RPGnet Forums

[Flexo]

Except nobody bans you off therpgsite for playing or talking about red list games. You might get made fun of, but you wouldn't be banned.

"...yet."

Never ever forget to add that to all statements about that website.

 

[Loose Goose]

They would not post a list like that, because they are passive aggressive, not aggressive aggressive. They like their rules vague, hidden from plain sight, and bitchy.

 

[Wallace]

They would not post a list like that, because they are passive aggressive, not aggressive aggressive. They like their rules vague, hidden from plain sight, and bitchy.

Well yeah, otherwise people might notice the contradictions and hypocrisy, and of course that will lead them down the path to Nazism.

 

[Wallace]

Another 30 day ban for having the wrong opinion.




Also: curt, absolute statements that impute great and malicious moral importance to someone's comparatively small or invented transgression are apparently actionable. If that was true, then half the board would have been banned by now, including all of the mods.

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

Another 30 day ban for having the wrong opinion.

View attachment 5108837
View attachment 5108835

Also: curt, absolute statements that impute great and malicious moral importance to someone's comparatively small or invented transgression are apparently actionable. If that was true, then half the board would have been banned by now, including all of the mods.

I know Dawgstar is a titanic faggot, but... sigh. They're technically and legally correct. The onus does not fall upon the receiver of property, except in cases where it was stolen. More to the point, unless said receiver signed a contractual agreement with WotC over the NDA/embargo, they cannot be at fault for revealing it. Darrin is being a retard.

I don't think it warrants a 30 day ban though.

 

[Wallace]

I know Dawgstar is a titanic faggot, but... sigh. They're technically and legally correct. The onus does not fall upon the receiver of property, except in cases where it was stolen. More to the point, unless said receiver signed a contractual agreement with WotC over the NDA/embargo, they cannot be at fault for revealing it. Darrin is being a retard.

I don't think it warrants a 30 day ban though.

The ban isn't for getting the bit of contract law wrong. The ban is for having the wrong opinion on a subject the hugbox has already decided upon.

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

The ban isn't for getting the bit of contract law wrong. The ban is for having the wrong opinion on a subject the hugbox has already decided upon.

Eh, point. Even more egregious is that the hugbox's dogma is not always clear.

 

[Wallace]

Eh, point. Even more egregious is that the hugbox's dogma is not always clear.

That's a feature, not a bug. The nebulous nature of the dogma allows them to mold it into whatever they need it to be at any given moment. Same thing goes for every other inconsistent social justice dogma.

 

[Mola Ram]

That's a feature, not a bug. The nebulous nature of the dogma allows them to mold it into whatever they need it to be at any given moment. Same thing goes for every other inconsistent social justice dogma.

An arbitrary law is one that is designed to be abused.

 

[AnOminous]

Another 30 day ban for having the wrong opinion.

To be fair it's a really retarded opinion but a 30 day ban for it is even more retarded than the opinion.

I think what may be the smarmiest and most punchable thing about these shitmods is how they'll deliver some sanctimonious lecture to someone while banning them. Nobody gives a flying fuck what some janny thinks.

 

[Mola Ram]

To be fair it's a really retarded opinion but a 30 day ban for it is even more retarded than the opinion.

I think what may be the smarmiest and most punchable thing about these shitmods is how they'll deliver some sanctimonious lecture to someone while banning them. Nobody gives a flying fuck what some janny thinks.

Any time I read an RPG.net mod's sermon over a ban it strikes me that these people have absolutely nothing else going on in their lives.

 

[Hugbox Kommissar]

Soft ban on US politics still stands.

Also, if you've ever earnestly used the phrase "anarchist praxis" you need to be hit with sticks until you stop being a terminally online faggot.

 

[Capsaicin Addict]

Soft ban on US politics still stands.
View attachment 5114003
Also, if you've ever earnestly used the phrase "anarchist praxis" you need to be hit with sticks until you stop being a terminally online faggot.

Correction: the ban only comes into play if you don't follow the narrative. Even as dumb as this fucker is, he correctly recognizes what a disaster Sleepy Joe has been.

 

[Wallace]

Soft ban on US politics still stands.
View attachment 5114003
Also, if you've ever earnestly used the phrase "anarchist praxis" you need to be hit with sticks until you stop being a terminally online faggot.

This isn't even a ban for disagreeing, or not agreeing hard enough, it's more like agreeing in the wrong way.

 

[Loose Goose]

Par for course for a forum whose politics are stuck in the Queen Hillary era with a dash of panicky "the fash are coming" doomerism. They are aging people the world has long left behind.

 

[Wallace]

Par for course for a forum whose politics are stuck in the Queen Hillary era with a dash of panicky "the fash are coming" doomerism. They are aging people the world has long left behind.

It's a perfect match for their arrested emotional development.

 

[The Ugly One]

This isn't even a ban for disagreeing, or not agreeing hard enough, it's more like agreeing in the wrong way.

RPG.net is deep in the terminal stage of a forum's life cycle, and I'm not just talking about the troons. At some point, the moderators of a forum start using their mod powers to argue with posters - adding arguments to their posts, changing their post text, or giving them time outs for not saying whatever it was the mod wanted them to say.

 

[Wallace]

More bans for having the wrong opinion or having the right opinion in the wrong way.

 

[Mola Ram]

"Next time, there'll be no next time" is a direct quote from a Sopranos character after staging a "final warning" mock execution, to give you some idea of how badass the RPG.net mods think they are.

Kali-ma give me strength.

 

[Flexo]

So, making politics personal is not acceptable, but don't you dare make politics NOT personal because that's also unacceptable.

Everybody got that?

(also who else is betting the "actual starvation" poster is overweight?)