Sam Hyde

raisinlove said:
I didn’t realize until that how even less evidence there is for marky shit.
Click to expand...

Evidence of what? That he had intercourse with a minor or that she wasn't of legal age? I'm trying to understand what some of you disagree with or say "lacks evidence".
There clearly was some sort of relationship between the two, their photos imply that it was romantic and likely sexual. Now, do you wanna know if she was or wasn't 16 to be able to consent in Rhode Island? Well, i don't know why that would matter at this point since we're not judges and the statute of limitation ran out, but the guy who made that "Sam Hyde and Marky - The Truth" did a good job in detailing the possible timeline of their relationship.

I'm gonna stop talking about this because even i'm tired of it. I guess it's like with Metokur and the loli shit, people will overlook anything bad about their e-daddies.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: latinlover, Jobama, Queesechake and 3 others
Nigger Cattle said:
Evidence of what? That he had intercourse with a minor or that she wasn't of legal age? I'm trying to understand what some of you disagree with or say "lacks evidence".
There clearly was some sort of relationship between the two, their photos imply that it was romantic and likely sexual. Now, do you wanna know if she was or wasn't 16 to be able to consent in Rhode Island? Well, i don't know why that would matter at this point since we're not judges and the statute of limitation ran out, but the guy who made that "Sam Hyde and Marky - The Truth" did a good job in detailing the possible timeline of their relationship.

I'm gonna stop talking about this because even i'm tired of it. I guess it's like with Metokur and the loli shit, people will overlook anything bad about their e-daddies.
Click to expand...
the faggot you are arguing with has been camped out in this thread for years crying that every single person who criticizes anything sam does is an obsessed hater.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: latinlover, MayoMustardMilkMan, Jobama and 5 others
Nigger Cattle said:
I'm gonna stop talking about this because even i'm tired of it. I guess it's like with Metokur and the loli shit, people will overlook anything bad about their e-daddies.
Click to expand...
It's not even about the e-daddy thing. This topic has been discussed to death. What else is there to say? If you care about it that much, just don't watch his videos. It's not like you can do more than repeat "did you know that your favorite Internet personality had sex with a minor?!" until you're blue in the face.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Disagree
Reactions: Queesechake, Unmarkedgrave, Israel's Top Guy and 1 other person
It is true that rock is "black music" but it doesn't matter. Rock music was heavily rooted in black culture and popularized by God's Chosen People to slowly subvert western society. This is not a conspiracy and it's easy to understand depending on how far back you're willing to research. It didn't just happen on accident. I'm not a historian or a teacher and I most certainly don't want to debate about cultural Marxism with faggots on KFs Official Sam Hyde Fan Club thread. Saying that rock is "black music" is pretty gay though because it sounds like some Black Israelite Wakanda "we done taught yall stank ass crackers how to wash yo ass" nonsense. Still, I know a white guy who refuse to listen to anything with an electric guitar because "it's nigger music". Personally I think he's missing out on a lot of great stuff (like having a wife for example).

Rock has had its black pioneers for sure, but it's been mostly innovated and improved by whites who took a basic formula to amazing places. Not to mention all the production techniques, recording process, instruments etc were created by whites and Jews. I read that black people in Africa didn't even think to invent chairs and would just stand up or sit on the ground for like a thousand years. Not sure if it's true but I choose to believe it because it's funny.

It’s also funny how often groundbreaking artistic innovation by white creators was vilified as demonic simply for challenging the norms of its time and then later gets recognized as completely normal and undeniably brilliant. It's the direct opposite for blacks. Here's an example:

Whenever I get into a classical composer there's usually a story about how controversial his work was at the time. Something like Rites of Spring by Stravinsky was considered as offensive to the church at the time as Slayer would later be. When you listen to it now it's almost impossible to understand why without an incredible amount of context. That type of ostracization and social stigma most likely slowed a lot of white innovation.

Meanwhile blacks will change up almost nothing in their formulaic hip hop songs and be praised as incredible innovators when they do. Their lyrics have always been extremely hedonist and overtly sexual and somehow they always find ways to get even more profane. Whenever a black leader tries to push back against it they're called an uncle tom coon.

So anyways, yeah... whites are smart and blacks are stupid. Don't shoot the messenger.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: latinlover, 85CentSoda, ThePissWitch and 6 others
Noble Redditor said:
Rock has had its black pioneers for sure, but it's been mostly innovated and improved by whites who took a basic formula to amazing places.
Click to expand...
Is it really that amazing though, or is it just what you grew up with? Why willingly associate with a bunch of jigaboos and come up with excuses for the 1950s equivalent of wiggers when Beethoven's 9th Symphony exists and far outstrips literally any piece of music written in the last 100 years?

Noble Redditor said:
Not to mention all the production techniques, recording process, instruments etc were created by whites and Jews.
Click to expand...
Now imagine if there was an entire genre of music with all those production techniques, recording processes, and instruments, and the music itself had no debt to outdated farm equipment. It would seem like the perfect candidate for a style of music for white advocates to rally around instead of needing to add caveats every time the Beatles are mentioned.

Noble Redditor said:
Something like Rites of Spring by Stravinsky was considered as offensive to the church at the time
Click to expand...
The Rite of Spring was never offensive to the church. It had no relation whatsoever to sacred music.
What you are talking about is the riot that occurred at the premiere concert of the Rite of Spring. The part that many neglect to mention is that it was not the music itself but the ballet that accompanied the music that caused the riot.
When the music alone was played in concert several months later, it received unanimous acclaim. What Stravinsky was doing wasn't particularly radical compared to what people like Schoenberg, Scriabin, and Debussy were already doing prior to the Rite's premiere and at the same time.

Noble Redditor said:
Their lyrics have always been extremely hedonist and overtly sexual and somehow they always find ways to get even more profane.
Click to expand...
This is an incredibly ironic sentiment considering we're literally talking about Led Zeppelin.

Hentai-Semitism said:
Yeah, just look at all those famous black rock bands.
Click to expand...
You not knowing who BB King is doesn't make him any less famous or historically relevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85CentSoda and BigfrodChungusington9000X
Sneedifarms said:
This is an incredibly ironic sentiment considering we're literally talking about Led Zeppelin.
Click to expand...
Sorry your e daddy Robert Plant won't let you squeeze his lemon.
Sneedifarms said:
You not knowing who BB King is doesn't make him any less famous or historically relevant.
Click to expand...
Can't believe this guy really didn't know about the "famous black rock band" BB King.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Sneedifarms
Untitled-2.webp
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Punished Borzoi, BullfrogBill, Queesechake and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back