Sarah Nyberg / Srhbutts Internet Defense Force - It's Okay To be a Pedo As Long As He's Trans/Anti-GG

  • 🐕 Maintenace complete. Database is on a new RAID. Everything should load faster. Will optimize more over time.
havent read the whole thread yet but is Sarah's girlfriend known? Curious to see who would date her
"Charloppe" in those logs is Charlotte Danowski, Sarah's MtF trans girlfriend who lives in Milwaukee. She seems to have deleted her twitter account (google cache archive) at some point in the last 24 hours, probably in response to the leaked chatlogs that @Hellfire is quoting.

Previously, Charlotte tried to get her picture taken down from Sarah's ED article by DMCA'ing Encyclopedia Dramatica. As you'd probably expect, it didn't work.

View attachment 128281 View attachment 128280 View attachment 128282 View attachment 128283 View attachment 128285

capture-png.128281


450px-charlotte_danowski-jpg.128280


capture-png.128283

File:Charlotte_Danowski.jpg
 
she looks fairly attractive and she's dating a misfit transwoman, found creepy by some...this is the kind of relationship that gave Chris hope
Well, as evidenced by this thread, Nyberg's done some crazy successful damage control that someone like Chris could only dream of. And Danowski was in CON, so, y'know, not exactly the most stable or unbiased individual out there.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Nyberg's done some crazy successful damage control that someone like Chris could only dream of

yeah ..but there's a difference between getting a left wing movement that pities you to forgive your past sins and ..then finding one that wants to date you. I guess Nyberg just has her head screwed on and a better personality maybe. And can do big puss in boots eyes when talking about why she was creepy then or something. wheras Chris wouldn't even recognise he's been creepy. I guess Nyberg is basically sane/self aware enough to know they were doing wrong back then.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: SHITTAHS CLOGGED!
Logs that Nyberg himself has admitted are real. The only reason he wasn't arrested is because you can't get busted for talking about illegal things, and there's no evidence he ever actually molested his cousin. From what I can surmise, her parents picked up on his predatory behavior and kept her away from him before he could do anything.
 
It might already be noted due to him doing the same thing last year, but RationalWiki's David Gerard (and whoever the other RationalMedia Foundation board members are) supports pedophile Nicholas 'Sarah' Nyberg and bans people for speaking the truth and expressing disgust about the sick fuck.

upload_2016-12-3_21-18-33-png.159235


upload_2016-12-3_21-15-39-png.159232


upload_2016-12-3_21-14-6-png.159230


upload_2016-12-3_21-12-8-png.159229
 
It might already be noted due to him doing the same thing last year, but RationalWiki's David Gerard (and whoever the other RationalMedia Foundation board members are) supports pedophile Nicholas 'Sarah' Nyberg and bans people for speaking the truth and expressing disgust about the sick fuck.

upload_2016-12-3_21-18-33-png.159235


upload_2016-12-3_21-15-39-png.159232


upload_2016-12-3_21-14-6-png.159230


upload_2016-12-3_21-12-8-png.159229

So, when Sarah slips up and pisses off the wrong person, are all these people going to act shocked, SHOCKED that she was a pedo the whole time?

Because it's only a matter of time before she's cannibalized.
 
Sarah Jeong, soc jus blogger that specializes in harassing people on twitter, continues to claim Sick Nick did nothing wrong and goober gobber threatened his employment. When did Nick ever have a job? Is there nothing dumpster fires like Sarah Jeong wont lie about when it comes to promoting their awful friends? At least Sarah realized her message is going nowhere and people don't give a shit about her.

http://archive.is/H4ywF
 
Sarah Jeong, soc jus blogger that specializes in harassing people on twitter, continues to claim Sick Nick did nothing wrong and goober gobber threatened his employment. When did Nick ever have a job? Is there nothing dumpster fires like Sarah Jeong wont lie about when it comes to promoting their awful friends? At least Sarah realized her message is going nowhere and people don't give a shit about her.

http://archive.is/H4ywF

If Pizzagate is surprising, it’s because memories of Gamergate have been locked away in a “pink ghetto,” marginalized as a women’s issue that can be safely ignored.

No, I believe it was locked away in a "huge fucking stupid bullshit nerd fight" ghetto.
 
It might already be noted due to him doing the same thing last year, but RationalWiki's David Gerard (and whoever the other RationalMedia Foundation board members are) supports pedophile Nicholas 'Sarah' Nyberg and bans people for speaking the truth and expressing disgust about the sick fuck.

upload_2016-12-3_21-18-33-png.159235


upload_2016-12-3_21-15-39-png.159232


upload_2016-12-3_21-14-6-png.159230


upload_2016-12-3_21-12-8-png.159229

That can be easily answered:

Rationalwiki [URL='http://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=RationalWiki:RationalMedia_Foundation&oldid=1717824']Source[/URL] said:
Board Of Trustees See the main article on this topic: RationalWiki:RationalMedia Foundation/List of board members The initial board was made up of three members appointed prior to the Foundation filing for legal status in order to bootstrap policies, procedures and facilitate legal incorporation. The first elections were held in January 2011.

