SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
If you want to see an SJW infestation, read those logs in the op about the site's chat drama with the user Roxie. Like @True&HonestAutismo said, it is cringey as fuck. It is pretty interesting watching an obviously bpd troon blatantly manipulate a group of autists into continuously reversing bans though.

To sum it up for those of you don't want to read dozens of chatlogs filled primarily with nothing but autistic screeching for some reason, here is roxie's m.o. -
  • 'Accidentally' misinterpret a slightly ambiguous statement as not just an attack on trans people, but also a clear cut attack on you personally.
  • Attack that violent bigot back for troons everywhere, and continue to attack them while they try to explain that you misunderstood them.
  • A chanop gets involved and tells you both to stop,which you ignore.
  • You and the bigot get banned, proving that the chanops hate trannies too.
  • Appeal the ban on the site's incredibly convoluted and bureaucratic appeals chat, making sure to mention that you are autistic, and a troon, and that everyone hates you and are involved in a massive conspiracy to hurt you as often as possible.
  • Insist you speak for all trans people and that your response is the only response you could possibly make, and when the chanop gets confused by the ridiculous mess that is your argument, start attacking them and calling them a bigot and transphobe even if they are trans too.
  • This next step is important - apologise in as dramatic a fashion possible. Really pile it on, and explain that you don't want to hit them don't want to be so angry, but don't have a choice.
  • Get apologised to, and told they will do better by you in the future, but that your ban stands.
  • Have the ban halved, if not cancelled entirely, by the chat's troon admin, who then admonishes the chanop who punished you.
After dozens of warnings however, it seems the admin could no longer keep his favourite pet safe, and roxie was banned for 6 months. It came back a month later to explain that it had learned that being an unbearable cunt all the time isn't cool, but the ban was not rescinded ;_;
God bless you for giving a tl;dr for everyone else, I was too focused on ProcyonLotor to do it.
 
If you want to see an SJW infestation, read those logs in the op about the site's chat drama with the user Roxie. Like @True&HonestAutismo said, it is cringey as fuck. It is pretty interesting watching an obviously bpd troon blatantly manipulate a group of autists into continuously reversing bans though.

To sum it up for those of you don't want to read dozens of chatlogs filled primarily with nothing but autistic screeching for some reason, here is roxie's m.o. -
  • 'Accidentally' misinterpret a slightly ambiguous statement as not just an attack on trans people, but also a clear cut attack on you personally.
  • Attack that violent bigot back for troons everywhere, and continue to attack them while they try to explain that you misunderstood them.
  • A chanop gets involved and tells you both to stop,which you ignore.
  • You and the bigot get banned, proving that the chanops hate trannies too.
  • Appeal the ban on the site's incredibly convoluted and bureaucratic appeals chat, making sure to mention that you are autistic, and a troon, and that everyone hates you and are involved in a massive conspiracy to hurt you as often as possible.
  • Insist you speak for all trans people and that your response is the only response you could possibly make, and when the chanop gets confused by the ridiculous mess that is your argument, start attacking them and calling them a bigot and transphobe even if they are trans too.
  • This next step is important - apologise in as dramatic a fashion possible. Really pile it on, and explain that you don't want to hit them don't want to be so angry, but don't have a choice.
  • Get apologised to, and told they will do better by you in the future, but that your ban stands.
  • Have the ban halved, if not cancelled entirely, by the chat's troon admin, who then admonishes the chanop who punished you.
After dozens of warnings however, it seems the admin could no longer keep his favourite pet safe, and roxie was banned for 6 months. It came back a month later to explain that it had learned that being an unbearable cunt all the time isn't cool, but the ban was not rescinded ;_;

You're doing God's work friend, nobody should have to subject themselves to these exceptional chat logs. Also I think I'll just drop this gem here.

[13:38] Roxie Quikngruvn: Are you trying to imply that you let us continue so that we would reach a ban-worthy state?
[13:38] Roxie In order for our bans to be justified?
[13:38] Roxie Or am I really *really* mistaken?
[13:38] Quikngruvn Rox, don't you fucking blame your behavior on me.
[13:39] Roxie That's not what I'm doing.
[13:39] Roxie I'm asking a sincere question.
[13:39] Dr_Kens …except that is exactly what you're doing.
[13:39] Roxie I apologize, I have a developmental disorder that makes it hard for me to decipher what people mean sometimes.
[13:39] Roxie There is no subtext in the question I asked. Take it at face value.
[13:40] Quikngruvn I was pondering whether I should knee-jerk stop the conversation then, or let it progress a bit.
[13:40] Silber I believe that Quik meant that he hoped the argument would burn itself out soon enough that he wouldn't have to issue a stop order.
[13:40] Dr_Kens Roxie, if you keep this up I'm going to be extending your ban. We've very clearly laid it out as is.
[13:40] Quikngruvn Part of me honestly hoped you two would hash out your differences.
[13:41] Roxie Dr_Kens: Wait… are you seriously threatening to extend my ban because of a disability that I have?
[13:41] Roxie You may have it very clearly laid out, but I'm sorry, with my disability, I sometimes need a bit more help with that.
[13:41] Roxie It's a struggle, and I try my best to understand everything you are saying.
[13:42] Dr_Kens I'm sorry, but we're not there to hold your hand. We can help, and we can understand, but we're not here to hand-hold you through social situations.
[13:42] Roxie That's not what I'm asking.
[13:42] Roxie I'm asking for the appeal process to be accessible.
[13:42] Roxie That's not asking for handholding. That's asking for no prejudice.
[13:42] Dr_Kens The appeal is denied.
[13:43] Roxie Where do I go to complain if I feel as though operators have acted with prejudice towards me?
[13:43] Dr_Kens …really?
[13:43] Roxie I'm asking a sincere question.
[13:43] Roxie You have refused to make the appeal process disability-friendly.

They turned an argument about sticking tampons up your nose or some shit and turned it into something requiring Supreme Court levels of deliberation, it's mind boggling.
 
They turned an argument about sticking tampons up your nose or some shit and turned it into something requiring Supreme Court levels of deliberation, it's mind boggling.

Wikispergs have made a science of that kind of shit, particularly ArbCom proceedings. I sometimes wish someone would explain these because they're so arcane, bizarrely formatted and incomprehensible to normies that it can be tricky to see the humor in them. These are when a couple autists, or quite often, a whole shit-ton of autists, shit up the place so badly with their autism that intervention is needed. That intervention is generally by the Arbitration Committee, who are the biggest autists on the site.

After a lengthy, ridiculous orgy of autism, the losers get banned and go off and be mad somewhere like wikipedia review.

This Roxie type is very common in communities that tolerate lots of autism. Where it's obvious that they're just insufferable cunts regardless of any "disability," they usually have this similar m.o. of tarding out constantly, creating drama, then whining about their "disability." When if you're actually disabled and people tell you quit doing whatever dumb, autistic shit you're doing, if you don't understand why, you quit doing it because fuck you.

Also SCP-1689 is worth a read.

It's a great boring item that suddenly leaves you realizing you're in way over your head, and kind of sums up why the Foundation does it's thing.

(I'm not sorry for double posting)

I like this. No edgy tryhard, just a strange thing which slowly has apocalyptic overtones.

This is one of my favorite of the weird alternate universe/exploration types: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-093 (like many of these the meat of it is in the additional links at the bottom).

A lot of the Safe/Euclid objects are better than super edgy Keter shit that destroys the universe unless you fart on it 15 times a day or whatever.
 
Last edited:
You're doing God's work friend, nobody should have to subject themselves to these exceptional chat logs. Also I think I'll just drop this gem here.

[13:38] Roxie Quikngruvn: Are you trying to imply that you let us continue so that we would reach a ban-worthy state?
[13:38] Roxie In order for our bans to be justified?
[13:38] Roxie Or am I really *really* mistaken?
[13:38] Quikngruvn Rox, don't you fucking blame your behavior on me.
[13:39] Roxie That's not what I'm doing.
[13:39] Roxie I'm asking a sincere question.
[13:39] Dr_Kens …except that is exactly what you're doing.
[13:39] Roxie I apologize, I have a developmental disorder that makes it hard for me to decipher what people mean sometimes.
[13:39] Roxie There is no subtext in the question I asked. Take it at face value.
[13:40] Quikngruvn I was pondering whether I should knee-jerk stop the conversation then, or let it progress a bit.
[13:40] Silber I believe that Quik meant that he hoped the argument would burn itself out soon enough that he wouldn't have to issue a stop order.
[13:40] Dr_Kens Roxie, if you keep this up I'm going to be extending your ban. We've very clearly laid it out as is.
[13:40] Quikngruvn Part of me honestly hoped you two would hash out your differences.
[13:41] Roxie Dr_Kens: Wait… are you seriously threatening to extend my ban because of a disability that I have?
[13:41] Roxie You may have it very clearly laid out, but I'm sorry, with my disability, I sometimes need a bit more help with that.
[13:41] Roxie It's a struggle, and I try my best to understand everything you are saying.
[13:42] Dr_Kens I'm sorry, but we're not there to hold your hand. We can help, and we can understand, but we're not here to hand-hold you through social situations.
[13:42] Roxie That's not what I'm asking.
[13:42] Roxie I'm asking for the appeal process to be accessible.
[13:42] Roxie That's not asking for handholding. That's asking for no prejudice.
[13:42] Dr_Kens The appeal is denied.
[13:43] Roxie Where do I go to complain if I feel as though operators have acted with prejudice towards me?
[13:43] Dr_Kens …really?
[13:43] Roxie I'm asking a sincere question.
[13:43] Roxie You have refused to make the appeal process disability-friendly.

They turned an argument about sticking tampons up your nose or some shit and turned it into something requiring Supreme Court levels of deliberation, it's mind boggling.

