Scout Schultz Salt

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Q6y56i3.jpg
hey @Shiversblood do you approve of this police car
 
The September 11 hijackers managed with a couple of box cutters. And these idiots think that a knife wound wouldn't be serious?



Exactly. SBC was my very first thought. It's sad and I feel for his loved ones, but I don't think for one second that Schultz didn't know what would happen.

And cops don't "shoot to kill" necessarily, even when they go for center mass. They're trying to take the person down as best they can, before someone else gets hurt. They're not, "yay, I killed a guy! One more and I get a free toaster oven!" No doubt some cops are assholes. But this wasn't some unarmed teenager smoking weed with his friends. This was a person coming at the cops with a knife. They have a split second to make the decision, and it's not one I envy.

It's a sad event for everyone.

Shooting the weapon out of the hand or leg or arm is a hollywood myth that needs to die. Unless it is a sniper who has a considerable amount of time to get into position then enough time to calculate the shot. You can forget the shooting the gun to disable it or knock the knife out of the hand. Even a member of the pistol olympic shooting team wouldn't try to make such a shot and those guys are some of the best pistol shots on the planet. You aim center mass because on a target it is easier to hit and because the chance of stopping threat is much much higher. Aiming for the legs you are likely to miss especially if the subject moves.
 
I don't see how you can watch that one short video of the guy going to town stabbing cops with his knife, killing one of them, and question the decision here.
 
I don't see how you can watch that one short video of the guy going to town stabbing cops with his knife, killing one of them, and question the decision here.

video for those late to thread. sorry if you seen it if you were watching from the start of the thread


Yuck. That's worth about a quarter of a troon life. Check this out.

View attachment 283038

Bugatti.

That's easily worth 3 trannies, maybe 3 and a half.

Come now. To be objective as to the value of the life a tranny or lq whatever the shit it is now advocate, we have to do the following calculation. We put down the value of the car is worth in real world money versus the amount of taxpayer money lost due to inability of paying back student loans for a gender studies diploma.

So 2.6 mill for the Bugatti. A gender studies degree maybe 120k cost. So the answer would be 22 trannies if we round up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yuck. That's worth about a quarter of a troon life. Check this out.

View attachment 283038

Bugatti.

That's easily worth 3 trannies, maybe 3 and a half.

3 trannies seems comically low, easily 3,000,000

Edit: No,t hats mean. I figure what, 1 hp per tranny? A tranny's life is probably worth 2 garage door openers, right? So I figure the Bugatti is worth 1,200 trans-things using that math. Seems fair
 
3 trannies seems comically low, easily 3,000,000

Edit: No,t hats mean. I figure what, 1 hp per tranny? A tranny's life is probably worth 2 garage door openers, right? So I figure the Bugatti is worth 1,200 trans-things using that math. Seems fair

I think that all depends on the conversion rate of tranny to dollar. Stateside your math checks out but if you get your Bugatti in Europe, and depending on the country, the tranny value fluctuates wildly. Now Bugatti is out of France so I think their tranny rate is 60% higher than here in the US going off the Euro. Now if we go by the Franc then I think it's more of a 1 to 1 exchange rate. You don't even want to know the rate of tranny to Lira that shit is super depressing.
 
Come now. To be objective as to the value of the life a tranny or lq whatever the shit it is now advocate, we have to do the following calculation. We put down the value of the car is worth in real world money versus the amount of taxpayer money lost due to inability of paying back student loans for a gender studies diploma.

So 2.6 mill for the Bugatti. A gender studies degree maybe 120k cost. So the answer would be 22 trannies if we round up.

Sorry, I was considering Canadian trannies, and I forgot to carry the two when I converted from loonies to troons. The value is indeed closer to 20 trannies American. My mistake.
 
I think that all depends on the conversion rate of tranny to dollar. Stateside your math checks out but if you get your Bugatti in Europe, and depending on the country, the tranny value fluctuates wildly. Now Bugatti is out of France so I think their tranny rate is 60% higher than here in the US going off the Euro. Now if we go by the Franc then I think it's more of a 1 to 1 exchange rate. You don't even want to know the rate of tranny to Lira that shit is super depressing.

Thats why I changed it to horsepower instead of USD, since thats cooler anyhow
 
Given the troon/hp ratio, if Scout was holding a weed wacker instead of a knife, they probably should have valued xir's life a little more, no?
 
Shooting the weapon out of the hand or leg or arm is a hollywood myth that needs to die. Unless it is a sniper who has a considerable amount of time to get into position then enough time to calculate the shot. You can forget the shooting the gun to disable it or knock the knife out of the hand. Even a member of the pistol olympic shooting team wouldn't try to make such a shot and those guys are some of the best pistol shots on the planet. You aim center mass because on a target it is easier to hit and because the chance of stopping threat is much much higher. Aiming for the legs you are likely to miss especially if the subject moves.

This is the thing that all the faggots on Twitter and whatever never understand and therefore repeat ad nauseum every time there's a lethal shooting.

B-B-BUT WHY COULDN'T THEY HAVE SHOT HIM IN DA LEG

People whose only experience with guns is James Bond films and maybe video games (though those are problematic) don't understand that

1. Shooting someone in the arm/leg is super hard because it's a tiny target and it's moving
2. If you miss and you probably will, your bullet is now flying off into the wild blue yonder at full speed ready to ricochet off the concrete and go who knows where
3. If you do manage to hit a limb, they're full of arteries that, when severed, will cause someone to bleed out in no time flat (particularly the leg / femoral artery).
4. Hitting someone in the arm doesn't guarantee they'll stop and won't necessarily cause enough systemic shock to force them to.

Dunning-Kruger strikes again, I suppose.
 
Complete spaz out over a squad car being mentioned

Um, Shiversblood, he was mentioning that as among the problems that the guy caused, not saying that this guy had it coming for burning a squad car.

Please calm down before you get a thread of your own, man.
 
Because the outrage brigade wants outrage, not solutions.

If they had shot him in the leg, they'd have still been villified for shooting when they could have maced him.

And macing would've been villified because they should have just talked him down.

And talking to him would've hurt his feelings because the cops just don't understand his pain ..... they should have just ledt him alone.

And leaving him alone him means you don't care if he lives or dies.....

And on and on it goes, whatever you did, you did wrong by the troons.
 
I'd equate troons to being the Mitsubishi i-MiEV of people. Comically ugly, can't pull any weight in society (66hp), and go nowhere in life (62 miles per charge, compared to the Tesla Model S at 230 at the lowest wattage). The standard price of a Mitsubishi i-MiEV is $22,300. Given the Bugatti Veyron standard of $1.5mil, I'm saying that it would take 67.26 troons.
 
All s/h/it had to do was not carry a knife and not act like a pyscho. It is just that simple, but Scout never seemed sane imo.
 
My father was a cop for about 26 years and he'll tell you that you kill someone more quickly with a knife than a gun. So that's why they're trained to respond that way. (Granted he retired in the 90s, but I don't think much has changed.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom