JKLawling
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2023
Separating 'art' from the 'artist' is quite impossible as without artist you have no art to separate and I think this is where most people seem to get it wrong. The 'art' is just a thing. It doesn't do anything aside from what said artist does or has done or indeed what the reader/viewer imagines as a result.
Remember if you will the morons who wanted to rebind Harry Potter books as if that somehow meant it wasn't written by the person who wrote it. It's obviously a meaningless exercise which I hope should describe what I've said visually as well as philosophically. It can't be done physically or metaphorically.
To elaborate slightly the art is a mere thing a person has made for whatever reason surely only they can ever truly know if only because no one else will ever actually care to know. When you enjoy it as it then exists regardless of the artist or any intention they might've been in possession of it is not the 'art' being separated from the 'artist' but simply you are a different person entirely separate from the artist to begin with it never being any kind of act requiring effort.
Why or indeed what is this convoluted act being described surrounding 'art' as a whole is very mysterious with which I will respond with an equally mysterious seemingly out of place statement that indeed finds no objectively nor immediately obvious place in this line of thought or questioning made independently of myself via youtube video:
Remember if you will the morons who wanted to rebind Harry Potter books as if that somehow meant it wasn't written by the person who wrote it. It's obviously a meaningless exercise which I hope should describe what I've said visually as well as philosophically. It can't be done physically or metaphorically.
To elaborate slightly the art is a mere thing a person has made for whatever reason surely only they can ever truly know if only because no one else will ever actually care to know. When you enjoy it as it then exists regardless of the artist or any intention they might've been in possession of it is not the 'art' being separated from the 'artist' but simply you are a different person entirely separate from the artist to begin with it never being any kind of act requiring effort.
Why or indeed what is this convoluted act being described surrounding 'art' as a whole is very mysterious with which I will respond with an equally mysterious seemingly out of place statement that indeed finds no objectively nor immediately obvious place in this line of thought or questioning made independently of myself via youtube video: