Sanctioned Suicide - "Kill yourself" but unironically with sodium nitrite. Higher death count than the Farms. Targeted by parents, legislators, and journalists looking to alter Section 230.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
In a wonderful and truly glorious development, Kenneth Law, who was prosecuted by the Canadian government for selling SN kits, will have his murder charges dropped. He will plead guilty to aiding suicide as part of a plea agreement.


Of course, the Fixers are raging on Twitter. Just LOL:

This development was to be expected. Law's murder charges were the result of overcharging by zealously woke Canadian prosecutors. But the Supreme Court of Canada ("SCC"), in an separate judgment last year, poured cold water on their theory.

I read the judgment for funsies. Here are the key takeaways from R v. B.F., 2025 SCC 41 (brackets are references to paragraph numbers):

The decision was 6-3. Justice O'Bonsawin's majority opinion offered "no opinion on whether someone voluntarily attempting to end their own life precludes all liability for attempted murder in respect of that attempt" (at [48]). They did not overturn the lower court's ruling that for the supplier of a substance to be found guilty of attempted murder (or murder), the supplier must have interfered with the victim's independent will to self-administer that substance ([25]).

The joint dissent, by Justices Karakatsanis and Moreau, features the thorough discussion (from [119] to [146]) that we were looking for, and wholly endorsed the lower court's reasoning on this particular issue. Their logic was simple: Parliament created the separate offence of "aiding suicide," so the legal distinction between "aiding suicide" and "culpable homicide" must be identified in order to respect and give effect to the distinction drawn by the legislature ([121]). The distinction between the two crimes is reflected by differing levels of "moral blameworthiness" ([135]), as assessed by legal causation ([137]). Thus, "where the deceased took their own life autonomously and of their own free will, this independent choice to act to cause their own death may sever the accused’s legal causation. Those circumstances reduce the accused’s moral blameworthiness, and do not establish legal causation for culpable homicide. The accused’s actions will therefore not be a significant contributing cause of death, and an acquittal for any culpable homicide charge should follow." ([141]).

In other words, there was NOT a single Canadian Supreme Court Justice who was willing to say that the supplier of a substance could be guilty of (attempted) murder in a case even if the Crown could not prove that the supplier interfered with the independent will of the person who self-administered the sentence.

In the minds of Canadian prosecutors, this must have doomed the murder case against Law.

I've attached the full decision in R v. B.F. if anyone is interested.
 

Attachments

@PPEcel sanity prevails. I'd be so pissed from beyond the grave if I was one of the "victims" and they tried to make my suicide into a murder. Some of the families want him charged in the UK after he serves his sentence in Canada too. One of them was banging on about it being murder still when he bought the exact same substance "to see how easy it was to buy" and yet strangely enough he's still alive to tell the tale. It's almost as if you don't have to buy SN and if you do you don't have to take it-KL just didn't give enough of a crap to care either way. Which makes him a shitty human being, but not a murderer. What sentence do we think he'll get? The fact it's a legal substance might help his case a bit I'm thinking? But after the ridiculous first degree murder charges at one point, I really can't call it...
 
how the fuck is aiding suicide a crime in a country whose leading cause of death is government assisted suicide? they should be giving him a fucking medal, maybe a doctorate in medicine.
 
Null said:
how the fuck is aiding suicide a crime in a country whose leading cause of death is government assisted suicide? they should be giving him a fucking medal, maybe a doctorate in medicine.
Click to expand...
The same way selling drugs and killing muslims are crimes in a country whose leading revenue streams are selling drugs and killing muslims. It's just business.
 
IWantItAll said:
@PPEcel sanity prevails. I'd be so pissed from beyond the grave if I was one of the "victims" and they tried to make my suicide into a murder. Some of the families want him charged in the UK after he serves his sentence in Canada too. One of them was banging on about it being murder still when he bought the exact same substance "to see how easy it was to buy" and yet strangely enough he's still alive to tell the tale. It's almost as if you don't have to buy SN and if you do you don't have to take it-KL just didn't give enough of a crap to care either way. Which makes him a shitty human being, but not a murderer. What sentence do we think he'll get? The fact it's a legal substance might help his case a bit I'm thinking? But after the ridiculous first degree murder charges at one point, I really can't call it...
Click to expand...
It was truly ridiculous to see the first-degree murder charges being applied, a prosecution that would strain the credulity of any first-year law student. Had the Crown actually succeeded, it would have obviated any distinction between first- and second-degree murder, between murder and manslaughter, and between manslaughter and aiding suicide. The statutes criminalizing second-degree murder, manslaughter, and aiding suicide would have been rendered as surplusage.

The Canadian legislature must have had a purpose or intent in mind when they created all of these separate and distinct offenses, instead of creating a singular offence of "homicide" that would cover every type of unlawful death. The courts naturally chose to interpret the law in a way that would give effect to that purpose or intent.

But Canadian prosecutors got much of what they wanted, of course: Every silly journalist under the sun trumpeted the murder charge in headlines without critically examining how likely it was for the murder charges to actually go through, and in turn every lefty taxpayer-sucking NGO used the headlines as fodder in reports about so-called "online harms", et cetera...

Law will still get a hefty sentence, he's facing multiple charges so the judge could choose to sentence him consecutively, or partially consecutively, but it won't be a life sentence.
 
x3firehexx said:
Well yes, but it cuts into their business, so technichally competiton, thus they have to go.
Click to expand...
I think that's also why trannies hate us so much. It's not as if they're holier than us and don't engage in laughing at retards online, because they do. It's not even that we laugh at some of them, they are happy to turn on their own the split second it's kosher to do so. It's just that we're competition.
 
Markass the Worst said:
I think that's also why trannies hate us so much. It's not as if they're holier than us and don't engage in laughing at retards online, because they do. It's not even that we laugh at some of them, they are happy to turn on their own the split second it's kosher to do so. It's just that we're competition.
Click to expand...
We are the retards they couldn't estrogenise.
 
went to check in the website and holy fuck, these guys are beyond salvation lol Screenshot_20260503_082111_Chrome.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom