Roe V Wade chimpout thread - thread documenting chimpouts due to the overturning of Roe V Wade

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Oxous said:
I think this goes here?

This Twitter user (archive) was very surprised to learn yesterday that yes, feds do know when you advocate burning government buildings and murdering government employees, and they don't like it!
View attachment 3446337
The original tweet was in response to a video of Biden saying that people should be peaceful when protesting against Roe v. Wade being struck down.
View attachment 3446349
Click to expand...
Info on the dumbass here:
Larry David's Opera Cape said:
Opsec is not the strong suit of:

Madeline Lee Walker
1425 Whitney Dr
Garland, TX 75040

Has a history with the court in the State of Texas.

And drugs:

View attachment 3450931

Twitter includes a link to her OnlyFans. Don't anybody think of encouraging her.
Instagram
Pinterest
Facebook

ETA: she could still be prosecuted.
Click to expand...
 
wtfNeedSignUp said:
This tweet is pretty much a self own considering the obvious reply is "would you support the right to abort a kid for homosexuality?"
Click to expand...
And imagine how they'll go full Greta Thunberg if we said we're pro-abortion but abortion clinic need more diversity with more blacks, jews, migrants having an abortion.
God's drunkest driver said:
I see the latest distraction from the war on the middle class has been a total success. Meanwhile inflation keeps rising, the recession keeps marching closer and wages relative to true inflation numbers keep falling.

But go on, keep complaining about how you won't be able to let random men nut in you without consequence.
Click to expand...
I can see lots of cats going visiting them as one meme mentioned, they're one cat away to become a cat lady. :story:
1656850501544.png


Btw, the guys of American Thinker posted a good rant about countering the pro-abortion memes.
July 3, 2022

Countering the Pro-Abortion Social Media Memes​

By Dustan Ashe


Readers have no doubt been subjected to a wide array of commentaries and internet memes following the Supreme Court ruling overturning Roe v Wade. Because the war of ideas in 2022 is often fought through internet memes, this essay hopes to offer ideas that can inform and strengthen the pro-life position based on an everyday, average person’s interpretation of legal, logical, rational, and reasoned arguments.
There are few casual observers. Both sides of the argument evoke strong emotions. However, because the issue involves real and irrevocable impacts on the life of the mother and the infant, more than emotions must guide the individual conscience and our national discourse. For those who are able or willing, we should not shy away from this debate but we should make sure we have a firm foundation for our own opinions and arguments. The difficult task of changing hearts and minds must begin anew every day because this issue has been remanded to the states and it will soon be coming to a legislature near you.

The pro-abortion argument almost always leads off with the woman’s “right to choose,” a.k.a., “bodily autonomy.” An offshoot of the autonomy argument is, “Nobody has the right to use your body, against your will, even to save their life or the life of another person.”
This argument must be flipped on its head immediately and stridently. Nobody has the right to end another person’s life deliberately and against their will (the obvious exception to this would be the common practice of “do not resuscitate” orders or a living will which provides for the contingency of discontinuing prolonged medical care to artificially support life). The natural law against taking another person’s life is innate to humanity and has been fundamentally understood from the beginning of human civilization. Furthermore, an infant in the womb had no choice in being conceived in the first place and the infant, therefore, is not represented in the decision to end its life.
It is an irrefutable scientific fact that human life begins at conception. It is also an irrefutable scientific fact that conception creates a unique human being, with individual DNA, chromosomes, genes, and all that consists of one becoming a uniquely gifted and talented person. Therefore, abortion kills a human life, someone whom society anticipates one day will have a unique identity, personhood, and name.

The most fundamental of human rights is the right to life. Abortion activists present an utterly contradictory argument. Those who scream the loudest for their individual rights and autonomy to choose, then decry a “patriarchy” or “system” that victimizes or subjugates them and denies their rights, are the same people who are denying the fundamental right to life to another person who has no voice and has no choice in the matter.
The one, undeniable truth that is most often omitted in the pro-abortion argument is an admission that abortion takes the life of the unborn. It is this truth that should be the pro-abortion argument’s undoing.

In Justice Alito’s majority opinion, it is clear that Roe v, Wade ignored natural law This natural law can never be set aside by any past, current, or future precedent. Therefore, when Roe conferred a constitutional right to an abortion that denied fundamental natural law, it was fatally flawed based on faulty reasoning and jurisprudence. Thus, Roe v. Wade conceived and then perpetrated a lie, contrary to the truth innately known by every human being.
239016_5_.jpg
Click to expand...
 
American Thinker is right. John Locke stipulated that liberty was a natural right so long as it didn't violate life. From a secular point of view, abortions at a certain point violates the unalienable right to life for the fetus. I love how only just now these pro-choice people actually care about liberty when for years they have been hammering away at that right any chance they got.
 
Johnny Salami said:
These lunatics don't seem to understand that a person can be okay with a shot that isn't mandatory but oppose the obvious draconian policy of forcing everyone to be vaxed
Click to expand...
Yeah, shockingly wanting control over what medicines you take means you get to pick one and not another. You might be willing to do other things too, like treat strep throat with antibiotics, but not take chemo for cancer if you don't think you'll recover your quality of life enough to make the pain of the treatment worth it.

Although, truth be told, I wouldn't waste my time with flu shots at this stage of my life, either. They are essentially lottery tickets and I'm not likely to pull an anti-jackpot and die of flu at this stage of life. When I was a wee hypochondriac, I took some, and the nurse administering them derrided me for being a kid getting a flu shot. They were for olds, I should just use my immune system.

Also to be a bit more on topic, I was watching some videos on meiji (?) era infanticide. Since abortions were dangerous and Japanese people viewed having more than 2-3 children in that period to be greedy, they used to "send them back" moments after birth. Strange to think we've returned to the same sort of point in the timeline where a loud fringe wants the right to murder their children at the time of birth or shortly after in some states, although if they were actually to follow the science they claim to worship, they would realize there's a reason why most of Europe has set their abortion limit around 15 weeks.
 
Last edited:
Dolphin Lundgren said:
It's not fake, tbh.

Oh yes. This is more true and deeper than people realise. People on Twitter think they are safe and anonymous because their names online. No. No they're not. I have a friend who has a relative who worked in the Secret Service, and from what I was told and what this ex-SS worker said, everything you say is monitored by the SS. Not only do they monitor every tweet, if you are stupid enough to make a tweet where you threaten to kill the president or commit any kind of serious crime as violent as the one written in the letter, not only do they take note of you, they take your information, your Twitter name, everything about you, and put you in a file, a kind of watch list, where you are monitored. And they will keep you in that file.

That letter is proof of that. They're not safe, and these losers assume they can get away with their dangerous tweets with no consequence.

TLDR; I hope that dumbfuck likes being watched for the rest of his online life.
Click to expand...
They ought to read what the PATRIOT Act actually says, then maybe rethink being an "activist".
 
Just got into a heated argument on facebook with dumb bitch on the abortion issue.
Note I live in canada when they're no real law against or for abortion, so I pointed them protesting about a thing that don't happen here and obviously they don't even understand the issue is the same as USA meddling into other country for their own benefit
This is pretty much the same as kicking a hornet nest. Already got 2-3 bitch whining that our abortion right will be destroyed and all the conservative party are misogynistic pro-life.
Damn those fuckwit pro choice make me just want me to claim to be pro life just to piss them off
 
I’m going to assume these stories are fake, because it’s straight up admitting to murder. Also, I don’t think “women will commit horrific infanticide if they can’t kill it in the womb” is the epic own you think it is.
C35B0A55-7180-47FD-A81C-2706BC537E94.jpeg
 
Grand Duke Snowfall said:
I’m going to assume these stories are fake, because it’s straight up admitting to murder. Also, I don’t think “women will commit horrific infanticide if they can’t kill it in the womb” is the epic own you think it is.
View attachment 3456152
Click to expand...
This is some shitty android raptor tier infanticide fantasy fiction. I'll buy that the occasional schizo smothered her baby in the crib and it was passed off as an accident. But the idea that women were doing this kind of thing en masse and their husbands somehow didn't notice is batshit. "Huh Betty was pregnant when I went to the office this morning. Wonder what happened. Well, I won't say anything."
 
Grand Duke Snowfall said:
I’m going to assume these stories are fake, because it’s straight up admitting to murder. Also, I don’t think “women will commit horrific infanticide if they can’t kill it in the womb” is the epic own you think it is.
View attachment 3456152
Click to expand...
I'm going to list a few events that didn't happen and that you can never verify and in doing this i will win the abortion argument. What a fag
 
Larry David's Opera Cape said:
This is some shitty android raptor tier infanticide fantasy fiction. I'll buy that the occasional schizo smothered her baby in the crib and it was passed off as an accident. But the idea that women were doing this kind of thing en masse and their husbands somehow didn't notice is batshit. "Huh Betty was pregnant when I went to the office this morning. Wonder what happened. Well, I won't say anything."
Click to expand...
I mean it's considered true because leftists have weaved a certain narrative.
The narrative spun has been women were horrifically abused by their husbands and abortion liberated women from the oppressive patriarchy. When the reality was tyrants often en masse encouraged infanticide so they could kill off the weak and meek.
 
Kino Likes Knowledge said:
I'm going to list a few events that didn't happen and that you can never verify and in doing this i will win the abortion argument. What a fag
Click to expand...
When you're scared of having your worldview shattered you're bound to accept any old bullshit as long as it gets retweeted a thousand times.
LeChampion1992 said:
I mean it's considered true because leftists have weaved a certain narrative.
The narrative spun has been women were horrifically abused by their husbands and abortion liberated women from the oppressive patriarchy. When the reality was tyrants often en masse encouraged infanticide so they could kill off the weak and meek.
Click to expand...
Ancient Spartan society is a perfect example from history on culling the weak from birth.
 
LoFi_Bandit said:
When you're scared of having your worldview shattered you're bound to accept any old bullshit as long as it gets retweeted a thousand times.

Ancient Spartan society is a perfect example from history on culling the weak from birth.
Click to expand...
It reminds me too, about the infanticide culture of historic Japan. They considered it unseemly to have more than 2-3 children, so they would "send back" the ones they didn't want to the spirit world right after birth.

Since it wasn't viewed as a crime, it became so rampant that their population growth flatlined. It wasn't until the leaders decided that was a problem that the practice was discouraged and eventually fell out of favor.
 
LoFi_Bandit said:
When you're scared of having your worldview shattered you're bound to accept any old bullshit as long as it gets retweeted a thousand times.

Ancient Spartan society is a perfect example from history on culling the weak from birth.
Click to expand...
True, but the Spartans were proven wrong just a couple centuries later by the birth of Julius Caesar. A premature baby who may or may not have exhibited the symptoms of his later epilepsy, he would have been a prime weak candidate for culling, but grew up to be one of the Great Chads of History. A weak baby doesn't necessarily mean a weak adult.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom