UN Rwanda officially blames France for the 1994 Genocide

Article

PARIS (AP) — The French government bears “significant” responsibility for “enabling a foreseeable genocide,” a report commissioned by the Rwandan government concludes about France’s role before and during the horror in which an estimated 800,000 people were slaughtered in 1994.

The report, which The Associated Press has read, comes amid efforts by Rwanda to document the role of French authorities before, during, and after the genocide, part of the steps taken by France’s President Emmanuel Macron to improve relations with the central African country.

The 600-page report says that France “did nothing to stop” the massacres, in April and May 1994, and in the years after the genocide tried to cover up its role and even offered protection to some perpetrators.


It was made on Monday after its formal presentation to Rwanda’s Cabinet.

It concludes that in years leading up to the genocide, former French President Francois Mitterrand and his administration had knowledge of preparations for the massacres — yet kept supporting the government of then-Rwandan President Juvénal Habyarimana despite the “warning signs.”

“The French government was neither blind nor unconscious about the foreseeable genocide,” the authors stress.

The Rwandan report comes less than a month after a French report, commissioned by Macron, concluded that French authorities had been “blind” to the preparations for genocide and then reacted too slowly to appreciate the extent of the killings and to respond to them. It concluded that France had “heavy and overwhelming responsibilities” by not responding to the drift that led to the slaughter that killed mainly ethnic Tutsis and the moderate Hutus who tried to protect them. Groups of extremist Hutus carried out the killings.

The two reports, with their extensive even if different details, could mark a turning point in relations between the two countries.

Rwanda, a small but strategic country of 13 million people, is “ready” for a “new relationship” with France, Rwanda’s Foreign Affairs Minister Vincent Biruta told AP.

“Maybe the most important thing in this process is that those two commissions have analyzed the historical facts, have analyzed the archives which were made available to them and have come to a common understanding of that past,” he said. “From there we can build this strong relationship.”


A top official in Macron’s office on Monday welcomed the report as a “decisive step” which showed “the willingness expressed by Rwandan authorities to write a shared history and, above all, to look to a common future.”

He also noted “unprecedented political trust” reached between Paris and Kigali as Rwandan officials have shown signs that they agree with the “irreversible rapprochement approach” taken by France.

Macron is considering traveling to Rwanda in the coming months, said the official, who spoke anonymously in accordance with the French presidency’s policies.

The Rwandan report, commissioned in 2017 from the Washington law firm of Levy Firestone Muse, is based on a wide range of documentary sources from governments, non-governmental organizations and academics including diplomatic cables, documentaries, videos, and news articles. The authors also said they interviewed more than 250 witnesses.

In the years before the genocide, “French officials armed, advised, trained, equipped, and protected the Rwandan government, heedless of the Habyarimana regime’s commitment to the dehumanization and, ultimately, the destruction and death of Tutsi in Rwanda,” the report charges.

French authorities at the time pursued “France’s own interests, in particular the reinforcement and expansion of France’s power and influence in Africa.”

In April and May 1994, at the height of the genocide, French officials “did nothing to stop” the massacres, says the report.

Operation Turquoise, a French-led military intervention backed by the U.N. which started on June 22, “came too late to save many Tutsi,” the report says.

Authors say they found “no evidence that French officials or personnel participated directly in the killing of Tutsi during that period.”

This finding echoes the conclusion of the French report that cleared France of complicity in the massacres, saying that “nothing in the archives”demonstrates a “willingness to join a genocidal operation.”

The Rwandan report also addressed the attitude of French authorities after the genocide.

Over the past 27 years, “the French government has covered up its role, distorted the truth, and protected” those who committed the genocide, it says.

The report suggests that French authorities made “little efforts” to send to trial those who committed the genocide. Three Rwandan nationals have been convicted of genocide so far in France.

It also strongly criticizes the French government for not making public documents about the genocide. The government of Rwanda notably submitted three requests for documents in 2019, 2020 and this year that the French government “ignored,” according to the report.

Under French law, documents regarding military and foreign policies can remain classified for decades.

But things may be changing, the Rwandan report says, mentioning “hopeful signs.”

On April 7, the day of commemoration of the genocide, Macron announced the decision to declassify and make accessible to the public the archives from 1990 to 1994 that belong to the French president and prime minister’s offices.

“Recent disclosures of documents in connection with the (French) report ... may signal a move toward transparency,” authors of the Rwandan report said.

President Paul Kagame of Rwanda praised the report commissioned by Macron as “a good thing,” welcoming efforts in Paris to “move forward with a good understanding of what happened.”

Félicien Kabuga, a Rwandan long wanted for his alleged role in supplying machetes to the killers, was arrested outside Paris last May.

And in July an appeals court in Paris upheld a decision to end a years-long investigation into the plane crash that killed Habyarimana and set off the genocide. That probe aggravated Rwanda’s government because it targeted several people close to Kagame for their alleged role, charges they denied.

Last week, a Rwandan priest was arrested in France for his alleged role in the genocide, which he denied.

Macron’s office said the French government is committed to provide the “necessary means” to allow the “intensification” of legal proceedings against alleged perpetrators of the genocide. Activists estimate more than 100 of them are believed to live on French territory.
 
My recollection is that part of the issue was that the ruling government at the time spoke French, while the out-group had started to adopt speaking English. Nothing gets a frog angrier than someone dissing their language, so they were quite willing to allow the English-speakers to be slaughtered.

France also occasionally does things in their former African colonies like send attack helicopters to mow down crowds of protestors who were against the French-backed government.
 
France also occasionally does things in their former African colonies like send attack helicopters to mow down crowds of protestors who were against the French-backed government.
Based France. They know their own people are degenerate but cannot give domestic helicopter rides without incident. However, they're selflessly doing their duty to their former colonies. If only the UK did the same.
 
Its göpbp homos fault... the dutch would have fired all their guns without all this negro love
 
ProTip: Necroposting is a dumb idea, in general
Not to mention doubleposting.
D34E1FD2-EB26-4CED-800D-A4A2370ECB06.jpeg
@PUTIN MAKES ME HORNY You have to go back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Corpun
The French are also responsible for Libya since Ghadaffi wanted an African equivalent of the Euro and it fucked with the French so they worked with Clinton to depose him, which is another reason why Obama fucking loathes Hilary because there are a lot of rumors Libya was done behind his back.

The French have been fucking Africa since they carved it up during their days of Imperialism. North Africa especially. Its going to get weird with Africa slowly becoming China's sphere of Influence with France being up North. Not to mention Egypt, which is kind of ME/Africa weirdness.

So yeah, its not a fucking stretch that France is somewhat responsible for the genocide as they've been constantly and consistently fucking with Africa like the US fucks with South America.
I mean the US might find narcos or the rare crazy insane dictatorship in Latin America. But all things considered in the grand scheme yanqui colonialism is basically sell us your bananas and leave our tourists alone and no one gets hurt and also surpress communists. Which for Latin America isn't that hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nod Flenders
My recollection is that part of the issue was that the ruling government at the time spoke French, while the out-group had started to adopt speaking English. Nothing gets a frog angrier than someone dissing their language, so they were quite willing to allow the English-speakers to be slaughtered.

France also occasionally does things in their former African colonies like send attack helicopters to mow down crowds of protestors who were against the French-backed government.
Except Rwanda was a former Belgian colony
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NevskyProspekt
I wouldn't be surprised if this becomes more common for genocides in the Third World. You have revisionist Turks trying to blame Germans for Armenian "Massacres" already, next you will see Tanzania blame Britain for the Zanzibar Genocide of it's Arab and Persian upper and middle class.
Same goes for Kenya and Darfur. I wouldn’t necessarily call it revisionism, at least for África, because the colonies actually exploited pre existing feuds, but the locals are surprisingly forgetful of their own wrongdoings.
 
The way I remember it was that the french at the time helped the hutus organize and distributed weapons (mostly machetes).
It's all hearsay of course but I honestly believe it might be true.
The french have been doing some glow in the dark shit in africa since WW2 .
And while they may not be to blame for the genocide itself they certainly did nothing to stop it.
Just like the UN tho.
 
Back