RPGnet Forums

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
They would not post a list like that, because they are passive aggressive, not aggressive aggressive. They like their rules vague, hidden from plain sight, and bitchy.
 
Loose Goose said:
They would not post a list like that, because they are passive aggressive, not aggressive aggressive. They like their rules vague, hidden from plain sight, and bitchy.
Click to expand...
Well yeah, otherwise people might notice the contradictions and hypocrisy, and of course that will lead them down the path to Nazism.
 
Another 30 day ban for having the wrong opinion.

1.png
2.png

Also: curt, absolute statements that impute great and malicious moral importance to someone's comparatively small or invented transgression are apparently actionable. If that was true, then half the board would have been banned by now, including all of the mods.
 
Wallace said:
Another 30 day ban for having the wrong opinion.

View attachment 5108837
View attachment 5108835

Also: curt, absolute statements that impute great and malicious moral importance to someone's comparatively small or invented transgression are apparently actionable. If that was true, then half the board would have been banned by now, including all of the mods.
Click to expand...
I know Dawgstar is a titanic faggot, but... sigh. They're technically and legally correct. The onus does not fall upon the receiver of property, except in cases where it was stolen. More to the point, unless said receiver signed a contractual agreement with WotC over the NDA/embargo, they cannot be at fault for revealing it. Darrin is being a retard.

I don't think it warrants a 30 day ban though.
 
Capsaicin Addict said:
I know Dawgstar is a titanic faggot, but... sigh. They're technically and legally correct. The onus does not fall upon the receiver of property, except in cases where it was stolen. More to the point, unless said receiver signed a contractual agreement with WotC over the NDA/embargo, they cannot be at fault for revealing it. Darrin is being a retard.

I don't think it warrants a 30 day ban though.
Click to expand...
The ban isn't for getting the bit of contract law wrong. The ban is for having the wrong opinion on a subject the hugbox has already decided upon.
 
Wallace said:
The ban isn't for getting the bit of contract law wrong. The ban is for having the wrong opinion on a subject the hugbox has already decided upon.
Click to expand...
Eh, point. Even more egregious is that the hugbox's dogma is not always clear.
 
Capsaicin Addict said:
Eh, point. Even more egregious is that the hugbox's dogma is not always clear.
Click to expand...
That's a feature, not a bug. The nebulous nature of the dogma allows them to mold it into whatever they need it to be at any given moment. Same thing goes for every other inconsistent social justice dogma.
 
Wallace said:
That's a feature, not a bug. The nebulous nature of the dogma allows them to mold it into whatever they need it to be at any given moment. Same thing goes for every other inconsistent social justice dogma.
Click to expand...

An arbitrary law is one that is designed to be abused.
 
Wallace said:
Another 30 day ban for having the wrong opinion.
Click to expand...
To be fair it's a really retarded opinion but a 30 day ban for it is even more retarded than the opinion.

I think what may be the smarmiest and most punchable thing about these shitmods is how they'll deliver some sanctimonious lecture to someone while banning them. Nobody gives a flying fuck what some janny thinks.
 
AnOminous said:
To be fair it's a really retarded opinion but a 30 day ban for it is even more retarded than the opinion.

I think what may be the smarmiest and most punchable thing about these shitmods is how they'll deliver some sanctimonious lecture to someone while banning them. Nobody gives a flying fuck what some janny thinks.
Click to expand...

Any time I read an RPG.net mod's sermon over a ban it strikes me that these people have absolutely nothing else going on in their lives.
 
Soft ban on US politics still stands.
Screenshot_20230504_040458_Brave.jpg
Also, if you've ever earnestly used the phrase "anarchist praxis" you need to be hit with sticks until you stop being a terminally online faggot.
 
Hugbox Kommissar said:
Soft ban on US politics still stands.
View attachment 5114003
Also, if you've ever earnestly used the phrase "anarchist praxis" you need to be hit with sticks until you stop being a terminally online faggot.
Click to expand...
Correction: the ban only comes into play if you don't follow the narrative. Even as dumb as this fucker is, he correctly recognizes what a disaster Sleepy Joe has been.
 
Loose Goose said:
Par for course for a forum whose politics are stuck in the Queen Hillary era with a dash of panicky "the fash are coming" doomerism. They are aging people the world has long left behind.
Click to expand...
It's a perfect match for their arrested emotional development.
 
Wallace said:
This isn't even a ban for disagreeing, or not agreeing hard enough, it's more like agreeing in the wrong way.
Click to expand...

RPG.net is deep in the terminal stage of a forum's life cycle, and I'm not just talking about the troons. At some point, the moderators of a forum start using their mod powers to argue with posters - adding arguments to their posts, changing their post text, or giving them time outs for not saying whatever it was the mod wanted them to say.
 
"Next time, there'll be no next time" is a direct quote from a Sopranos character after staging a "final warning" mock execution, to give you some idea of how badass the RPG.net mods think they are.

Kali-ma give me strength.
 
1685368218815.png

1685368245889.png


So, making politics personal is not acceptable, but don't you dare make politics NOT personal because that's also unacceptable.

Everybody got that?

(also who else is betting the "actual starvation" poster is overweight?)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom