SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

[Punished “Venom” pH]

Is there any update in site about the RU situation? Has anything even been done?

So far, they’ve lost to Duksin in court and then haven’t updated since November of 2020

 

[Jeff Heaney]

To be frank, most critics of SCP as a writing site know neither jack or shit of what is actually going on in there.

Yes, there has been a long-standing desire to "sanitize" specifically two articles; SCP-166 and SCP-231, both of which include or imply underage rape as a major component. Whether the "sanitized" instances are better, I don't know, but I certainly prefer them to using child rape for shock horror. Fixing them is entirely justified.

That being said, "popular" old articles have been removed all the time because they were dogshit and were downvoted for being dogshit until they hit the deletion range. Some of those get rewritten (4715 is an example of an old article rewritten) to comply with modern standards which, to an outside eye, are indeed rather homogenous, but this is not an intentional process.

All of the fearmongering that SCP is "destroying its own legacy" by making everything a reality bender, self insert, fetish, apollyon article, world ender, meta, etc etc whatever is literally just hearsay. No one that says this is actually an active reader. "I read a few articles every once in a while" is not a good sample size to determine anything that happens to a community the size and the speed of SCP.

Why are they rating you dumb? You're right!

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

Honestly, I still hate the fact that they replaced the original image for SCP-682. It may be minor, but it was one of the most well known images connected to SCP as a whole.

They had to, same with 106, because they didn’t have license-compatible images.

 

[AStupidMonkey]

Some of his nudes got leaked, and it was upsetting.

Upsetting to him, or the people who had to view them?

Here you go retard. Now everyone knows that Francesco Piseddu from Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia - Università degli Studi di Cagliari posts on alleged Nazi hate sites and takes pictures of himself doing deviant sped shit like this:
View attachment 1941027
View attachment 1941028
I'm sure that'll look great when potential employers Google you. Great job squandering the opportunity your parents are busting their asses to give you.

Spoiler: Links/Archives

https://www.wikidot.com/user:info/dr-pisy

https://archive.md/Zfj6u

View attachment 1941033
View attachment 1941034

@francesco.piseddu is on Instagram • 842 people follow their account

842 Followers, 952 Following, 34 Posts - See Instagram photos and videos from Francesco Piseddu 🏳️‍🌈 🇪🇺 (@francesco.piseddu)

www.instagram.com

https://archive.md/xwFFK

View attachment 1941031
View attachment 1941032

https://facebook.com/francesco.piseddu.26

https://archive.md/5mOm1

https://archive.md/eNWRB

https://facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10211141434705594&id=1048907561&set=p.10211141434705594

https://archive.md/HCNfe

"Francesco Piseddu" you say? As in "Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia?" From the "Università degli Studi di Cagliari" no less? Gee, I hope this doesn't SEO itself up to the top google results! Furthermore, it'd be absolutely horrible if someone were to make a thread on this Francesco Piseddu fellow! HORRIBLE, I say! EDIT: Oh look, Francesco Piseddu has a youtube, as well! I hope cross-referencing this doesn't upset the google algorythm!

(Francesco Piseddu)
EDIT: Oh look, Francesco Piseddu has a youtube, as well! I hope cross-referencing this doesn't trigger activate the google algorithm!

In a writing project there shouldn't have been any rules other than write well or go fuck yourself. Not turn the place into some kind of asylum for broke brain retards.

Wouldn't have been a big deal, except that it started as one and then became the other. Nobody would have objected if the special interest pandering hugbox squad had made their own SCP with hookers and blackjack. (Yet somehow they're upset that RCP did exactly that? Good god WHY?)

To be frank, most critics of SCP as a writing site know neither jack or shit of what is actually going on in there.

Irrelevant premises don't always lead to false conclusions. You know what they say: you can stick your head up a cow's ass, but the sky is still blue.

EDIT: case in point from the other thread:

Spoiler

It was a doorknob that was a very horny doorknob and would anyone who touch it horny. I remember Mr. Metokur talk about the drama

Okay, why is there an influx of RPC users? I don’t think KF & RPC correlate at all

In retrospect, it’s funny that such an off-base hot take inspired so much hand-wringing and self-inflicted pain by the ss.

"HAHA, JIM DIDN'T KNOW THE WHOLE STORY, ERGO IT'S WRONG!"
>Proceeds to point out nothing Jim was actually wrong about, let alone how anyone outside the sausage factory could possibly come to any other conclusion.

