- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
There are things in Dune you can frame in a woke way; you could view Fremen as oppressed POC fighting colonialism, Bene Gesserit and Fish Speakers as badass feminists who don't need no man, maybe there could be a genderqueer take on genetic memory since it means that a person can have memories from people of either sex. But for every woke reading there are a bunch of problematic things: Leto II describes homosexuality as an aberration, the noble oppressed Fremen go on a bloody rampage across the galaxy and the Bene Gesserit are often antagonistic and give rise to the monstrous Honored Matres. Also Duncan Idaho is a male chauvinist shitlord and the depiction of Baron Harkonnen isn't exactly body-positive.Which is so ironic because as I recall, GEoD is actually a pretty SJW book with Leto II spending long paragraphs going on about why his all female army is superior to any alternative army.
But what makes Dune the worst from a SocJus perspective is the ambiguity and openness to interpretation. What does it mean to be human, to uphold humanity? What actions are justified to serve the greater good? Is the struggle to control one's destiny in vain? You can answer these questions in many ways based on the characters and events in Dune.
Dune is a truly subversive series, first subverting the hero's journey model after the first book and then turning every other narrative convention on its head in the following books. The woke claim to like subverting conventions, but they actually cling harder than anyone to the need for a clearly delineated good and evil. Look how nu-Star Wars bends over backwards to make sure that no one will see the First Order as cool (and then makes Kylo Ren the most interesting character...).