SCP Foundation - Creepypasta with roid rage - now ITT: SCP fans

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
So apparently Djoric fucked off because the staff drama.

He was kinda autistic but some of his things were funny, like the chapter of on of his stories where one of the main characters has to fight against a group of real life discord mods:
Screenshot 2026-03-03 213333.pngScreenshot 2026-03-03 213351.png
 
GeorgeSmarty said:
So apparently Djoric fucked off because the staff drama.
Click to expand...
As far as I understand, he was the reason why the conversation about removal of Bright got active again. Because he whined and left.

If anyone needs a list of what has been deleted and links to those works from web achieve, let me know.
 
Now that all of Bright's works have been deleted, what do you think will be the next big issue people will dramatically quit the site over?

My predictions:

- "SCP-5000 keeps the legacy of Bright alive, and yet not a single admin dares to slightly edit it. I'm quitting the site."

- "Old admins who knew Bright and were best buddies with him up until he got exposed are still in positions of authority. I'm quitting the site."

- "Max Landis also did some messed up stuff, right? I think. Anyway, I'm quitting over the staff not deleting SCP-2137. "

You can expect that to happen more and more, as the SCP wiki continues to fade from relevance and slowly loses active users. If an author quits, they might as well do so in a final blaze of attention and righteousness. No one's just logging out and not returning.
 
I read "There is no antimemetics division."

Starting out, SCPs did include plenty of supernatural stuff that implied they lived in an Idealist (by which I mean "mind over matter, thought precedes and generates the material world") cosmos, but there were plenty of SCPs that were compatible with a Materialist (matter precedes mind, our minds are somehow rooted in physical processes) outlook, and what was neat about memetics as originally conceived was that it was compatible with the latter, a more conservative take on Snow Crash's idea that human cognition could have zero-days.

"There is no antimemetics division" is a mess that shits all over that initial conceit. Right off the bat we get a vignette where a character discovers a corpse that is getting ignored so hard it is undecomposable and spontaneously dematerializing. What? But this gets at a broader contradiction: the world depicted seems Idealist insofar as living beings ignoring or paying attention to things can affect their material reality, but also, things that are viciously ignored remain in some sense "real", meaning that there is some world out there independent of human cognition (or at least of human awareness), but all these short stories trying to hide under a book-shaped trenchcoat can't seem to agree on which approach to take, and so its core conceit of "memetics" devolves into just another horror story magic word used to cover for every contradictory memory- and behaviour- and baseline reality-altering thing that occurs.

In short, it has a sort of nightmare pseudologic to it that is engrossing in situ but hopelessly confused on retrospect.
 
Last edited:
crowabunga said:
I read "There is no antimemetics division."

Starting out, SCPs did include plenty of supernatural stuff that implied they lived in an Idealist (by which I mean "mind over matter, thought precedes and generates the material world") cosmos, but there were plenty of SCPs that were compatible with a Materialist (matter precedes mind, our minds are somehow rooted in physical processes) outlook, and what was neat about memetics as originally conceived was that it was compatible with the latter, a more conservative take on Snow Crash's idea that human cognition could have zero-days.

"There is no antimemetics division" is a mess that shits all over that initial conceit. Right off the bat we get a vignette where a character discovers a corpse that is getting ignored so hard it is undecomposable and spontaneously dematerializing. What? But this gets at a broader contradiction: the world depicted seems Idealist insofar as living beings ignoring or paying attention to things can affect their material reality, but also, things that are viciously ignored remain in some sense "real", meaning that there is some world out there independent of human cognition (or at least of human awareness), but all these short stories trying to hide under a book-shaped trenchcoat can't seem to agree on which approach to take, and so its core conceit of "memetics" devolves into just another horror story magic word used to cover for every contradictory memory- and behaviour- and baseline reality-altering thing that occurs.

In short, it has a sort of nightmare pseudologic to it that is engrossing in situ but hopelessly confused on retrospect.
Click to expand...
I don't really know if the author actually tried to have some philosophical approach or was just "supernatural ideas do supernatural stuff" which honestly was fine by me.

Like I'm not sure if you are critizing the story from an angle that the author didn't even think about when writing some fantasy/scifi story.
 
GeorgeSmarty said:
I don't really know if the author actually tried to have some philosophical approach or was just "supernatural ideas do supernatural stuff" which honestly was fine by me.

Like I'm not sure if you are critizing the story from an angle that the author didn't even think a
Click to expand...
My beef is that it seems like the core "memetics" conceit is yet another bit of old SCP lore that got hit by power and scope creep to the point that it no longer resembles its old self and is now just another horror plot point that is able to do anything, and no longer seems consistent even in the context of SCP faux-science.

I half expected this to have disappeared by now but it's still up, albeit altered from when I read it years ago. I had hoped the book would err on the conservative side of this guideline and end up more of a techno-thriller, but instead I got a horror novel that was fun in the moment but unsatisfying on consideration.
 
crowabunga said:
My beef is that it seems like the core "memetics" conceit is yet another bit of old SCP lore that got hit by power and scope creep to the point that it no longer resembles its old self and is now just another horror plot point that is able to do anything, and no longer seems consistent even in the context of SCP faux-science.
Click to expand...
I would say expanded rather than power-creep. We aren't dealing with the usual memetic hazard of seeing some words and then something crazy happens to you. We are dealing with more esoteric concepts, like the noosphere and the horror that lies with perception.

What if our minds filter out portions of reality? Things that physically exist but we can't recall or perceive them. What if certain ideas are unable to be passed on, refuse to be passed on?

It is less of a hard science horror and more of a soft science horror, which just might not be your preference.
 
Hazard Crab said:
qntm, who co-authored SCP-055 and later wrote the Antimemetics Division canon, got a publishing deal awhile back which included a rerelease of the main Antimemetics storyline with the SCP IP scraped off. That book is out now, available in print, ebook, and audiobook. The Antimemetics canon was one of the few that I thought was decently written so I picked up the audiobook to see how it stands on its own.
Click to expand...
Read this a couple months ago. It held my attention, although I had to read it in short bursts. Definitely something I have thought about since finishing, which isn’t all that common.

More recommends in this vein welcome.
 
Mary Lee Harvey osWalsh said:
What the fuck that makes no fucking sense. I am so sick of this shit.

"Special error" being renamed to "basic error" - those are two completely different things. A "basic error" implies a relatively common error, or one that is a basis to other more specific errors. "Special error" implies a more specific or less-common error. Maybe they renamed it because "basic" was a more apt description? Either way, when I see "special error" I don't think of "special needs." I think of "specific" or "uncommon." I am going to be cautiously optimistic that the removal of "special" was less about "ableism" and more about accurate descriptors.
Click to expand...

SBCPFOUNDATION.ORG

Item #: SCPBCP-████

Object Class: Pending Updated Policies

SpecialBasic Containment Procedures:

SCPBCP-████ is to be contained within a standard linguistic quarantine server hosted on Foundation-controlled infrastructure. All personnel assigned to SCPBCP-████ are to prioritize terminological auditing above all competing operational demands, including but not limited to:

∙ Active Keter-class containment breaches
∙ Structural collapse of inhabited Foundation facilities
∙ Ongoing personnel casualties
∙ Requests for immediate medical intervention
∙ The building being on fire

Any document produced by Foundation personnel — internal memoranda, containment briefs, lunch orders, cries for help — is to be reviewed for non-compliant language before action is taken. Documents found to contain the SB-word are to be revised immediately.

Personnel are reminded that renaming a thing is equivalent to changing it.

Description:

SCPBCP-████ is a memetic pathogen of unknown origin that targets language-processing centers of the brain. Infected individuals (SCPBCP-████-A instances) develop a compulsive need to audit, revise, and sanitize all language within their sphere of influence, with particular fixation on words that could, under sufficiently creative interpretation, be considered harmful.

Cognitively, SCPBCP-████-A instances demonstrate no measurable impairment otherwise. Brain imaging reveals no structural changes whatsoever.

Pathological changes are instead localized entirely to the gastrointestinal tract — specifically the colon and anus, where tissue undergoes progressive softening, prolapse, and in advanced cases, a condition Foundation physicians have elected to document only as “the situation.” Vaginal tissue, where present, undergoes analogous atrophying. Neurologists consulted on the case have noted that this is, quote, “not where language is processed,” and have not been consulted again.

SCPBCP-████ spreads most aggressively in closed digital communities with limited contact with the outside world, where it benefits from low immune resistance to groupthink and a cultural environment that mistakes renaming for reform. In these environments, the pathogen achieves a self-reinforcing loop: infected moderators enforce sanitized language standards; non-compliant members are removed; the remaining population grows more susceptible; terminology becomes more contested; the colon softens further. Prolapse can progress to interference with gait and can increase the risk of mechanical falls without additional structural support wear.

Observed behavioral symptoms of SCPBCP-████-A instances include:

∙ Interpreting descriptive technical terms as targeted slurs
∙ Treating the renaming of internal software variables as moral achievement
∙ Expending energy proportional to the triviality of the linguistic change
∙ Complete indifference to whether the renamed thing has changed in any way
∙ “The situation”

SCPBCP-████ does not appear to be aware that mountains continue to exist when removed from maps. Testing to determine whether this can be explained to it is ongoing and, frankly, not going well.

Addendum SCPBCP-████-1: Recovered Internal Memo

The following memo was recovered from an infected online community during initial observation. It is reproduced here without editorial comment, except to note that the software it describes remained non-functional at time of recovery.

“The ableist slur ‘special’ has been removed from the codebase. Progress has been made, one line at a time.”

The variable previously named special_action now reads runtime_action. Users attempting to load the site received the same error message as before. The error message was not affected by the renaming.

Addendum SCPBCP-████-2: O5 Council Vote — Proposed Resolution 1337-Ω

RE: Replacement of the spoken phoneme “specialbasic” with an alternative communicative medium to eliminate residual memetic exposure risk.

Proposed by: O5-7

Summary: O5-7 proposes that all future spoken references to the term formerly employed to denote exception be replaced, in formal Foundation communication, with a deliberate controlled exhalation of intestinal gas (“the signal”). This would, per O5-7, achieve full phonemic eradication of the hazardous morpheme while preserving semantic function.

The Council requested a brief recess prior to voting. Standard agenda note appended below.

“Recess: 10 minutes. All O5 members are reminded to attend to their prolapsed rectal infrastructure before the vote commences. This is not optional. Facilities has been notified.”



Council Member — Vote — Notes

O5-1 — YEA — “The signal is unambiguous.”
O5-2 — YEA — “Less ambiguous than ‘basic,’ certainly.”
O5-3 — NAY — “This is insane.” (Reminder issued.)
O5-4 — YEA — No comment. Attending to infrastructure.
O5-5 — YEA — “Language evolves. So does the colon.”
O5-6 — ABSTAIN — Medical leave. Related.
O5-7 — YEA — Proposing member. Visibly enthusiastic.
O5-8 — YEA — “We already renamed it twice. What’s left?”
O5-9 — NAY — “The signal cannot be reproduced in written memos.” (Overruled.)
O5-10 — YEA — “I don’t feel anything anymore.”
O5-11 — YEA — Attending to infrastructure. Voted remotely.
O5-12 — YEA — “Will this change what the thing does?” (Voted yea regardless.)
O5-13 — NAY — Resigned following recess. Seat under review.


Result: PASSED (9–3–1)



Effective immediately, all verbal references to the term formerly employed to denote exception in O5 Council sessions are to be replaced with the signal. Written documentation will use the strikethrough notation special followed by “basic”, which is understood to represent the signal in textual form.

Foundation linguists have noted this is not how language works.

Foundation linguists have been reassigned to audit the lunch menu for compliance.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned here yet, but...
SCP Confinement, the animated series made by the infamous Lord Bung is getting a Season 2, it's being done independently and doesn't have any ties with Bung himself.
Here's the trailer:
Archive (Preservetube)
 
Mary Lee Harvey osWalsh said:
Can someone fill me in on who Lord Bung is?
Click to expand...
Basically, the creator of Confinement. Used the donations from Patron(?) to make a episode 8 that was just soft-core porn, it got leaked and he removed himself from the internet. That's all I remember about Bung. At least the main thing he did to get himself hated by the community
 
Rufus Deponia said:
As far as I understand, he was the reason why the conversation about removal of Bright got active again. Because he whined and left.

If anyone needs a list of what has been deleted and links to those works from web achieve, let me know.
Click to expand...
nope, that's not what happened - the conversation flared up every couple of months or so, then Queerious - yes, exactly what you think based off of the name - made a project and forum thread in May 2025. they happen to have a degree in some sort of business administration, and they decided the right way to get the project going was to make it as bureaucratic and comprehensive as possible. this did get the ball rolling after SCP staff were able to fend off criticism for a few years reg. not deleting bright's works, but came at the cost of being both really fucking annoying and really fucking stressful to accomplish for the three or four people actually working on the project at any given time instead of bitching on the forums or in the staffcord.

djoric was one of those whiny bitches, all he did was delete a couple of 231 works off the site. he didn't even delete his 001 or his +600 rated tale "Quiet Days", which you would think would be more impactful. it was performative bullshit, just like 99.9% of *us* (unfortunately, im a mere user and so all i can do is just discuss since i've made it clear if i ever got any actual staff privileges i would just delete that shit off the site immediately and then resign). djoric didn't do anything except attract a schizophrenic redditor who tried to doxx sexual harassment and assault victims.
 
Local User said:
Basically, the creator of Confinement. Used the donations from Patron(?) to make a episode 8 that was just soft-core porn, it got leaked and he removed himself from the internet. That's all I remember about Bung. At least the main thing he did to get himself hated by the community
Click to expand...
That and the side-lore of him dating this woman who grew on him and his story like a cancer forcing herself on the writing of the show who was also involved in her own drama because she accused some ‘internet sensation’ YouTube retard named Kwite of raping her
 
ellito said:
i would just delete that shit off the site immediately and then resign
Click to expand...
Well, hello, censorship supporter from the main site, I guess. Good thing you created a KF account just to post this. While you're here, do you have any dirt on anyone? Anything interesting to add about your fellow site members?
 
ellito said:
all he did was delete a couple of 231 works off the site. he didn't even delete his 001 or his +600 rated tale "Quiet Days", which you would think would be more impactful. it was performative bullshit,
Click to expand...
FTR, Djoric didn't write Quiet Days, that was Dmatix.

And while we're on topic I'm surprised that the staff members who were buddies with Bright right up until his sex pest shit became impossible to sweep under the rug aren't also getting a ton of shit from the userbase.
 
Just wait for the next shitfit, it'll be brought up. It's basically free ammunition for a fight, may as well save it for an actual fight.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom