of course one of the many things he is unaware of.

Somebody here wanted this?
View attachment 2017231 Here you go, true believers!

Thank you!

Mad that a father allows his kids to have fun during Spring Break:

"But he does have children."

Kristi Noem, who vetoed the "transphobic" sports ban in South Dakota, got on Tucker Carlson's show. Bobby think they are a team.

Part of the interview is on Noem's Twitter. She is reciting from a script and is boring.

Typical Bob - assumes one thing and then doesn't even bother to check if he is right.

For those curious, here's an idea on how Noem is being taken on the right-side of politics.

Ace of Spades HQ

Except she's been in love with Steve Trevor since ... what, 1941 or 42?

Well to be fair, he is Captain Kirk.

It's bizarre to me how these types want us to let everybody in in the name of God, when he literally has his Chosen People commit genocide to get living room for their ethnostate.

“Don’t think to yourself, after your God has pushed them out ahead of you, ‘It is to reward my righteousness that Adonai has brought me in to take possession of this land.’ No, it is because these nations have been so wicked that Adonai is driving them out ahead of you. It is not because of your righteousness, or because your heart is so upright, that you go in to take possession of their land; but to punish the wickedness of these nations that Adonai your God is driving them out ahead of you, and also to confirm the word which Adonai swore to your ancestors, Avraham, Yitz’chak and Ya‘akov. Therefore, understand that it is not for your righteousness that Adonai your God is giving you this good land to possess. -Deuteronomy 9:4-6 CJB

It's made very clear that the inhabitants of Palestine at the time are so freakin' evil God needs them wiped off the map.

The only reason Bob watched The Boys is so he could get some more material to fetishise his Congresswaifu with.

Don't forget the nazi girl in black leather (his second fetish after asians). No really:

Might as well try to save the jobs of VCR repairmen now.

Damn straight we need to save them!

Attempts to translate them to the big screen, or direct-to-video movies, or reboot them as hip "modern" characters have failed time and time again for over 40 years now because they keep trying to give them personality that never existed. Going back to the top, It's like trying to do a 2 hour Road Runner movie... the dynamite and ACME gags can't go on for 2 hours straight, so you'd have to "pad" it with characterization that wouldn't fit with either RR or Wile E.... since they don't have any beyond "stubborn predator fails to catch clearly uncatchable prey"

1 exception I can think of which takes the concept, gives them personalities, AND makes it work:

Tom & Jerry in that style could work.

bob chipman being a retard for 33 secondsView attachment 2024635

Converted into gif.

Which I can't upload right now, Hm.

Bob, you voted for Biden who literally can't walk up stairs. STFU

So i'm watching those editors review Bob's book. Some fun new memes I'm finding in it.

We should give a board award for most savage burn each week. I nominate:

Eh? I don't go around accusing people who are against monarchism of being anti-Semites.

I was replying to @LORD IMPERATOR not you. Also zionists would be pro-semites, not anti. But the politicing will be in another post.

 

[LORD IMPERATOR]

There! Now caught up.

I always liked how the Dark Forces game explained & executed it: the rifles made and carried by stormtroopers were horribly inaccurate with bolts flying in every direction (like some kind of retarded lazer shotgun). So you always wanted to close in where most of the shots would nail the hitbox.

The Dark Forces games (mostly Jedi Outcast and Jedi Academy) have two firing modes for the E-11: the regular slow firing mode where it's the same as the films, very accurate, but the second is the spray and pray where it just fires all over the place.

That, and we see in the plot they only miss when the bad guys want them to miss. Otherwise, they scored a hit on Leia and R2 on Endor when there was no Darth Vader to order them to be captured alive.

But we all know that if Bobbo tried firing those guns, he'd hit the ceiling and the ceiling would collapse on himself.

 

[Marshal Mannerheim]

Don't forget the nazi girl in black leather (his second fetish after asians). No really:

Given his remarks about Ilsa: She-Wolf of the SS, it doesn't surprise me.

 

[Woe-B-Gon (TM)]

Also what the fuck? Bob just painted a wall green?

And a door jamb. And some electrical switches. And a doorknob.

