Off-Topic "Scientific" Studies regarding Transpeople

  • Happy Easter!
Although our study has revealed a statistically significant increase in suicide risk among those who have undergone gender-affirming surgery, it remains vital to recognize and support the positive impacts that these surgical interventions can have on the lives of transgender individuals.
It never ceases to amaze me that when the evidence that something is bad is overwhelmingly abundant, people still try to contradict the evidence by the spewing of the same bullshit rhetoric that directly contradicts the whole result of the investigation.

It's like a paper on the harms of smoking saying, "although smoking obviously bad, we should still recommend and encourage people to keep smoking, because maybe they'll turn out fine despite our evidence saying they won't"

Retards.
 
It never ceases to amaze me that when the evidence that something is bad is overwhelmingly abundant, people still try to contradict the evidence by the spewing of the same bullshit rhetoric that directly contradicts the whole result of the investigation.

It's like a paper on the harms of smoking saying, "although smoking obviously bad, we should still recommend and encourage people to keep smoking, because maybe they'll turn out fine despite our evidence saying they won't"

Retards.

Right? Look at this fucking conclusion: "Gender-affirming surgery is significantly associated with elevated suicide attempt risks, underlining the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support."

OR MAYBE STOP FUCKING DOING IT. The idea that it should be done in the first place is supposedly to RELIEVE psychological symptoms.

Christ these people are cowards. "No, no, please don't cancel us, we're not saying NOT to chop up the trannies if they want it, just maybe spend MORE time and money talking to them afterward".
 
It never ceases to amaze me that when the evidence that something is bad is overwhelmingly abundant, people still try to contradict the evidence by the spewing of the same bullshit rhetoric that directly contradicts the whole result of the investigation.

It's like a paper on the harms of smoking saying, "although smoking obviously bad, we should still recommend and encourage people to keep smoking, because maybe they'll turn out fine despite our evidence saying they won't"

Retards.
It's not necessarily retarded or even written with bad intentions. They have to word it like that or the kikes in charge of the journal would never publish their paper. It's the same when you try to publish a paper on the adverse effect of the holocough vax or, God forbid, childhood vaccines. Your conclusion must be singing praises about the wonderful safety & effectivn-ACK! of whatever The Science™-approved drug you are writing about, and only tentatively can you afford to mention that perhaps such-and-such minor side effect is a distant possibility in a small number of patients.

In an article about any even remotely controversial subject, don't bother reading the conclusions; look only at the data.
 
Last edited:
How does this tell us anything about the efficacy of 'gender-affirmation surgery' if we're comparing trannies to normal people and not pre-op trannies? All I'm able to get from this is that trannies rope more than normal people, unless the claim is that having an operation reduces suicide rates to baseline level.

If we're comparing Cohort A with Cohort C, why is tubal litigation or vasectonomy considered a decent enough proxy for transness to use? There are way more surgically sterilized people than there are trans.

... and Cohort D? I assume this was an attempt to ferret out gay men, since they tend to have more throat issues with fecal matter and unwashed phalluses being on the table. This entire thing is just poorly constructed.
 
Oh wow! Almost like it's a retarded social contagion and body mutilation won't fix the cluster B, depression, mento illness, etc.
Right? Look at this fucking conclusion: "Gender-affirming surgery is significantly associated with elevated suicide attempt risks, underlining the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support."

OR MAYBE STOP FUCKING DOING IT. The idea that it should be done in the first place is supposedly to RELIEVE psychological symptoms.

Christ these people are cowards. "No, no, please don't cancel us, we're not saying NOT to chop up the trannies if they want it, just maybe spend MORE time and money talking to them afterward".
Of course, never the tranny cult's fault. Patient still severely suicidal after surgery supposed to alleviate psychological symptoms? O-Oh, must be that heckin' chud harassment or something. Needs therapy to tell them how brave and stunning they are. They are right in a sense though. I'd imagine anyone going extreme body mutilation would have serious regrets and a mountain of self doubt. They need therapy to hopefully be able to move on and get adequate treatment for their mental illness and mourning for their body.

At least the pendulum is finally swinging. Hopefully more and more studies come out so this modern day lobotomy can end. Hopefully some more studies debunking other sham papers, like that dutch """"""""study"""""" on puberty blockers.

...In fact, it seems like these tranny studies follow a pretty interesting pattern. Patient undergoes treatment to alleviate apparent psychological symptoms (everything gets blamed on gender dysphoria) in the end they worsen or catastrophically worsen, but hey the gender dysphoria's "fixed." Just ignore the fact that the patient is even more debilitated, non functional and depressed than before. Just pop some SSRIs, that'll fix it.
 
Right? Look at this fucking conclusion: "Gender-affirming surgery is significantly associated with elevated suicide attempt risks, underlining the necessity for comprehensive post-procedure psychiatric support."
To be fair, there's a proverbial gun to their head, if it wasn't there it wouldn't be published. Also I doubt the researchers wrote that. The wording screams GPT3.5 to me.
 
If people are stupid enough to slice up their genitals for attention, then they deserve it. Honestly it’s helping sterilize the future generation of autists and retards.
They don't reproduce anyways, they recruit. I'm willing to accept that gay people exist even in the absence of child sexual abuse, but gender dysphoria is always groomed into someone by others. There is no way to be trans other than believing you are unhappy with your body, and there is no way to be unhappy with your body without another "correct" body to compare it to.

Every single person that has been convinced that "you can be born in the wrong body" was groomed into accepting that belief as truth.
 
They don't reproduce anyways, they recruit. I'm willing to accept that gay people exist even in the absence of child sexual abuse, but gender dysphoria is always groomed into someone by others. There is no way to be trans other than believing you are unhappy with your body, and there is no way to be unhappy with your body without another "correct" body to compare it to.

Every single person that has been convinced that "you can be born in the wrong body" was groomed into accepting that belief as truth.
Some of the most compelling eviden e to me is Dementia patients forgetting they are Troo s and freaking out when they realize their dicks are missing.
People with Dementia never suddenly forget they are gay, but Troons with Dementia or Alzheimers are so notorious for losing their shit because eventually the memory of their fetish goes away that theres even special notes and training for people who deal with Dementia patients on how to deal with it.
That right there is pretty solid evidence they aren't "in the wrong body" otherwise why would they thing something was wrong if they have no penis if they're actually, True and Honest Women?
 
Some of the most compelling eviden e to me is Dementia patients forgetting they are Troo s and freaking out when they realize their dicks are missing.
People with Dementia never suddenly forget they are gay, but Troons with Dementia or Alzheimers are so notorious for losing their shit because eventually the memory of their fetish goes away that theres even special notes and training for people who deal with Dementia patients on how to deal with it.
That right there is pretty solid evidence they aren't "in the wrong body" otherwise why would they thing something was wrong if they have no penis if they're actually, True and Honest Women?
I think what made me realize the whole "born in the wrong body" thing was a lie is the fact that most TIMs dont get the chop off. They justify it by claiming gender having nothing to do with sex. (Even though that whole thing is a bait and switch.) It really started to make me question the whole trans brains studies, cause if you noticed none of the articles ever explains how a TIMs brain is similar to a "cis" woman's. If it isn't biological sex then what is it then? This goes back into the question of "What does it mean to be a "man" and a "woman" if its not biology"? Sex stereotypes?
 
What you bigots need to understand is that the suicide rate is only so high because trans people get bullied even harder when they get life saving surgery. This is 100% fact checked false.
The suicide rate isn't high though.
Thats the thing.
The facts don't match the claim.
If the suicide rate was really what Troons claim you would have seen a way higher suicide rate prior to this Gendershit being openly pushed.
It just doesn't bare out on examination.
The 41% thing is a fucking meme.

What Troons do threatening suicide is no different to Toddler Breath Holding. Its emotional blackmail.
They very rarely follow through.
And even if they did its not a reason to give in to their bullshit.
Holding a gun to your head and saying you'll kill yourself if you don't get your own way is toddler behavior.
Its pathetic and its time we stopped pandering to spoilt delusional brats.

Thankfully the pendulum is swinging back.
Troons pushed too hard and exposed the normies to how disgusting and perverse they are, and they've managed to destroy any good will they once had.
Its finally coming to an end and it can't come soon enough.
 
Last edited:
Some of the most compelling eviden e to me is Dementia patients forgetting they are Troo s and freaking out when they realize their dicks are missing.
People with Dementia never suddenly forget they are gay, but Troons with Dementia or Alzheimers are so notorious
I would like to see more studies on transgender people with dementia. Other than the caregiver education, which seems speculative and future-proofing, the only case I keep seeing over and over is that one long-term transbian with dementia who was living separately from his female (or "female") partner in an ALF/independent living and started propositioning male residents.

As more post-op transgender people age into dementia--this includes the grandpa troons who get a vagina at age 70, a tiny percentage of their memories--I would expect more case studies. I mean, I'm sure it's going to be more people, but we only hear about this one guy.

Anecdotally demented people often become aggressively bi. Tiny little matriarchs grabbing through your scrubs at your vulva Metal Gear-style and propositioning you while you're trying to put a humidifier on their oxygen, but who knows, maybe they were lesbians all their repressed life and the dementia freed them. No matter what, it's gonna be a weird few decades.
 
I would like to see more studies on transgender people with dementia. Other than the caregiver education, which seems speculative and future-proofing, the only case I keep seeing over and over is that one long-term transbian with dementia who was living separately from his female (or "female") partner in an ALF/independent living and started propositioning male residents.

As more post-op transgender people age into dementia--this includes the grandpa troons who get a vagina at age 70, a tiny percentage of their memories--I would expect more case studies. I mean, I'm sure it's going to be more people, but we only hear about this one guy.

Anecdotally demented people often become aggressively bi. Tiny little matriarchs grabbing through your scrubs at your vulva Metal Gear-style and propositioning you while you're trying to put a humidifier on their oxygen, but who knows, maybe they were lesbians all their repressed life and the dementia freed them. No matter what, it's gonna be a weird few decades.
Its all the same guy?
I've heard a few different versions of the story, I didn't realize they were all about the same man.

I guess its something we'll be able to get some real data on as the Troon population ages, these surgeries haven't been that common for long enough for there to be a large amount of old as shit Troons yet.
I'd be interested in seeing some more studies myself, even as a layman.
 
Its all the same guy?
I've heard a few different versions of the story, I didn't realize they were all about the same man.
The ones I have seen (here) have been the case study of the transbian dude, or they've been thinkpieces that allude to that transbian and then spin off into hypotheticals.

I'm sure it's happening to more people, but as with other transgender medical care, it's not being documented or collected anywhere centrally. The people writing education modules for caregivers can only cite that transbian because that's the case study that was actually published and can be studied.

I may well have missed some vital transphobia; I can't prove a negative, but it's just that one published case I keep seeing.

eta: this guy
dementia.JPG
At this point all I can say is "lmao". My empathy for these people has been stretched to the breaking point.
https://wchh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/pnp.724

A 76-year-old female transgender person was diagnosed with Alzheimer's dementia in 2014 with MOCA (MOntreal Cognitive Assessment) score of 17/30. She was treated with donepezil 10mg OD and prescribed mirtazapine 15mg ON to treat insomnia and low mood.

She underwent male to female gender reassignment surgery, including bilateral breast surgery completed in 1960s, and hormonal treatment with estradiol. She considered her sexual orientation to be towards the same sex, and she was in a long-term relationship with a female partner. Her medical history included migraine and she was on propranolol 80mg OD. There was no other significant psychiatric history. She resided in her own flat and her partner lived in a separate flat in the same block. The couple had two of three surviving adopted daughters, both in their forties. The patient's primary carer was her partner and there was no formal care input.

In 2016, her MOCA score dropped to 11/30 and she had impaired hygiene and nutrition. In 2018, she started wandering and bringing men to her flat and engaging with them in sexual activities leading to a high risk of vulnerability to abuse culminating in Mental Health Act assessment and admission to a dementia unit. MOCA was not performed due to receptive and expressive dysphasia. In the unit, she presented with insomnia, agitation, dysphasia, having sexually inappropriate conversations with staff about being interested in men, which was a continuation of new behaviour that was identified in the community, as well as making innuendos to female members of staff while talking about herself as a ‘man’. She presented with toileting behaviour that would identify her as male gender, for example standing to urinate as if using a urinal, interpreted as reversal towards biological gender identification. Her partner felt devastated by behaviours exhibited by the patient, which could be identified as male-gender based behaviour aligned with biological gender by birth.
My bold.
 
Last edited:
Her partner felt devastated by behaviours exhibited by the patient, which could be identified as male-gender based behaviour aligned with biological gender by birth.
If her partner loved "her", then she should love him too, and accept that she's straight now. Otherwise it's genital preference which we all know is just transphobia.

My recommendation is to get the patient a strap-on and encourage sexytime to affirm the patient's gender.
 
If her partner loved "her", then she should love him too, and accept that she's straight now. Otherwise it's genital preference which we all know is just transphobia.
Besides other case studies, I would like to know more about this one. Specifically, is the partner a woman or a "woman?" If it's two transbians, that's got to be like someone walking on your grave.
 
Sorry for the double post, it's an hour apart and I'm not sure if I should edit or not.

Here's another dementia story:


Bold is mine.

Susan (information changed), was an 85-year-old Caucasian, right-handed transgender female with 12 years of education and a medical history significant for cardiovascular risk factors and completing gender affirmation surgery in her 70’s. Susan’s home-based primary care physician referred her for an outpatient neuropsychological evaluation due to clinician observed cognitive and functional decline over a two-year period. Susan’s primary care physician was concerned regarding her ability to live independently, and requested a neuropsychological evaluation to determine the appropriate level of care needed to ensure her safety. Prior to the current evaluation, she completed a cognitive screening measure and her score was suggestive of mild dementia. Susan consented for her data to be used in a case study.
...
At the time of the neuropsychological evaluation, Susan demonstrated limited insight into her medical history and functional decline. Susan was aware she had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease, although was “unsure why.” She reported she was “functioning fine;” however, acknowledged a decline in memory over the prior four years. Medical records indicated Susan had difficulty recalling her autobiographical information for five years prior to the current evaluation. For example, she possibly confabulated many stories to fit with her current gender (i.e., stories about her “husband,” her delivery of her children). Susan endorsed having difficulty driving and reported that her driving privileges were revoked by her primary care physician at 82 years of age. At the time of the evaluation, Susan lived alone in a senior housing apartment complex and had limited social support. She participated in limited leisure activities (e.g., watched television, attended lunch with a friend) and recently reduced her participation at a local senior center. She denied socializing with family and friends that lived nearby.
...
The patient denied a history of “significant depression.” However, during the clinical evaluation she expressed “a lot of sadness” due to her family’s rejection of her decision to transition from male to female. Per medical history, at the time of her decision to transition, she became estranged from her family. In addition, the patient lost her community social support subsequent to her transition. At the time of the evaluation, she also endorsed feeling “lonely, anxious and sad,” in the context of limited socialization and loss of independence.

I wonder if his wife died and he began skinwalking her.
 
Back