The current Trustees are:
David Gerard
FuzzyCatPotato
Human
ikanreed
Reverend Black Percy
Tmtoulouse (Operations Manager, incumbent)

The Trustees' duties, authority, and tenure are set out in the Foundation's by-laws.

ikanreed claimed the whole board defended Nyberg in the 4/5 vote and the one vote missing was an absentee (most likely human). Percy is more of a naive dolt, Fuzzy goes with the flow, but ikanreed and David Gerard are true believers. They have defended Nyberg at other places, too and see no reason to make a gesture of distance.

Note that the RationalWiki has a unique special “Nyberg protection clause”, which is not mentioned in the official rules and which violates every other practice of the site. They usually make a huge week-long fuss about any possible case (called COOP), except for Nyberg, that's instant death sentence by firing squad. Of course it is not mentioned in any rules. When pointed out, they lie about that too, and claim they were only protecting themselves from lawsuits. But take note, their articles are teeming with slander and smear, and even repeating accusations of rape-apologia in article space (i.e. what you cannot say truthfully about Nyberg as opinion can be written into official articles on other people they don't like and without evidence — so much for libel concerns.)

Worse, David Gerard also runs the official RationalWiki twitter account that friendly chirpes and retweeted with Nyberg many times. He has been defending the practice without reservation when the above happened, and ever since. In other words, Gerard is completely and without any shred of a doubt supporting Nyberg, and doesn't even deem it necesssary to maintain some professional or tactical PR distance (well) after Nyberg conceded the accusations to be true. Keep in mind that it costs Gerard nothing whatsoever to not re/tweet with Nyberg, and he's not gaining anything either. And keep in mind that Nyberg's case is controversial and yucky enough to compell a normally functioning person to maintain a bit of distance with an official account, even if only for PR reasons.
 
That can be easily answered:



ikanreed claimed the whole board defended Nyberg in the 4/5 vote and the one vote missing was an absentee (most likely human). Percy is more of a naive dolt, Fuzzy goes with the flow, but ikanreed and David Gerard are true believers. They have defended Nyberg at other places, too and see no reason to make a gesture of distance.

Note that the RationalWiki has a unique special “Nyberg protection clause”, which is not mentioned in the official rules and which violates every other practice of the site. They usually make a huge week-long fuss about any possible case (called COOP), except for Nyberg, that's instant death sentence by firing squad. Of course it is not mentioned in any rules. When pointed out, they lie about that too, and claim they were only protecting themselves from lawsuits. But take note, their articles are teeming with slander and smear, and even repeating accusations of rape-apologia in article space (i.e. what you cannot say truthfully about Nyberg as opinion can be written into official articles on other people they don't like and without evidence — so much for libel concerns.)

Worse, David Gerard also runs the official RationalWiki twitter account that friendly chirpes and retweeted with Nyberg many times. He has been defending the practice without reservation when the above happened, and ever since. In other words, Gerard is completely and without any shred of a doubt supporting Nyberg, and doesn't even deem it necesssary to maintain some professional or tactical PR distance (well) after Nyberg conceded the accusations to be true. Keep in mind that it costs Gerard nothing whatsoever to not re/tweet with Nyberg, and he's not gaining anything either. And keep in mind that Nyberg's case is controversial and yucky enough to compell a normally functioning person to maintain a bit of distance with an official account, even if only for PR reasons.

How irrational of him.
 
That can be easily answered:



ikanreed claimed the whole board defended Nyberg in the 4/5 vote and the one vote missing was an absentee (most likely human). Percy is more of a naive dolt, Fuzzy goes with the flow, but ikanreed and David Gerard are true believers. They have defended Nyberg at other places, too and see no reason to make a gesture of distance.

Note that the RationalWiki has a unique special “Nyberg protection clause”, which is not mentioned in the official rules and which violates every other practice of the site. They usually make a huge week-long fuss about any possible case (called COOP), except for Nyberg, that's instant death sentence by firing squad. Of course it is not mentioned in any rules. When pointed out, they lie about that too, and claim they were only protecting themselves from lawsuits. But take note, their articles are teeming with slander and smear, and even repeating accusations of rape-apologia in article space (i.e. what you cannot say truthfully about Nyberg as opinion can be written into official articles on other people they don't like and without evidence — so much for libel concerns.)

Worse, David Gerard also runs the official RationalWiki twitter account that friendly chirpes and retweeted with Nyberg many times. He has been defending the practice without reservation when the above happened, and ever since. In other words, Gerard is completely and without any shred of a doubt supporting Nyberg, and doesn't even deem it necesssary to maintain some professional or tactical PR distance (well) after Nyberg conceded the accusations to be true. Keep in mind that it costs Gerard nothing whatsoever to not re/tweet with Nyberg, and he's not gaining anything either. And keep in mind that Nyberg's case is controversial and yucky enough to compell a normally functioning person to maintain a bit of distance with an official account, even if only for PR reasons.

Wow, and people argued with @Dynastia burning half that website to the ground.
 
They're still going. Years of logs and forum posts by Nyberg declaring himself to be a pedophile, talking about grooming his cousin, sharing links to CP/pedo sites, etc. is "total bullshit."
View attachment 432623
DISCLAIMER: THESE ARE THE SAME PEOPLE WHO FULLY BUY INTO THE "MUH RUSSIA" BULLSHIT
 
Back