Careercow Scott Raymond Adams / @ScottAdamsSays / “Real Coffee With Scott Adams” - The Washed Up Cartoonist Behind “Dilbert”, Creator of “The Dilberito”, Professional Bullying Victim, Political Grifter, Terminally Online Narcissistic Boomer, Divorced Twice, Is (Not) Glad His Stepson Overdosed. This is Not a Racial Politics Debate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
What makes all of this more rich is, when California lifted the mask restriction on the state level(business can still require it) Scott cut up a mask and proudly gloated about how he made it through covid in the “optimal” way by getting vaxxed and never contracting it. He would later get it.

I have no actual opinions on whether or not the vaccine is bad for people’s health or not. I’m 100% against forced vaccination and the like, but I was also around extremely vulnerable people and had to take the first two shots. I had no noticeable side effects, not even a sore arm, but I also got covid 4 months after the vax despite never getting it prior and going out every single day during 2020. Anecdotally I was okay, but I still chose to not risk the booster.

But I’ve also never been asked to show proof of vaccine, even going in and out of the US 3 times
 
I had no noticeable side effects, not even a sore arm, but I also got covid 4 months after the vax despite never getting it prior and going out every single day during 2020. Anecdotally I was okay, but I still chose to not risk the booster.
I've heard more than one person tell me their doctor said if they recently got COVID that getting the booster was pointless, you already have the most recent "upgrade."
 
Regarding Scott hedging his bets, at some point he actually did start placing bets on gambling sites to make a record of his correct predictions, and guess what? He lost.

For instance, he bet Kamala Harris would be the Democrat candidate in 2020, but when she lost the primaries, he proudly doubled down predicting Joe Biden would make her his running mate "and then the bottom of the ticket becomes the top of the ticket" either by Joe Biden resigning or people practically voting for her as president. Someone pointed out he would still technically lose the bet, which he somberly conceded.

By the end of 2020, Scott laughingly gloated "That's 4 or 5 bets I technically won but won't be getting the money for!"
 
I cannot think of a more bitchy, juvenile way to interact with the world than Scott's strategy of trying to only ever communicate in sarcasm, questions, """jokes""" and telling people that's not what you actually believe in, just so that you can always retort that technically you never said you believed in something or were ever wrong about anything ever. Any criticism is bounced away with the shield of "you're mind reading, I never said exactly that!" Literal, actual beta male behavior of never saying what you mean, and never accepting responsibility when you're wrong.
 
"That's 4 or 5 bets I technically won but won't be getting the money for!"
Look, did I lose the fight? He had me on the ground and was punching my bloodied head at the end, so I can see how some might interpret it that way. I certainly won't claim that I won the fight, probably more of a draw than anything from the perspective of truly neutral observers.

But, I had every opportunity to win the fight. Had some of my earlier punches connected more strongly, or had I gotten the leverage instead of him as we went to the floor, it certainly would have been my win instead of the inconclusive draw that it was. If one had to declare a singular winner, you'd likely even say it was me if you were being honest, as I fought it to a clear draw despite missing so many opportunities.
 
Look, did I lose the fight? He had me on the ground and was punching my bloodied head at the end, so I can see how some might interpret it that way. I certainly won't claim that I won the fight, probably more of a draw than anything from the perspective of truly neutral observers.

But, I had every opportunity to win the fight. Had some of my earlier punches connected more strongly, or had I gotten the leverage instead of him as we went to the floor, it certainly would have been my win instead of the inconclusive draw that it was. If one had to declare a singular winner, you'd likely even say it was me if you were being honest, as I fought it to a clear draw despite missing so many opportunities.
Some stream, I can't remember which of the thousands, he talks about deciding to win a fight, which he described as "Maybe you'll win the fight today, then I come back with a weapon! And if I get caught then I do my time, and come back with another weapon! Again and again and again until I kill you, because I DECIDED to win this fight!"

Hopefully he didn't declare a blood vendetta over someone cutting him in line. This "deciding" also doesn't take into account the possibility of getting killed himself in one of the attempts, or dying in prison.

He also once admitted to brutally beating an innocent man by mistake, but not regretting it because he had it coming for something.
 
18491B85-C714-4B5B-9CDA-E223F3540CC9.jpeg
As much as I’ve enjoyed the AntiVax arc, it’s been a while since we’ve had some good ShootPosting
 
Maybe not directly, but it happened. Maybe the shot just functioned as a distraction for my immune system while a different strain of the flu was going around. All I know is, I got the shot and two or three days later I was stuck in bed with a bucket to puke in
Not to sperg here but the flu shot is an injection of a dead flu virus that allows your body to absorb it and fight it safely, but in the process weakens your immune system slightly because it's 'fighting' the virus. Given how prominent flu is at any one time there's a solid chance you caught it either on the way to your shot or on the way back and because of your slightly weakened immune system it completely rocked you.

Same with the covid vaccination, you know fine well that a shitload of people queuing for the vaccine had the virus even if it wasn't showing up in tests so getting the covid vaccine was one of the easiest ways to get covid AND get hammered with it from a weakened immune system. [sidesperg: yes I'm aware the covid vaccination wasn't with dead covid cells but with RNA but the same weakened immune system applies]
 
Not to sperg here but the flu shot is an injection of a dead flu virus that allows your body to absorb it and fight it safely, but in the process weakens your immune system slightly because it's 'fighting' the virus. Given how prominent flu is at any one time there's a solid chance you caught it either on the way to your shot or on the way back and because of your slightly weakened immune system it completely rocked you.

Same with the covid vaccination, you know fine well that a shitload of people queuing for the vaccine had the virus even if it wasn't showing up in tests so getting the covid vaccine was one of the easiest ways to get covid AND get hammered with it from a weakened immune system. [sidesperg: yes I'm aware the covid vaccination wasn't with dead covid cells but with RNA but the same weakened immune system applies]
People will honestly get tested regularly with people that test because they were around someone with Covid. A lot of people got it while they were testing
 
View attachment 4331645
As much as I’ve enjoyed the AntiVax arc, it’s been a while since we’ve had some good ShootPosting


TL;DW - Scott predicts mass shootings are going to keep skyrocketing. He then explains that women don't know that men feel hopeless in society because they don't give a shit about them. Generic blackpill points, tinder makes you feel undateable, being undateable means you won't marry, if you do marry you're the 3rd class citizen in the relationship, ect. Admits it might be true for women, but he doesn't know. As the number of men that feel hopeless increase the number of mass shootings will increase. Concludes with no one will do anything about the problem, because no one cares about men. Scott does not offer a solution.

I don't understand why he brought women into it if it's a societal problem. Is he trying to imply that women are mostly at fault because they neglect men? My biggest question is...Are we gonna get a Manosphere arc?
 
Generic blackpill points, tinder makes you feel undateable, being undateable means you won't marry, if you do marry you're the 3rd class citizen in the relationship, ect.

Didn't watch but that sounds like some industrial-grade projection. I wonder if he's trying to replace Katrina but his rep is bad enough not even sugar babies are interested.
 
Scott's blackpilled views on marriage go back a long ways.

In a 2013 blogpost he theorizes that marriage will become a "pre internet thing"
You can find lovers who don’t want a commitment. You can find people willing to trade sex for travel experiences. You can find surrogates to have your baby, or you can adopt from another country. Then you can find a nanny who is willing to work primarily for room and board. You can find an intellectual partner, a business partner, a tennis partner, you name it. The Internet provides all.
In a 2016 blogpost, Scott explains that we should abolish the family in favor of a stoic "parenting co-op" because two parent households are damaging to "75% of children" as well as the reason for a lack of universal healthcare and ISIS. He caps it off with
In my view – and I mean this literally, not satirically – marriage is the biggest contributor to mental health problems, crime, poverty, drug abuse, climate change, terrorism, violence, rape, incest, poor health, and ignorance. But you have been brainwashed to not see it.
 
TL;DW - Scott predicts mass shootings are going to keep skyrocketing. ... As the number of men that feel hopeless increase the number of mass shootings will increase.
Did he even bother to establish whether mass shootings are increasing or not? Because if he just points to the total number then he's introducing a far more confounding variable here, the population is rising so there simply will be more "hopeless men" willing to do a mass shooting holding all else equal. Even a decrease in "hopeless men" per capita could be outweighed by the total increase in men who can become hopeless, etc.

Why do all these self-declared smart people think everything is controlled by a single independent variable that you can just tweak at will?
 
Scott's blackpilled views on marriage go back a long ways.

In a 2013 blogpost he theorizes that marriage will become a "pre internet thing"

In a 2016 blogpost, Scott explains that we should abolish the family in favor of a stoic "parenting co-op" because two parent households are damaging to "75% of children" as well as the reason for a lack of universal healthcare and ISIS. He caps it off with
Does Scott have any biological kids, or just one dead druggie stepkid?

I don’t feel like it would be a good thing for Scott to have any involvement in the raising of my kids. I’ll pass on the stoic co-op.
 
Back