 

[AnOminous]

Honestly, I still hate the fact that they replaced the original image for SCP-682. It may be minor, but it was one of the most well known images connected to SCP as a whole.

That's an actual copyright issue though. They were more or less forced to do that. Same with the weirdness about the picture for SCP-173 but the actual owner of the copyright was pretty much a sport about it, but had never released it under any license, but agreed only to noncommercial use, which is why you can't ever get merch of it.

 

[Furret]

Honestly, I still hate the fact that they replaced the original image for SCP-682. It may be minor, but it was one of the most well known images connected to SCP as a whole.

They had to, unfortunately. Gears got most of his images by going on random /x/ threads and picking out stuff that he thought could be made to work as SCPs, which meant that some of his original images weren't actually compatible with the site's license, which is a major issue. If they kept those images, they would have had to dedicate even more resources to telling people across the Internet not to use those likenesses in anything commercial.

Yes, there has been a long-standing desire to "sanitize" specifically two articles; SCP-166 and SCP-231, both of which include or imply underage rape as a major component. Whether the "sanitized" instances are better, I don't know, but I certainly prefer them to using child rape for shock horror. Fixing them is entirely justified.

I've noticed that there's a small faction of people on the wiki who really want to erase Clef's old articles in particular. I can see why; Clef went out of his way to be as shocking as possible when he wrote SCPs, which has led to a lot of his early work clashing with the wiki's modern sensibilities. I don't care too much either way because they're not going to succeed, but it's an interesting trend. Also, for what it's worth, Clef personally approved the 166 rewrite after rejecting some other ones for not being close enough to his original vision for the article, and he had been asking for someone to rewrite it for a long time.

Upsetting to him, or the people who had to view them?

Yes.

 

[AStupidMonkey]

They had to, unfortunately. Gears got most of his images by going on random /x/ threads

>We do not talk of /x/. There is no /x/. There never was an /x/. God save our souls.

 

[BurnerPhone]

Nobody would have objected if the special interest pandering hugbox squad had made their own SCP with hookers and blackjack. (Yet somehow they're upset that RCP did exactly that? Good god WHY?)

Because if you don't matter in real life, you can at least pretend you do online. We know a lot of SCP staff took the RPC situation personally. Just look at the existing chat logs Roget provided plus his own claims of engaging in manipulation of RPC staff.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

I've noticed that there's a small faction of people on the wiki who really want to erase Clef's old articles in particular. I can see why; Clef went out of his way to be as shocking as possible when he wrote SCPs, which has led to a lot of his early work clashing with the wiki's modern sensibilities. I don't care too much either way because they're not going to succeed, but it's an interesting trend. Also, for what it's worth, Clef personally approved the 166 rewrite after rejecting some other ones for not being close enough to his original vision for the article, and he had been asking for someone to rewrite it for a long time..

I will say that some of his old stuff (Hello Kitty Panties, anyone?) definitely did not stand the test of time even ten years ago.

 

[Valstrax]

(Hello Kitty Panties, anyone?)

Context?

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

Context?

Clef had an awful article called “Hello Kitty Panties” that were panties which repaired the hymen and were found in a Catholic School, Djoric got demoted for instigating a downvote brigade. In retrospect it was a very noble act on Djoric’s part because good grief it was just written as a rape evidence destroyer by a Clef who at that point in his life probably hadn’t come closer than sniffing range to a living woman that wasn’t related to him.

 

[Furret]

I will say that some of his old stuff (Hello Kitty Panties, anyone?) definitely did not stand the test of time even ten years ago.

Wasn't his first ever article a chef's knife that compels people to rape each other and not help rape victims or something? I always thought it was dumb that people bitch about 231 so much but never even give that one a glance.

Clef had an awful article called “Hello Kitty Panties” that were panties which repaired the hymen and were found in a Catholic School, Djoric got demoted for instigating a downvote brigade

If you're going to be demoted for something, brigading an article about Hello Kitty panties is one of the better things to get demoted for.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

Wasn't his first ever article a chef's knife that compels people to rape each other and not help rape victims or something? I always thought it was dumb that people bitch about 231 so much but never even give that one a glance.

If you're going to be demoted for something, brigading an article about Hello Kitty panties is one of the better things to get demoted for.

Yeah people kinda sleep on the fucked up implications of the chef’s knife

 

[AStupidMonkey]

Clef had an awful article called “Hello Kitty Panties” that were panties which repaired the hymen and were found in a Catholic School, Djoric got demoted for instigating a downvote brigade. In retrospect it was a very noble act on Djoric’s part because good grief it was just written as a rape evidence destroyer by a Clef who at that point in his life probably hadn’t come closer than sniffing range to a living woman that wasn’t related to him.

You... you don't think this was a stab at the Catholic church being literal child-rapists? Specifically, child-rapists who would want to take the same victims' virginity over and over?

I mean, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt you're not covering for the Catholic priesthood or anything. But how did the satire angle not even occur to you here?

I'll grant you it's maybe distasteful. But not as distasteful as the actual, historical abuses it's satirizing.

(And if it later became a cesspool for posting pedo-porn, I hereby retroactively rescind my objection and yield back the remainder of my time.)

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

You... you don't think this was a stab at the Catholic church being literal child-rapists? Specifically, child-rapists who would want to take the same victims' virginity over and over?

I mean, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt you're not covering for the Catholic priesthood or anything. But how did the satire angle not even occur to you here?

I'll grant you it's maybe distasteful. But not as distasteful as the actual, historical abuses it's satirizing.

(And if it later became a cesspool for posting pedo-porn, I hereby retroactively rescind my objection and yield back the remainder of my time.)

I read it and it was possible he was thinking that but the whole article description focused on the genitals of underage girls with a throwaway line about where it was found.

 

[Furret]

You... you don't think this was a stab at the Catholic church being literal child-rapists? Specifically, child-rapists who would want to take the same victims' virginity over and over?

I mean, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt you're not covering for the Catholic priesthood or anything. But how did the satire angle not even occur to you here?

I'll grant you it's maybe distasteful. But not as distasteful as the actual, historical abuses it's satirizing.

(And if it later became a cesspool for posting pedo-porn, I hereby retroactively rescind my objection and yield back the remainder of my time.)

People on the wiki generally view any amount of rape as being a negative, even if it has a valid purpose. A great example is 231. The point of the article is that the scenario the reader imagines in their head is ten times worse than anything Clef could actually write, and yet people still chimp out over the possibility that it could be rape, even though Clef actually edited out stuff that made it too obviously rape so it would be more of a mystery.

 

[Punished “Venom” pH]

People on the wiki generally view any amount of rape as being a negative, even if it has a valid purpose. A great example is 231. The point of the article is that the scenario the reader imagines in their head is ten times worse than anything Clef could actually write, and yet people still chimp out over the possibility that it could be rape, even though Clef actually edited out stuff that made it too obviously rape so it would be more of a mystery.

My head canon is that 231-7 is a whale, it never states it has to be a human.

 

[AStupidMonkey]

I read it and it was possible he was thinking that but the whole article description focused on the genitals of underage girls with a throwaway line about where it was found.

I have no plans on reading it, but even just based on your personal description, it sounds like an earnest condemnation of the Catholic priesthood and the subsequent cover-ups (this being a magical device that would explain-away even more cover-ups and drastically inflate the actual abuse in-universe.)

More at issue: if there were an SCP rifle that fired magical mid-air curving projectile path bullets (with "one throw-away line" about JFK), would you come to the conclusion that the author is pro-political-assassinations?

People on the wiki generally view any amount of rape as being a negative, even if it has a valid purpose. A great example is 231. The point of the article is that the scenario the reader imagines in their head is ten times worse than anything Clef could actually write, and yet people still chimp out over the possibility that it could be rape, even though Clef actually edited out stuff that made it too obviously rape so it would be more of a mystery.

The fact that they're now being shown to be, largely, hypocrites makes this all the more concerning. Are there any over-head projector SCP's by chance?

 

[Furret]

The fact that they're now being shown to be, largely, hypocrites makes this all the more concerning. Are there any over-head projector SCP's by chance?

I mean, it's not rape, but you've no doubt at least seen mentions of the child grooming and generally creepy activity some of them get up to.

 

[AStupidMonkey]

I mean, it's not rape, but you've no doubt at least seen mentions of the child grooming and generally creepy activity some of them get up to.

Yeah, I just meant the hair-triggers about rape. And the many many cases of SJW's/feminists/etc turning out to be the abuser, while claiming victimhood.