scp-wiki.wikidot.com
Right off the bat, this one borrows heavily from 4000, with the green text that can’t refer directly to a location. We see an O5 council again filled with names of common scp authors. The nepotism and sycophantic flattery is as strong as ever.
No one is more exalted though than Dr Bright, still a hastily welcomed and celebrated figure in the canon it seems. The return in upvotes must be worth the moral collateral.
In this article, Dr Bright is a sole survivor in an apocalyptic ritual gone wrong, and is the shadow leader of the rest of the world. Hm.
———
In looking at all these, I’m not sure what the hell happened but in-article pictures on mobile are too small to be meaningful now. Was that an official format change or something? They used to be separate and sequential with the text for this reason.
———
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
This one isn’t bad. Aesthetics are clean too.
———
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
A mystery; what is causing an increase in the number and OMGZ badass Mary Sue like powers of the anomalies? Keters everywhere.
Well that’s an easy one: more shitty scp writers.
No? Oh ok.
What if the Foundation is a sort of irritant that increases the severity and frequency of the anomalous itself? What do the O5 council do? Drink and dissolve the Foundation.
So we end with an absolutely vomit-inducing cringe meta move:
Barf.
———
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
Not bad. A huge Venus flytrap mechanism that preys on people’s desire to travel. It’s no slight that this uses the name of Fishmonger’s old infamous works. I don’t think that helps buoy the work.
I can’t see this one winning, just doesn’t have that it factor. This is Kirby so it is of course competent. But because its Kirby and not in the lead, you can be sure he is letting that get to him. Heh heh. There are always things to enjoy.
———
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/6000contesttrutherford
There it is. A first-person-narrated novel, internal monologues and all, pitched as an scp document. Was wondering when the writing would be unpegged from the format, the standards taken as something that’s just holding the gushing creativity back.
———
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
This one has great self-awareness of the SCP community itself:
“ But you don't suddenly take control of something as large and complex as The Foundation. You have to do it piece by piece. You replace some people here, you reclassify some anomalies there. You give them a sense of security and then you just never let them leave. And over time, the people who remember what life was like before these changes disappear and you've created a new normal... Managing a relationship with a community is much, much easier when one group holds all the control. People are more manageable when demonized.“
Surprised it is doing as well as it is given the meta-messaging.
———
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
The “sexual health” community of scp is as unapologetic and unrelenting as ever (now with TWO content warnings!... super mature). Currently one of the head of the pack. If this is selected as 6k I think it’s safe to say all decorum has been thrown out the window and let’s just classify it as a smut site with a containment fiction flare.
“SCP-6000 is the designation for a thaumaturgic biological process which occurs during ejaculation.”
It’s also sad to see the ability of articles to do well based solely on their css themes. Which
is spiffy here.
The article takes a familiar turn when after its indulging of sexual detail, it pulls out an asexual sentiment on ya. (“Sex is a joke. And we are the punchline.”) Fittingly, this mirrors the default defense of the roving sexual predators in the culture, thrown in as an absolving punctuation mark to a questionable subject matter. (See Uncle Nicolini for more info.)
———
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
Seems as though Shaggy and a crew are back with a vengeance, their gargantuan SCP-5999 not quiiiite elaborate enough. The article proper “ends” with a choose-your-own-adventure series of tales with the classic Warrior/Mage/Theif straight outta Skyrim.
There’s no way in hell I am reading all of this. Even if it wins. Just tell me the gist and if it is as good as its production value.
I guess visuals are the future of SCP. I am beyond caring what direction the site takes and if it is a good thing.
———
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
Solid SCP article, try-hard title that leaves a bad taste.
———