 

[Arthur Morgan]

There's a reason Bob insists that bartenders and theatre workers are the TRUE and HONEST working class; they vote for his policies. It's basically the Marxist idea of the lumpenproletariat, only a fat man from Bahstan instead of a political theorist and sociologist from Germany is using it.

I think it's more likely because they're the only people he interacts with. In his liittle mind, anyone he has a conversation with is his friend. Because he doesn't have any real friends. So if they lose their jobs, he loses all his social interaction with people outside his family, and loses yet another 'defense' against the idea that he's a worthless loser.

 

[blablabla]

Dont forget the poor hooter girls who in his failed mind totally want to bang him and are in no way repulsed by the worthless swine who comes every friday at 11 am to stuff his maw with chicken nuggets and stay the whole day trying to start small talk with them and the rest of the staff.

 

[Flexo]

The Dark Forces games (mostly Jedi Outcast and Jedi Academy) have two firing modes for the E-11: the regular slow firing mode where it's the same as the films, very accurate, but the second is the spray and pray where it just fires all over the place.

That, and we see in the plot they only miss when the bad guys want them to miss. Otherwise, they scored a hit on Leia and R2 on Endor when there was no Darth Vader to order them to be captured alive.

But we all know that if Bobbo tried firing those guns, he'd hit the ceiling and the ceiling would collapse on himself.

The original Dark Forces game you can literally see for yourself right now on the first level:

STAR WARS DARK FORCES 1 (MS-DOS) : LucasArts : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

Star Wars: Dark Forces is a first-person shooter video game developed and published by LucasArts. It was released in 1995 for DOS and Apple Macintosh, and in...

archive.org

(literally play it in your browser) Kyle's little Bryer pistol can nail imperials that are just in the same zip code while the stormtrooper blaster rifle sends bolts in random directions. Either fire mode (secondary fire just makes it fire faster). This was the same in the second game (Jedi Knight) but it would be in the expansion to it, "Mysteries of the Sith" that a scope was added to the gun.

And it never stopped being funny that the most inaccurate gun in the game could be converted into a lethal, highly accurate sniper rifle.

So I like to assume the troopers in the movies just got accurate when they finally used their scopes.

Spoiler: politisperging 2:electric boogaloo

The overt demonization of all monarchies have overshadowed that fact. The fact is, peasants living on a farm had better quality of life conditions than workers slaving away in a factory. And especially back in the old days, when the calendar was full of Saints' holidays, which meant that over half the days of the year were vacation days. Nowadays, you can barely get a month or two for yourself without your boss screaming about how lazy you are.

Yeah it was all fun in games until a round of bad weather let you play the fun "guess which of my children I get to watch starve to death" game.

Don't assume our ancestors were so dumb they couldn't make rational choices of what lifestyles they preferred. Heck you can go join the Amish now and enjoy the full farmer life if you want. Godspeed to you.

Most Zionists are republicans, dude. They fucking hate monarchs because monarchs don't give as much concessions to Jews as the republics do. Monarchs routinely limited Jewish activity (like banning them from certain professions or owning Christian slaves) or even persecuted Jews, most democracies either didn't give a wet fart about Jews or openly supported Zionist causes as is the case with America, the European Union states, et. al.

Yeah. I know that. I'm saying you're being just like them and trying to play a definition game of everything good that you like as X while all the bad stuff you don't as not-X. Which leads you to making really dumb arguments like a government which functions and acts like a monarchy, isn't one because of "labels."

What exactly was stopping either side of the English Civil War from mobilizing 600K troops? Even if just 1 out of 5 of all Brits fought, they'd at least have 500K guys each.

Women, children, elderly. Not all of a population is viable as a fighting force. (have you like... been around people? at all?)

Also, you can screw your logistics sending all the farmers out to go fight and leaving nobody to grow your food.

Also, the English Civil War's sides relied mostly on bannermen flocking to either the king or the roundheads. Meanwhile, the US Army drafted everyone they can, and many in both armies didn't even want to fight. Meanwhile, both sides in the English Civil War sided with one or the other because they wanted to fight for the King or for the Puritans.

And of course, when the Puritans won, they proclaimed a republic and began oppressing everyone, to the point where the populace, which did nothing when Charles I got decapitated, began to openly rebel and call for the return of the Stuart monarchy.

lol sure dude - way to paper over a whoooooooole lot of nuance and inconvenient fact there.

Like all the other monarchies in history who have instituted drafts (*cough WW2 japan*)

Yes, Habeas Corpus was a concept that was made by Medieval monarchs, not the Athenian, Roman, or Italian republics. No democracy in the modern day would have habeas corpus if it wasn't for a bunch of medieval kings and nobles coming up with the concept.

And yet other monarchies all over the world did not come up with it. It's like an idea that developed over time and in a specific location.

So let's see here you've got...
1 monarchy which had it.
VS
100000000 (rough estimate) of monarchies which did not have it.

Yeah. I'm sure that's a real trend there.

The Aztecs were the oddity, as I noted. Meanwhile, modern-day America and most of modern-day Europe practices human sacrifice in the form of abortions, not to please some ancient god or keep the sun rising, but because they just don't want to raise kids. Even though we have a welfare system that gives food and money out like candy to people too poor to afford kids, we're still doing the same shit that the Aztecs and the Carthaginian Republic were doing. With them, it was to please some kind of god. With modern democracies, it's because people just don't want to take up responsibility. Most monarchies would look at the Aztecs and put a stop to the shit they did. Modern democracies would do the same shit they did, for even stupider reasons.

AND ODDITY? lolololololol The Aztecs were the fucking norm of history. What do you think the other tribes were doing in ancient Palestine that pissed God off so badly he sent in Joshua with the Jews to clean their clocks?

Hell how do you think Christianity took over? Romans kept leaving their extra kids outside to die of exposure (a common practice since abortion wasn't quite a viable medical procedure) so the early Christians went around saving them (leading to the first orphanages). Guess what? Saving and raising a bunch of a population the wider society is throwing away is a great way to raise up your numbers until you win by sheer natural selection. It wouldn't have happened if it wasn't really popular in the monarchy of Rome.

So yes, we are just as bad, if not worse than the Aztecs. They sacrificed human beings because they were genuinely scared that their gods will get angry if they don't. We throw babies in the dumpster because little Susie or Sally didn't want to be tied down when she wants to be a STRONG EMPOWERED WOMAN who works as a corporate wage slave in the office.

This isn't saying modern society doesn't have problems, but for America to be as bad as the Aztecs, we would have to be invading mexico and canada to take their citizens and drag them back to Washington DC to be killed alive on TV. You can gussy it up all you want with stretched to hell metaphors but we still have a bit further to go.

And that's not even getting into China and North Korea.

But we DID have unregulated free market capitalism in the 1800s. And it was TERRIBLE. Worse than what we have now. As bad as the unions that we piss on now are, as bad as the welfare state is now, back then, you had robber barons eating up whole sectors of the economy, kids getting worked while being paid barely enough to eat, and workers being treated so badly, they formed anarchist sects or outright joined socialist parties with the expressed idea of overthrowing the capitalist regime. Because when backed to the wall, a cornered animal will do just about anything to break free. Even if it means joining up with certified lunatics who want to create a utopian la-la land based on pure insanity.

I uh... I have news for you.

If you don't have factories? Kids still work. On farms. Again - see Amish.

Child labor stops when a society gets rich enough that it can afford to not work its children - which always happens when the country gains a free market.

Here's a little secret: Throughout history, humans everywhere lived on less than $3 a day. ALL of history - EVERYWHERE even where your beloved monarchs reigned.

You wanna know when that began to change? You wanna know when that increased?

Right there during that time which you have described with all the nuance and accuracy of a political cartoon.

Actually it started increasing around 1700s but I guess Bob isn't the only one who just expects utopia to be an immediate leap instead of a gradual climb.

You want an explanation as to why so many people wanted to try out Communism in the 1900s? The unregulated capitalism of the 1800s are your answer. That's where people like Bob come from. Anytime someone argues on behalf of free-market capitalism without regulations, and Pinkos like Bob just have to point to the era when capitalism was unregulated, robber barons sprang up like vultures, workers were treated worse than slaves in the Dixie South, and many workers responded to it by joining parties calling for an overhaul of the entire political system or just joining plain old bomb-throwing anarchist outfits.

LOL *objects to cliche depictions of serfs*
*completely buys into cliche depictions of turn of the century America*

Aren't you a bundle of laughs. Gell-Mann Amnesia on steroids is what we got here.

Yeah those robber barons were so awful lowering the price of resources so more of the lower class could afford them. Things were so much better when only the kings and nobles could afford luxuries and the serfs were stuck in subsistence living. Oh yeah THAT was more fair. /sarc

And the funny thing is, monarchs were nowhere near this bad. Capitalist republics treated people like utter shit and allowed robber barons to game the system, whereas monarchs at most, had peasants working out in the fields who get some bad luck on a bad harvest, while at the same time, most peasants had at least half the year off due to holy days, while today, you'd get accused of laziness by your boss if you wanted more than three months off.

You really are getting to be about as dishonest as Bob. "Nuance for me but not for thee" eh?

If you think farming peasants had half a year off I know one things is for certain: You have never been on a farm. Or even seen a farm. Or even talked to anybody who has worked on a farm.

In fact, during the revolutions of the 1800s where most monarchies lost their crowns, most of the peasants were loyal to the king, and it was usually those city-folk who were easily swayed by the upper-class bourgeois who supported the revolutionaries, only for them to get treated like shit when factories sprang up and they got worked to the bone worse than slaves in Cuba. Then of course, the same people who put the bourgeoisie in power start plotting to put socialists in power or outright joining the bomb-throwing anarchist groups, and the capitalist upper class had to break bread and make peace with former monarchists and traditionalists in Europe, (the very same people whose heads the bourgeois wanted removed during the French Revolution) or use groups like the Pinkertons and the Ku Klux Klan in America to put down these industrial worker revolts.

Where there's smoke, there's fire. People like Movieslob didn't come out of nowhere; them and the communist movements they represented were a result of unregulated capitalism in the 1800s and early 1900s being so bad that people had to rely on Churches, mafia bosses, and corrupt gangsters like Boss Tweed for welfare. And of course, when the state got in on that business, the "true capitalist republicans" got pissy that the state was doing its job providing for the poor. If it wasn't for the Churches (many of which would rather have monarchies) mafia bosses (many of whom acted like corrupted versions of nobility and had Dons and Made Men being paid protection money by businesses not wanting to get roughed up by ruffians) or the corrupt party machines like those of Boss Tweed (which outright subverted traditional democratic principles by gaming the system) then the lower classes of the west would have either starved to death, or started the Cultural Revolution a century earlier than Red China did.

And of course, in these so-called republics, the rich always dominate. It's been that way since Ancient Rome, where the Patricians dominated the Republic and saw the plebians as beneath them. Today, we have American democracy where the political elites see the people as pawns for a game, and they turn violent against anyone who subverts their script.

Oh yes because if there's one thing we know, it's that the kings and nobles were never rich no sir...
/sarc

I mean... seriously do you even listen to yourself any more? What welfare do you think people had, BEFORE 1800? Before 1700? There's so much ignorance in your post it's getting close to moviebob levels. Like apparently Boss Tweed is awful, but hey if you throw a crown on him, suddenly a saint! Never mind all the examples history is replete with of kings and rulers every bit as thuggish as Boss Tweed. If anything the only reason we don't know about more of them is that there are so few records of the more ancient past than recent history.

I mean I'll agree with you that the cliche, two-dimensional depiction of ancient societies is not fair and overlooks a lot of nuance. But that also doesn't make your two-dimensional depiction of recent history any more correct. All you're doing is committing the same sin as those who bash monarchies - you're just doing it against a different target.

Well it's still a bad tactic.

 

[Adamska]

The Dark Forces games (mostly Jedi Outcast and Jedi Academy) have two firing modes for the E-11: the regular slow firing mode where it's the same as the films, very accurate, but the second is the spray and pray where it just fires all over the place.

That, and we see in the plot they only miss when the bad guys want them to miss. Otherwise, they scored a hit on Leia and R2 on Endor when there was no Darth Vader to order them to be captured alive.

But we all know that if Bobbo tried firing those guns, he'd hit the ceiling and the ceiling would collapse on himself.

Stormtroopers are actually pretty damn accurate in the movies; it's really just Return of the Jedi that is denigrated.

 

[Pokemonquistador2]

 

[Positron]

Uproarious responses to yesterday's "Why should I help assholes who hate me?" convo.


That Jehoshaphat guy has known Bobby for 5 years, yet he continues to be astounded:


Bobby knows a techno-totalitalian kindred spirit when he sees one:



"I'm not 'woke'; I'm just smart" -- and what's more, Bobby is constantly evolving!


This is how you own Robert the Smart:


But that own comes at a price: it makes you "scum".
More importantly, Bobby thinks racism is a form of ableism:

I give Bobby one thing: racism has a cognitive component, and my extremely unpopular opinion is that racism can be empirically, rationally justified -- though not by nitwits like Bobby.

The "scum" Shitstain Johnson continues to argue with SJW Gozilla. It is very tedious and you have to go to their convo.






Someone is really mad.


Bwak...Bwak...Bwaaak...Bacock-Bacock-Bacock....

Such a busy day, yet Bobby still keeps Peter in his thoughts. These Nazis just want to kill black people


+ + + +


Bob's pet issues, or else!


"Token Karen":


Not a Karen:


Women! You are not empowered -- indeed you are barely a "person" -- unless you surrender your WAP to men and abort the clump of sin!


+ + + +
Starfucking Michael Moore, and Bobby has to make it about white men's obsolete jerbs:


Don't learn to code:

Indeed, if you know how to code, Amazon or whatever big corps Bobby fellates on will find it slightly more difficult to replace you.


Bobby is so good at reading comprehension.

+ + + +
Bobby won't even grant Synder a well-composed shot:


On the other hand, Wanda proves to be our cultural zeitgeist:

Indeed, it was so fast that Sony couldn't possibly be looking over the shoulder at Disney.

More Disney bullshit:



I thought I was looking at Desperately Seeking Susan, but this is the trailer of something called Shoplifters Of The World, "featuring 20 songs by The Smiths".

Nobody the movie:


Consoom:


Food:


Nerds! Fight!


True to his words, Bobby thinks at least some poor white men matter:


A Gang of Angles Who Matter:






For Luke, everything leads back to TLOU2

 

[Jetpack Himmler]

Just because a bunch of idiots pay Bob to produce mediocre reviews via Patreon doesn't make him valuable. Bob could die tomorrow and another reviewer can take his place.

 

[Troonologist PhD]

Just because a bunch of idiots pay Bob to produce mediocre reviews via Patreon doesn't make him valuable. Bob could die tomorrow and another reviewer can take his place.

Entertainment is the most useless profession next to bloated government bureaucracy. FACT.

 

[Lasersuit Larry]

Entertainers are among the most useless people in the world. FACT.

What even makes someone an entertainer? Just being a fool, or a snide cunt? Frank Sinatra, bless his mobster bones, was an Entertainer. Dolly Parton is an Entertainer, already made her fortune and still reads to children. Millions of people would take a bullet for Robin Williams, he got to be an ambassador for our species to one of the first other animals that learned to speak our language, and he fucking made that signing gorilla smile. That's an Entertainer.

Bob is the jew-goblin yelling at the dude playing bad trumpet. Trumpet-goblin-jew probably actually has a degree in what he was bitching about.

Blob is lower than trumpet-goblin-jew.

 

[Positron]

Just because a bunch of idiots pay Bob to produce mediocre reviews via Patreon doesn't make him valuable. Bob could die tomorrow and another reviewer can take his place.

I'll give Bobby another thing. He rages a lot but he really didn't hurt anybody, so by his own metric he should be spared from extermination. The same, of course, can be said about every single one of the Trumpings and Christofascists he wants "binned".

Idealistic Leftist vs Realistic Bob. I think Bob scores (No not in that sense! Perish the thought!).


Although Bobby can't resist going nuts with his robot fantasy:

"People drag me down; I'm so tired of that 'compassion' thingy. Spot the Robot Dog! Only you are my match in the intellect. You'll always my best friend. Let's fandango!"

Same of "abolish the electoral college" bullshit. Imbecile.

Qwynneviere -- if you don't already guessed from the name -- is a troon, albeit a female-to-trans.



She runs something called Extra Credit for Teachers.