Rule 41 — The Unspoken Rule - the LGBTs will never tell you this

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
ABDLs
Furries
Bronies
Pretty sure they don't need the internet to be degenerates.
Methinks you're talking about the identity aspect in your OP and how much it matters or not if nobody's there to reinforce it, but even then you can still wear diapers and act like a baby alone in the middle of a forest, you can wear a mascot costume and act like an animal alone in the middle of a forest. You can't pretend to be a woman alone in the middle of a forest tho dat's true, trannies do need an audience to reinforce their identity.
 
The fucking "Plural system" and fictionkin/otherkin bullshit is the posterchild for this.
DID (which these ladies co-opt to justify their make-believe personaes) is a controversial diagnosis in its own right, because said diagnosis is reliant mainly on what the patient is saying, there's no objective test to identify it. Everyone I've seen claim they have it instead exhibited Cluster B personality traits. Papers have been written about DID fraud and its convenient comorbidities with other mental illnesses.

Even the DSM criteria for DID diagnosis is inconsistent. The DSM states that "altars" have to crop up during childhood and manifest from childhood trauma, yet the most famous DID patient, Chris Sizemore, claims that her altars didn't manifest from trauma and claims she was "born with multiple selves with full-formed personalities". You know what diseases commonly spring up from childhood trauma, though? Cluster B Personality Disorders.

I think many of these girls faking DID/plurals for clout are either Borderline, Munchie, or lonely liars.
 
It's not even just a subset anymore. I'd wager the vast majority of "proud asexuals" nowadays are those that tell you in all seriousness that they're still having sex (regularly) just only when they feel like it, unless normies who apparently have a daily sex quota to fulfil. That’s an actual fucking argument I've seen before.

It's also some kind of -ism if you think that asexuals don't have sex. Educate yourself on the meaning of the term, bigot!
Sorry man I gotta go, I got anal scheduled for three o'clock and also oral at quarter past nine.

Is this how they think normies live?
 
Well honestly being "asexual" just without the name or any of that extra bullshit existed before the internet and was even normal, it was just called "vow of celibacy". But the modern "asexual" movement is just trannies and autists making up bullshit to feel special. Like there's even new categorizations of asexual that include people who like to have sex. Which just defeats the point of it
I think thats my issue with asexual/aromantic. Like sure there's probably people out there who have a low sex drive or aren't really into romance but why the fuck is it part of the LGBTQ community? Nobody has ever been oppressed because they chose not to have sex or be with someone. Sure your parents will probably be disappointed but nobody went out and killed you for being asexual
It's not even just a subset anymore. I'd wager the vast majority of "proud asexuals" nowadays are those that tell you in all seriousness that they're still having sex (regularly) just only when they feel like it, unless normies who apparently have a daily sex quota to fulfil. That’s an actual fucking argument I've seen before.

It's also some kind of -ism if you think that asexuals don't have sex. Educate yourself on the meaning of the term, bigot!
I've notice aromantics in particular always seem to be obsessed with gay romances. Doesn't the author of that one gay show called Heartstopper claim to be a nonbinary aromantic? Even this one other chick I know online claims to be aromantic but posts nothing but yuri romances. Its like for people who are not into romance, they constantly post about it 24/7.
 
I think thats my issue with asexual/aromantic. Like sure there's probably people out there who have a low sex drive or aren't really into romance but why the fuck is it part of the LGBTQ community? Nobody has ever been oppressed because they chose not to have sex or be with someone. Sure your parents will probably be disappointed but nobody went out and killed you for being asexual

I've notice aromantics in particular always seem to be obsessed with gay romances. Doesn't the author of that one gay show called Heartstopper claim to be a nonbinary aromantic? Even this one other chick I know online claims to be aromantic but posts nothing but yuri romances. Its like for people who are not into romance, they constantly post about it 24/7.
Lmao about Heartstopper, I know it's banned in Hungary. Honestly good on Orban, he seems to be the only EU leader that's actually a leader and not a passive faggot like Macron or whoever the new UK guy is letting the powers that be fuck his country sideways.
 
Even this one other chick I know online claims to be aromantic but posts nothing but yuri romances. Its like for people who are not into romance, they constantly post about it 24/7.
They want you to believe there is a "romantic" spectrum and a "sexual" spectrum. So anyone telling you he or she's aromantic means crap cuz he or she's probably gay.

Also related to the thread while I'm at it.
@KiwiFarmerSimulator2021 ’s article reminded me of this glorious piece of literature that discusses the conundrum of Schrödinger’s gender.

How Do I Define My Gender if No One Is Watching Me?View attachment 2662301

Basically an admission that their entire existence depends on forcing others to participate in their fuckery. They can’t exist in a vacuum. They’re entire identity hinges on how others perceive them (do you confirm or deny my delusions?). :story:
View attachment 2662305
Not the first time it's been discussed apparently lol.
 
ABDLs
Furries
Bronies
Asexuality
I wouldn't really call any of these "identities". Like none of these should be a foundational part of who you are. Like calling brony an identity would be like calling kiwi farmer an identity, it's just retarded. I guess that is the problem you are referring to though people turning these interests or character traits into lifestyles, but then again I don't even think that's happening too often outside of maybe furries.
 
Back