I've said this in other CW threads but shit mods are the worst thing for an internet community's long term health. Ideally, a mod has two jobs: contain drama and execute shitposters. That's it. They can and should engage with the community (except on anonymous sites) but they shouldn't stoop to this chat drama bullshit. Nothing good ever comes from people treating chat rooms like IRL conversations and that's doubly true when the people who should act responsibly stoop to a lower level of behavior.
 
I refuse to believe a woman or group of women who aren't emotionless husks came up with some of the more horrifying and popular SCPs. Closest I can kind of picture a woman creating is SCP-597. Maybe SCP-053, or SCP-136. But something like SCP-231? Not likely.

I swear, you could make an SCP entry on this very community alone and it'd fit right in at home. Wouldn't that be the biggest irony of the SCP Foundation also keeping themselves under heavy lock and key for mankind's sake? (I mean, they already have one on TV Tropes, joke entry or not.)
SCP-597 reads like an allegory warning us of what happens to people when they are inculcated into Tumblr culture and SJW extremism.

Increased pettiness, regression to childish states, extreme immaturity, decreased bowel control, fetishization, promiscuity, and even reports of public masturbation have all been noted. Staff's IQ, focus, and rationality all drop significantly over a period of time... and they often will fight with each other over silly things, such as objects or perceived insults, be wracked with laughing and crying fits, be unable to resolve problems in an adult way, and lose the ability to control their emotions. After four to five weeks, it is impossible for them to function in a work setting, and they all communicate with each other with a series of grunts, coos, and short confused sentences... snacking, gluttony, nail and lip biting, and hair chewing, rises as well, almost to the point of psychosis; there are deadly weight gains...
 
I've said this in other CW threads but shit mods are the worst thing for an internet community's long term health. Ideally, a mod has two jobs: contain drama and execute shitposters. That's it.

It's sort of the opposite here, though. Here, mods need to enhance drama and shitpost themselves.
 
They turned an argument about sticking tampons up your nose or some shit and turned it into something requiring Supreme Court levels of deliberation, it's mind boggling.
Characters like this Roxie seem to think there's no possible way they could have a "fair" way to appeal and still be banned. I think she believes "appeal" means "you need to never punish me for anything".
 
I've noticed that a lot of these spergs will take the interesting SCPs and give them the proverbial cringe treatment. One cursory glance at the fan art and fanfics on DA is proof enough of that. It's the whole "this is why we can't have nice things" thing.

Also SCP-049 will always be a personal favorite of mine.
 
Last edited:
None of these are creepy at all. The Ronald Reagan one was especially perplexing. I went through the comments thinking it was a joke and everyone was like "oooh shit son this is huge" and I just didn't get it. After about an hour I got too bored. All the top articles are basically the same, and very verbose. "do x and x is very serious and if anyone does x rotate them out at y intervals and also terminate if they do z at all." almost every single one is like that.

I guess the biggest detachment is that I know it's all bullshit. I can't immerse myself in fake documents when they're patently fake. The word choice they use is juvenile and would not be acceptable in a professional environment like they try and set up.
 
Welp, Null said he doesn't like it, guess that means we all don't like it!

But in all seriousness, I don't mind SCP. I just remember a while back there was this big push for "THIS IS A HORROR SITE" among the old guard when by then it had really become more "Spooky Sci-Fi" than anything. And it confusee me a little.
 
Jeez, why do troons have to infect everything?

I've heard a little about the SCP writing community before but most of it extended to the fact that the writers are very strict about what goes in. But that's good.

One of my favorite SCPs is this one for sure:
http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-261

Some of the experiment logs for that one are so clever and funny. Snapple.
 
None of these are creepy at all. The Ronald Reagan one was especially perplexing. I went through the comments thinking it was a joke and everyone was like "oooh shit son this is huge" and I just didn't get it. After about an hour I got too bored. All the top articles are basically the same, and very verbose. "do x and x is very serious and if anyone does x rotate them out at y intervals and also terminate if they do z at all." almost every single one is like that.

I guess the biggest detachment is that I know it's all bullshit. I can't immerse myself in fake documents when they're patently fake. The word choice they use is juvenile and would not be acceptable in a professional environment like they try and set up.
This thread was mostly meant to be "watch out for SJW infestation in SCP," not "shit on SCP because I can't suspend my disbelief."
 
Welp, Null said he doesn't like it, guess that means we all don't like it!
This thread was mostly meant to be "watch out for SJW infestation in SCP," not "shit on SCP because I can't suspend my disbelief."
I'm very sorry for giving my opinion on my own fucking website. Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.
 
I'm very sorry for giving my opinion on my own fucking website. Your letter has been read fully, and your thoughts have been inputed and accepted for better improvement. Thank you for your time and efforts.
I don't really care about your opinion and you have the right to do whatever the fuck you want, but I don't think enough people are focused on the point of this thread.
 
Back