Dramacow Ryulong / Michael Cohen - Fanatic Wikisperg, Anti-Gamergater and All Around Asshole

I think they did, and that's why the place is such a nutty little shithole of autism.

Any sane people who were there were driven off.

Eh, quite a few of them seem okay to me. Ryulong has maybe 3-4 fanatical supporters, including David Gerard, who owns the RationalWiki, and everyone else is sick and tired of him and wants him gone. FuzzyCatPotato seems alright, Carpetsmoker seems alright, most of them basically seem alright (aside from being wiki-editors and therefore autistic by default). Calling them all insane for tolerating him is like calling all of you insane for tolerating me. It's not up to them, and it's not up to you. Ryulong has Gerard protecting him and I have sempai Noll. None of you can do shit about it.
 
Cohen defends ignoring the request of someone he doesn't like to have his middle name removed from RW: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Gamergate_claims&diff=prev&oldid=1591056

When he made this request he was told "No, you're not getting your way, Collingwood." and then immediately banned. His dox remains posted on the Timeline of Gamergate page.

Doesn't this mean that using the part of his legal name that he objects to, and does not generally use for internet business, is doxing him? It appears this way to me. I really don't understand how it's any different from using Zoe Quinn or Sarah Nyberg's real names, and I find it incredibly difficult to understand how we can consider that a crime so heinous we have to avoid linking to any publication that's done it, while we're perfectly happy to not just host the information ourselves but mock the victim for asking us to remove it if we don't like him. Seriously (talk) 11:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Sam Smith's middle name was found on the Gamergate Wikia, so I considered that fair game as being a "neutral" zone that doesn't host dox (I've found the Gamergate Wikia presently doesn't list Zoe's name at all) and because they mostly adore him. I've also done this for Sargon (his name is in the caption of his interview with David Pakman) and Izcer (her name is in a puff piece on Breitbart and she uses it on Twitter now anyway). This is vastly different from let's say Breitbart (or Ralph's website your pick) listing Zoe Quinn's (former?) legal name, Sarah Nyberg's deadname, or Gamergate's conspiracy theories about Brianna Wu's gender identity.—Ryulong (talk) 11:47, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 
For someone who has defended "Sick Nick" Nyberg, Cohen sure seems intent on smearing Brennan/8chan with presumably false claims that 8chan was made in response to 4chan banning CP: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170904&diff=1591367&oldid=1591349

Cohen is a suspect for anything relating to sperging on a wiki.


The bronies also loosely know of him as a "crazy wiki editor" that hates them.



I was trying to embed the tweets but it doesn't seem to be working for me, just shows blank spaces. Edit: Looks like they embedded anyway, not sure what broke that I can't see Twitter embeds anymore.
 
Cohen sure seems intent on smearing Brennan/8chan with presumably false claims that 8chan was made in response to 4chan banning CP: http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170904&diff=1591367&oldid=1591349

Don't miss that this is also an opportunity to smear 4chan (by claiming that they allowed CP in the first place), even though Ryulong was a long time regular on the site until 2011. I tend to think of Ryulong's relationship with the chans as that of a spurned lover. Senpai noticed him and told him to fuck off.
 
Don't miss that this is also an opportunity to smear 4chan (by claiming that they allowed CP in the first place), even though Ryulong was a long time regular on the site until 2011. I tend to think of Ryulong's relationship with the chans as that of a spurned lover. Senpai noticed him and told him to fuck off.

He was a tripfag which is basically the lowest form of scum on 4chan. Not just that, he had a secure trip which only the most gargantuan of douchebags have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
Seriously joined Keter in kicking Ryulong's insanity in the balls:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...70956&diff=1591472&oldid=1591456&rcid=2059027

Also, don't know if Ryulong saw this, but it probably makes him feel better.

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...otato&curid=159101&diff=1591435&oldid=1591143

Ryulong; FUCK YOU KETER, THE NARRATIVE MUST STAND THAT GAMERGATE IS UTTERLY WRONG!

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170904&diff=1591492&oldid=1591490

New account shows up to pitch his hat in the "call Ryulong out on his shit" fray:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...70956&diff=1591481&oldid=1591473&rcid=2059036

Seriously has balls of solid brass:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...70904&diff=1591496&oldid=1591492&rcid=2059051
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First two links are the same.

Good catch, probably forgot to change tabs.

And Ryulong's dicksucking minion reverted any sanity Seriosuly tried to add:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170904&diff=1591499&oldid=1591496

They will do ANYTHING to deny the existence of Anti-GamerGate

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...70904&diff=1591510&oldid=1591509&rcid=2059066

Just how fucking much is Ryulong going to deny Nyberg's a sick fuck?

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170956&diff=1591511&oldid=1591487

Seriously, you are arguing against the insanity of a crazy man on ground friendly to him. I love what you are trying to do, but he won't change:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...laims&curid=170956&diff=1591515&oldid=1591511
 
Last edited:
Seriously, you are arguing against the insanity of a crazy man on ground friendly to him. I love what you are trying to do, but he won't change:

It's not friendly ground anymore. He's turned 3/4 of the mods against him, almost the entire userbase is outright sick of his bullshit, and he's limited to one edit every 30 minutes. He's playing a game of whack-a-mole where he desperately wants to whack every person who argues with him, or reverts his edits, or adds content, but he's only permitted a swing every thirty minutes. For a man who's spent 8-10 hours a day editing Gamergate bullshit for well over a year and is pathologically incapable of letting others ever get the last word, this is torture. And for a man who lives off autistic tears, it's beautiful.
 
So why is wiki his life? I mean, I get the autism thing, but this in particular and it being that strong? What's the appeal to just editing for the whole day with no breaks?
 
For once, he retorts with something that can be called evidence:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1591549&oldid=1591539

Depends on context. If it's legally actionable, then it's fair warning:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...rgate&curid=169714&diff=1591627&oldid=1591625

Still arguable, but credit to Ryulong, at least he's not tard raging and making an argument based on some actual evidence:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1591588&oldid=1591579

And even HuskyHarlot agrees:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1591589&oldid=1591588
 
Last edited:
Michael Cohen said:
Now, with regards to the section "Just plain old libel", perhaps I was describing it in a wrong way, because the issue is that for every single libelous and false claim made against Gamergate's targets and critics (ex. "Zoe's an abuser", "Anita's a scammer", "Ian's a Nazi", "Dan should be arrested for looking at child porn", "Sarah's a pedo") those can be directly applied to Gamergate's figureheads, supporters, defenders, and allies (Eron physically assaulted Zoe, Aurini and Owen made the absolute worst and amateur movie after being given thousands of dollars, the Honey Badgers spent thousands of dollars on hiring a disbarred lawyer to be their legal counsel, weev is a literal Nazi, Hotwheels wrote a pro-eugenics piece for Stormfront, most of Gamergate is made of /pol/acks, 8chan only exists because of child porn, Gamergaters keep sending Kern half naked pedobait anime characters). The section exists to point out the abject hypocrisy displayed by Gamergate on a daily basis for a year and a half.

This is what Michael Cohen actually believes.
 
For once, he retorts with something that can be called evidence:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1591549&oldid=1591539

Depends on context. If it's legally actionable, then it's fair warning:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php...rgate&curid=169714&diff=1591627&oldid=1591625

Still arguable, but credit to Ryulong, at least he's not tard raging and making an argument based on some actual evidence:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1591588&oldid=1591579

And even HuskyHarlot agrees:

http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gamergate&curid=167863&diff=1591589&oldid=1591588
I never thought I'd see this but Ryulong actually backing up his shit with links and evidence? Holy shit. It took him fucking long enough but it still irks me that he wants to throw the word harassment as if it was just something he could use to not engage with someone else in a debate.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BOLDYSPICY!
Back