SAS officer with semi-automatic shotgun kills 5 ISIS nimrods as part of raid on suicide bomb factory - Shotgun is OP, plz nerf.

SAS hero with shotgun 'kills five ISIS fighters including two wearing suicide vests in just seven seconds during raid on jihadi bomb factory in Iraq'

18496360-7465523-image-a-8_1568536141904.jpg


An SAS officer armed with a shotgun has killed five jihadis during a dawn raid, it has been reported.
The intense fire fight was over in just seven seconds, and quickly led to the militant group's surrender of the stronghold.

The covert operation took place on an Islamic State outpost in Baghdad, Iraq.
MI6 agents, working with Iraq's special forces, had identified the building as a suspected bomb factory from which militants would carry out attacks.

A 12-man SAS team was then sent to watch the house for several days.
Upon receiving reports of a planned multiple suicide bombing, the team planned a dawn raid for the next day.

A 'breach team' were the first to enter, breaking through a doorway into a courtyard.
However they were soon faced by a group of heavily armed men, who had reportedly just finished morning prayers and were loading weapons into a vehicle.

One of the officers, armed with a Benelli M4 Super 90 semi-automatic shotgun, fired at them, killing three would-be bombers.

Another two terrorists then appeared from a building, but before they could fire off a shot they had been neutralised them as well.
'The terrorists were no more than a few feet away when the SAS team came face to face with them,' a source told the Daily Star about the raid late last year.

18496364-7465523-image-a-10_1568536268785.jpg


'One of the breach team opened fire with a shotgun and shot dead three before they could get a shot off. Another two terrorists appeared from a building and he neutralised them as well.
'Several other terrorists emerged from the building but immediately surrendered and began panicking as two of the bodies didn’t have heads – they thought they were about to be executed.'

It was reported that two suicide vests, one weighing 30lbs, were found on the dead men. They were made mostly from ball bearings and plastic explosives.
At least one officer on a raid is armed with a 12 gauge pump-action Benelli shotgun, which is usually used to blast through locks and remove hinges from doors.

The Ministry of Defence does not comment on special forces operations.

 
The SAS are awesome, mega-hard super-soldiers but I'm always a bit suspicious when I read articles about them in the MSM. The MOD will not comment on anything to do with them & there's no way that a serving member of The Regiment would go to the press with a story like this, he'd be out of a job & possibly in jail. So where do the sources of these stories come from ?

Maybe there is someone in the MOD who leaks information ? Or perhaps stories like this are propaganda for the purpose of recruiting more soldiers into the SAS as they're having problems in that area at the moment. They're short of money too, so this could possibly be a way of gaining support for more government funding ? Idk, these stories could well be true, or even based on facts from previous battles in different countries ? But I've read a few similar stories in the press over the last few years, some of which sound like they're giving far too much away in tactics, methods of operating or even where the SAS are fighting at the moment.

I'm not knocking the OP for posting, it's interesting stuff but these stories just seem a little bit off somehow, for several reasons.
Here's a couple more.









Maybe I'm too suspicious of the media as the SAS are capable of some real super-hero type exploits, not sure.
SAS was streaming their Soldier of Fortune match, media mistook it for the real deal.
 
Maybe I'm too suspicious of the media as the SAS are capable of some real super-hero type exploits, not sure.
There's always going to be some fluff to make what the special forces/military does sound exemplary, and most stories are either forwarded from a proud superior or "I heard from a guy" types of things that somehow get substantiated later on.
Generally you'll have to do research on your own and compare notes to what's reported, find out how badly it's exaggerated(usually pretty badly) and what's an outright lie.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
There's always going to be some fluff to make what the special forces/military does sound exemplary, and most stories are either forwarded from a proud superior or "I heard from a guy" types of things that somehow get substantiated later on.
Generally you'll have to do research on your own and compare notes to what's reported, find out how badly it's exaggerated(usually pretty badly) and what's an outright lie.

It's pretty much an impossible subject to research though if the MOD does not comment on special forces activity & operations. There are no sources to check.

This story may well be true, or even based on half-truths, not sure, but there have been too many articles like this in the tabloid press over the last 3 years or so. Sometimes, they even go into details like 'The SAS are disguising themselves with niqabs in Allahtown, Iraq ...' Well that sort of detail has got to be bullshit because the ragheads would obviously know that they have to keep a close eye on & probably search every woman in a niqab. Sometimes, these stories just stick out as being very dodgy.
 
The SAS are awesome, mega-hard super-soldiers but I'm always a bit suspicious when I read articles about them in the MSM. The MOD will not comment on anything to do with them & there's no way that a serving member of The Regiment would go to the press with a story like this, he'd be out of a job & possibly in jail. So where do the sources of these stories come from ?

Maybe there is someone in the MOD who leaks information ? Or perhaps stories like this are propaganda for the purpose of recruiting more soldiers into the SAS as they're having problems in that area at the moment. They're short of money too, so this could possibly be a way of gaining support for more government funding ? Idk, these stories could well be true, or even based on facts from previous battles in different countries ? But I've read a few similar stories in the press over the last few years, some of which sound like they're giving far too much away in tactics, methods of operating or even where the SAS are fighting at the moment.

I'm not knocking the OP for posting, it's interesting stuff but these stories just seem a little bit off somehow, for several reasons.
Here's a couple more.









Maybe I'm too suspicious of the media as the SAS are capable of some real super-hero type exploits, not sure.
Im pretty sure even the frogman fear the SAS
 
It's pretty much an impossible subject to research though if the MOD does not comment on special forces activity & operations. There are no sources to check.
Some people spill the beans about spec-ops on occasion and, otherwise, books are written, you can go from there and speculate whether or not it matches their MO.
With anything related to special forces it's generally a big "Maybe?" as to if it actually happened since there have been both genius and totally pants-on-head operations in the past that ordinary military or police would get slapped for.

This story may well be true, or even based on half-truths, not sure, but there have been too many articles like this in the tabloid press over the last 3 years or so. Sometimes, they even go into details like 'The SAS are disguising themselves with niqabs in Allahtown, Iraq ...' Well that sort of detail has got to be bullshit because the ragheads would obviously know that they have to keep a close eye on & probably search every woman in a niqab. Sometimes, these stories just stick out as being very dodgy.
I do know there's suspicion of this kind of thing being a sort of warning/boasting to enemies, flaunting capabilities or otherwise making them fearful of everything from trashcans to their suddenly bearded and British-accented flat-chested wives
 
  • Informative
Reactions: spiritofamermaid
Some people spill the beans about spec-ops on occasion and, otherwise, books are written, you can go from there and speculate whether or not it matches their MO.
With anything related to special forces it's generally a big "Maybe?" as to if it actually happened since there have been both genius and totally pants-on-head operations in the past that ordinary military or police would get slapped for.


I do know there's suspicion of this kind of thing being a sort of warning/boasting to enemies, flaunting capabilities or otherwise making them fearful of everything from trashcans to their suddenly bearded and British-accented flat-chested wives

I know what the MO of the SAS is though & boasting about current or recent operations in the tabloids, or anywhere else, is absolutely not it. In this case, some of the story is believable but broadcasting it isn't, unless, like I said before, it's for propaganda reasons. But the SAS are known worldwide, there's no need to try to scare Jihadists with stories like this.

Some of the guys who were in the regiment & have written books about past operations have been ostracised by the sas & MOD because it's all supposed to be confidential. I agree with freedom of the press in the main but this is an area where they really need to STFU. " Loose lips sink ships ".
 
It's pretty much an impossible subject to research though if the MOD does not comment on special forces activity & operations. There are no sources to check.
The same goes for Australia's military. To paraphrase an article on Australian military secrecy, the easiest way to find out what the Brits/Aussies are doing is to go ask the Americans.
 
Auto-shotty is a noob stick, everyone knows that. At least use the pump shotty and bunny hop your way to headshots like a real counter terrorist!
 
Back