Sea Levels Are Rising Faster Than Most Pessimistic Forecasts - 'fearmongering scientists' undersold things once again

Climate change is causing oceans to rise quicker than scientists’ most pessimistic forecasts, resulting in earlier flood risks to coastal economies already struggling to adapt.

The revised estimates published Tuesday in Ocean Science impact the two-fifths of the Earth’s population who live near coastlines. Insured property worth trillions of dollars could face even greater danger from floods, superstorms and tidal surges. The research suggests that countries will have to rein in their greenhouse gas emissions even more than expected to keep sea levels in check.

“It means our carbon budget is even more depleted,” said Aslak Grinsted, a geophysicist at the University of Copenhagen who co-authored the research. Economies need to slash an additional 200 billion metric tons of carbon — equivalent to about five years of global emissions — to remain within the thresholds set by previous forecasts, he said.

The researchers built on the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s models, many of which only consider the last 150 years, by incorporating data going back several centuries. The new observations show about a half-meter of sea rise by the end of the century can now be expected with just a 0.5 degree Celsius rise in temperatures. Oceans could rise more than 1 meter at 2 degrees Celsius, a trajectory that will be easily passed under current climate policies.

“The models we are basing our predictions of sea-level rise on presently are not sensitive enough,” Grinsted said. “To put it plainly, they don’t hit the mark when we compare them to the rate of sea-level rise we see when comparing future scenarios with observations going back in time.”

The conclusions follow last month’s warning that rising temperatures have melted 28 trillion metric tons of ice — equivalent to a 100 meter thick sheet of ice covering the entire U.K. — making the worst-case climate scenarios more likely. The new methodology for tracking sea level change could help insurance companies, real estate developers and city planners erecting tidal-defense systems.

“The scenarios we see before us now regarding sea-level rise are too conservative – the sea looks, using our method, to rise more than what is believed using the present method,” Grinsted said, adding that his team at the Niels Bohr Institute is in touch with the IPCC about incorporating its results in next year’s sixth Assessment Report.
Original paper: https://os.copernicus.org/articles/17/181/2021
Doi: 10.5194/os-17-181-2021
 
This is a dog shit paper. Basically what the authors did was take historical records of rate of sea level rise from 1850-2017 (a blip on the climatological time scale), plot them against reconstructed global mean surface temperatures for the same period, extrapolate into the future and we're supposed to be scared that their results were more dire than IPCC models. Baked into their findings are some pretty big assumptions, in particular that the historical reconstructions are accurate, that the IPCC models are worth comparing against in the first place, and that the sea level rise sensitivity of the 1850-2017 period will remain the same in the future. The authors even admit the last one might not be true, but they assure themselves that it's fine because all the experts say it is and the models were made with that in mind. Because they could never all be wrong, right?
 
Back